[Avis sur la participation des observateurs du Conseil de l’Europe à l’Assemblée commune et sur la conclusion d’un accord à cet effet, Strasbourg, 16 December 1952.]Search in Google Scholar
[BARNARD, Catherine. A proportionate response to proportionality in the field of collective action. E.L. Rev., 2012, vol. 37, no. 2.]Search in Google Scholar
[BARENTS, René. The Autonomy of Community Law. The Hague: Kluwer Law International, 2004.]Search in Google Scholar
[BARTELSON, Jens. Sovereignty as Symbolic Form. London and New York: Routledge, 2014.10.4324/9781315774909]Search in Google Scholar
[BIEBER, Roland. An Association of Sovereign States. European Constitutional Law Review, 2009, vol. 5, no. 3.10.1017/S1574019609003915]Search in Google Scholar
[BOGDANOWICZ, Piotr. Jak Trybunał Sprawiedliwości „aktywował” art. 19 ust. 1 TUE w kontekście praworządności: uwagi na tle sprawy C-64/16, Associação Sindical dos Juízes Portugueses. In BARCZ, Jan, ZAWIDZKA-ŁOJEK, Anna (red). Sądowe mechanizmy ochrony praworządności w Polsce w świetle najnowszego orzecznictwa Trybunału Sprawiedliwości UE. Warszawa: Elipsa, 2018.]Search in Google Scholar
[BRAUER, Jurgen, HAYWOOD, Robert. Non-state Sovereign Entrepreneurs and Non-territorial Sovereign Organizations. UNU-WIDER Working Paper, 2010, no. 9.10.1057/9780230295155_14]Search in Google Scholar
[CONTARTESE, Cristina. The autonomy of the EU legal order in the ECJ’s external relations case law: From the “essential” to the “specific characteristics” of the Union and back again. CMLR, 2017, vol. 54, no. 6.10.54648/COLA2017145]Search in Google Scholar
[DE BÚRCA, Gráinne. The European Court of Justice and the International Legal Order After Kadi. Harvard International Law Journal, 2010, vol. 51, no. 1.]Search in Google Scholar
[DYEVRE, Arthur. European Integration and National Courts: Defending Sovereignty under Institutional Constraints? European Constitutional Law Review, 2013, vol. 9, no. 1.10.1017/S157401961200106X]Search in Google Scholar
[GEENENS, Raf. Sovereignty as Autonomy. Law and Philosophy, 2017, vol. 36, no. 5.10.1007/s10982-017-9295-3]Search in Google Scholar
[GRILLI, Antonio. Aux origines du droit de l’Union Européenne: Ie “ius commune” national dans les conclusions des avocats généraux: Karl Roemer et Maurice Lagrange (1954–1964). Tijdschrift voor Rechtsgeschiedenis, 2008, vol. 76, no. 1–2.10.1163/157181908X277608]Search in Google Scholar
[GRIMM, Dieter. Defending Sovereign Statehood Against Transforming the Union Into a State. European Constitutional Law Review, 2009, vol. 5, no. 3.10.1017/S1574019609003538]Search in Google Scholar
[GRIMM, Dieter. Sovereignty: The Origin and Future of a Political and Legal Concept, New York: Columbia University Press, 2015.10.7312/grim16424]Search in Google Scholar
[HAMUĽÁK, Ondrej. Lessons from the “Constitutional Mythology” or How to Reconcile the Concept of State Sovereignty with European Integration. DANUBE: Law and Economics Review, 2015, vol. 6, no. 2.10.1515/danb-2015-0005]Search in Google Scholar
[JAKAB, András. Neutralizing the Sovereignty. Question Compromise Strategies in Constitutional Argumentation. European Constitutional Law Review, 2006, vol. 2, no. 3.10.1017/S1574019606003750]Search in Google Scholar
[JESSURUN D’OLIVEIRA, Hans Ulrich. The EU and Its Monarchies: Influences and Frictions. European Constitutional Law Review, 2012, vol. 8, no. 1.10.1017/S1574019612000041]Search in Google Scholar
[Judgment of the Court of 21 December 1954, French Republic v High Authority of the European Coal and Steel Community, 1–54, ECLI:EU:C:1954:7.]Search in Google Scholar
[Judgment of the Court of 29 November 1956, Fédération Charbonnière de Belgique v High Authority of the European Coal and Steel Community, 8–55, ECLI:EU:C:1956:11.]Search in Google Scholar
[Judgment of the Court of 5 February 1963, NV Algemene Transport- en Expeditie Onderneming van Gend & Loos v Netherlands Inland Revenue Administration, 26–62, ECLI:EU:C:1963:1.]Search in Google Scholar
[Judgment of the Court of 17 December 1970, Internationale Handelsgesellschaft mbH v Einfuhr- und Vorratsstelle für Getreide und Futtermittel, 11–70, ECLI:EU:C:1970:114.]Search in Google Scholar
[Judgment of the Court of 31 March 1971, Commission of the European Communities v Council of the European Communities, 22–70, ECLI:EU:C:1971:32.]Search in Google Scholar
[Judgment of the Court of 9 July 1987, Federal Republic of Germany and others v Commission of the European Communities, 281, 283, 284, 285 and 287/85, ECLI:EU:C:1987:351.]Search in Google Scholar
[Judgment of the Court of First Instance of 21 September 2005, Yassin Abdullah Kadi v Council of the European Union and Commission of the European Communities, T-315/01, ECLI:EU:T:2005:332.]Search in Google Scholar
[Judgment of the Court of 3 September 2008, Yassin Abdullah Kadi and Al Barakaat International Foundation v Council of the European Union and Commission of the European Communities, C-402/05 P and C-415/05 P, ECLI:EU:C:2008:461.]Search in Google Scholar
[Judgment of the Court, 18 July 2013, European Commission and Others v Yassin Abdullah Kadi, C-584/10 P, C-593/10 P and C-595/10 P., ECLI:EU:C:2013:518.]Search in Google Scholar
[Judgment of the Court of 27 February 2018, Associação Sindical dos Juízes Portugueses v Tribunal de Contas, case C-64/16, ECLI:EU:C:2018:117.]Search in Google Scholar
[KLABBERS, Jan. An introduction to international institutional law. Second Edition. Cambridge: CUP, 2009.10.1017/CBO9780511801013]Search in Google Scholar
[KRANZ, Jerzy. Pojęcie suwerenności we współczesnym prawie międzynarodowym. Warszawa: Elipsa, 2015.]Search in Google Scholar
[KRASNER, Stephen D. Sovereignty: organized hypocrisy, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1999.10.1515/9781400823260]Search in Google Scholar
[KWIECIEŃ, Roman. Sir Hersch Lauterpacht’s Idea of State Sovereignty – Is It Still Alive? International Community Law Review, 2011, vol. 13, no. 1–2.10.1163/187197311X552901]Search in Google Scholar
[KWIECIEŃ, Roman. Interesy indywidualne państw a interesy wspólnotowe w prawie społeczności międzynarodowej. O znaczeniu liberalizmu i komunitaryzmu dla teorii prawa międzynarodowego. Lublin: UMCS, 2015.]Search in Google Scholar
[KWIECIEŃ, Roman. Państwo i jego suwerenność a prawo międzynarodowe jako system prawa. In KWIECIEŃ, Roman (ed). Państwo a prawo międzynarodowe jako system prawa. Lublin: UMCS, 2015.]Search in Google Scholar
[LENAERTS, Koen. The Kadi Saga and the Rule of Law within the EU. SMU Law Review, 2014, vol. 67, no. 4.]Search in Google Scholar
[LOCK, Tobias. Why the European Union is not a State: Some Critical Remarks. European Constitutional Law Review, 2009, vol. 5, no. 3.10.1017/S1574019609004076]Search in Google Scholar
[LOHSE, Eva J. Fundamental Freedoms and Private Actors – towards an ‘Indirect Horizontal Effect’. European Public Law, 2007, vol. 13, no 1.10.54648/EURO2007008]Search in Google Scholar
[Opinion of the Court of 16 May 2017, Free Trade Agreement between the European Union and the Republic of Singapore, 2/15, ECLI:EU:C:2017:376.]Search in Google Scholar
[PERNICE, Ingolf. Multilevel Constitutionalism and the Crisis of Democracy in Europe. European Constitutional Law Review, 2015, vol. 11, no. 3.10.1017/S1574019615000279]Search in Google Scholar
[PŘIBÁŇ Jiří. Sovereignty in Post-Sovereign Society. A Systems Theory of European Constitutionalism. London and New York: Routledge, 2015.10.4324/9781315610085]Search in Google Scholar
[TANZI, Attila. Remarks on Sovereignty in the Evolving Constitutional Features of the International Community. International Community Law Review, 2010, vol. 12, no. 2.10.1163/187197310X498570]Search in Google Scholar
[VAN DER WALT, Johan. The horizontal effect revolution and the question of sovereignty. Berlin: De Gruyter, 2014.10.1515/9783110248036]Search in Google Scholar
[VAN ELSUWEGE, Peter, GREMMELPREZ, Femke. Protecting the Rule of Law in the EU Legal Order: A Constitutional Role for the Court of Justice. European Constitutional Law Review, 2020, vol. 16, no. 1.10.1017/S1574019620000085]Search in Google Scholar
[VAN ROSSEM, Jan, W. The Autonomy of EU Law: More is Less? In WESSEL, Ramses A., BLOCKMANS, Steven (eds). Between Autonomy and Dependence. The EU Legal Order under the Influence of International Organisations. The Hague: T.M.C. Asser Press, 2013.10.1007/978-90-6704-903-0_2]Search in Google Scholar
[WEINERT, Matthew S. Democratic Sovereignty. Authority, legitimacy, and state in a globalizing age. New York: UCL Press, 2007.10.4324/9780203965689]Search in Google Scholar
[WESSEL, Ramses A., BLOCKMANS, Steven. Between Autonomy and Dependence: The EU Legal Order Under the Influence of International Organisations – An Introduction. In WESSEL, Ramses A., BLOCKMANS, Steven (eds). Between Autonomy and Dependence. The EU Legal Order under the Influence of International Organisations. The Hague: T.M.C. Asser Press, 2013.10.1007/978-90-6704-903-0]Search in Google Scholar
[WIND, Marlene. Sovereignty and European Integration. Towards a Post-Hobbesian Order. New York: Palgrave, 2001.]Search in Google Scholar
[ZETTERQUIST, Ola. Out with the New, in with the Old – Neo-Roman Constitutional Thought and the Enigma of Constitutional Pluralism in the EU. In AVBELJ, Matej, KOMÁREK, Jan (eds). Constitutional Pluralism in the European Union and Beyond. Oxford: Hart Publishing, 2012.]Search in Google Scholar
