[
1. Berry, S. L., Read, D. H., Famula, T. R., Mongini, A., Döpfer, D., 2012: Long-term observations on the dynamics of bovine digital dermatitis lesions on a California dairy after topical treatment with lincomycin HCl. Vet. J., 193, 654—658. DOI: 10.1016/j.tvjl.2012.06.048.10.1016/j.tvjl.2012.06.04822892182
]Search in Google Scholar
[
2. Cha, E., Hertl, J. A., Bar, D., Grohn, Y. T., 2010: The cost of different types of lameness in dairy cows calculated by dynamic programming. Prev. Vet. Med., 97, 1—8. DOI: 10.1016/j. prevetmed.2010.07.011.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
3. Dolecheck, K. A., Dwyer, R. M., Overton, M. W., Bewley, J. M., 2018: A survey of United States dairy hoof care professionals on costs associated with treatment of foot disorders J. Dairy Sci., 101, 8313—8326. DOI: 10.3168/jds.2018-14718.10.3168/jds.2018-1471830126603
]Search in Google Scholar
[
4. Döpfer, D., Koopmans, A., Meijer, F. A., Szakáll, I., Schukken, Y. H., Klee, W., et al., 1997: Histological and bacterio-logical evaluation of digital dermatitis in cattle, with special reference to spirocheates and Campylobacter faecalis. Vet. Rec., 140, 620—623.10.1136/vr.140.24.6209228692
]Search in Google Scholar
[
5. Evans, N. J., Brown, J. M., Murray, R. D., Getty, B., Birtles, R. J., Hart, C. A., et al., 2011: Characterization of novel bovine gastointestinal tract treponema isolates and comparison with bovine digital dermatitis treponemes. Appl. Environ. Microbiol., 77, 138—147. DOI: 10.1128/AEM.00993-10.10.1128/AEM.00993-10301971221057019
]Search in Google Scholar
[
6. Evans, N. J., Brown, J. M., Demirkan, I., Murray, R. D., Vink, W. D., Blowey, R. W., et al., 2008: Three unique groups of spirochetes isolated from digital dermatitis lesions in UK cattle. Vet. Microbiol., 130, 141—150. DOI: 10.1016/j.vetmic. 2007.12.019.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
7. Gomez, A., Cook, N. B., Bernardoni, N. D., Rieman, J., Du-sick, A. F., Hartshorn, R., et al., 2012: An experimental infection model to induce digital dermatitis infection in cattle. J. Dairy Sci., 95, 1821—1830. DOI: 10.3168/jds.2011-4754.10.3168/jds.2011-475422459830
]Search in Google Scholar
[
8. Higginson Cutler, J. H., Cramer, G., Walter, J. J., Millman, S. T., Kelton, D. F., 2013: Randomized clinical trial of tetracycline hydrochloride bandage and paste treatments for resolution of lesions and pain associated with digital dermatitis in dairy cattle. J. Dairy Sci., 96, 7550—7557. DOI: 10.3168/jds.2012-6384.10.3168/jds.2012-638424140336
]Search in Google Scholar
[
9. Hulek, M., Sommerfeld-Stur, I., Kofler, J., 2010: Prevalence of digital dermatitis in first lactating cows assessed at breeding cattle auctions. Vet. J., 183, 161—165. DOI: 10.1016/j.tvjl. 2008.11.001.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
10. Jacobs, C., Orsel, K., Mason, S., Barkema, H. W., 2018: Comparison of effects of routine topical treatments in the milking parlor on digital dermatitis lesions. J. Dairy Sci., 101, 5255—5266. DOI: 10.3168/jds.2017-13984.10.3168/jds.2017-1398429573803
]Search in Google Scholar
[
11. Klawitter, M., Döpfer, D., Braden, T. B., Amene, E., Mueller, K. E., 2019: Randomised clinical trial showing the curative effect of bandaging on M2-stage lesions of digital dermatitis in dairy cows. Vet. Rec. Open, 6, e000264. DOI: 10.1136/vetreco-2017-000264.10.1136/vetreco-2017-000264654110131205723
]Search in Google Scholar
[
12. Krull, A. C., Cooper, V. L., Coatney, J. W., Shearer, J. K., Gorden, P. J., Plummer, P. J., 2016: A highly effective protocol for the rapid and consistent induction of digital dermatitis in Holstein calves. PLOS ONE, 11, 4, e0154481. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0154481.10.1371/journal.pone.0154481484780027119564
]Search in Google Scholar
[
13. O’Connell, N., 2013: Digital dermatitis: tackling an emerging problem. Vet. Rec., 173, 577—578. DOI: 10.3390/ani5030369.10.3390/ani5030369459869126479371
]Search in Google Scholar
[
14. Orsel, K., Plummer, P., Shearer, J., De Buck, J., Carter, S. D., Guatteo, R., et al., 2017: Missing pieces of the puzzle to effectively control digital dermatitis. Transbound. Emerg. Dis., 65, 186—198. DOI: 10.1111/tbed.12729.10.1111/tbed.1272929124910
]Search in Google Scholar
[
15. Palmer, M. A., O’Connell, N., 2015: Digital dermatitis in dairy cows: A review of risk factors and potential sources of between-animal variation and susceptibility. Animals (Basel), 5, 512—535. DOI: 10.3390/ani5030369.10.3390/ani5030369459869126479371
]Search in Google Scholar
[
16. Potterton, S. L., Bell, N. J., Whay, H. R., Berry, E. A., Atkinson, O. C. D., Dean, R. S., et al., 2012: A descriptive review of the peer and non-peer reviewed literature on the treatment and prevention of foot lameness in cattle published between 2000 and 2011. Vet. J., 193, 612—616. DOI: 10.1016/j.tvjl. 2012.06.040.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
17. Schöpke, K., Gomez, A., Dunbar, K. A., Swalve, H. H., Döpfer, D., 2015: Investigating the genetic background of bovine digital dermatitis using improved definitions of clinical status. J. Dairy Sci., 98, 8164—8174. DOI: 10.3168/jds.2015-9485.10.3168/jds.2015-948526364113
]Search in Google Scholar
[
18. Zuerner, R. L., Heidari, M., Elliott, M. K., Alt, D. P., Neill, J. D., 2007: Papillomatous digital dermatitis spirochetes suppress the bovine macrophage innate immune response. Vet. Microbiol., 125, 256—264. DOI: 10.1016/j.vetmic.2007.06.001.10.1016/j.vetmic.2007.06.00117628359
]Search in Google Scholar
