[
Areeda, P. (1990), Essential Facilities: An Epithet in need of Limiting Principles, Antitrust Law Journal, 58.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Boscheck, R. (2000), EU Policy Reform on Vertical Restraints – An Economic Perspective, World Competition: Law & Economics Review, 23(4), 3-49.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
CompassLexecon (2021), The Digital Market Act, https://www.compasslexecon.com/insights/publications/the-proposed-dma-back-to-the-form-based-future.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Condorelli, D. and J. Padilla (2020), Harnessing Platform Envelopment in the Digital World, Journal of Competition Law & Economics, 16(2), 143-187.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Elhauge, E. (2003), Defining Better Monopolization Standards, Stanford Law Review, 56, 253-286.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
European Parliament (2022, 24 March), Deal on Digital Markets Act: EU rules to ensure fair competition and more choice for users, Press Release.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Hoffmann, J. (2023, 3 August), European Digital Platform Regulation Risks Undermining Itself with Over-Centralization, Promarket.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Hovenkamp, H. (1994), Federal Antitrust Policy: The Law of Competition and its Practice, West Publishing Corporation.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Hovenkamp, H. (2019),Platforms and the Rule of Reason: The American Express Case, Columbia Business Law Review, 35, 47.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Hovenkamp, H. J. (2021), Antitrust and Platform Competition, The Yale Law Journal, 1952-2050.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Katz, M. L. and C. Shapiro (1994), Systems competition and network effects, Journal of Economic Perspectives, 8(2), 93-115.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Marquardt. P. D. and M. Leddy (2003), The Essential Facilities Doctrine and Intellectual Property Rights: A Response to Pitofsky, Patterson, and Hooks’, Antitrust Law Journal, 70(3), 847-873.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
McCallum, L., I. Bernaerts, M. Kadar, J. Holzwarth, D. Kovo, M. Lagrue, E. Leduc, L. Manigrassi, J. Marcos Ramos, I. Pereira Alves, V. Pozzato and P. Stamou (2023), A dynamic and workable effects-based approach to abuse of dominance, Competition policy brief, No. 1, European Commission.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Ocean State Physicians Health plan, Inc. v. Blue Cross & Blue Shield, 883, F2d, 1101, 1113 (1st Cir 1989), https://law.justia.com/cases/federal/appellate-courts/F2/883/1101/350683/.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Peeperkorn, L. (2003), IP Licenses and Competition Rules: Striking the Right Balance, World Competition, 26(4), 527-539.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Regulation (EU) 2022/1925 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 14 September 2022 on contestable and fair markets in the digital sector and amending Directives (EU) 2019/1937 and (EU) 2020/1828 (Digital Markets Act) (2022), Official Journal of the European Union, L 265, 1-66.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Ribera Martìnez, A. (2024, 8 January), The Digital Markets Act Is More Intricate Than Regulators and Detractors Give It Credit For, Promarket.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Scott Morton, F. M. and D. C. Dinielli (2020), Roadmap for an Antitrust Case Against Facebook, OMIDYAR NETWORK.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Suominen, K. (2022), Implications of the European Union’s Digital Regulations on U.S. and EU Economic and Strategic Interests, Center for Strategic & International Studies, CSIS.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
The Economist (2018, 20 January), How to tame the tech titans.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Tirole, J. (1988), Industrial Organization, MIT Press.
]Search in Google Scholar
