Does sexual orientation of bullying target influence bystander response?

Bennett, S., Banyard, V.L. and Edwards, K.M. (2017). ‘The impact of the bystander’s relationship with the victim and the perpetrator on intent to help in situations involving sexual violence.’ Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 32: 5, 682–702.BennettS.BanyardV.L.EdwardsK.M.2017‘The impact of the bystander’s relationship with the victim and the perpetrator on intent to help in situations involving sexual violence.’Journal of Interpersonal Violence32568270210.1177/0886260515586373Search in Google Scholar

Berdahl, J.L., Cooper, M., Glick, P., Livingston, R W. and Williams, J.C. (2018). ‘Work as a masculinity contest.’ Journal of Social Issues, 74: 3, 422–448.BerdahlJ.L.CooperM.GlickP.LivingstonR W.WilliamsJ.C.2018‘Work as a masculinity contest.’Journal of Social Issues74342244810.1111/josi.12289Search in Google Scholar

Bernstein, M., Kostelac, C. and Gaarder, E. (2003). ‘Understanding “heterosexism”: Applying theories of racial prejudice to homophobia using data from a southwestern police department.’ Race, Gender, & Class, 10: 4, 54–74.BernsteinM.KostelacC.GaarderE.2003‘Understanding “heterosexism”: Applying theories of racial prejudice to homophobia using data from a southwestern police department.’Race, Gender, & Class1045474Search in Google Scholar

Beyer, F., Sidarus, N., Bonicalzi, S. and Haggard, P. (2017). ‘Beyond self-serving bias: diffusion of responsibility reduces sense of agency and outcome monitoring.’ Social Cognitive & Affective Neuroscience, 12: 1, 138–145.BeyerF.SidarusN.BonicalziS.HaggardP.2017‘Beyond self-serving bias: diffusion of responsibility reduces sense of agency and outcome monitoring.’Social Cognitive & Affective Neuroscience12113814510.1093/scan/nsw160Search in Google Scholar

Blashill, A. and Powlishta, K. (2009). ‘Gay stereotypes: The use of sexual orientation as a cue for gender-related attributes.’ Sex Roles, 61: 11–12, 783–793.BlashillA.PowlishtaK.2009‘Gay stereotypes: The use of sexual orientation as a cue for gender-related attributes.’Sex Roles6111–1278379310.1007/s11199-009-9684-7Search in Google Scholar

Brody, N. and Vangelisti, A.L. (2016). ‘Bystander intervention in cyberbullying.’ Communication Monographs, 83: 1, 94–119.BrodyN.VangelistiA.L.2016‘Bystander intervention in cyberbullying.’Communication Monographs8319411910.1080/03637751.2015.1044256Search in Google Scholar

Catalyst. (2017, May 30). ‘Lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender workplace issues.’ Online: http://www.catalyst.org/knowledge/lesbian-gay-bisexualtransgender-workplace-issues.Catalyst2017May30‘Lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender workplace issues.’Online: http://www.catalyst.org/knowledge/lesbian-gay-bisexualtransgender-workplace-issues.Search in Google Scholar

Chabot, H.F., Gray, M.L., Makande, T.B. and Hoyt, R.L. (2018). ‘Beyond sex: Likelihood and predictors of effective and ineffective intervention in intimate partner violence in bystanders perceiving an emergency.’ Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 33: 12, 1909–1930.ChabotH.F.GrayM.L.MakandeT.B.HoytR.L.2018‘Beyond sex: Likelihood and predictors of effective and ineffective intervention in intimate partner violence in bystanders perceiving an emergency.’Journal of Interpersonal Violence33121909193010.1177/0886260515621064Search in Google Scholar

Corrington, A., Nittrouer, C.L., Trump-Steele, R.C.E. and Hebl, M. (2018). ‘Letting him B: A study on the intersection of gender and sexual orientation in the workplace.’ Journal of Vocational Behavior, online October 10. Online: doi.org/10.1016/j.jvb.2018.10.005.CorringtonA.NittrouerC.L.Trump-SteeleR.C.E.HeblM.2018‘Letting him B: A study on the intersection of gender and sexual orientation in the workplace.’Journal of Vocational Behavioronline October 10. Online:doi.org/10.1016/j.jvb.2018.10.005Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

Cox, A. and Adam, A. (2018). ‘The bystander effect in non-emergency situations: Influence of gender and group size.’ Modern Psychological Studies, 23: 2, 1–14.CoxA.AdamA.2018‘The bystander effect in non-emergency situations: Influence of gender and group size.’Modern Psychological Studies232114Search in Google Scholar

Coyne, I., Gopaul, A.-M., Campbell, M., Pankász, A., Garland, R., and Cousans, F. (2019). ‘Bystander Responses to Bullying at Work: The Role of Mode, Type and Relationship to Target’. Journal of Business Ethics, 157(3), 813–827. https://doi-org.leo.lib.unomaha.edu/10.1007/s10551-017-3692-2.CoyneI.GopaulA.-M.CampbellM.PankászA.GarlandR.CousansF.2019‘Bystander Responses to Bullying at Work: The Role of Mode, Type and Relationship to Target’Journal of Business Ethics1573813827https://doi-org.leo.lib.unomaha.edu/10.1007/s10551-017-3692-2.10.1007/s10551-017-3692-2Search in Google Scholar

Darley, J. M., Teger, A. I., and Lewis, L. D. (1973). ‘Do groups always inhibit individuals’ responses to potential emergencies?’ Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 26:3, 395–399.DarleyJ. M.TegerA. I.LewisL. D.1973‘Do groups always inhibit individuals’ responses to potential emergencies?’Journal of Personality and Social Psychology26339539910.1037/h0034450Search in Google Scholar

D’Cruz, P. and Noronha, E. (2010). ‘The limits to workplace friendship.’ Employee Relations, 33:3, 269–288.D’CruzP.NoronhaE.2010‘The limits to workplace friendship.’Employee Relations33326928810.1108/01425451111121777Search in Google Scholar

DeSilver, D. (2018). ‘Women scarce at the top of U.S. business - and in the jobs that lead there.’ FactTank: News in the Numbers, Pew Research Center. Online: https://www.pewresearch.org/fact-tank/2018/04/30/women-scarce-at-top-of-u-s-business-and-in-the-jobs-that-lead-there/.DeSilverD.2018‘Women scarce at the top of U.S. business - and in the jobs that lead there.’FactTank: News in the Numbers, Pew Research CenterOnline: https://www.pewresearch.org/fact-tank/2018/04/30/women-scarce-at-top-of-u-s-business-and-in-the-jobs-that-lead-there/.Search in Google Scholar

EEOC. (2016). Select Task Force on the Study of Harassment in the Workplace: Report of Co-Chairs Chai R. Feldblum & Victoria A. Lipnic. Online: https://www.eeoc.gov/eeoc/task_force/harassment/report.cfm.EEOC2016Select Task Force on the Study of Harassment in the Workplace: Report of Co-Chairs Chai R. Feldblum & Victoria A. LipnicOnline: https://www.eeoc.gov/eeoc/task_force/harassment/report.cfm.Search in Google Scholar

Eliason, M.J. (1997). ‘The prevalence and nature of biphobia in heterosexual undergraduate students.’ Archives of Sexual Behavior, 26, 317–326.EliasonM.J.1997‘The prevalence and nature of biphobia in heterosexual undergraduate students.’Archives of Sexual Behavior2631732610.1023/A:1024527032040Search in Google Scholar

Eliason, M.J., Dibble, S. and Robertson, P. (2011). ‘Lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender (LGBT) physicians’ experiences in the workplace.’ Journal of Homosexuality, 58: 10, 1355–1371.EliasonM.J.DibbleS.RobertsonP.2011‘Lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender (LGBT) physicians’ experiences in the workplace.’Journal of Homosexuality58101355137110.1080/00918369.2011.614902Search in Google Scholar

Emdad, R., Alipour, A., Hagberg, J. and Jensen, I.B. (2013). ‘The impact of bystanding to workplace bullying on symptoms of depression among women and men in industry in Swededn: An empirical and theoretical longitudinal study.’ International Archives of Occupational and Environmental Health, 86:6, 709–716.EmdadR.AlipourA.HagbergJ.JensenI.B.2013‘The impact of bystanding to workplace bullying on symptoms of depression among women and men in industry in Swededn: An empirical and theoretical longitudinal study.’International Archives of Occupational and Environmental Health86670971610.1007/s00420-012-0813-1Search in Google Scholar

Einarsdottir, A., Hoel, H., Lewis, D. (2015). ‘It’s nothing personal’: Anti-homosexuality in the British workplace.’ Sociology, 49:6, 1183–1199.EinarsdottirA.HoelH.LewisD.2015‘It’s nothing personal’: Anti-homosexuality in the British workplace.’Sociology4961183119910.1177/0038038515582160Search in Google Scholar

Escartín, J., Rodríguez-Carballeira, A., Zapf, D., Porrúa, C. and Martín-Peñaa, J. (2009). ‘Perceived severity of various bullying behaviours at work and the relevance of exposure to bullying.’ Work & Stress, 23: 3, 191–205.EscartínJ.Rodríguez-CarballeiraA.ZapfD.PorrúaC.Martín-PeñaaJ.2009‘Perceived severity of various bullying behaviours at work and the relevance of exposure to bullying.’Work & Stress23319120510.1080/02678370903289639Search in Google Scholar

Evans, D. (2017). ‘Categorizing the magnitude and frequency of exposure to uncivil behaviors: A new approach for more meaningful interventions.’ Journal of Nursing Scholarship, 49: 2, 214–222.EvansD.2017‘Categorizing the magnitude and frequency of exposure to uncivil behaviors: A new approach for more meaningful interventions.’Journal of Nursing Scholarship49221422210.1111/jnu.12275Search in Google Scholar

Festinger, L. (1962). A Theory of Cognitive Dissonance. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.FestingerL.1962A Theory of Cognitive DissonanceStanford, CAStanford University Press10.1038/scientificamerican1062-93Search in Google Scholar

Fischer, P., Greitemeyer, T., Pollozek, F. and Frey, D. (2006). ‘The unresponsive bystander: Are bystanders more responsive in dangerous emergencies?’ European Journal of Social Psychology, 36: 2, 267–278.FischerP.GreitemeyerT.PollozekF.FreyD.2006‘The unresponsive bystander: Are bystanders more responsive in dangerous emergencies?’European Journal of Social Psychology36226727810.1002/ejsp.297Search in Google Scholar

Fischer, P., Krueger, J.I., Greitemeyer, T., Kastenmüller, A., Heene, M., Wicher, M. and Kainbacher, M. (2011). ‘The bystander-effect: A meta-analytic review on bystander intervention in dangerous and non-dangerous emergencies.’ Psychological Bulletin, 137: 4, 517–537.FischerP.KruegerJ.I.GreitemeyerT.KastenmüllerA.HeeneM.WicherM.KainbacherM.2011‘The bystander-effect: A meta-analytic review on bystander intervention in dangerous and non-dangerous emergencies.’Psychological Bulletin137451753710.1037/a0023304Search in Google Scholar

Fritzsche, B.A., Finkelstein, M.A. and Penner, L.A. (2000). ‘To help or not to help: Capturing individuals’ decision policies.’ Social Behavior & Personality: An International Journal, 28: 6, 561–578.FritzscheB.A.FinkelsteinM.A.PennerL.A.2000‘To help or not to help: Capturing individuals’ decision policies.’Social Behavior & Personality: An International Journal28656157810.2224/sbp.2000.28.6.561Search in Google Scholar

Fyfe, B. (1983). ‘“Homophobia” or homosexual bias reconsidered.’ Archives of Sexual Behavior, 12: 6, 549–554.FyfeB.1983‘“Homophobia” or homosexual bias reconsidered.’Archives of Sexual Behavior12654955410.1007/BF01542216Search in Google Scholar

Gallup. (2017, January 11). ‘In U.S., more adults identifying as LGBT.’ Online: http://news.gallup.com/poll/201731/lgbt-identification-rises.aspx.Gallup2017January11‘In U.S., more adults identifying as LGBT.’Online: http://news.gallup.com/poll/201731/lgbt-identification-rises.aspx.Search in Google Scholar

Gates, T.G. and Viggiani, P.A. (2013). ‘Understanding lesbian, gay, and bisexual worker stigmatization: A review of the literature.’ International Journal of Sociology and Social Policy, 34: 5/6, 359–374.GatesT.G.ViggianiP.A.2013‘Understanding lesbian, gay, and bisexual worker stigmatization: A review of the literature.’International Journal of Sociology and Social Policy345/635937410.1108/IJSSP-07-2013-0077Search in Google Scholar

Graf, N., Brown, A. and Patten, E. (2018). ‘The narrowing, but persistent, gender gap in pay.’ FactTank: News in the Numbers: Pew Research Center. Online: http://www.pewresearch.org/fact-tank/2018/04/09/gender-pay-gap-facts/.GrafN.BrownA.PattenE.2018‘The narrowing, but persistent, gender gap in pay.’FactTank: News in the Numbers: Pew Research CenterOnline: http://www.pewresearch.org/fact-tank/2018/04/09/gender-pay-gap-facts/.Search in Google Scholar

Hellemans, C., Dal Cason, D. and Casini, A. (2017). ‘Bystander helping behavior in response to workplace bullying.’ Swiss Journal of Psychology, 76: 4, 135–144.HellemansC.Dal CasonD.CasiniA.2017‘Bystander helping behavior in response to workplace bullying.’Swiss Journal of Psychology76413514410.1024/1421-0185/a000200Search in Google Scholar

Herek, G.M. (1994). ‘Assessing attitudes toward lesbians and gay men: A review of empirical research with the ATLG scale’, in B. Greene and G.M. Herek (eds), Lesbian and Gay Psychology, Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.HerekG.M.1994‘Assessing attitudes toward lesbians and gay men: A review of empirical research with the ATLG scale’inGreeneB.HerekG.M.(eds),Lesbian and Gay PsychologyThousand Oaks, CASage10.4135/9781483326757.n11Search in Google Scholar

Herek, G.M. (1995). ‘Psychological heterosexism in the United States’, in A.R. D’Augelli and C.J. Patterson (eds), Lesbian, Gay, and Bisexual Identities Over the Lifespan: Psychological Perspectives, New York: Oxford University Press.HerekG.M.1995‘Psychological heterosexism in the United States’inD’AugelliA.R.PattersonC.J.(eds),Lesbian, Gay, and Bisexual Identities Over the Lifespan: Psychological PerspectivesNew YorkOxford University Press10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195082319.003.0013Search in Google Scholar

Herek, G.M. (2002). Heterosexuals’ attitudes toward bisexual men and women in the United States. The Journal of Sex Research, 39: 4, 264–275.HerekG.M.2002Heterosexuals’ attitudes toward bisexual men and women in the United StatesThe Journal of Sex Research39426427510.1080/00224490209552150Search in Google Scholar

Hettinger, V. and Vandello, J. (2014). ‘Balance without equality: Just world beliefs, the gay affluence myth, and support for gay rights.’ Social Justice Research, 27: 4, 444–463.HettingerV.VandelloJ.2014‘Balance without equality: Just world beliefs, the gay affluence myth, and support for gay rights.’Social Justice Research27444446310.1007/s11211-014-0226-2Search in Google Scholar

Hoefnagels, C. and Zwikker, M. (2001). ‘The bystander dilemma and child abuse: Extending the Latané and Darley model to domestic violence.’ Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 31:6, 1158–1183.HoefnagelsC.ZwikkerM.2001‘The bystander dilemma and child abuse: Extending the Latané and Darley model to domestic violence.’Journal of Applied Social Psychology3161158118310.1111/j.1559-1816.2001.tb02668.xSearch in Google Scholar

Hoel, H., Lewis, D. and Einarsdottir, A. (2017). ‘Debate: Bullying and harassment of lesbians, gay men and bisexual employees: Findings from a representative British national study.’ Public Money & Management, 37: 5, 312–314.HoelH.LewisD.EinarsdottirA.2017‘Debate: Bullying and harassment of lesbians, gay men and bisexual employees: Findings from a representative British national study.’Public Money & Management37531231410.1080/09540962.2017.1328169Search in Google Scholar

Jenkins, L.N. and Nickerson, A.B. (2019). ‘Bystander intervention in bullying: Role of social skills and gender.’ Journal of Early Adolescence, 39: 2, 141–166.JenkinsL.N.NickersonA.B.2019‘Bystander intervention in bullying: Role of social skills and gender.’Journal of Early Adolescence39214116610.1177/0272431617735652Search in Google Scholar

Katz, J., Federici, D. and Ramos-Dries, T. (2019). ‘Amnestic heterosexism and bystander responses to anti-gay bullying.’ Journal of Homosexuality, 66: 1, 1–16.KatzJ.FedericiD.Ramos-DriesT.2019‘Amnestic heterosexism and bystander responses to anti-gay bullying.’Journal of Homosexuality66111610.1080/00918369.2017.1395261Search in Google Scholar

Katz, J. and Klainberg, S. (2019). ‘Effects of group status and implicit theories of personality on bystander responses to antigay bullying.’ Psi Chi Journal of Psychological Research, 24, 97–105.KatzJ.KlainbergS.2019‘Effects of group status and implicit theories of personality on bystander responses to antigay bullying.’Psi Chi Journal of Psychological Research249710510.24839/2325-7342.JN24.2.97Search in Google Scholar

Katz-Wise, S.L. and Hyde, J.S. (2012). ‘Victimization experiences of lesbian, gay, and bisexual individuals: A meta-analysis.’ Journal of Sex Research, 49: 2–3, 142–167.Katz-WiseS.L.HydeJ.S.2012‘Victimization experiences of lesbian, gay, and bisexual individuals: A meta-analysis.’Journal of Sex Research492–314216710.1080/00224499.2011.637247Search in Google Scholar

Koehler, C. and Weber, M. (2018). ‘“Do I really need to help?!” Perceived severity of cyberbullying, victim blaming, and bystanders’ willingness to help the victim.’ Cyberpsychology, 12: 4, 1–15.KoehlerC.WeberM.2018‘“Do I really need to help?!” Perceived severity of cyberbullying, victim blaming, and bystanders’ willingness to help the victim.’Cyberpsychology12411510.5817/CP2018-4-4Search in Google Scholar

Latané, B. and Darley, J.M. (1968). ‘Group inhibition of bystander intervention in emergencies.’ Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 10: 3, 215–221.LatanéB.DarleyJ.M.1968‘Group inhibition of bystander intervention in emergencies.’Journal of Personality and Social Psychology10321522110.1037/h0026570Search in Google Scholar

Latané, B. and Darley, J.M. (1970). The Unresponsive Bystander: Why Doesn’t He Help? Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.LatanéB.DarleyJ.M.1970The Unresponsive Bystander: Why Doesn’t He Help?Englewood Cliffs, NJPrentice HallSearch in Google Scholar

Levine, M., Cassidy, C., Brazier, G. and Reicher, S. (2002). ‘Self-categorization and bystander non-intervention: Two experimental studies.’ Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 32: 7, 1452–1463.LevineM.CassidyC.BrazierG.ReicherS.2002‘Self-categorization and bystander non-intervention: Two experimental studies.’Journal of Applied Social Psychology3271452146310.1111/j.1559-1816.2002.tb01446.xSearch in Google Scholar

Lukacena, K.M., Reynolds-Tylus, T. and Quick, B.L. (2019). ‘An application of the reasoned action approach to bystander intervention for sexual assault.’ Health Communication, 34: 1, 46–53.LukacenaK.M.Reynolds-TylusT.QuickB.L.2019‘An application of the reasoned action approach to bystander intervention for sexual assault.’Health Communication341465310.1080/10410236.2017.1384356Search in Google Scholar

Lutgen-Sandvik, P., Hood, J. N. and Jacobson, R. P. (2016). ‘The impact of positive organizational phenomena and workplace bullying on individual outcomes’. Journal of Managerial Issues, 28:1–2, 30–49.Lutgen-SandvikP.HoodJ. N.JacobsonR. P.2016‘The impact of positive organizational phenomena and workplace bullying on individual outcomes’Journal of Managerial Issues281–23049Search in Google Scholar

MacCurtain, S., Murphy, C., O’Sullivan, M., MacMahon, J. and Tuerner, T. (2018). ‘To stand back or step in? Exploring the responses of employees who observe workplace bullying.’ Nursing Inquiry, 25(1).MacCurtainS.MurphyC.O’SullivanM.MacMahonJ.TuernerT.2018‘To stand back or step in? Exploring the responses of employees who observe workplace bullying.’Nursing Inquiry25110.1111/nin.12207Search in Google Scholar

MacInnis, C.C. and Hodson, G. (2015). ‘Why are heterosexual men (vs. women) particularly prejudiced toward gay men? A social dominance theory explanation.’ Psychology & Sexuality, 6: 3, 275–294.MacInnisC.C.HodsonG.2015‘Why are heterosexual men (vs. women) particularly prejudiced toward gay men? A social dominance theory explanation.’Psychology & Sexuality6327529410.1080/19419899.2014.987684Search in Google Scholar

McCord, M.A., Dhanani, L.Y., Joseph, D.L. and Beus, J.M. (2018). ‘A meta-analysis of sex and race differences in perceived workplace mistreatment.’ Journal of Applied Psychology, 103: 2, 137–163.McCordM.A.DhananiL.Y.JosephD.L.BeusJ.M.2018‘A meta-analysis of sex and race differences in perceived workplace mistreatment.’Journal of Applied Psychology103213716310.1037/apl0000250Search in Google Scholar

Mulder, R., Bos, A.E.R., Pouwelse, M. and van Dam, K. (2017). ‘Workplace mobbing: How the victim’s coping behavior influences bystander responses.’ Journal of Social Psychology, 157: 1, 16–29.MulderR.BosA.E.R.PouwelseM.van DamK.2017‘Workplace mobbing: How the victim’s coping behavior influences bystander responses.’Journal of Social Psychology1571162910.1080/00224545.2016.1152213Search in Google Scholar

Mulder, R., Pouwelse, M., Lodewijkx, H., Bos, A.E.R. and van Dam, K. (2016). ‘Predictors of antisocial and prosocial behaviour of bystanders in workplace mobbing.’ Journal of Community & Applied Social Psychology, 26: 3, 207–220.MulderR.PouwelseM.LodewijkxH.BosA.E.R.van DamK.2016‘Predictors of antisocial and prosocial behaviour of bystanders in workplace mobbing.’Journal of Community & Applied Social Psychology26320722010.1002/casp.2244Search in Google Scholar

Mulder, R., Pouwelse, M., Lodewijkx, H. and Bolman, C. (2014). ‘Workplace mobbing and bystanders’ helping behaviour towards victims: The role of gender, perceived responsibility and anticipated stigma by association.’ International Journal of Psychology, 49:4, 304–312.MulderR.PouwelseM.LodewijkxH.BolmanC.2014‘Workplace mobbing and bystanders’ helping behaviour towards victims: The role of gender, perceived responsibility and anticipated stigma by association.’International Journal of Psychology49430431210.1002/ijop.12018Search in Google Scholar

Namie, G. and Lutgen-Sandvik, P.E. (2010). ‘Active and passive accomplices: The communal character of workplace bullying.’ International Journal of Communication, 4, 343–373.NamieG.Lutgen-SandvikP.E.2010‘Active and passive accomplices: The communal character of workplace bullying.’International Journal of Communication4343373Search in Google Scholar

Nickerson, A.B., Aloe, A.M., Livingston, J.A. and Feeley, T.H. (2014). ‘Measurement of the bystander intervention model for bullying and sexual harassment.’ Journal of Adolescence, 37: 4, 391–400.NickersonA.B.AloeA.M.LivingstonJ.A.FeeleyT.H.2014‘Measurement of the bystander intervention model for bullying and sexual harassment.’Journal of Adolescence37439140010.1016/j.adolescence.2014.03.003Search in Google Scholar

Nielsen, M. and Einarsen, S. (2012). ‘Outcomes of exposure to workplace bullying: A meta-analytic review.’ Work and Stress, 26:4, 309–332.NielsenM.EinarsenS.2012‘Outcomes of exposure to workplace bullying: A meta-analytic review.’Work and Stress26430933210.1080/02678373.2012.734709Search in Google Scholar

Palmer, J.E., Nicksa, S.C. and McMahon, S. (2018). ‘Does who you know affect how you act? The impact of relationships on bystander intervention in interpersonal violence situations.’ Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 33: 17, 2623–2642.PalmerJ.E.NicksaS.C.McMahonS.2018‘Does who you know affect how you act? The impact of relationships on bystander intervention in interpersonal violence situations.’Journal of Interpersonal Violence33172623264210.1177/0886260516628292Search in Google Scholar

Paull, M., Omari, M. and Standen, P. (2012). ‘When is a bystander not a bystander? A typology of the roles of bystanders in workplace bullying.’ Asia Pacific Journal of Human Resources, 50: 3, 351–366.PaullM.OmariM.StandenP.2012‘When is a bystander not a bystander? A typology of the roles of bystanders in workplace bullying.’Asia Pacific Journal of Human Resources50335136610.1111/j.1744-7941.2012.00027.xSearch in Google Scholar

Piliavin, I.M., Piliavin, J.A. and Rodin, J. (1975). ‘Costs, diffusion, and the stigmatized victim.’ Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 32, 429–438.PiliavinI.M.PiliavinJ.A.RodinJ.1975‘Costs, diffusion, and the stigmatized victim.’Journal of Personality and Social Psychology3242943810.1037/h0077092Search in Google Scholar

Poteat, V.P. and Vecho, O. (2016). ‘Who intervenes against homophobic behavior? Attributes that distinguish active bystanders.’ Journal of School Psychology, 54, 17–28.PoteatV.P.VechoO.2016‘Who intervenes against homophobic behavior? Attributes that distinguish active bystanders.’Journal of School Psychology54172810.1016/j.jsp.2015.10.002Search in Google Scholar

Pugh, B., Ningard, H., Ven, T.V. and Butler, L. (2016). ‘Victim ambiguity: bystander intervention and sexual assault in the college drinking scene.’ Deviant Behavior, 37: 4, 401–418.PughB.NingardH.VenT.V.ButlerL.2016‘Victim ambiguity: bystander intervention and sexual assault in the college drinking scene.’Deviant Behavior37440141810.1080/01639625.2015.1026777Search in Google Scholar

Raja, S. and Stokes, J.P. (1998). ‘Assessing attitudes toward lesbians and gay men: The modern homophobia scale.’ Journal of Gay, Lesbian, and Bisexual Identity, 3: 2, 113–134.RajaS.StokesJ.P.1998‘Assessing attitudes toward lesbians and gay men: The modern homophobia scale.’Journal of Gay, Lesbian, and Bisexual Identity32113134Search in Google Scholar

Ryan, A.M. and Wessel, J.L. (2012). ‘Sexual orientation harassment in the workplace: When do observers intervene?’ Journal of Organizational Behavior, 33: 4, 488–509.RyanA.M.WesselJ.L.2012‘Sexual orientation harassment in the workplace: When do observers intervene?’Journal of Organizational Behavior33448850910.1002/job.765Search in Google Scholar

Salin, D. and Hoel, H. (2013). ‘Workplace bullying as a gendered phenomenon.’ Journal of Managerial Psychology, 28: 3, 235–251.SalinD.HoelH.2013‘Workplace bullying as a gendered phenomenon.’Journal of Managerial Psychology28323525110.1108/02683941311321187Search in Google Scholar

Salmivalli, C., Lagerspetz, K., Bjorkqvist, K., Osterman, K. and Kaukiainen, A. (1996). ‘Bullying as a group process: Participant roles and their relations to social status within the group.’ Aggressive Behavior, i: 1, 1–15.SalmivalliC.LagerspetzK.BjorkqvistK.OstermanK.KaukiainenA.1996‘Bullying as a group process: Participant roles and their relations to social status within the group.’Aggressive Behaviori111510.4324/9781351153683-13Search in Google Scholar

Sears, B. and Mallory, C. (2011). Documented Evidence of Employment Discrimination & Its Effects on LGBT People’. University of California, UCLA School of Law - Williams Institute. Online: https://williamsinstitute.law.ucla.edu/research/discrimination/documented-evidence-of-employment-discrimination-its-effects-on-lgbt-people/.SearsB.MalloryC.2011Documented Evidence of Employment Discrimination & Its Effects on LGBT People’University of California, UCLA School of Law - Williams InstituteOnline: https://williamsinstitute.law.ucla.edu/research/discrimination/documented-evidence-of-employment-discrimination-its-effects-on-lgbt-people/.Search in Google Scholar

Sidanius, J. and Pratto, F. (1999). Social Dominance. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.SidaniusJ.PrattoF.1999Social DominanceCambridge, EnglandCambridge University Press10.1017/CBO9781139175043Search in Google Scholar

Thorpe, J.R. (2017). People don’t step in when they see anti-gay bullying for this sad reason, according to a new study. Bustle. Online https://www.bustle.com/p/people-dont-step-in-when-they-see-anti-gay-bullying-for-this-sad-reason-according-to-anew-study-2991694.ThorpeJ.R.2017People don’t step in when they see anti-gay bullying for this sad reason, according to a new studyBustleOnline https://www.bustle.com/p/people-dont-step-in-when-they-see-anti-gay-bullying-for-this-sad-reason-according-to-anew-study-2991694.Search in Google Scholar

Vanette, D. (2017). ‘Using attention checks in your surveys may harm data quality.’ QulatricsXM Blog. Online: https://www.qualtrics.com/blog/using-attention-checks-in-your-surveys-may-harm-data-quality.VanetteD.2017‘Using attention checks in your surveys may harm data quality.’QulatricsXM BlogOnline: https://www.qualtrics.com/blog/using-attention-checks-in-your-surveys-may-harm-data-quality.Search in Google Scholar

Vartia, MA-L. (2001). ‘Consequences of workplace bullying with respect to the well-being of its targets and the observers of bullying.’ Scandinavian Journal of Work and Environmental Health, 27:1, 63–69.VartiaMA-L.2001‘Consequences of workplace bullying with respect to the well-being of its targets and the observers of bullying.’Scandinavian Journal of Work and Environmental Health271636910.5271/sjweh.588Search in Google Scholar

Walls, N. (2008). ‘Toward a Multidimensional understanding of heterosexism: The changing nature of prejudice,’ Journal of Homosexuality, 55:1, 20–70.WallsN.2008‘Toward a Multidimensional understanding of heterosexism: The changing nature of prejudice,’Journal of Homosexuality551207010.1080/00918360802129287Search in Google Scholar

Walter, S., Seibert, S., Goering, D.D. and O’Boyle, E.H. (2016). ‘An Examination of the convergence of online panel data and conventionally sourced data.’ Paper presented at the Academy of Management Annual Conference, Anaheim, CA.WalterS.SeibertS.GoeringD.D.O’BoyleE.H.2016‘An Examination of the convergence of online panel data and conventionally sourced data.’Paper presented at the Academy of Management Annual ConferenceAnaheim, CA10.5465/ambpp.2016.284Search in Google Scholar

Worthen, M. (2013). ‘An argument for separate analyses of attitudes toward lesbian, gay, bisexual men, bisexual women, MtF and FtM transgender individuals.’ Sex Roles, 68: 11–12, 703–723.WorthenM.2013‘An argument for separate analyses of attitudes toward lesbian, gay, bisexual men, bisexual women, MtF and FtM transgender individuals.’Sex Roles6811–1270372310.1007/s11199-012-0155-1Search in Google Scholar

Zapf, D., Einarsen, S., Hoel, H., and Vartia, M. (2002). ‘Empirical findings on bullying in the workplace,’ in S. Einarsen, H. Hoel, and C. Cooper (eds), Bullying and Emotional Abuse in the Workplace: International Perspectives in Research and Practice, London: Taylor & Francix.ZapfD.EinarsenS.HoelH.VartiaM.2002‘Empirical findings on bullying in the workplace,’inEinarsenS.HoelH.CooperC.(eds),Bullying and Emotional Abuse in the Workplace: International Perspectives in Research and PracticeLondonTaylor & Francix10.4324/9780203278734Search in Google Scholar

Zurbrügg, L. and Miner, K.N. (2016). ‘Gender, sexual orientation, and workplace incivility: Who is most targeted and who is most harmed?’ Frontiers in Psychology, 7, 565.ZurbrüggL.MinerK.N.2016‘Gender, sexual orientation, and workplace incivility: Who is most targeted and who is most harmed?’Frontiers in Psychology756510.3389/fpsyg.2016.00565Search in Google Scholar