[
Alexander, S. (1920). Space, time, and deity: The Gifford lectures at Glasgow, 1916–1918. London, England: MacMillan.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Asch, S. (1952). Social psychology. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall, p. 1952.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Bozzi, P. (1969). Presentazione. In W. Köhler (Ed.), Il posto di valore in un mondo di fatti. Florence, Italy: Giunti.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Broad, C. D. (1930). Five types of ethical theory. London, England: Routledge, Kegan & Paul.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Chrudzimski, A., & Huemer, W. (Eds.). (2004). Phenomenology and analysis: Essays on central European philosophy. Frankfurt, Germany: Ontos Verlag.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Dreyfus, H. (2005). Overcoming the myth of the mental: How philosophers can profit from the phenomenology of everyday expertise. Proceedings and Addresses of the American Philosophical Association, 79, 47–65.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Dreyfus, H., & Dreyfus, S. (1990). What is morality? A phenomenological account of the development of ethical expertise. In D. Rasmussen (Ed.), Universalism and communitarianism (pp. 237–264). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Duncker, K. (1939). Ethical relativity? Mind: A Quarterly Review of Psychology and Philosophy, 48, 39–57.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Ewing, A. C. (1947). The definition of good. New York, NY: Macmillan.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Frankena, W. (1967). Frondizi on the foundations of moral norms. In Proceedings of the Seventh Interamerican Congress of Philosophy. Quebec: Universite Laval.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Frondizi, R. (1968). Risposta a Frankena. Rivista di Filosofia, 49, 203–213.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Frondizi, R. (1969). The axiological foundation of the moral norm. The Personalist, 50, 241–253.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Frondizi, R. (1972). Value as a gestalt quality. Journal of Value Inquiry, 6, 163–184.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Frondizi, R. (1977). Introducción a los problemas fundamentales del Hombre. Mexico: Fondo de Cultura Económica.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Frondizi, R. (Spanish: 1958, English: 1971). What is value? An introduction to axiology. La Salle, IL: Open Court.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Groff, R. (2013). Ontology revisited: Metaphysics in social and political philosophy. London, England: Routledge.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Hartman, R. S. (2002). The knowledge of good: A critique of axiological reason. Amsterdam, The Netherlands: Rodopi.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Hatfield, G. (2004). Sense-data and the mind body problem. In R. Schumacher (Ed.), Perception and reality: From Descartes to the present (pp. 305–331). Paderborn, Germany: Mentis.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Hatfield, G. (2007). The reality of qualia. Erkenntnis, 66, 133–168.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Heider, F. (1946). Social perception and phenomenal causality. Psychological Review, 51, 358–374.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Horgan, T., & Timmons, M. (2005). Moral phenomenology and moral theory. Philosophical Issues [Normativity], 15, 56–77.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Horgan, T., & Timmons, M. (2008). What does moral phenomenology tell us about moral objectivity? Social Philosophy and Policy, 25, 267–300.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Huemer, W. (2005). The constitution of consciousness: A study in analytic phenomenology. New York, NY: Routledge.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Koffka, K. (1935). The ontological status of value. In M. Kallen, & S. Hook (Eds.), American philosophy today and tomorrow (pp. 275–309). New York, NY: Lee Furman.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Köhler, W. (1938). The place of value in a world of facts. New York, NY: Liveright.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Köhler, W. (1971). Value and fact. In M. Henle (Ed.), The selected papers of Wolfgang Köhler (pp. 356–375). New York, NY: Liveright.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Kriegel, U. (2007). Moral phenomenology: Foundational issues. Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences, 6, 115–136.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Lewin, K. (1951). Behavior and development as a function of the total situation. In D. Cartwright (Ed.), Field theory in social science (pp. 238–305). New York, NY: Harper.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Mackie, J. L. (1977). Ethics: Inventing right and wrong. Harmondsworth, London: Penguin.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Mandelbaum, M. (1955). The phenomenology of moral experience. Glencoe, Scotland: Free Press.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Mandelbaum, M. (1956). On the use of moral principles. Journal of Philosophy, 53, 662–670.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Mandelbaum, M. (1960). Determinism and moral responsibility. Ethics, 70, 204–219.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Mandelbaum, M. (1964). Philosophy, science and sense-perception. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Mandelbaum, M. (1986). The determinants of choice. Philosophy Research Archive, 11, 355–377.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Mandelbaum, M. (1987). Purpose and necessity in social theory. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Marietta, D. (2004). Beyond certainty: A phenomenological approach to moral reflection. Lanham, MD: Lexington Book.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
McDowell, J. (1985). Value and secondary qualities. In T. Honderich (Ed.), Morality and objectivity (pp. 110–129). London, England: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
McDowell, J. (2007). What myth? Inquiry: A Journal of Medical Care Organization, Provision and Financing, 50, 338–351.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Metzger, W. (1962). Schöpferische Freiheit. Frankfurt, Germany: Kramer.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Norris, C. (2002). Truth matters: Realism, anti-realism and response-dependence. Edinburgh, Scotland: Edinburgh University Press.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Passmore, J. (1973). Review of Mandelbaum, Maurice. History, Man and Reason, History and Theory, 12, 414–419.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Rietveld, E. (2010). McDowell and Dreyfus on unreflective action. Inquiry: A Journal of Medical Care Organization, Provision and Financing, 53, 183–207.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Ross, W. D. (1939). Foundations of ethics. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Sartre, J.-P. (2003). Being and nothingness. London, England: Routledge.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Smith, B. (1988). Gestalt theory: An essay in philosophy. In B. Smith (Ed.), Foundations of gestalt theory (pp. 11–81). Munich, Germany and Vienna, Austria: Philosophia.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Smith, B. (1994). Austrian philosophy: The legacy of Franz Brentano. Chicago and La Salle, IL: Open Court.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Strawson, G. (1994). Mental reality. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Timmons, M., & Horgan, T. (2010). Mandelbaum on moral phenomenology and moral realism. In I. Verstegen (Ed.), Maurice Mandelbaum and American critical realism (pp. 105–126). London, England: Routledge.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
von Ehrenfels, C. (1897). System der Werttheorie, vol. I, Allgemeine Werttheorie: Psychologie des Begehrens. Leipzig, Germany: Reisland.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
von Ehrenfels, C. (1898). System der Werttheorie, vol. II, Grundzüge einer Ethik. Leipzig, Germany: Reisland.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
von Ehrenfels, C. (1916). Höhe und Reinheit der Gestalt. Kosmogonie. Jena, Germany: Diederichs.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
von Ehrenfels, C. (German: 1890; English: 1988). On Gestalt qualities. In B. Smith, (Ed.), Foundations of gestalt theory (pp. 124–157). Munich, Germany and Vienna, Austria: Philosophia.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
von Hildebrand, D. (1916). Die Idee der sittlichen Handlung. Jahrbuch für Philosophie und phänomenologische Forschung, 3, 126–251.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Weiner, B. (1986). An attributional theory of emotion and motivation. Berlin, Germany: Springer.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Wertheimer, M. (1923). Untersuchungen zur Lehre von der Gestalt II. Psychologische Forschung, 4, 301–350.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Wertheimer, M. (1961). Some problems in the theory of ethics. In M. Henle (Ed.), Documents of Gestalt psychology (pp. 29–41). Berkeley and Los Angeles, CA: University of California Press.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Zahavi, D. (2010). Mindedness, mindlessness and first-person authority. In J. Schear (Ed.), Mind, reason and being-in-the-world: The McDowell–Dreyfus debate London, England: Routledge.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Zukier, H. (1982). Situational determinants of behavior. Social Research, 49, 1073–1091.
]Search in Google Scholar
