[DE FEO, Alfredo, SHACKLETON, Michael (edit). Shaping Parliamentary Democracy: Collected Memories from the European Parliament. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2019. Version pdf. Available at: <https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-27213-5> [Accessed: 15 May 2020].10.1007/978-3-030-27213-5]Search in Google Scholar
[BÁNKUTI, Miklós and et al. Opinion on Hungary’s New Constitutional Order: Amicus Brief to the Venice Commission on the Transitional Provisions of the Fundamental Law and the Key Cardinal Laws. [online] Available at: <https://lapa.princeton.edu/hosted-docs/hungary/Amicus_Cardinal_Laws_final.pdf>. [Accessed: 18 May 2020].]Search in Google Scholar
[BENKOVÁ, Lívia. Hungary-Orbán’s project towards ‘illiberal democracy.’ 2019. [online] pp.1–4. Available at: https://www.aies.at/download/2019/AIES-Fokus-2019-02.pdf [Accessed 11 Oct. 2020].]Search in Google Scholar
[BLOKKER, Paul. New democracies in crisis?: A comparative constitutional study of the Czech Republic, Hungary, Poland, Slovakia and Romania. London: Routledge, 2015.]Search in Google Scholar
[BOUTROS-GHALI, Boutros. Interdependence of democracy and development. France, SHS-2003/WS/24, UNESCO, 2003.10.1111/0893-7850.00572]Search in Google Scholar
[BUNGENBERG, Marc. and HAZARIKA, Angshuman. Rule of Law in the EU Legal Order. ZEuS Zeitschrift für Europarechtliche Studien, Volume 22(3), 2019, pp.383–406. [online] Available at: <https://doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2019-3>. [Accessed 27 Jun. 2020].10.5771/1435-439X-2019-3-383]Search in Google Scholar
[CARRERA, Sergio, GUILD, Elspeth, HERNANZ, Nicholas. The Triangular Relationship between Fundamental Rights, Democracy and the Rule of Law in the EU Towards an EU Copenhagen Mechanism. CEPS, 2013. Version pdf Available at:<http://www.ceps.eu> [Accessed 12 Jun. 2020].]Search in Google Scholar
[CHALMER, Damian, DAVIES, Gareth, MONTI, Giorgio. European Union law: cases and materials. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2011.]Search in Google Scholar
[CJEU, Case C-286/12, Commission & Hungary, ECLI:EU:C:2012:687 [2012] eur-lex. europa.eu (JUDGMENT OF THE COURT (First Chamber)) Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations – Social policy – Equal treatment in employment and occupation – Directive 2000/78/EC – Articles 2 and 6(1) – National scheme requiring compulsory retirement of judges, prosecutors and notaries on reaching the age of 62 – Legitimate objectives justifying a difference in treatment vis-à-vis workers under the age of 62 – Proportionality of the duration of the transitional period.]Search in Google Scholar
[COMMUNICATION FROM THE COMMISSION TO THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND THE COUNCIL (2014). A new EU Framework to strengthen the Rule of Law.]Search in Google Scholar
[FLECK, Zoltán, GADÓ, Gábor, HALMAI, Gábor. Opinion on the Fundamental Law of Hungary. 2011. [online] Available at: https://lapa.princeton.edu/hosteddocs/amicusto-vc-english-final.pdf. [Accessed 29 May 2020].]Search in Google Scholar
[FREYBURG, Tina, et al. Democracy promotion by functional cooperation: the European Union and its neighbourhood. Basingstoke; New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2015.10.1057/9781137489357]Search in Google Scholar
[FUREDI, Frank. Populism and the European culture wars the conflict of values between Hungary and the EU. London New York, Ny Routledge, 2018.10.4324/9781315104898]Search in Google Scholar
[GOUDAPPEL, Flora A.N.J., HIRSCH BALLIN, Ernst M.H. (editors). Democracy and rule of law in the European Union: essays in honour of Jaap W. de Zwaan. The Hague, The Netherlands: Asser Press, 2016.10.1007/978-94-6265-066-4]Search in Google Scholar
[HAMUĽÁK, Ondrej, SULYOK, Márton, KISS, Lilla Nóra. Measuring the ‘EU’clidean Distance between EU Law and the Hungarian Constitutional Court – Focusing on the Position of the EU Charter of Fundamental Rights. Czech Yearbook of Public and Private International Law, 2019, vol. 10, no. 1, pp. 130–150.]Search in Google Scholar
[KELLERBAUER, Manuel, KLAMERT, Marcus, TOMKIN, Janathan. The EU Treaties and the Charter of Fundamental Rights: a commentary. Editorial: Oxford, United Kingdom: Oxford University Press, 2019.10.1093/oso/9780198794561.001.0001]Search in Google Scholar
[KOCHENOV, Dimitry, PECH, Laurent. Monitoring and Enforcement of the Rule of Law in the EU: Rhetoric and Reality. European Constitutional Law Review, 2015, vol. 11, no. 3, pp. 512-540.10.1017/S1574019615000358]Search in Google Scholar
[LANDAU, David, LERNER, Hanna. Comparative constitution making. S.L.: Edward Elgar Publishing, 2019.10.4337/9781785365263]Search in Google Scholar
[MARTINICO, Guiseppe. The tangled complexity of the EU constitutional process: the frustrating knot of Europe. London: Routledge, 2014.10.2139/ssrn.2373152]Search in Google Scholar
[OREND, Brian. Human rights: concept and context. Peterborough, Ont.: Broadview Press, 2002.]Search in Google Scholar
[POLITICO. What should the EU do about Hungary? New bill gives Viktor Orbán sweeping new powers to fight coronavirus. www.politico.eu. 2020. [online] 15 Apr. Available at: https://www.politico.eu/article/what-should-the-eu-do-about-hungary-coronavirusviktor-orban/amp/ [Accessed 12 May 2020].]Search in Google Scholar
[SARGENTINI, Judith. (2018). REPORT on a proposal calling on the Council to determine, pursuant to Article 7(1) of the Treaty on European Union, the existence of a clear risk of a serious breach by Hungary of the values on which the Union is founded. [online] Available at: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-8-2018-0250_EN.html [Accessed 8 Dec. 2020].]Search in Google Scholar