[
1. Arif, M., Rehman, A., Abd El-Hack, M. E., Saeed, M., Khan, F., Akhtar, M., et al., 2018: Growth, carcass traits, cecal microbial counts, and blood chemistry of meat-type quail fed diets supplemented with humic acid and black cumin seeds. Asian-Australas. J. Anim. Sci., 31, 12, 1930‒1938. DOI: 10.5713/ajas.18.0148.10.5713/ajas.18.0148621273229879835
]Search in Google Scholar
[
2. Arpášová, H., Pistová, V., Hrnčár, C., Fík, M., Haščík, P., 2018: The impact of the humic acid and phytobiotics on performance and carcass parameters of broiler chickens. Acta Fytotechn. Zootechn., 21, 4, 173‒178. DOI: 10.15414/afz. 2018.21.04.173–1 78.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
3. Algawany, M., Abd El-Hack, M. E., Farag, M. R., Sachan, S., Karthik, K., Dhama, K., 2018: The use of probiotics as eco-friendly alternatives for antibiotics in poultry nutrition. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. Int., 25, 11, 10611‒10618. DOI: 10.1007/s11356-018–1 687-x.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
4. Avci, M., Denek, N., Kaplan, O., 2007: Effects of humic acid at different levels on growth performance, carcass yields and some biochemical parameters of quails. J. Anim. Vet. Adv., 6, 1, 1‒4. Available at https://medwelljournals.com/abstract/?doi=javaa.2007.1.4. Accessed August 16, 2022.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
5. Bahadori, Z., Esmaielzadeh, L., Karimi-Torshizi, M. A., Seidavi, A., Olivares, J., Rojas, S., et al., 2017: The effect of earthworm (Eisenia foetida) meal with vermi-humus on growth performance, haematology, immunity, intestinal microbiota, carcass characteristics, and meat quality of broiler chickens. Livest. Sci., 202, 74–81. DOI: 10.1016/j.livsci. 2017.05.010.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
6. Bailey, C. A., White, K. E., Domke, S. L., 1996: Evaluation of Menefee HumateTM on the performance of broilers. Poult. Sci., 75, Suppl. 1, 84.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
7. Carvalho, L. H. M., De Koe, T., Tavares, P. B., 1998: An improved molybdenum blue method for simultaneous determination of inorganic phosphate and arsenate. Ecotoxicol. Environ. Restoration, 1, 1, 13–19.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
8. Cunniff, P., 1995: Official Methods of Analysis of AOAC. 16th edn., Association of Official Analytical Chemists, Arlington, USA.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
9. Daněk, P., Paseka, A., Smola, J., Ondráček, J., Bečková, R., Rozkot, M., 2005: Influence of lecithin emulsifier on the utilisation of nutrients and growth of piglets after weaning. Czech J. Anim. Sci., 50, 10, 459–465.10.17221/4245-CJAS
]Search in Google Scholar
[
10. Demeterová, M., Mariščáková, R., Pistl, J., Naď, P., Šamudovská, A., 2009: The effect of the probiotic strain Enterococcus faecium DSM 7134 in combination with natural humic substances on performance and health of broiler chickens. Berl. Munch. Ttierarztl. Wochenschr., 122, 9‒10, 370‒377.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
11. Dominguez-Negrete, A., Gómez-Rosales, S., de Lourdes Angeles, M., López-Hernández, L. H., Reis-de Souza, T. C., López-García, Y., et al., 2019: Effect of the addition of humic substances as growth promoter in broiler chickens under two feeding regimens. Animals, 9, 12, 1101. DOI: 10. 3390/ani9121101.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
12. El-Ghany, W. A., Abdel-Latif, M. A., Hosny, F., Alatfeehy, N. M., Noreldin, A. E., Quesnell. R. R., et al., 2022: Comparative efficacy of postbiotic, probiotic, and antibiotic against necrotic enteritis in broiler chickens. Poult. Sci., 101, 8, 101988. DOI: 10.1016/j.psj.2022.101988.10.1016/j.psj.2022.101988927237535809347
]Search in Google Scholar
[
13. European Commission, 2009: Commission Regulation (EC) No 152/2009 of 27 January 2009 laying down the methods of sampling and analysis for the official control of feed. OJEU, 54. 1‒130. http://data.europa.eu/eli/reg/2009/152/oj. Accessed July 5, 2022.10.1016/S1351-4210(09)70289-6
]Search in Google Scholar
[
14. Gómez-Rosales, S., de Angeles, M., 2015: Addition of a worm leachate as source of humic substances in the drinking water of broiler chickens. Asian-Australas. J. Anim. Sci., 28, 2, 215‒222. DOI: 10.5713/ajas.14.0321.10.5713/ajas.14.0321428316625557817
]Search in Google Scholar
[
15. Gómez-Rosales, S., Angeles, M. L., López-Hernández, L. H., López-Garcia, Y. R., Domínguez-Negrete, A., 2022: Responses of broiler chickens fed low or high non-starch polysaccharide diets and the addition of humic substances from a worm compost. Braz. J. Poult. Sci., 24, 4, 11, 1087. DOI: 10.1590/1806-9061-2021–1 510.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
16. Gugliemo, C. G., Karasov, W. H., 1993: Endogenous mass and energy losses in ruffed grouse. The Auk, 110, 2, 386‒390.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
17. Hassan, S. M., 2014: Effect of adding dietary humate on productive performance of broiler chicks. Asian J. Poult. Sci., 8, 2, 23‒31. DOI: 10.3923/ajpsaj.204.23.31.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
18. Hudák, M., Semjon, B., Marcinčáková, D., Bujňák, L., Naď, P., Koréneková, B., et al., 2021: Effect of broilers chicken diet supplementation with natural and acidified humic substances on quality of produced breast meat. Animals, 11, 1087. DOI: 10.3390/ani11041087.10.3390/ani11041087806914133920276
]Search in Google Scholar
[
19. International Humic Substances Society (IHSS), 2007: What are humic substances ? Newsletter, IHSS, Number 38, 2. http://humic-substances.org/wp-content/uploads/NL_38_2007.pdf. Accessed August 15, 2022.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
20. Jaďuttová, I., Marcinčáková, D., Bartkovský, M., Semjon, B., Harčárová, M., Nagyová, A., et al., 2019: The effect of dietary humic substances on the fattening performance, carcass yield, blood biochemistry parameters and bone mineral profile of broiler chickens. Acta Vet. Brno, 88, 307–313. DOI: 10.2754/avb201988030307.10.2754/avb201988030307
]Search in Google Scholar
[
21. Johnson, L. A., Deep, A., Classen, H., 2014: Digestibility and performance responses of broiler chickens fed a pea-based diet with different levels of dietary microbial phytase. USURJ, 1, 1, 39‒44. DOI: 10.32396/usurj.vlil.53.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
22. Kocabagli, N., Alp, M., Acar, N., Kahraman, R., 2002: The effects of dietary humate supplementation on broiler growth and carcass yield. Poult. Sci., 81, 227–230. DOI: 10.1093/ps/81.2.227.10.1093/ps/81.2.22711873831
]Search in Google Scholar
[
23. Konieczka, P., Józefiak, D., Kinsner, M., Smulikowska, S., 2021: Effects of high-moisture corn preserved with organic acids combined with rapeseed meal and peas on performance and gut microbiota activity of broiler chickens. Anim. Feed Sci. Technol., 280, 115063. DOI: 10.1016/j.anifeedsci. 2021.115063.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
24. Kralik, G. Kralik, Z., Grčević, M., Hanžek, D., 2018: Quality of chicken meat. In Yücel, B., Taşkin, T.: Animal Husbandry and Nutrition. 1st edn., Intechopen, 63‒94. DOI: 10.5772/intechopen.72865.10.5772/intechopen.72865
]Search in Google Scholar
[
25. Kühnert, M., Bartels, K. P., Kröll, S., Lange, N., 1991: Veterinary pharmaceuticals containing humic acid for therapy and prophylaxis for gastro-intestinal diseases of dog and cat. Mon. Vet., 46, 1, 4‒8.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
26. Lever, M., 1977: Carbohydrate determination with 4-hydroxybenzoic acid hydrazide (PAHBAH): Effect of bismuth on the reaction. Anal. Biochem., 81, 1, 21–27. DOI: 10.1016/0003-2697(77)90594-2.10.1016/0003-2697(77)90594-2900479
]Search in Google Scholar
[
27. Levkut, M., Marcin, A., Lenhardt, Ľ., Porvaz, P., Revajová, V., Šoltysová, B., et al., 2010: Effect of sage extract on alkaline phosphatase, enterocyte proliferative activity and growth performance in chickens. Acta Vet. Brno, 79, 2, 177‒183. DOI: 10.2754/avb201079020177.10.2754/avb201079020177
]Search in Google Scholar
[
28. Levkut, M., Marcin, A., Revajová, V., Lenhardt, Ľ., Danielovič, I., Hecl, J., et al., 2011: Influence of oregano extract on the intestine, some plasma parameters and growth performance in chickens. Acta Vet., 61, 2‒3, 215‒225. DOI: 10. 2298/AVB1103215L.10.2298/AVB1103215L
]Search in Google Scholar
[
29. Marcin, A., Levkut, M., Revajová, V., Šoltysová, B., Naď, P., 2016: Influence of Salvia officinalis essential oil on digestion parameters and intestinal microflora of broiler chickens. Folia Vet., 60, 1, 5‒14. DOI: 10.1515/fv-2016-0001.10.1515/fv-2016-0001
]Search in Google Scholar
[
30. Marcin, A., Bujňák, L., Mihok, T., Naď, P., 2020: Effects of humic substances with urea on protozoal population and fermentation in the rumen of sheep. Bulg. J. Vet. Med., 23, 1, 60‒69. DOI: 10.15547/bjvm.2199.10.15547/bjvm.2199
]Search in Google Scholar
[
31. McCarthy, M. D., Bronk, D. A., 2008: Analytical methods for the study of nitrogen. In Capone, D. G., Bronk, D. A., Mulholland, M. R., Carpenter, E. J.: Nitrogen in the Marine Environment. 2nd edn., Academic Press, Elsevier, 1219‒ 1275. DOI: 10.1016/B978-0–1 2-372522-6.00028–1.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
32. Mudroňová, D., Karaffová, V., Pešulová, T., Koščová, J., Cingeľová Maruščáková, I., Bartkovský, M., et al., 2020: The effect of humic substances on gut microbiota and immune response of broilers. Food Agric. Immunol., 31, 1, 137‒149. DOI: 10.1080/09540105.2019.1707780.10.1080/09540105.2019.1707780
]Search in Google Scholar
[
33. Piccolo, A., 2002: The supramolecular structure of humic substances. A novel understanding of humus chemistry and implications in soil science. Adv. Agron., 75, 57–134. DOI: 10.1016/S0065-2113(02)75003-7.10.1016/S0065-2113(02)75003-7
]Search in Google Scholar
[
34. Písařiková, B., Zralý, Z, Herzig, I., 2010: The effect of dietary sodium humate supplementation on nutrient digestibility in growing pigs. Acta. Vet. Brno, 79, 349‒353. DOI: 10.2754/avb201079030349.10.2754/avb201079030349
]Search in Google Scholar
[
35. Slominski, P., 2011: Recent advances in research on enzymes for poultry diets. Poult. Sci., 90, 9, 2013‒2023. DOI: 10.3382/ps.2011-01372.10.3382/ps.2011-0137221844268
]Search in Google Scholar
[
36. Schuhmacher, A., Gropp, J. M., 2000: Effect of humic acids on health state and performance of weaners. Proc. Soc. Nutr. Physiol., 9, 77.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
37. Taklimi Seyed Mozafar, S. M., Ghahri, H., Isakan, M. A., 2012: Influence of different levels of humic acid and esterified glucomannan on growth performance and intestinal morphology of broiler chickens. Agric. Sci., 3, 5, 663‒668. DOI: 10.4236/as.2012.3508.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
38. Van Loon, J. C., 1980: Analytical Atomic Absorption Spectroscopy, Selected Methods. Academic Press, New York, 348 pp.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
39. Van Soest, P. J., Robertson, J. B., Lewis, B. A., 1991: Methods for dietary fibre, neutral detergent fibre, and non-starch polysaccharides in relation to animal nutrition. J. Dairy Sci., 74, 10, 3583–3597. DOI: 10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(91)78551-2.10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(91)78551-21660498
]Search in Google Scholar
[
40. Váradyová, Z., Kišidayová, S., Jalč., D., 2009: Effect of humic acid on fermentation and ciliate protoyoan population in rumen fluid of sheep in vitro. J. Sci. Food Agric., 89, 1936‒1940. DOI: 10.1002/jsfa.3675.10.1002/jsfa.3675
]Search in Google Scholar
[
41. Yasar, S., Gokcimen, A., Aluntas, I., Yonden, Z., Petekkaya, E., 2002: Performance and ileal histomorphology of rats treated with humic acid preparations. J. Anim. Physiol. Anim. Nutr. (Berl.), 86, 7‒8, 257‒264. DOI: 10.1046/j.1439-0396.2002.00383.x.10.1046/j.1439-0396.2002.00383.x15379912
]Search in Google Scholar
[
42. Yüca, S., Gul, M., 2021: Effect of adding humate to the ration of dairy cows on yield performance. Ankara Univ. Vet. Fak. Derg., 68, 7–14. DOI: 10.33988/auvfd.626066.10.33988/auvfd.626066
]Search in Google Scholar
