Juliana v United States of America: The Final Frontier for Climate Litigation in America?

Appellant’s Opening Brief (1 February 2019) [online]. Available at: <http://blogs2.law.columbia.edu/climate-change-litigation/wp-content/uploads/sites/16/case-documents/2019/20190201_docket-18-36082_brief.pdf> Accessed: 24 January 2020.Search in Google Scholar

Application for a Stay of Proceedings by the United States Department of Justice (18 October 2018) [online]. Available at:<https://www.scotusblog.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/10/18A410.pdf> Accessed: 24 January 2020.Search in Google Scholar

Ashgar Leghari v Federation of Pakistan, WP No 25501/2015, Lahore High Court Green Bench, Orders of 4 and 14 September 2015.Search in Google Scholar

Associated Press. US temporarily stops youth climate lawsuit days before trial in Oregon [online]. Available at: <https://www.oregonlive.com/environment/index.ssf/2018/10/us_temporarily_stops_youth_cli.html> Accessed: 24 January 2020.Search in Google Scholar

California v. Gen. Motors Corp., No. C06-05755, 2007 WL 2726871, N.D. Cal. Sept. 17, 2007.Search in Google Scholar

Climate Change and Future Generations Lawsuit in Colombia: Key Excerpts from the Supreme Court’s Decision [online]. Available at: <https://www.dejusticia.org/en/climate-change-and-future-generations-lawsuit-in-colombia-key-excerpts-from-the-supreme-courts-decision/> Accessed: 20 May 2019.Search in Google Scholar

Comer v. Murphy Oil USA, No. 1:05-CV-436, 2007 WL 6942285, S.D. Miss. Aug. 30, 2007.Search in Google Scholar

Connecticut v. Am. Elec. Power Co., 406 F. Supp. 2d 265, S.D.N.Y. 2005.Search in Google Scholar

DOORI, Song. Judicial approaches to political questions: A comparative study of the United States and South Korea. International and Comparative Law Review, 2019, vol. 19, no. 1, pp. 234–260. https://doi.org/10.2478/iclr-2019-0008.10.2478/iclr-2019-0008Search in Google Scholar

GALLUCCI, Maria. Trump Administration Takes a ‘Drastic’ Step to Stop Youth Climate Lawsuit. [online]. Available at: <https://mashable.com/2017/06/11/trump-climate-lawsuit-drastic-step/> Accessed: 23 January 2020.Search in Google Scholar

Greenpeace Nordic Ass’n and Nature and Youth v Ministry of Petroleum and Energy, Case no. 16166674TVI-OTIR/06, Oslo District Court, 4 January 2018.Search in Google Scholar

HARTMAN, Steven. Juliana v United States: The unresolved case already making a difference. [online] Available at: <https://bifrostonline.org/juliana-v-united-states-the-unresolved-case-already-making-a-difference> Accessed: 22 January 2020).Search in Google Scholar

IRFAN, Umair. The Supreme Court Stepped in to Stall a Climate Lawsuit. That’s Really Weird. [online]. Available at: <https://www.vox.com/energy-andenvironment/2018/10/23/18010582/childrens-climate-lawsuit-supreme-court> Accessed: 24 January 2020.Search in Google Scholar

Juliana et al v United States of America et al, US District Court, District of Oregon, First Amended Complaint for Declaratory and Injunctive Relief; Case No.: 6:15-cv-01517-TC, 9 October 2015.Search in Google Scholar

Juliana v United States of America 217 F Supp 3d, D Or 2016.Search in Google Scholar

Juliana v United States of America 339 F Supp 3d, D Or 2018Search in Google Scholar

Juliana v United States of America Case 6:15-cv-01517-TC Document 182, 28 June 2017.Search in Google Scholar

Kelsey Rose Juliana vs USA United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, Portland Oregon case no 18-36082, 4 June 2019.Search in Google Scholar

Kelsey Rose Juliana vs USA United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, Portland Oregon case no 18-36082 Opinion, 17 January 2020.Search in Google Scholar

KORMANN, Carolyn. The Right to a Stable Climate is the Constitutional Question of the Twenty-First Century. [online]. Available at: < https://www.newyorker.com/news/daily-comment/the-right-to-a-stable-climate-is-the-constitutional-question-of-the-twenty-first-century> Accessed: 23 January 2020.Search in Google Scholar

Lujan v. Defenders of Wildlife, 504 U.S. 555, US Case Law, vol. 504, 1992.Search in Google Scholar

Massachusetts v Environmental Protection Agency, 22 Ill.549 U.S. 497, 127 S. Ct. 1438, 167 L. Ed. 2d 248, 63 ERC 2057, 2007.Search in Google Scholar

Native Vill. of Kivalina v. ExxonMobil Corp., 663 F. Supp. 2d 863, N.D. Cal. 2009.Search in Google Scholar

Obergefell v Hodges 135 S. Ct. 2584, 2015.Search in Google Scholar

Opinion of the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals (7 March 2018). [online]. Available at: <http://cdn.ca9.uscourts.gov/datastore/opinions/2018/03/07/17-71692.pdf > Accessed: 23 January 2020.Search in Google Scholar

Opinion of the United States Supreme Court (30 July 2018). [online]. Available at: <https://www.supremecourt.gov/docket/docketfiles/html/public/18a65.html> Accessed: 23 January 2020.Search in Google Scholar

Order of the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals (26 December 2018) [online]. Available at: <http://blogs2.law.columbia.edu/climate-change-litigation/wp-content/uploads/sites/16/case-documents/2019/20190107_docket-18-36082_order.pdf> Accessed: 24 January 2020.Search in Google Scholar

Order of the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals (8 November 2018) [online]. Available at: <http://blogs2.law.columbia.edu/climate-change-litigation/wp-content/uploads/sites/16/case-documents/2018/20181108_docket-18-73014_order.pdf> Accessed: 24 January 2020.Search in Google Scholar

Order of the United States District Court for the District of Oregon (21 November 2018) [online]. Available at: < https://www.documentcloud.org/documents/5219185-Juliana-v-US-Interlocutory-Appeal-Order-112118.html> Accessed: 24 January 2020.Search in Google Scholar

Order of the United States Supreme Court (2 November 2018) [online]. Available at: https://www.supremecourt.gov/orders/courtorders/110218zr2_8ok0.pdf> Accessed: 24 January 2020.Search in Google Scholar

O‘ROURKE, Ciara. The 11-Year Old Suing Trump Over Climate Change. The Atlantic. [online]. Available at: <https://www.theatlantic.com/science/archive/2017/02/trump-climate-lawsuit/516054/> Accessed: 23 January 2020.Search in Google Scholar

POWERS, Melissa. Juliana v United States: The next frontier in US climate mitigation? Review of European, Comparative & International Environmental Law, 2018, vol.27, no. 2, pp. 199–204.10.1111/reel.12248Search in Google Scholar

Rabab Ali v Federation of Pakistan & Another, 2016.04.04, Supreme Court of Pakistan.10.4172/2315-7844.1000198Search in Google Scholar

Stichting Urgenda v Government of the Netherlands (Ministry of Infrastructure and the Environment), ECLI:NL:RBDHA:2015:7145, Rechtbank Den Haag, C/09/456689/HA ZASearch in Google Scholar

Summary and translation of STC4360-2018 de la Corte Suprema de Justicia, Sala de Casacion Civil, M.P. Luis Armando Tolosa Villabona (2018) by Environmental Law Alliance Worldwide. [online]. Available at: <https://www.elaw.org/CO_Amazon> accessed: 20 May 2019Search in Google Scholar

United States of America et al v United States District Court for the District of Oregon and Kelsey Cascadia Rose Juliana et al (Petition for a Writ of Mandamus to the United States District Court for the District of Oregon and Request for Stay of Proceedings in District Court) Case No 6:15-cv-01517-TC-AA, D. Or., 9 June 2017, p. 12.Search in Google Scholar

WEAVER, R. Henry, KYSAR, Douglas. A. Courting Disaster: Climate Change and the Adjudication of Disaster. Notre Dame Law Review, 2017, vol. 93, no. 1, pp. 295–356.10.2139/ssrn.2965084Search in Google Scholar