Analysis of the Consumer Knowledge and Attitude toward Innovations in the Fashion Industry

Anderson, J.C., & Gerbing, D.W. (1984). The effect of sampling error on convergence, improper solutions, and goodness-of-fit indices for maximum likelihood confirmatory factor analysis. Psychometrika, 49(2), 155–173.10.1007/BF02294170Search in Google Scholar

Srinivasan K, Rajanikumar K, Sheetal Bhardwaj K, Lalitha Kumari B, Murthy Chavali. Nanotechnology Trends in Fashion and Textile Engineering. Curr Trends Fashion Technol Textile Eng. 2018; 2(3): 555590Search in Google Scholar

Srinivasan K, Rajanikumar K, Sheetal Bhardwaj K, Lalitha Kumari B, Murthy Chavali. Nanotechnology Trends in Fashion and Textile Engineering. Curr Trends Fashion Technol Textile Eng. 2018; 2(3): 555590Search in Google Scholar

Srinivasan K, Rajanikumar K, Sheetal Bhardwaj K, Lalitha Kumari B, Murthy Chavali. Nanotechnology Trends in Fashion and Textile Engineering. Curr Trends Fashion Technol Textile Eng. 2018; 2(3): 555590Search in Google Scholar

Srinivasan K, Rajanikumar K, Sheetal Bhardwaj K, Lalitha Kumari B, Murthy Chavali. Nanotechnology Trends in Fashion and Textile Engineering. Curr Trends Fashion Technol Textile Eng. 2018; 2(3): 555590Search in Google Scholar

Srinivasan K, Rajanikumar K, Sheetal Bhardwaj K, Lalitha Kumari B, Murthy Chavali. Nanotechnology Trends in Fashion and Textile Engineering. Curr Trends Fashion Technol Textile Eng. 2018; 2(3): 555590Search in Google Scholar

Bainbridge, S. W. (2002). Public Attitudes Toward Nanotechnology. Journal of Nanoparticle Research, 4. 561-570.Search in Google Scholar

Batista, L., & Ng. I. (2012). The emergence of relationship-based retailing-a perspective from the fashion sector. Oxford Retail Futures Conference - New Technologies, Business Models and Customer Experience. Retrieved from https://ueaeprints.uea.ac.uk/60849/ Accessed 05 April 2019.Search in Google Scholar

Bentler, P. M., & Bonett, D. G. (1980). Significance tests and goodness of fit in the analysis of covariance structures. Psychological Bulletin, 88, 588-606.10.1037/0033-2909.88.3.588Search in Google Scholar

Bentler, P. M. (1990). Comparative fit indexes in structural models. Psychological Bulletin, 107(2), 238-246.10.1037/0033-2909.107.2.2382320703Search in Google Scholar

Berry, L. L., Bolton, R. N., Bridges, C. H., Meyer, J., Parasuraman, A., & Seiders, K. (2010). Opportunities for innovation in the delivery of interactive retail services. Journal of Interactive Marketing, 24(2), 155-167.10.1016/j.intmar.2010.02.001Search in Google Scholar

Bredahl, J. L., (2001). Determinants of Consumer Attitudes and Purchase Intentions with Regard to Genetically Modified Food – Results of a Cross-National Survey. Journal of Consumer Policy. 24.10.1023/A:1010950406128Search in Google Scholar

Brown, J., Fatehi, L., & Kuzma, J. (2015). Altruism and skepticism in public attitudes toward food nanotechnologies. Journal of Nanoparticle Research, 17, 122.10.1007/s11051-015-2926-4Search in Google Scholar

Capon, A., Gillespie, J., Rolfe, M., & Smith, W. (2015). Comparative analysis of the labelling of nanotechnologies across four stakeholder groups. Journal of nanoparticle research: an interdisciplinary forum for nanoscale science and technology, 17(8), 327.10.1007/s11051-015-3129-8451807626246798Search in Google Scholar

Chen, M., Lin, Y., & Cheng, T. (2013). Public attitudes toward nanotechnology applications in Taiwan. Technovation, 33(s 2-3), 88–96.10.1016/j.technovation.2012.11.008Search in Google Scholar

Cobb, D. M. & Macoubrier, J. (2004). Public perceptions about nanotechnology: Risks, benefits and trust. Journal of Nanoparticle Research, 6, 385-405.10.1007/s11051-004-3394-4Search in Google Scholar

D’Silva, J., & Bowman, D.M (2010) To label or not to label? It’s more than a Nano-sized question. European Journal of Risk Regulation, 4, 420–427.10.1017/S1867299X00000891Search in Google Scholar

European Commission. (2010). Eurobarometer 73.1 Biotechnology Report. Retrieved from http://ec.europa.eu/commfrontoffice/publicopinion/archives/ebs/ebs_341_en.pdf Accessed 10 April 2019.Search in Google Scholar

Fishbein, M., & Ajzen, I. (1975). Belief, Attitude, Intention and Behaviour: An introduction to theory and research, Addison-Wesley.Search in Google Scholar

Goldsmith, R. E., Moore, M. A., & Beaudoin, P. (1999). Fashion innovativeness and self-concept: a replication”. Journal of Product & Brand Management, 8(1), 7-18.10.1108/10610429910257904Search in Google Scholar

Hung, S.C, & Chu, Y.Y. (2006). Stimulating new industries from emerging technologies: challenges for the public sector. Technovation, 26 (1), 104-110.10.1016/j.technovation.2004.07.018Search in Google Scholar

Kline, R.B. (2016). Principles and Practice of Structural Equation Modelling, Fourth Edition. The Guilford Press: New York.Search in Google Scholar

National Nanotechnology Initiative. (2014). Retrieved from https://www.nano.gov/nanotech-101/special Accessed 08 April 2019.Search in Google Scholar

Nerlich, B. D., Clarke. D., & Ulph, F. (2007). Risks and benefits of nanotechnology: How young adults perceive possible advances in nanomedicine compared with conventional treatments. Health, Risk & Society, 9(2), 159-171.10.1080/13698570701306856Search in Google Scholar

R Core Team (2018). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria.Search in Google Scholar

URL: https://www.r-project.org/Search in Google Scholar

Renn, O., & Rocco, M.C. (2006). Nanotechnology and the need for risk governance. Journal of Nanoparticle Research, 8(2), 153-191.10.1007/s11051-006-9092-7Search in Google Scholar

Revelle, W. (2018). psych: Procedures for Personality and Psychological Research, Northwestern University, Evanston, Illinois, USA, https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/psych/Version=1.8.12.Search in Google Scholar

Scheufele, D., & Lewenstein, B. (2005). The Public and Nanotechnology: How Citizens Make Sense of Emerging Technologies. Journal of Nanoparticle Research, 7, 659-667.10.1007/s11051-005-7526-2Search in Google Scholar

Srinivasan K, Rajanikumar K, Sheetal Bhardwaj K, Lalitha Kumari B, Murthy Chavali. Nanotechnology Trends in Fashion and Textile Engineering. Curr Trends Fashion Technol Textile Eng. 2018; 2(3): 555590Search in Google Scholar

Srinivasan, K., Rajanikumar, K., Sheetal, B. K., Lalitha, K. B, & Murthy, C. (2018). Nanotechnology Trends in Fashion and Textile Engineering. Current Trends Fashion Technology and Textile Engineering, (3).Search in Google Scholar

Tomarken, A. & Waller, G.N. (2005). Structural Equation Modelling: Strengths, Limitations, and Misconceptions. Annual review of clinical psychology. 1. 31-65.10.1146/annurev.clinpsy.1.102803.14423917716081Search in Google Scholar

Trott, P. (2008). Innovation Management and New Product Development. 3^rd edition. Pearson Education.Search in Google Scholar

Tzou, R., & Lu, H. (2009). Exploring the emotional, aesthetic, and ergonomic facets of innovative product on fashion technology acceptance model. Behaviour & Information Technology, 28(4), 311-322.10.1080/01449290701763454Search in Google Scholar

Vargas, M. (2016). Structural Equation Modelling in R (Part 1). Retrieved from R-bloggers: https://www.r-bloggers.com/structural-equation-modelling-in-r-part-1.Search in Google Scholar

Yves, R. (2012). lavaan: An R Package for Structural Equation Modelling. Journal of Statistical Software, 48(2), 1-36.Search in Google Scholar

URL: https://www.jstatsoft.org/article/view/v048i02.Search in Google Scholar