[
ALESSI, Stefania. Eternal Sunshine: The Right to Be Forgotten in the European Union after the 2016 General Data Protection Regulation. Emory International Law Review, 2017, vol. 32, no. 1, pp. 145–171. Available at: https://scholarlycommons.law.emory.edu/eilr/vol32/iss1/4.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
ANDRAŠKO, Jozef and MESARČÍK, Matúš. Those Who Shall Be Identified: The Data Protection Aspects of the Legal Framework for Electronic Identification in the European Union, TalTech Journal of European Studies, 2021, vol. 11, no. 2, pp.3–24. https://doi.org/10.2478/bjes-2021-0012.10.2478/bjes-2021-0012
]Search in Google Scholar
[
AUSLOOS, Jef. The ‘Right to be Forgotten’ – Worth Remembering? Computer Law & Security Review, 2012, vol. 28, no. 2, pp. 143–152.10.1016/j.clsr.2012.01.006
]Search in Google Scholar
[
BERTRAM, Theo; BURSZTEIN, Elie; CARO, Stephanie et al. Three years of the right to be forgotten, online 2018. Available at: www.elie.net/static/files/three-years-of-the-right-to-be-forgotten/three-years-of-the-right-to-be-forgotten-paper.pdf
]Search in Google Scholar
[
BUNN, Anna. The curious case of the right to be forgotten. Computer Law & Security Review, 2015, vol. 31, no. 3, pp. 336–350. Available at: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S026736491500060610.1016/j.clsr.2015.03.006
]Search in Google Scholar
[
CANNATACI, Joseph; ZHAO, Bo et.al. Balancing Privacy and Transparency and Redefining Their New Boundaries in the Internet Ecosystem. UNESCO Internet Study, 2016. Available at: http://www.rug.nl/research/groningen-centre-for-law-and-governance/onderzoekscentra/step-research-group/project-descriptions/unesco-study-privacy-and-transparency
]Search in Google Scholar
[
COOK, Lyndsay. The Right to be forgotten: a step in the right direction for cyberspace law and policy. Journal of Law, Technology & the Internet, 2015, vol. 6, pp. 121–132. Available at: https://scholarlycommons.law.case.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1081&context=jolti
]Search in Google Scholar
[
CUNNINGHAM, McKay (2017) Privacy Law That Does Not Protect Privacy, Forgetting the Right to be Forgotten. Buffalo Law Review. 2017, vol. 65, p. 502, 495–546. Available at: http://www.buffalolaw.org/past_issues/65_3/Cunningham.pdf
]Search in Google Scholar
[
CURTIS, Sophie and PHILIPSON, Alice. Wikipedia founder: EU’s Right to be Forgotten is ‘deeply immoral, The Telegraph online, 06/08/2014. Available at: https://www.telegraph.co.uk/technology/wikipedia/11015901/EU-ruling-on-link-removal-deeply-immoral-says-Wikipedia-founder.html
]Search in Google Scholar
[
De ANDRADE, Norberto. Oblivion: The Right to Be Different from Oneself – Repro-posing the Right to Be Forgotten. IDP. Revista de Internet, Derecho y Política, 2012, no. 13, pp. 122–137. Available at: https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2033155
]Search in Google Scholar
[
DE HERT, Paul. The Right to Protection of Personal Data. Incapable of Autonomous Standing in the Basic EU Constituting Documents? Utrecht Journal of International and European Law, 2015, vol. 31, no. 80, pp. 1–4, http://doi.org/10.5334/ujiel.cz.10.5334/ujiel.cz
]Search in Google Scholar
[
ERDOS, David. The ‘right to be forgotten’ beyond the EU: an analysis of wider G20 regulatory action and potential next steps, Journal of Media Law, 2021, vol. 13, no. 1, p. 5. 1–3510.1080/17577632.2021.1884947
]Search in Google Scholar
[
GESENHUES, Amy. The Inevitable Happened: First Company Provides “Right To Be Forgotten” Removal Service, online 2014. Available at: https://searchengineland.com/reputation-vip-online-management-firm-launches-site-assist-googles-forget-form-194998
]Search in Google Scholar
[
GLOBOCNIK, Jure. The Right to Be Forgotten is Taking Shape: CJEU Judgments in GC and Others (C-136/17) and Google v CNIL (C-507/17), GRUR International – Journal of European and International IP Law, 2020, vol. 69, no. 4, pp. 380–388. Available at: https://academic.oup.com/grurint/article/69/4/380/573280710.1093/grurint/ikaa002
]Search in Google Scholar
[
HOFFMAN, David. Creating an Internet Obscurity Center: Reducing the Burden of Google Spain on Businesses, LawFare online, 2016. Available at: https://www.lawfareblog.com/creating-internet-obscurity-center-reducing-burden-google-spain-businesses
]Search in Google Scholar
[
KULK, Stefan; ZUIDERVEEN BORGESIUS, Frederic. Privacy, Freedom of Expression, and the Right to Be Forgotten in Europe. In Selinger, E.; Polonetsky, J. & Tene, O. (eds.), The Cambridge Handbook of Consumer Privacy, Cambridge University Press, 2018, pp. 301–320. Available at: https://dare.uva.nl/search?identifier=f7d0f415-3404-426a-8833-12861fee7112
]Search in Google Scholar
[
LEE, Dave. Google ruling ‘astonishing’, says Wikipedia founder Wales, BBC News, 14/05/2014. Available at: https://www.bbc.com/news/technology-27407017
]Search in Google Scholar
[
LEE, Edward. The Right to Be Forgotten v. Free Speech. I/S: A Journal Of Law And Policy For The Information Society, 2015, vol. 12, no.1, pp. 85–111. Available at: https://kb.osu.edu/bitstream/handle/1811/80043/ISJLP_V12N1_085.pdf
]Search in Google Scholar
[
MARKS, Demi. The Internet Doesn’t Forget: Redefining Privacy Through an American Right to Be Forgotten. UCLA Entertainment Law Review, 2016, vol. 23, pp. 41–64 Available at: https://escholarship.org/uc/item/4n00j4j310.5070/LR8231034309
]Search in Google Scholar
[
MAYES, Tessa. We have no right to be forgotten online, The Guardian Online, 18/03/2011. Available at: https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/libertycentral/2011/mar/18/forgotten-online-european-union-law-internet
]Search in Google Scholar
[
McGOLDRICK, Dominic. Developments in the Right to be Forgotten, Human Rights Law Review, 2013, vol. 13, no. 4, pp. 761–776, https://doi.org/10.1093/hrlr/ngt035.10.1093/hrlr/ngt035
]Search in Google Scholar
[
MILOSAVLJEVIĆ, Marko; POLER, Melita; ČEFERIN, Rok. In the Name of the Right to be Forgotten: New Legal and Policy Issues and Practices regarding Unpublishing Requests in Slovenian Online News Media, Digital Journalism, 2020, vol. 8, no. 6, 780–796. https://doi.org/10.1080/21670811.2020.174794210.1080/21670811.2020.1747942
]Search in Google Scholar
[
PALEIT, Andreas; FONTANELLA-KHAN, James; PICKARD Jim. Google’s removal of BBC article raises censorship fears. CNN Business Online, 03/07/14. Available at: https://edition.cnn.com/2014/07/03/business/ft-google-story-removal/index.html
]Search in Google Scholar
[
PAVELEK, Ondřej and ZAJÍČKOVÁ, Drahomíra. Personal Data Protection in the Decision-Making of the CJEU Before and After the Lisbon Treaty. TalTech Journal of European Studies, 2021, vol. 11, no. 2, pp.167–188. https://doi.org/10.2478/bjes-2021-002010.2478/bjes-2021-0020
]Search in Google Scholar
[
RAZMETAEVA, Yulia. The Right to Be Forgotten in the European Perspective, TalTech Journal of European Studies, 2020, vol. 10, no. 1, pp. 58–76, https://doi.org/10.1515/bjes-2020-000410.1515/bjes-2020-0004
]Search in Google Scholar
[
REVENTLOW, Nani Jansen. Can the GDPR and Freedom of Expression Coexist? AJIL Unbound, 2020, vol. 114, pp. 31–34. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1017/aju.2019.77.10.1017/aju.2019.77
]Search in Google Scholar
[
ROSEN, Jeffrey. The right to be forgotten. Stanford Law Review Online, 2012, vol. 64, pp. 88–92. Available at: https://review.law.stanford.edu/wp-content/uploads/sites/3/2012/02/64-SLRO-88.pdf
]Search in Google Scholar
[
ROSEN, Jeffrey. The right to be forgotten. Stanford Law Review Online, 2012, vol. 64, pp. 88–92. Available at: https://review.law.stanford.edu/wp-content/uploads/sites/3/2012/02/64-SLRO-88.pdf
]Search in Google Scholar
[
SCHECHNER, Sam. Google Defends ‘Right to Be Forgotten’ Response. The Wall Street Journal, online 19/11/2014, Available at: https://www.wsj.com/articles/google-defends-right-to-be-forgotten-response-1416414403
]Search in Google Scholar
[
SINGLETON, Shaniqua. Balancing A Right To Be Forgotten With A Right To Freedom Of Expression In The Wake Of Google Spain v. AEPD. The Georgia Journal of International and Comparative Law, 2015, vol. 44, no. 1, pp. 165–193. Available at: https://digitalcommons.law.uga.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=2256&context=gjicl
]Search in Google Scholar
[
WEBER, H. Rolf. The Right to Be Forgotten: More Than a Pandora’s Box? JIPITEC – Journal of Intellectual Property, Information Technology and E-Commerce Law, 2011, vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 121–130. Available at: https://www.jipitec.eu/issues/jipitec-2-2-2011/3084
]Search in Google Scholar
[
BundesgesetzzumSchutznatürlicherPersonenbei der VerarbeitungpersonenbezogenerDaten (Datenschutzgesetz – DSG) StF: BGBl. I Nr. 165/1999 (NR: GP XX RV 1613 AB 2028 S. 179. BR: 5992 AB 6034 S. 657.) [CELEX-Nr.: 395L0046] Available at: https://www.ris.bka.gv.at/GeltendeFassung.wxe?Abfrage=Bundesnormen&Gesetzesnummer=10001597&FassungVom=2018-05-25
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Directive 2002/58/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 12 July 2002 concerning the processing of personal data and the protection of privacy in the electronic communications sector (Directive on privacy and electronic communications). Available at: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/ALL/?uri=CELEX%3A32002L0058
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Directive 2006/24/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 15 March 2006 on the retention of data generated or processed in connection with the provision of publicly available electronic communications services or of public communications networks and amending Directive 2002/58/EC. Available at: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=OJ:L:2006:105:0054:0063:EN:PDF
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Report of Estonian Ombudsman 2019. Available at: https://www.oiguskantsler.ee/ylevaade2019/eraelu-kaitse.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Swedish Personal Data Act (1998:204); issued 29 April 1998. Available at: https://www.wipo.int/edocs/lexdocs/laws/en/se/se097en.pdf
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Zákon 18/2018 Z. z. z 29. novembra 2017 o ochrane osobných údajov a o zmene a doplnení niektorých zákonov (§ 78), Available at: https://www.slov-lex.sk/pravne-predpisy/SK/ZZ/2018/18/20180525
]Search in Google Scholar
