Leather products, especially those often and intensively used, are an ideal environment for microbial growth. The leather protection against microbes at different stages of the tanning process does not make it completely resistant to microflora. The availability of various sources of nutrients stimulates spores to germinate, and then supports the growth of hyphae [1]. Also, a sufficiently high temperature and moisture content enhances bacterial and fungal colonisation by different microbes, such as
Finished leather, which is intended for the production of different leather products, should be characterised by increased microbiological resistance, consisting in a reduction in colonising microorganisms during storage and use. In order to prevent the appearance and development of various types of microorganisms and to prevent damage to leather, it is treated with certain biocides. Antimicrobial agents (biocides) used in the leather industry can be classified as quaternary ammonium compounds, isothiazoles, halogenated organic compounds, such as 2-bromo-2-nitro-propane-1,3-diol, isothiazoles and halogenated organic compounds containing heterocycles, such as derivatives of benzothiazole [1]. Unfortunately, biocides currently used in the leather industry are generally harmful to human health and the environment, and their use has been or shall be restricted or even banned. It affects consumers who are in contact with the products, penetrating through the clothes onto the consumer's skin, causing painful skin, dermatitis, including itching, irritation and redness. Therefore, the use of biocides for the protection of materials should be controlled within the scope of the dose applied and intended use of the final product [1]. Changes in consumers' preferences toward more natural products than synthetic ones stimulate also the use of natural products in the leather tanning process. In addition, numerous recent studies have reported the biological activity of essential oils: they exhibit antibacterial, fungicidal, antioxidant, and antiradical activities [5].
Essential oils are aroma products extracted from plants mainly by steam distillation. In terms of chemistry, volatile oils are complex mixtures of aliphatic and aromatic hydrocarbons, aldehydes, alcohols, esters and other constituents [6]. Depending on the type and amounts of compounds contained, essential oils show various properties, e.g. they inhibit the growth of infectious microbes, prevent fungal growth, accelerate wound healing and mitigate inflammations. Essential oils are widely used as components of drugs, biologically active additives and dietary supplements, as well as in aromatherapy and the food and cosmetics industries [5, 7]. In addition, there have been attempts worldwide to use essential oils as natural bioactive substances for protecting leathers in the tanning industry [1, 2, 5]. Širvaitytė et al. (2012) investigated the possibility of using essential oils of
The aim of this work was to investigate the antifungal activity of thyme and tea tree oils applied to finished chromium leather intended for leather products, especially for leather accessories. The work included the selection of essential oils, determination of doses, the application of selected preparation to different leathers, and verification of antifungal activity.
Two ready-made commercial essential oils (tea tree and thyme oils) were selected for the tests. Tea tree and thyme essential oils were obtained from CHDL SA (INDIA). They are 100% pure essential oils extracted by steam distillation, intended for the production of perfumes. Thyme oil is a colorless, reddish or yellow liquid with a strong aromatic thyme-like odour. The main ingredients of the oil are thymol (up to 55%), cymene (15–28%), linalool (4–6.5%) and carvacrol (1–4%). Tea tree essential oil is also a complex mixture of hydrocarbons and terpenes, consisting of approximately 100 components. All other chemicals were obtained from Polaura (Poland) unless otherwise specified. The following concentrations of essential oils were selected for the research: 1, 2 and 5%. These are the minimum concentrations ensuring acceptable organoleptic characteristics of the leather tested.
Four types of finished chromium tanned leather were selected for the tests: I - black grain cowhide with a thickness of 1.30 mm, II - black grain cowhide with a thickness of 2.30 mm, III - brown full-grain cowhide with a thickness of 1.65 mm, and IV - purple cow nubuck with a thickness of 2.10 mm. Each of the four leathers tested was soaked in essential oils: tea tree oil at concentrations of 1, 2 and 5%, and thyme oil at concentrations of 1, 2 and 5%. The symbols of samples treated with thyme and tea tree essential oils are presented in
Description of leather samples tested
Reference leather without an antimicrobial finish | I KON | I |
Leather treated with 1% thyme essential oil | I 1t | I |
Leather treated with 2% thyme essential oil | I 2t | I |
Leather treated with 5% thyme essential oil | I 5t | I |
Leather treated with 1% tea tree essential oil | I 1h | I |
Leather treated with 2% tea tree essential oil | I 2h | I |
Leather treated with 5% tea tree essential oil | I 5h | I |
Reference leather without an antimicrobial finish | II KON | II |
Leather treated with 1% thyme essential oil | II 1t | II |
Leather treated with 2% thyme essential oil | II 2t | II |
Leather treated with 5% thyme essential oil | II 5t | II |
Leather treated with 1% tea tree essential oil | II 1h | II |
Leather treated with 2% tea tree essential oil | II 2h | II |
Leather treated with 5% tea tree essential oil | II 5h | II |
Reference leather without an antimicrobial finish | III KON | III |
Leather treated with 1% thyme essential oil | III 1t | III |
Leather treated with 2% thyme essential oil | III 2t | III |
Leather treated with 5% thyme essential oil | III 5t | III |
Leather treated with 1% tea tree essential oil | III 1h | III |
Leather treated with 2% tea tree essential oil | III 2h | III |
Leather treated with 5% tea tree essential oil | III 5h | III |
Reference leather without an antimicrobial finish | IV KON | IV |
Leather treated with 1% thyme essential oil | IV 1t | IV |
Leather treated with 2% thyme essential oil | IV 2t | IV |
Leather treated with 5% thyme essential oil | IV 5t | IV |
Leather treated with 1% tea tree essential oil | IV 1h | IV |
Leather treated with 2% tea tree essential oil | IV 2h | IV |
Leather treated with 5% tea tree essential oil | IV 5h | IV |
The effectiveness of the essential oils selected (tea tree and thyme essential oils) was tested for three selected fungal strains:
Example photo of the microorganisms tested: Aspergillus niger, Chaetomiuum globosum, Candida albicans (KEYENCE VHX 95OF)
Evaluation of resistance to fungi and determination of the antifungal effect were conducted according to the PNEN 14119:2005 standard [8]. Rectangles measuring 2.5 cm x 8 cm were cut from each leather sample and then trimmed to a width of 2 cm. The tests were carried out in triplicate for each trial. The working specimens were exposed to the standard fungal test spore mixture on a complete agar medium. Test samples prepared in this way were incubated for 2 weeks. During and after the cultivation, the plates were observed with the unaided eye and under a stereoscopic microscope. The fungal growth was evaluated on the basis of observations, according to the scale described in
Grading scale for visible antifungal effects
0 | No visible growth assessed under the microscope (magnification 50x), |
1 | No visible growth without magnifying devices, clearly visible under the microscope. |
2 | Visible increase without magnifying devices, covering up to 25% of the examination surface. |
3 | Visible increase without magnifying devices, covering up to 50% of the examination surface. |
4 | Significant increase, covering more than 50% of the surface tested. |
5 | Heavy growth, covering the surface tested. |
Results of the microbiological tests of the leathers selected are presented in
Evaluation of the antifungal activity of leather samples I against strains tested
5 | 5 | 5 | 0 | 5 | 5 | 5 | |
5 | 5 | 3 | 0 | 5 | 5 | 5 | |
5 | 5 | 2 | 0 | 5 | 5 | 5 |
Evaluation of the antifungal activity of leather samples II against strains tested
5 | 5 | 5 | 4 | 5 | 5 | 5 | |
5 | 4 | 4 | 2 | 5 | 5 | 5 | |
5 | 4 | 4 | 0 | 2 | 5 | 5 |
Evaluation of the antifungal activity of leather samples III against strains tested
5 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 5 | 4 | |
2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 2 | |
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Evaluation of the antifungal activity of leather samples IV against strains tested
5 | 5 | 4 | 0 | 5 | 5 | 5 | |
5 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 5 | 5 | |
5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 0 | 0 |
Very similar results were obtained for leather II (
The results for leather III were slightly different (
According to the results obtained in the present work, thyme essential oil has decidedly stronger antifungal activity than tea tree essential oil. Moreover, the increased antimicrobial activity of thyme essential oil was observed with an increase in the concentration of this oil applied to the leather. The leather treated with 5% thyme essential oils inhibited the growth of all strains tested:
As the concentration of thyme essential oil applied to the leather was increased, the antimicrobial activity of this essential oil also increased. The application of 5% thyme essential oil to leather samples inhibited the growth of all strains tested.
No fungistatic effect against
The III KON sample without antimicrobial finishing showed antifungal activity. It may be caused by the presence of additional substances in the leather, e.g. dyes or chromium, which may be toxic to microorganisms.
The use of a natural bioactive substance such as thyme essential oil for the modification of leather in the leather finishing process may be an alternative to biocides used in the tanning industry, as well as which it can improve the hygienic properties of leather products.