Impact of stand variables on characteristics of avian soundscape in common oak (Quercus robur L.) forests

Ambuel, B., Temple, S.A. 1983. Area-dependent changes in the bird communities and vegetation of southern Wisconsin forests. – Ecology, 64(5), 1057–1068.10.2307/1937814Search in Google Scholar

Atemasov, A.A., Atemasova, T.A., Devyatko, T.N., Lysenko, N.G., Goncharov, G.L. 2011. The structure of the communities of breeding birds in oak forests on elevated positions in the southern part of Middle Russian Hills. – Birds ecology: species, communities, interrelations. Part 1. – Proceedings of the Meeting Commemorating the 150^th Anniversary of the Birth of Nikolay N. Somov (1861–1923), Ukraine, Dec. 2011. Kharkov, 345–354. (In Russian with English summary).Search in Google Scholar

Balestrieri, R., Basile, M., Posillico, M., Altea, T., Matteucci, G. 2017. Survey effort requirements for bird community assessment in forest habitats. – Acta Ornithologica, 52(1), 1–9.10.3161/00016454AO2017.52.1.001Search in Google Scholar

Bibby, C.J., Burgess, N.D., Hill, D.A. 1992. Bird Census Techniques. London, Academic Press. 257 pp.Search in Google Scholar

Bobryk, Ch.W., Rega-Brodsky, C.C., Bardhan, S., Farina, A., He, H.S., Jose, S. 2016. A rapid soundscape analysis to quantify conservation benefits of temperate agroforestry systems using low-cost technology. – Agroforestry Systems, 90(6), 997–1008.10.1007/s10457-015-9879-6Search in Google Scholar

Boelman, N.T., Asner, G.P., Hart, P.J., Martin, R.E. 2007. Multi-trophic invasion resistance in Hawaii: bioacoustics, field surveys, and airborne remote sensing. – Ecological Applications, 17, 2137–2144.10.1890/07-0004.1Search in Google Scholar

Browning, E., Gibb, R., Glover-Kapfer, P., Jones, K.E. 2017. Passive acoustic monitoring in ecology and conservation. WWF Conservation Technology Series 1(2). Woking, United Kingdom, WWF-UK. 75 pp.Search in Google Scholar

Buxton, R.T., Agnihotri, S., Robin, V.V., Goel A., Balakrishnan, R. 2018. Acoustic indices as rapid indicators of avian diversity in different land-use types in an Indian biodiversity hotspot. – Journal of Ecoacoustics, 2, #GWPZVD.10.22261/jea.gwpzvdSearch in Google Scholar

Czeszczewik, D., Walankiewicz, W., Mitrus, C., Tumiel, T., Stanski, T., Sahel, M., Bednarczyk, G. 2013. Importance of dead wood resources for woodpeckers in coniferous stands of the Białowieża Forest. – Bird Conservation International, 23, 414–425.10.1017/S0959270912000354Search in Google Scholar

Czeszczewik, D., Zub, K., Stanski, T., Sahel, M., Kapusta, A., Walankiewicz, W. 2015. Effects of forest management on bird assemblages in the Białowieża Forest, Poland. – iForest, 8, 377–385.10.3832/ifor1212-007Search in Google Scholar

Eldridge, A., Guyot, P., Moscoso, P., Johnston, A., Eyre-Walker, Y., Peck, M. 2018. Sounding out ecoacoustic metrics: Avian species richness is predicted by acoustic indices in temperate but not tropical habitats. – Ecological Indicators, 95(1), 939–952.10.1016/j.ecolind.2018.06.012Search in Google Scholar

Farina, A. 2014. Soundscape Ecology: Principles, Patterns, Methods and Applications. Dordrecht, Springer. 315 pp.10.1007/978-94-007-7374-5Search in Google Scholar

Farina, A., Morri, D. 2008. Source-sink and eco-field: hypotheses and experimental evidence. (Source-sink e eco-field: ipotesi ed evidenze sperimentali). – Atti del X congresso nazionale della SIEP-IALE. Ecologia e governance delpaesaggio: esperienze e prospettive. Bari, 365–372.Search in Google Scholar

Fuller, R.J., Langslow, D.R. 1984. Estimating numbers of birds by point counts: how long should counts last? – Bird Study, 31(3), 195–202.10.1080/00063658409476841Search in Google Scholar

Gardner, T. 2010. Monitoring Forest Biodiversity: Improving Conservation through Ecologically-Responsible Management. London, Routledge. 388 pp.10.4324/9781849775106Search in Google Scholar

Gòmez, W.E., Isaza, C.V., Daza, J.M. 2018. Identifying disturbed habitats: a new method from acoustic indices. – Ecological Informatics, 45, 16–25.10.1016/j.ecoinf.2018.03.001Search in Google Scholar

Gorelova, L.N. 1989. Protection of vegetation cover in Siversky Donets river basin in Kharkiv region. (Охрана растительного покрова бассейна р. Сев. Донец в пределах Харьковской области). – Kharkov University Bulletin, 330, 23–26. (In Russian).Search in Google Scholar

Guziy, A.I. 2006. Spatio-Typological Organization of Bird Forest Stands in Western Ukraine. (Просторово-типологічна організація населення птахів лісостанів західного регіону України). Zhytomyr, Volyn’, Ruta. 448 pp. (In Ukrainian).Search in Google Scholar

Hutto, R.L., Pletschet, S.M., Hendricks, P. 1986. A fixed-radius point count method for nonbreeding and breeding season use. – The Auk, 103(3), 593–602.10.1093/auk/103.3.593Search in Google Scholar

James, F.C., Shugart, H.H. Jr. 1970. A quantitative method of habitat description. – Audubon Field Notes, 24(6), 727–736.Search in Google Scholar

Jorge, F.C., Machado, C.G., da Cunha Nogueira S.S., Nogueira-Filho S.L.G. 2018. The effectiveness of acoustic indices for forest monitoring in Atlantic rainforest fragments. – Ecological Indicators, 91, 71–76.10.1016/j.ecolind.2018.04.001Search in Google Scholar

Kasten, E.P., Gage, S.H., Fox, J., Joo, W. 2012. The remote environmental assessment laboratory’s acoustic library: An archive for studying soundscape ecology. – Ecological Informatics, 12, 50–67.10.1016/j.ecoinf.2012.08.001Search in Google Scholar

Lindenmayer, D.B., Margules, C.R., Botkin, D.B. 2000. Indicators of biodiversity for ecologically sustainable forest management. – Conservation Biology, 14(4), 941–950.10.1046/j.1523-1739.2000.98533.xSearch in Google Scholar

Machado, R.B., Aguiar, L., Jones, G. 2017. Do acoustic indices reflect the characteristics of bird communities in the savannas of Central Brazil? – Landscape and Urban Planning, 162, 36–43.10.1016/j.landurbplan.2017.01.014Search in Google Scholar

Mammides, Ch., Goodale, E., Dayananda, S.K., Kang, L., Chen, J. 2017. Do acoustic indices correlate with bird diversity? Insights from two biodiverse regions in Yunnan Province, south China. – Ecological Indicators, 82, 470–477.10.1016/j.ecolind.2017.07.017Search in Google Scholar

Matsuoka, S.M., Mahon, C.L., Handel, C.M., Sòlymos, P., Bayne, E.M., Fontaine, P.C., Ralph, C.J. 2014 Reviving common standards in point-count surveys for broad inference across studies. – The Condor, 116(4), 599–608.10.1650/CONDOR-14-108.1Search in Google Scholar

Morozov, N.S. 1997. Observer and analyst variability in ecological research. III. Animal counts: birds. – Biology Bulletin Reviews, 117(2), 196–217. (In Russian with English summary).Search in Google Scholar

Ng, M.-L., Butler, N., Woods, N. 2018. Soundscapes as a surrogate measure of vegetation condition for biodiversity values: A pilot study. – Ecological Indicators, 93, 1070–1080.10.1016/j.ecolind.2018.06.003Search in Google Scholar

Pekin, B.K., Jung, J., Villanueva-Rivera, L.J., Pijanowski, B.C., Ahumada, J.A. 2012. Modeling acoustic diversity using soundscape recordings and LIDAR-derived metrics of vertical forest structure in a neotropical rainforest. – Landscape Ecology, 27(10), 1513–1522.10.1007/s10980-012-9806-4Search in Google Scholar

Pieretti, N., Farina, A., Morri, D. 2011. A new methodology to infer the singing activity of an avian community: The Acoustic Complexity Index (ACI). – Ecological Indicators, 11, 868–873.10.1016/j.ecolind.2010.11.005Search in Google Scholar

Pijanowski, B.C., Farina, A., Gage, S.H., Dumyahn, S.L., Krause, B.L. 2011a. What is soundscape ecology? An introduction and overview of an emerging new science. – Landscape Ecology, 26, 1213–1232.10.1007/s10980-011-9600-8Search in Google Scholar

Pijanowski, B.C., Villanueva-Rivera, L.J., Dumyahn, S.L., Farina, A., Krause, B.L., Napoletano, B.N., Gage, S.H., Pieretti, N. 2011b. Soundscape ecology: the science of sound in the landscape. – BioScience, 61, 203–216.10.1525/bio.2011.61.3.6Search in Google Scholar

Priedniks, Ya., Kuresoo, A., Kurlavichus, P. 1986. Recommendations for Ornithological Monitoring in the Baltics. (Рекомендации к орнитологическому мониторингу в Прибалтике). Riga, Zinatne. 65 pp. (In Russian).Search in Google Scholar

Prokudin, Yu.N. 1980. Seversk-Donetsk Nature Complex. (Северско-Донецкий природный комплекс). Kharkov, Vyshcha Shkola. 88 pp. (In Russian).Search in Google Scholar

R Core Team. 2018. R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. [WWW document]. – URL https://www.R-project.org/. [Accessed 2 July 2018].Search in Google Scholar

Ralph, C.J., Droege, S., Sauer, J.R. 1995. Managing and monitoring birds using point counts: standards and applications. – Ralph, C.J., Sauer, J.R., Droege, S. (eds.). Monitoring Bird Populations by Point Counts. Albany, CA, Pacific Southwest Research Station, Forest Service, US. Department of Agriculture, 161–168.10.2737/PSW-GTR-149Search in Google Scholar

Ralph, C.J., Scott, J.M. (eds.) 1981. Estimating Numbers of Terrestrial Birds. Los Angeles, Cooper Ornithological Society. 630 pp.Search in Google Scholar

Ravkin, E.S., Ravkin, Yu.S. 2005. Birds of the Plains of Northern Eurasia: Number, Distribution, and Spatial Organization of Communities. (Птицы равнин Северной Евразии: численность, распределение и пространственная организация сообществ). Novosibirsk, Nauka. 304 pp. (In Russian).Search in Google Scholar

Retamosa Izaguirre, M.I., Ramírez-Alán, O., De la O Castro, J. 2018. Acoustic indices applied to biodiversity monitoring in a Costa Rica dry tropical forest. – Journal of Ecoacoustics, 2, #TNW2NP.10.22261/jea.tnw2npSearch in Google Scholar

Roberge, J-M., Angelstam, P., Villard, M-A. 2008. Specialised woodpeckers and naturalness in hemiboreal forests – deriving quantitative targets for conservation planning. – Biological Conservation, 141, 997–1012.10.1016/j.biocon.2008.01.010Search in Google Scholar

Shiu, H.-J., Lee, P.-F. 2003. Assessing avian point-count duration and sample size using species accumulation functions. – Zoological Studies, 42(2), 357–367.Search in Google Scholar

Sokolov, V.E., Reshetnikov, Yu.S. 1997. Monitoring of biodiversity in Russia. (Мониторинг биоразнообразия в России). – Sokolov, V.E., Reshetnikov, Yu.S., Shatunovsky, M.I. (eds.). Monitoring of Biological Diversity. Moscow, Russian Academy of Science, 8–15. (In Russian).Search in Google Scholar

Sòlymos, P., Matsuoka, S.M., Cumming, S.G., Stralberg, D., Fontaine, P., Schmiegelow, F.K.A., Song, S.J., Bayne, E.M. 2018. Evaluating time-removal models for estimating availability of boreal birds during point count surveys: sample size requirements and model complexity. – The Condor, 120(4), 765–786.10.1650/CONDOR-18-32.1Search in Google Scholar

Sorace, A., Gustin, M., Calvario, E., Ianniello, L., Sarrocco, S., Carere, C. 2000. Assessing bird communities by point counts: repeated sessions and their duration. – Acta Ornithologica, 35(2), 197–202.10.3161/068.035.0213Search in Google Scholar

Sueur, J., Pavoine, S., Hamerlynck, O., Duvail, S. 2008. Rapid acoustic survey for biodiversity appraisal. – PLoS ONE, 3(12), e4065.10.1371/journal.pone.0004065Search in Google Scholar

Sueur, J., Farina, A., 2015. Ecoacoustics: the ecological investigation and interpretation of environmental sound. – Biosemiotics, 8, 493–502.10.1007/s12304-015-9248-xSearch in Google Scholar

Thompson, I.D., Hogan, H.A., Montevecchi, W.A. 1999. Avian communities of mature balsam fir forests in Newfoundland: age-dependence and implications for timber harvesting. – The Condor, 101, 311–323.10.2307/1369994Search in Google Scholar

Towsey, M., Wimmer, J., Williamson, I., Roe, P. 2014. The use of acoustic indices to determine avian species richness in audio-recordings of the environment. – Ecological Informatics, 21, 110–119.10.1016/j.ecoinf.2013.11.007Search in Google Scholar

Tozer, D.C., Burke, D.M., Nol, E., Elliott, K.A. 2010. Short-term effects of group-selection harvesting on breeding birds in a northern hardwood forest. – Forest Ecology and Management, 259, 1522–1529.10.1016/j.foreco.2010.01.028Search in Google Scholar

Venier, L.A., Pearce, J.L. 2007. Boreal forest landbirds in relation to forest composition, structure, and landscape: implications for forest management. – Canadian Journal of Forest Research, 37, 1214–1226.10.1139/X07-025Search in Google Scholar

Venier, L.A., Mazerolle, M.J., Rodgers, A., McIlwrick, K.A., Holmes, S., Thompson, D. 2017. Comparison of semiautomated bird song recognition with manual detection of recorded bird song samples. – Avian Conservation and Ecology, 12(2), 2.10.5751/ACE-01029-120202Search in Google Scholar

Villanueva-Rivera, L.J., Pijanowski, B.C., Doucette, J., Pekin, B. 2011. A primer of acoustic analysis for landscape ecologists. – Landscape Ecology, 26, 1233–1246.10.1007/s10980-011-9636-9Search in Google Scholar

Villanueva-Rivera, L.J., Pijanowski, B.C. 2015. Soundecology: Soundscape Ecology. R package version 1.3. [WWW document]. – URL http://CRAN.R-project.org/package=soundecology. [Accessed 2 July 2018].Search in Google Scholar

Walankiewicz, W., Czeszczewik, D., Mitrus, C., Bida, E. 2002. Snag importance for woodpeckers in deciduous stands of the Bialowieza forest. (Znaczenie martwych drzew dla zespolu dzieciolow w lasach lisciastych Puszczy Bialowieskiej). – Notatki Ornitologiczne, 43, 61–71. (In Polish with English summary).Search in Google Scholar

Walankiewicz, W., Czeszczewik, D., Tumiel, T., Stański, T. 2011. Woodpeckers abundance in the Białowieża Forest – a comparison between deciduous, strictly protected and managed stands. – Ornis Polonica, 52, 161–168.Search in Google Scholar