This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Arumäe, T., Lang, M. 2020. Airborne laser scanning as a basis for forest mensuration. – Forestry Studies / Metsanduslikud Uurimused, 73, 136–144.ArumäeT.LangM.2020Airborne laser scanning as a basis for forest mensuration7313614410.2478/fsmu-2020-0020Search in Google Scholar
Buongiorno, J., Dahir, S., Lu, H.C., Lin, C.R. 1994. Tree size diversity and economic returns in uneven-aged forest stands. – Forest Science, 40, 83–103.BuongiornoJ.DahirS.LuH.C.LinC.R.1994Tree size diversity and economic returns in uneven-aged forest stands4083103Search in Google Scholar
Gadow, K.v. 1993. New variables for describing stands of trees. (Zur Bestandesbeschreibung in der Forsteinrichtung). – Forst und Holz, 48(21), 602–606. (In German).GadowK.v.1993New variables for describing stands of trees. (Zur Bestandesbeschreibung in der Forsteinrichtung)4821602606(In German).Search in Google Scholar
Gadow, K.v. 1999. Forest structure and diversity. (Waldstruktur und Diversität). – Allgemeine Forst- und Jagdzeitung, 170(7), 117–122. (In German).GadowK.v.1999Forest structure and diversity. (Waldstruktur und Diversität)1707117122(In German).Search in Google Scholar
Gadow, K.v., Hui, G.Y. 2002. Characterising forest spatial structure and diversity. – Bjoerk, L. (ed.). Sustainable Forestry in Temperate Regions. Lund, Sweden, SUFOR, University of Lund, 20–30.GadowK.v.HuiG.Y.2002Characterising forest spatial structure and diversityBjoerkL.(ed.).Lund, SwedenSUFOR, University of Lund2030Search in Google Scholar
Gadow, K.v., Zhang, C.Y., Wehenkel, C., Pommerening, A., Corral-Rivas, J., Korol, M., Myklush, S., Hui, G.Y., Kiviste, A., Zhao, X.H. 2012. Forest structure and diversity. – Pukkala, T., Gadow, K.v. (eds.). Continuous Cover Forestry. Managing Forest Ecosystems. Dordrecht, Springer Netherlands, 29–83.GadowK.v.ZhangC.Y.WehenkelC.PommereningA.Corral-RivasJ.KorolM.MyklushS.HuiG.Y.KivisteA.ZhaoX.H.2012Forest structure and diversityPukkalaT.GadowK.v.(eds.).DordrechtSpringer Netherlands298310.1007/978-94-007-2202-6_2Search in Google Scholar
Hui, G.Y., Gadow, K.v. 2002. The optimum standard angle of the Winkelmass. (Das Winkelmass – Herleitung des optimalen Standardwinkels). – Allgemeine Forst- und Jagdzeitung, 173(10), 173–177. (In German).HuiG.Y.GadowK.v.2002The optimum standard angle of the Winkelmass. (Das Winkelmass – Herleitung des optimalen Standardwinkels)17310173177(In German).Search in Google Scholar
Huuskonen, S., Domisch, T., Finér, L., Hantula, J., Hynynen, J., Matala, J., Miina, J., Neuvonen, S., Nevalainen, S., Niemistö, P., Nikula, A., Piri, T., Siitonen, J., Smolander, A., Tonteri, T., Uotila, K., Viiri, H. 2021. What is the potential for replacing monocultures with mixed-species stands to enhance ecosystem services in boreal forests in Fennoscandia? – Forest Ecology and Management, 479, 118558. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2020.118558.HuuskonenS.DomischT.FinérL.HantulaJ.HynynenJ.MatalaJ.MiinaJ.NeuvonenS.NevalainenS.NiemistöP.NikulaA.PiriT.SiitonenJ.SmolanderA.TonteriT.UotilaK.ViiriH.2021What is the potential for replacing monocultures with mixed-species stands to enhance ecosystem services in boreal forests in Fennoscandia?479118558https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2020.118558.10.1016/j.foreco.2020.118558Search in Google Scholar
Juchheim, J. 2020. Quantifying the impact of forest management intensity and tree species diversity on individual tree shape and three-dimensional stand structure. – Doctoral dissertation. Göttingen, Georg-August-University of Göttingen. 125 pp.JuchheimJ.2020Doctoral dissertation.GöttingenGeorg-August-University of Göttingen125Search in Google Scholar
Kint, V., van Meirvenne, M., Nachtergale, L., Geudens, G., Lust, N. 2003. Spatial methods for quantifying forest stand structure development: a comparison between nearest-neighbor indices and variogram analysis. – Forest Science, 49(1), 36–49.KintV.van MeirvenneM.NachtergaleL.GeudensG.LustN.2003Spatial methods for quantifying forest stand structure development: a comparison between nearest-neighbor indices and variogram analysis4913649Search in Google Scholar
Kiviste, A., Hordo, M., Kangur, A., Kardakov, A., Laarmann, D., Lilleleht, A., Metslaid, S., Sims, A., Korjus, H. 2015. Monitoring and modeling of forest ecosystems: the Estonian Network of Forest Research Plots. – Forestry Studies / Metsanduslikud Uurimused, 62, 26–38.KivisteA.HordoM.KangurA.KardakovA.LaarmannD.LillelehtA.MetslaidS.SimsA.KorjusH.2015Monitoring and modeling of forest ecosystems: the Estonian Network of Forest Research Plots62263810.1515/fsmu-2015-0003Search in Google Scholar
Korjus, H., Laarmann, D., Kiviste, A. 2012. Analysis of the Estonian Forest Conservation Area Network. – Journal of Environmental Science and Engineering. B, 1(6B), 779–788.KorjusH.LaarmannD.KivisteA.2012Analysis of the Estonian Forest Conservation Area Network16B779788Search in Google Scholar
Laarmann, D., Korjus, H., Sims, A., Stanturf, J.A., Kiviste, A., Köster, K. 2009. Analysis of forest naturalness and tree mortality patterns in Estonia. – Forest Ecology and Management, 258S, S187–S195.LaarmannD.KorjusH.SimsA.StanturfJ.A.KivisteA.KösterK.2009Analysis of forest naturalness and tree mortality patterns in Estonia258SS187S19510.1016/j.foreco.2009.07.014Search in Google Scholar
Maa-amet. 2021. Altitude points for aerial laser scanning (ALS). Estonian Land Board, geoportal. [WWW document]. – URL https://geoportaal.maaamet.ee/est/Ruumiandmed/Korgusandmed/Aerolaserskaneerimise-korguspunktid-p499.html. [Accessed 21 October 2022].Maa-amet2021[WWW document]. – URL https://geoportaal.maaamet.ee/est/Ruumiandmed/Korgusandmed/Aerolaserskaneerimise-korguspunktid-p499.html. [Accessed 21 October 2022].Search in Google Scholar
McElhinny, C., Gibbons, P., Brack, C., Bauhus, J. 2005. Forest and woodland stand structural complexity: its definition and measurement. – Forest Ecology and Management, 218(1–3), 1–24.McElhinnyC.GibbonsP.BrackC.BauhusJ.2005Forest and woodland stand structural complexity: its definition and measurement2181–312410.1016/j.foreco.2005.08.034Search in Google Scholar
Mikoláš, M., Svitok, M., Bollmann, K., Reif, J., Bače, R., Janda, P., Trotsiuk, V., Čada, V., Vítková, L., Teodosiu, M., Coppes, J., Schurman, J.S., Morrissey, R.C., Mrhalová, H., Svoboda, M. 2017. Mixed-severity natural disturbances promote the occurrence of an endangered umbrella species in primary forests. – Forest Ecology and Management, 405, 210–218.MikolášM.SvitokM.BollmannK.ReifJ.BačeR.JandaP.TrotsiukV.ČadaV.VítkováL.TeodosiuM.CoppesJ.SchurmanJ.S.MorrisseyR.C.MrhalováH.SvobodaM.2017Mixed-severity natural disturbances promote the occurrence of an endangered umbrella species in primary forests40521021810.1016/j.foreco.2017.09.006Search in Google Scholar
Pommerening, A., Särkkä, A. 2013. What mark variograms tell about spatial plant interactions. – Ecological Modelling, 251, 64–72.PommereningA.SärkkäA.2013What mark variograms tell about spatial plant interactions251647210.1016/j.ecolmodel.2012.12.009Search in Google Scholar
Pretzsch, H. 1995. On the effect of the spatial distribution of trees on the stand growth. (Zum Einfluss des Baumvertielungsmusters auf den Bestandszuwachs). – Allgemeine Forst- und Jagdzeitung, 166, 190–201. (In German).PretzschH.1995On the effect of the spatial distribution of trees on the stand growth. (Zum Einfluss des Baumvertielungsmusters auf den Bestandszuwachs)166190201(In German).Search in Google Scholar
Põldveer, E. 2022. Quantitative assessment of stand structural traits and health condition in hemiboreal forest ecosystems. – Doctoral thesis. Tartu, Estonian University of Life Sciences. 106 pp. Available online: https://dspace.emu.ee/handle/10492/7248.PõldveerE.2022Doctoral thesis.TartuEstonian University of Life Sciences106Available online: https://dspace.emu.ee/handle/10492/7248.Search in Google Scholar
Põldveer, E., Korjus, H., Kiviste, A., Kangur, A., Paluots, T., Laarmann, D. 2020. Assessment of spatial stand structure of hemiboreal conifer dominated forests according to different levels of naturalness. – Ecological Indicators, 110, 105944.PõldveerE.KorjusH.KivisteA.KangurA.PaluotsT.LaarmannD.2020Assessment of spatial stand structure of hemiboreal conifer dominated forests according to different levels of naturalness11010594410.1016/j.ecolind.2019.105944Search in Google Scholar
Põldveer, E., Potapov, A., Korjus, H., Kiviste, A., Stanturf, J.A., Arumäe, T., Kangur, A., Laarmann, D. 2021. The structural complexity index SCI is useful for quantifying structural diversity of Estonian hemiboreal forests. – Forest Ecology and Management, 490(1–3), 119093.PõldveerE.PotapovA.KorjusH.KivisteA.StanturfJ.A.ArumäeT.KangurA.LaarmannD.2021The structural complexity index SCI is useful for quantifying structural diversity of Estonian hemiboreal forests4901–311909310.1016/j.foreco.2021.119093Search in Google Scholar
Reimand, S. 2019. Assessment of stand structural indices on forest permanent sample plots. – Bachelor’s thesis. Tartu, Estonian University of Life Sciences. 39 pp. (In Estonian with English summary).ReimandS.2019Bachelor’s thesis.TartuEstonian University of Life Sciences39(In Estonian with English summary).Search in Google Scholar
Seidel, D., Ehbrecht, M., Annighöfer, P. Ammer, C. 2019. From tree to stand-level structural complexity – Which properties make a forest stand complex? – Agricultural and Forest Meteorology, 278, 107699.SeidelD.EhbrechtM.AnnighöferP.AmmerC.2019From tree to stand-level structural complexity – Which properties make a forest stand complex?27810769910.1016/j.agrformet.2019.107699Search in Google Scholar
Sirkas, F., Valgepea, M. 2022. Yearbook Forest 2020. (Aastaraamat Mets 2020). Tallinn, Estonian Environment Agency. 322 pp. [WWW document]. – URL https://keskkonnaportaal.ee/sites/default/files/Teemad/Mets/Mets2020.pdf. [Accessed 21 October 2022].SirkasF.ValgepeaM.2022Tallinn, Estonian Environment Agency322[WWW document]. – URL https://keskkonnaportaal.ee/sites/default/files/Teemad/Mets/Mets2020.pdf. [Accessed 21 October 2022].Search in Google Scholar
Thompson, I., Mackey, B., McNulty, S., Mosseler, A. 2009. Forest resilience, biodiversity, and climate change. A synthesis of the biodiversity/resilience/stability relationship in forest ecosystems. Technical Series No. 43. Montreal, Secretariat of the Convention on Biological Diversity. 67 pp.ThompsonI.MackeyB.McNultyS.MosselerA.2009Technical Series No. 43.MontrealSecretariat of the Convention on Biological Diversity67Search in Google Scholar
Thorn, S., Bässler, C., Svoboda, M., Müller, J. 2017. Effects of natural disturbances and salvage logging on biodiversity – Lessons from the Bohemian Forest. – Forest Ecology and Management, 388, 113–119.ThornS.BässlerC.SvobodaM.MüllerJ.2017Effects of natural disturbances and salvage logging on biodiversity – Lessons from the Bohemian Forest38811311910.1016/j.foreco.2016.06.006Search in Google Scholar
Zenner, E.K. 1998. A new index for describing the structural complexity of forests. – Doctoral dissertation. Corvallis, Oregon, Oregon State University. 177 pp.ZennerE.K.1998Doctoral dissertation.Corvallis, OregonOregon State University177Search in Google Scholar
Zenner, E.K. 2000. Do residual trees increase structural complexity in Pacific Northwest coniferous forests? – Ecological Applications, 10(3), 800–810.ZennerE.K.2000Do residual trees increase structural complexity in Pacific Northwest coniferous forests?10380081010.1890/1051-0761(2000)010[0800:DRTISC]2.0.CO;2Search in Google Scholar
Zenner, E.K., Hibbs, D.E. 2000. A new method for modeling the heterogeneity of forest structure. – Forest Ecology and Management, 129, 75–87.ZennerE.K.HibbsD.E.2000A new method for modeling the heterogeneity of forest structure129758710.1016/S0378-1127(99)00140-1Search in Google Scholar