Otwarty dostęp

Interaction between stem damage, crown vitality and growth performance of European yew in Central–East Europe


Zacytuj

Fig 1

a) Location of the study sites STR (Strazov Mts.), PAV, LAG (Stare Hory Mts.) and VFA (Great Fatra) in Slovakia; b) climate diagrams showing mean monthly courses of temperature and precipitation sums; climate data were derived from KNMI monthly E-OBS 0.25° gridded observations (E-OBS 19.0e); c) number of trees in crown and stem damage classes according to localities.
a) Location of the study sites STR (Strazov Mts.), PAV, LAG (Stare Hory Mts.) and VFA (Great Fatra) in Slovakia; b) climate diagrams showing mean monthly courses of temperature and precipitation sums; climate data were derived from KNMI monthly E-OBS 0.25° gridded observations (E-OBS 19.0e); c) number of trees in crown and stem damage classes according to localities.

Fig A1

a) Healthy-looking yew with undamaged stem and crown; b) multiple stem, more than 50% of the stem circumference is stripped by deer, crown with transparency of more than 50%.
a) Healthy-looking yew with undamaged stem and crown; b) multiple stem, more than 50% of the stem circumference is stripped by deer, crown with transparency of more than 50%.

Fig A2

Degree of bark stripping damage related to mean height of yew trees in Slovakia. SE—standard error.
Degree of bark stripping damage related to mean height of yew trees in Slovakia. SE—standard error.

Fig 2

Summarisation of mean values and their differences among a) sex categories (non-significant differences in Gnekro and Pbeech between male and female trees are not displayed) and b) localities of the yew trees in surrounding stand characteristics Gtrees, Gnekro, Gt, Gbeech and Pbeech; Gtrees—basal area of living trees, Gnekro—basal area of standing dead trees and stumps, Gbeech—basal area of living beech trees, Pbeech—proportion of beech, LAG (Lackov Grun), PAV (Pavelcovo), STR (Strazov), VFA (Velka Fatra), L and R—left and right y-axis.
Summarisation of mean values and their differences among a) sex categories (non-significant differences in Gnekro and Pbeech between male and female trees are not displayed) and b) localities of the yew trees in surrounding stand characteristics Gtrees, Gnekro, Gt, Gbeech and Pbeech; Gtrees—basal area of living trees, Gnekro—basal area of standing dead trees and stumps, Gbeech—basal area of living beech trees, Pbeech—proportion of beech, LAG (Lackov Grun), PAV (Pavelcovo), STR (Strazov), VFA (Velka Fatra), L and R—left and right y-axis.

Fig 3

Sex-specific mean raw tree-ring width (TRW) chronologies of yew according to four localities. Dashed (male) and dotted (female) lines on left (L) y-axis denote standard error (SE) of the mean TRW chronology value. Dashed (male) and dotted (female) lines on the right (R) y-axis refer to the number of sampled trees, from which the mean chronology was constructed. LAG (Lackov Grun), PAV (Pavelcovo), STR (Strazov) and VFA (Velka Fatra); black arrows point to significant within-site differences in growth between male and female chronologies (sequences of sex-specific mean chronologies, in which curves of SE do not overlap), white arrows show release as a response to known cutting treatment.
Sex-specific mean raw tree-ring width (TRW) chronologies of yew according to four localities. Dashed (male) and dotted (female) lines on left (L) y-axis denote standard error (SE) of the mean TRW chronology value. Dashed (male) and dotted (female) lines on the right (R) y-axis refer to the number of sampled trees, from which the mean chronology was constructed. LAG (Lackov Grun), PAV (Pavelcovo), STR (Strazov) and VFA (Velka Fatra); black arrows point to significant within-site differences in growth between male and female chronologies (sequences of sex-specific mean chronologies, in which curves of SE do not overlap), white arrows show release as a response to known cutting treatment.

Fig 4

Cumulative radial growth of female (blue line) and male (red line) yew trees according to four localities (L-left y-axis): LAG (Lackov Grun), PAV (Pavelcovo), STR (Strazov) and VFA (Velka Fatra). Number of corresponding averaged male (dashed line) and female (dotted line) trees displayed on the right (R) y-axis.
Cumulative radial growth of female (blue line) and male (red line) yew trees according to four localities (L-left y-axis): LAG (Lackov Grun), PAV (Pavelcovo), STR (Strazov) and VFA (Velka Fatra). Number of corresponding averaged male (dashed line) and female (dotted line) trees displayed on the right (R) y-axis.

Fig 5

Raw tree-ring width chronologies of damaged/undamaged yew trees according to crown transparency status in four localities: LAG (Lackov Grun), PAV (Pavelcovo), STR (Strazov) and VFA (Velka Fatra). Values of mean TRW (solid lines) and corresponding standard error (dashed line for undamaged and dotted line for damaged trees) are displayed on left (L) y-axis. Right (R) y-axis displays respective values of sampling depth.
Raw tree-ring width chronologies of damaged/undamaged yew trees according to crown transparency status in four localities: LAG (Lackov Grun), PAV (Pavelcovo), STR (Strazov) and VFA (Velka Fatra). Values of mean TRW (solid lines) and corresponding standard error (dashed line for undamaged and dotted line for damaged trees) are displayed on left (L) y-axis. Right (R) y-axis displays respective values of sampling depth.

Fig 6

Raw tree-ring width chronologies of damaged/undamaged yew trees according to stem status in four localities: LAG (Lackov Grun), PAV (Pavelcovo), STR (Strazov) and VFA (Velka Fatra). Values of mean TRWs (solid lines) and corresponding standard error (dashed line for undamaged and dotted line for damaged trees) are displayed on left (L) y-axis. Right (R) y-axis displays respective values of sampling depth.
Raw tree-ring width chronologies of damaged/undamaged yew trees according to stem status in four localities: LAG (Lackov Grun), PAV (Pavelcovo), STR (Strazov) and VFA (Velka Fatra). Values of mean TRWs (solid lines) and corresponding standard error (dashed line for undamaged and dotted line for damaged trees) are displayed on left (L) y-axis. Right (R) y-axis displays respective values of sampling depth.

Fig 7

Results of the general linear model, which evaluates interactions of stem and crown damage in relation to yew female and male radial growth in selected periods: a) 2010–2015, b) 2005–2015, c) 2000–2015. Main effect (F) calculated for means of independent continuous variables (DBH). Vertical lines denote 0.95 confidence interval.
Results of the general linear model, which evaluates interactions of stem and crown damage in relation to yew female and male radial growth in selected periods: a) 2010–2015, b) 2005–2015, c) 2000–2015. Main effect (F) calculated for means of independent continuous variables (DBH). Vertical lines denote 0.95 confidence interval.

Fig 8

Plotted A-values against the sines of the included angle for all taller neighbours of central yew at localities a) LAG (Lackov Grun) and b) STR (Strazov). For A-value above 2.0, the sine value of the respective angle reaches Gt mainly of more than 0.8, which allows to select the threshold for selective release cutting of trees i in surrounding of the central yew trees j. In the cutting scheme, trees in the right upper corner are marked to be removed.
Plotted A-values against the sines of the included angle for all taller neighbours of central yew at localities a) LAG (Lackov Grun) and b) STR (Strazov). For A-value above 2.0, the sine value of the respective angle reaches Gt mainly of more than 0.8, which allows to select the threshold for selective release cutting of trees i in surrounding of the central yew trees j. In the cutting scheme, trees in the right upper corner are marked to be removed.

Fig 9

Example of cutting scheme (with cross-marked central yew tree in the middle of the three sampling plots) at localities a, b) LAG (Lackov Grun) and c) STR (Strazov). The set criteria of release cut are A-value = 2.5, Tdist < 0 and sineϑ ≥ 0.8. On two sampling plots at locality Lackov Grun with comparable stand basal area (density) a) G = 37.0 m2ha-1b) G = 38.8 m2ha-1, the intensity of release cut is higher (24.35% from basal area) on the plot a) with unfavourable canopy closure (Gt = 20.15), and on the plot b) with more favourable canopy closure (Gt = 11.91), removal of one neighbouring tree is planned. c) In low stand density (G = 17.2 m2ha-1) and low canopy closure (Gt = 4.78), cutting intervention is not indicated. In the figure, circles refer to position of trees on the sampling plot and their size corresponds to DBH of trees; red colour marks trees to be removed by the release cutting, green colour marks living trees, and grey colour marks of standing dead trees and stumps.
Example of cutting scheme (with cross-marked central yew tree in the middle of the three sampling plots) at localities a, b) LAG (Lackov Grun) and c) STR (Strazov). The set criteria of release cut are A-value = 2.5, Tdist < 0 and sineϑ ≥ 0.8. On two sampling plots at locality Lackov Grun with comparable stand basal area (density) a) G = 37.0 m2ha-1b) G = 38.8 m2ha-1, the intensity of release cut is higher (24.35% from basal area) on the plot a) with unfavourable canopy closure (Gt = 20.15), and on the plot b) with more favourable canopy closure (Gt = 11.91), removal of one neighbouring tree is planned. c) In low stand density (G = 17.2 m2ha-1) and low canopy closure (Gt = 4.78), cutting intervention is not indicated. In the figure, circles refer to position of trees on the sampling plot and their size corresponds to DBH of trees; red colour marks trees to be removed by the release cutting, green colour marks living trees, and grey colour marks of standing dead trees and stumps.

Basic statistics of European yew tree-ring series and standardised chronologies for the common periods in four localities of Slovakia

LocalityRaw seriesStandardised chronology
Time spanNtMSLTRWSDMSsAC1RBTEPS
LAG1766-2015371270.7130.440.2510.810.5260.976
PAV1897-201548940.8850.520.2570.760.3030.952
STR1782-2015302040.5510.320.2360.830.1870.869
VFA1755-2015351850.4950.270.2700.880.2240.967

Parameter estimates and goodness-of-fit statistics of the generalised linear regression model applied to test the relationship of stand canopy closure (shading) and crown damage (transparency) of yew adult trees.

Parameter estimates
EffectLevel of effectColumnEstimateSEp
Intercept n110.110.360.770.77
Intercept n222.480.440.000.00
Intercept n334.940.650.000.00
Gt4−30.090.020.000.00
Scale1.000.00
Goodness-of-fit statistics
DevianceScaled deviancePearson’s chi2Scaled P. chi2AICBICLoglikelyhood
Df359359359359
Statistic263.04263.04383.01383.01271.04282.23−131.52
Stat/Df0.730.731.071.07

Stand characteristics Gtrees, Gnekro, Gt, Gbeech and Pbeech surrounding central yew trees, their mean values and inter-correlations

MeanSDGnekro(m2ha-1)Gtrees(m2ha-1)GtGBeech(m2ha-1)PBeech (%)
Gnekro13.011.601.00−0.51−0.41−0.290.01
Gtrees31.18.50−0.511.000.620.670.04
Gt17.09.36−0.410.621.000.440.06
Gbeech18.66.98−0.290.670.441.000.71
Pbeech59.618.540.010.040.060.711.00

Description of the study sites

Study areaLackov GrunPavelcovoStrazovVelka Fatra
Orographic unitStare Hory Mts.Stare Hory Mts.Strazov MtsGreat Fatra
NameLAGPAVSTRVFA
Type of managementmanaged forest with the main protection function—soil erosion, water retentionmanaged forest with the main wood production function, 7% of plots are special purpose forests with main protection function52%—managed forest with the main protection function—soil erosion, water retention 48%—managed forest with the main wood production functionmanaged forest with the main protection function—soil erosion, water retention, 10%—managed forest with the main wood production function
Altitude (m asl)603–688640–720710–930940–1,030
ExpositionNES, NENW–N–NENW–N–NE
Slope inclination20–40°10–30°25–45°20–40°
Ground surfacesampling plots had no parent rock present on the surface groundsampling plots had no parent rock present on the surface ground13% of sampling plots had parent rock present on the surface ground25% of sampling plots had parent rock present on the surface ground
Canopy cover estimation0.7–1.0 all plots placed inside the forest stands0.7–1.0 57% of plots placed inside the forest stand 43% of plots placed in cut forest where yew trees were present in group of trees of remaining mature stand0.4–1.0 83% of plots placed inside the forest stands 17% of plots placed in cut forest where yew trees grow solitary or in small groups of trees0.7–1.0 all plots placed inside the forest stands
Sign of disturbance (based on stumps being present on the sampling plot)all plotsall plots except twoall plots1/3 of plots were recorded as having no disturbance sign
Relief93% of plots were established in the middle and upper part of the hill (slope)except one, all plots were established in the middle and upper part of the hill (slope)plots were established mainly (74%) in the middle part of the hill (slope)plots were established in the middle and upper part of the hill (slope)
Number of plots3030 (13-fieldmapped)2331
Size of the plot (m2)500500 (one plot—2,500)500 (1x300; 2x200)500
Radius (m)12.6212.6212.62 (1x9.77; 2x7.98)12.62
Number of tree species131099
Year of the sampling2017201520162017
Disturbancesmall scale signs of disturbance—selfthining or windthrow of treesregeneration cut has begun in forest standssmall scale signs of disturbance—selfthinning 17% of plots—finished regeneration cutsmall scale signs of disturbance—selfthining or windthrow of trees 6% of plots—regeneration cut

Two-way table showing no relationship between stem and crown damage of European yew trees expressed in relative frequencies (Pearson’s chi-square = 15.69; Df = 9; p < 0.07)

DegreeStem damage
Crown transparency1234All
13.3317.338.002.0030.67
212.0013.3310.674.6740.67
32.0010.676.674.0023.33
40.672.002.670.005.33
All18.0043.3328.0010.67100.00

Basic description of sampled male and female trees of European yew at four localities in Slovakia

LocalitySexTreesDBH (cm)Height (m)G(cm2)Crown width (m)Crown length (m)Pith age (years)
NtMeanSDMeanSDMeanSDMeanSDMeanSDMeanSD
LAG1623.93.7011.21.490.050.015.50.948.01.1613733.3
2121.64.799.82.690.040.025.80.957.42.4813522.0
PAV2721.17.1410.12.070.020.025.11.377.12.0510110.8
2120.35.6410.62.330.020.025.01.257.62.3110210.6
STR1730.37.779.62.650.080.047.11.557.42.3120633.3
1326.39.258.12.010.060.056.21.305.71.8922311.8
VFA1826.17.999.32.240.060.035.01.127.12.1418752.9
1521.64.527.71.150.040.024.80.945.31.2719935.7
227.04.178.80.780.060.024.70.406.21.062355.0
ALL15023.67.129.72.340.040.035.51.377.02.1515453.9

Results of ANOVA showing summary of all effects (locality and sex) of trees in stand characteristics Gtrees, Gnekro, Gt, Gbeech and Pbeech surrounding focal yew trees

Gnekro (m2ha-1)Gtrees (m2ha-1)Gt
EffectDfSSMSFpSSMSFpSSMSFp
Intercept123229232292510.0010358110358121010.0029759297595750.00
Locality35299176619.070.00255185017.20.003690123023.80.00
Sex10.210.210.00.962242244.50.0457957911.20.00
Error1141055792.6561949.3590051.7
Total11815882856710485
GBeech (m2ha-1)PBeech (%)
EffectDfSSMSFpSSMSFp
Intercept136796367968490.0039121639121612790.00
Locality34661553.580.02605920206.60.00
Sex12672676.10.01168.71690.550.46
Error114493943.334859305.8
Total118569740973
eISSN:
1897-1695
Język:
Angielski
Częstotliwość wydawania:
Volume Open
Dziedziny czasopisma:
Geosciences, other