Growth-climate responses of Picea sitchensis [Bong.] Carr. versus Picea abies [L.] Karst. in the British Isles and Central europe

1Ábri, T., Keseru, Z., Rásó, J., Rédei, K., 2021a: Stand structure and growth of Robinia pseudoacacia ‘Jaszkiséri’ – ‘Jaszkiséri’ black locust. Journal of Forest Science, 67:489–497. Search in Google Scholar

2Ábri, T., Keseru, Z., Szab´o, F., Rédei, K., 2021b: Structure of black walnut (Juglans nigra L.) stands on sandy soils in Hungary. Journal of Forest Science, 67:298–305. Search in Google Scholar

3Ayan, S., Yucedag, C., Simovski, B., 2021: A major tool for afforestation of semi-arid and anthopogenic steppe areas in Turkey: Pinis nigra J. F. Arnold subsp. pallasiana (Lamb.) Holmboe. Journal of Forest Science, 67:449–463.Search in Google Scholar

4Andreassen, K., Solberg, S., Tveito, O. E., Lystad S. L., 2006: Regional differences in climatic responses of Norway spruce (Picea abies L. Karst) growth in Norway. Forest Ecology and Management, 222:211–221. Search in Google Scholar

5Beauchamp, K., Mencuccini, M., Perks, M., Garnier, B., 2013: The regulation of sapwood area, water transport and heartwood formation in Sitka spruce. Plant Ecology & Diversity, 6:45–56.Search in Google Scholar

6Bednarz, Z., Jaroszewicz, B., Ptak, J., Szwagrzyk, J., 1999: Dendrochronology of Norway spruce (Picea abies [L.] Karst.) in the Babia Góra National Park, Poland. Dendrochronologia, 16–17:45–55.Search in Google Scholar

7Beran, F., Šindelář, J., 1996: Perspektivy vybraných cizokrajných dřevin v lesním hospodářství ČR. Lesnictví – Forestry, 42:337–355. (In Czech). Beran, F., 2018: Introdukované dřeviny v lesním hospodářství ČR – Přehled. In: Vacek, Z., Podrázský, V. (eds.): Introdukované dřeviny jako součást českého lesnictví, ČLS, Kostelec nad Černými lesy, Praha 2018:7–16. (In Czech).Search in Google Scholar

8Bergh, J., Linder, S., Bergström, J., 2005: Potential production of Norway spruce in Sweden. Forest Ecology and Management, 204:1–10.Search in Google Scholar

9Biondi, F., Waikul, K., 2004: Dendroclim 2002: AC++ program for statistical calibration of climate signals in tree ring chronologie. Computers and Geosciences, 30:303–311.Search in Google Scholar

10Bolle, C., 1887: Andeutungen über die Freiwillige Baumund Strauchvegetation der Provinz Brandenburg; Verlag des Märkisches Provinzial-Museum: Berlin, Germany. (In German).Search in Google Scholar

11Brazier, J. D., Mobbs, I. D., 1993: The influence of planting distance on structural wood yields of unthinned Sitka spruce. Forestry, 66:333–352.Search in Google Scholar

12Bugała, W., 2000: Drzewa i krzewy (Trees and shrubs). Warszawa, Państwowe Wydawnictwo Rolnicze i Leśne, 614 p. (In Polish).Search in Google Scholar

13Bunn, A. G., 2008: A dendrochronology program library in R (dplR). Dendrochronologia, 26:115–124. Search in Google Scholar

14Buriánek, V., 2019: Problematika invazních dřevin v Česku. – Přehled. In: Vacek, Z., Podrázský, V. (eds.): Introdukované dřeviny jako součást českého lesnictví, ČLS, Kostelec nad Černými lesy 2019. ČLS, Praha 2019:11–16. (In Czech).Search in Google Scholar

15Cukor, J., Vacek, Z., Linda, R., Sharma, R.P., Vacek, S., 2019a: Afforested farmland vs. forestland: Effects of bark stripping by Cervus elaphus and climate on production potential and structure of Picea abies forests. Plos One, PLoS ONE 14:e0221082.Search in Google Scholar

16Cukor, J., Vacek, Z., Linda, R., Vacek, S., Marada, P., Šimůnek, V. et al., 2019b: Effects of Bark Stripping on Timber Production and Structure of Norway Spruce Forests in Relation to Climatic Factors. Forests, 10:320.Search in Google Scholar

17Deal, R. L., Hennon, P., O’Hanlon, R., D’Amore, D., 2014: Lessons from native spruce forests in Alaska: managing Sitka spruce plantations worldwide to benefit biodiversity and ecosystem services. Forestry, 87:193–208.Search in Google Scholar

18Deans, J. D., Milne, R., 1999: Effects of respacing on young Sitka spruce crops. Forestry, 72:47–57. Search in Google Scholar

19Desplanque, C., Rolland, C., Schweingruber, F. H., 1999: Influence of species and abiotic factors on extreme tree ring modulation. Trees, 13:218–227.Search in Google Scholar

20Di Franco, C. P., Lima, G., Schimmenti, E., Asciuto A., 2021: Methodological approaches to the valuation of forest ecosystem Services: An overview of recent international research trends. Journal of Forest Science, 67:307–317.Search in Google Scholar

21Durrant, T. H., Mauri, A., de Rigo, D., Caudullo, G., 2016: Picea sitchensis in Europe: distribution, habitat, usage and threats. European Atlas of forest tree species. Luxembourg, Publ. Off. EU, e0137a1.Search in Google Scholar

22Eckenwalder, J. E., 2009: Conifers of the World: The Complete Reference. Timber Press, 744 p.Search in Google Scholar

23Endalew, B., Wondimagegnhu, B. A., Tassie, K., 2021: Willingness to pay for church forest conservation: a case study in northwestern Ethiopia. Journal of Forest Science, 67:105–116.Search in Google Scholar

24Farjon, A., 2017. Picea abies. The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species 2017: e.T42318A71233492.Search in Google Scholar

25Feliksik, E., 1972: Studia dendrochronologiczne nad świerkiem (Picea excelsa L.). Część I. Badania nad świerkiem z Lasu Gąsienicowego w Tatrach. Acta Agraria et Silvestria, 12:39–70. (In Polish).Search in Google Scholar

26Feliksik, E., Wilczynski, S., 2008: Tree-ring chronology as a source of information on susceptibility of Sitka spruce to climatic conditions of Pomerania (northern Poland). Geochronometria, 30:79–82.Search in Google Scholar

27Fletcher, A. M., Faulkner, R., 1972: A plan for the improvement of Sitka spruce by breeding and selection. Forestry Commission Research and Development Paper No. 85, HMSO, London, 567 p.Search in Google Scholar

28Forest Europe, 2020: State of Europe’s Forests 2020. In: Ministerial Conference on the Protection of Forests in Europe – Forest Europe Liaison Unit Bratislava, 392 p.Search in Google Scholar

29Forestry Commission, 2008: Forestry statistics 2014. Forestry Commission, Edinburgh.Search in Google Scholar

30Fritts, H. C, 1976: Tree rings and climate. Academic Press, London.Search in Google Scholar

31Fulín, M., Novotný, P., Podrázský, V., Beran, F., Dostál, J., Jehlička, J., 2017: Evaluation of the provenance plot “Hrubá Skála” (Northern Bohemia) with grand fir at the age of 36 years. Journal of Forest Science, 63:75–87.Search in Google Scholar

32Fulín, M., Podrázský, V., Baláš, M., 2018: Vliv jedle obrovské na stav lesních půd: případová studie. Zprávy lesnického výzkumu, 63:129–135. (In Czech).Search in Google Scholar

33Funda, T., Kobliha, J., Vacek, S., 2006: Vývoj a současný stav provenienčních výzkumných ploch smrku černého v oblasti Krušných hor. [Development and current state of black spruce provenance trials in the Ore Mts.]. In: Slodičák, M., Novák, J. (eds.): Lesnický výzkum v Krušných horách. Recenzovaný sborník z celostátní vědecké konference. Teplice 20. 4. 2006, Opočno, VÚLHM VS, p. 215–231.Search in Google Scholar

34Gallo, J., Vacek, Z., Vacek, S., 2021: Quarter of a century of forest fertilization and liming research at the Department of Silviculture in Prague, Czech Republic. Central European Forestry Journal, 67:123–134.Search in Google Scholar

35Giordano, L., Garbelotto, M., Nicolotti, G., Gonthier P., 2013: Characterization of fungal communities associated with the bark beetle Ips typographus varies depending on detection method, location, and beetle population levels. Mycol Progress, 12:127–140.Search in Google Scholar

36Green, S., Hendry, S. J., Redfern, D. B., 2008: Drought damage to pole-stage Sitka spruce and other conifers in north-east Scotland. Scottish Forestry, 62:10–18.Search in Google Scholar

37Grissino-Mayer, H. D., Holmes, R. L., Fritts, H. C., 1992: International tree-ring data bank program library: user´s manual. Laboratory of Tree-Ring Research, University of Arizona, Tuscon, USA, Tuscon, p. 75–87.Search in Google Scholar

38Halldórsson, G., Benedikz, T., Eggertsson, O., Odds-dóttir, E.S., Óskarsson, H., 2003: The impact of the green spruce aphid Elatobium abietinum (Walker) on long-term growth of Sitka spruce in Iceland. Forest Ecology and Management, 181:281–287.Search in Google Scholar

39Harlow, W. M., Harrar, E. S., White, F. M., 1978: Tex-book of Dendrology. Covering the Important Forest Trees of the United States and Canada. New York, McGraw-Hill Book Company, p. 134–136.Search in Google Scholar

40Harris, A.S., 1990: Sitka Spruce (Picea sitchensis [Bong.] Carr.), Agriculture Handbook 654, U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Washington, D.C., p. 513–529.Search in Google Scholar

41Hlásny, T., Trombik, J., Bošeľa, M., Merganič, J., Marušák, R., Šebeň, V. et al., 2017: Climatic drivers of forest productivity in Central Europe. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology, 234:258–273.Search in Google Scholar

42Honfy, V., Ábri T., Juhász, L., Rásó, J., Keseru, Z., Rédei, K., 2021: A simple method for application of natural regeneration on black locust (Robinia pseudoacacia L.) stands in Hungary. Journal of Forest Science, 67:66–70.Search in Google Scholar

43Hrib, M., Podrázský V., Matějka, K., Viewegh, J., 2017: Effect of black walnut (Juglans nigra) on the under-storey vegetation – a case study of South Moravian Forests (Czech Republic). Journal of Forest Science, 63:136–148.Search in Google Scholar

44Kantor, P., 2008: Production potential of Douglas fir at mesotrophic sites of Křtiny Training Forest Enterprise, Journal of Forest Science 54: 321–332.Search in Google Scholar

45Kantor, P., Mareš, R., 2009: Production potential of Douglas fir in acid sites of Hůrky Training Forest District, Secondary Forestry School in Písek. Journal of Forest Science, 55:312–322.Search in Google Scholar

46Knibbe, B., 2007: PAST4: personal analysis system for treering research, Version 4.2. SCIEM, Vienna, Austria, 161 p.Search in Google Scholar

47Kowarik, I., Säumel, I., 2007: Biological Flora of Central Europe: Ailanthus altissima [Mill.] Swingle. Perspectives in Plant Ecology, Evolution and Systematics, 8:207–237.Search in Google Scholar

48Kraft, G., 1884: Beiträge zur lehre von den durchforstungen, schlagstellungen und lichtungshieben. Klind-worth, Germany, 147 p. (In German).Search in Google Scholar

49Král, J., Vacek, S., Vacek, Z., Putalová, T., Bulušek, D., Štefančík, I., 2015: Structure, development and health status of spruce forests affected by air pollution in the western Krkonoše Mts. in 1979–2014. Lesnícky časopis – Forestry Journal, 61:175–187.Search in Google Scholar

50Lee, S., Thompson, D., Hansen, J. K., 2013: Forest Tree Breeding in Europe. L. E. Pâques, ed., Springer Netherlands, vol. 25 of Managing Forest Ecosystems, p. 177–227.Search in Google Scholar

51Liao, C. Y., Podrázský, V., 2001: Growth dynamics of individual tree basal area of Eastern White Pine in Kostelec nad Černými lesy region. Journal of Forest Science, 47:124–129.Search in Google Scholar

52Lines, R., 1987: Choice of seed origins for the main forest species in Britain. Forestry Commission Bulletin 66. HMSO, London.Search in Google Scholar

53Ludley, K. E., Jickells, S. M., Chamberlain, P. M., Whitaker, J., Robinson, C. H., 2009: Distribution of monoterpenes between organic resources in upper soil horizons under monocultures of Picea abies, Picea sitchensis and Pinus sylvestris. Soil Biology and Biochemistry, 41:1050–1059.Search in Google Scholar

54MacDonald, J. A. B., 1979: Norway or Sitka spruce? Forestry, 40:129–138.Search in Google Scholar

55Manso, R., Davidson, R., McLean, J. P., 2022: Diameter, height and volume increment single tree models for improved Sitka spruce in Great Britain. Forestry, 95:391–404.Search in Google Scholar

56MARD, 2021: Správa o lesnom hospodárstve v Slovenskej republike za rok 2020. Zelená správa. Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Development of the Slovak Republic, 71 p.Search in Google Scholar

57Martiník, A., Kantor, P., 2007: Branches and the assimilatory apparatus of full-grown trees of Douglas fir (Pseudotsuga menziesii [Mirb.] Franco) of a different coenotic position. Ekológia (Bratislava), 26:223–239.Search in Google Scholar

58McLean, J. P., Moore, J. R., Gardiner, B. A., Lee, S. J., Mochan, S. J., Jarvis, M. C., 2016: Variation of radial wood properties from genetically improved Sitka spruce in the UK. Forestry, 89:109–116.Search in Google Scholar

59Mikulenka, P., Prokůpková, A., Vacek, Z., Vacek, S., Bulušek, D., Simon, J. et al., 2020: Effect of climate and air pollution on radial growth of mixed forests: Abies alba [Mill.] vs. Picea abies [L.] Karst. Central European Forestry Journal, 66:23–36.Search in Google Scholar

60Miltner, S., Podrázský, V., Baláš, M., Kupka, I., 2017: Vliv dubu červeného (Quercus rubra L.) na lesní stanoviště. Zprávy lesnického výzkumu, 62:109–115. (In Czech).Search in Google Scholar

61Mondek, J., Baláš M., 2019: Douglas-fir (Pseudotsuga menziesii [Mirb.] Franco) and its role in the Czech forests. Journal of Forest Science, 65:41–50.Search in Google Scholar

62Mondek J., Matějka, K., Gallo, J., Prokůpková, A., Hájek, V., 2021: Picea abies and Pseudotsuga menziesii radial growth in relation to climate: case study from South Bohemia. Austrian Journal of Forest Science, 138:209–244.Search in Google Scholar

63Moore, J., 2011: Wood properties and uses of Sitka spruce in Britain. Research Report – Forestry Commission, UK, 48 p.Search in Google Scholar

64Moore, J. R., Lyon, A. J., Lenhneke, S., 2012: Effects of rotation length on the grade recovery and wood properties of Sitka spruce structural timber grown in Great Britain. Annals of Forest Science, 69:353–362.Search in Google Scholar

65Musil, I., Hamerník, J., 2007: Jehličnaté dřeviny: přehled nahosemenných i výtrusných dřevin. Praha, Academia, 177 p. (In Czech).Search in Google Scholar

66Nygaard, P. H., Øyen, B. H., 2017: Spread of the Introduced Sitka Spruce (Picea sitchensis) in Coastal Norway. Forests, 8:24.Search in Google Scholar

67Ogwu, D. S., Nemesova, A., Lynch, T., Phillips, H., Hunter, A., Mac Siúrtáin, M., 2012: Site classification and growth models for Sitka spruce plantations in Ireland. Forest Ecology and Management, 283:56–65. Search in Google Scholar

68Pástor, M., Jankovič, J., Belko, M., Modranský, J., 2022: Evaluation of selected growth parameters of Paulownia corevisa plantation in the Danubian Lowland. Journal of Forest Science, 68:156–162.Search in Google Scholar

69Peterken, G. F., 2001: Ecological effects of introduced tree species in Britain. Forest Ecology and Management, 141:31–42.Search in Google Scholar

70Podrázský, V., Ulbrichová, I., Moser, W. K., 2005: Využití břízy a smrku pichlavého při obnově porostů na plochách s nenarušenou vrstvou nadložního humusu. Zprávy lesnického výzkumu, 50:75–77. (In Czech). Search in Google Scholar

71Podrázský, V., Remeš, J., Ulbrichová, I., 2006: Rychlost regenerace lesních půd v horských oblastech z hlediska kvantity nadložního humusu. Zprávy lesnického výzkumu, 51:230–234. (In Czech).Search in Google Scholar

72Podrázský, V., 2008: Tvorba povrchového humusu při zalesňování zemědělských ploch a po buldozerové přípravě v Krušných horách. Zprávy lesnického výzkumu, 53:258–263. (In Czech).Search in Google Scholar

73Podrázský, V., Kupka, I., 2011: Vliv borovice vejmutovky a metasekvoje čínské na stav nadložního humusu na stanovišti potočního luhu. Zprávy lesnického výzkumu, 56:14–19. (In Czech).Search in Google Scholar

74Podrázský, V., Čermák, R., Zahradník, D., Kouba, J., 2013a: Production of Douglas-fir in the Czech Republic based on national forest inventory data. Journal of Forest Science, 59:398–404.Search in Google Scholar

75Podrázský, V., Zahradník, D., Pulkrab, K, Kubeček, J., Peña, J. F. B., 2013b: Hodnotová produkce douglasky tisolisté (Pseudotsuga menziesii [Mirb.] Franco) na kyselých stanovištích Školního polesí Hůrky, Písecko. Zprávy lesnického výzkumu, 58:226–232. (In Czech).Search in Google Scholar

76Podrázský, V., Martiník, A., Matějka, K., Viewegh, J., 2014: Effects of Douglas fir (Pseudotsuga menziesii [Mirb.] Franco) on understorey layer species diversity in managed forests. Journal of Forest Science, 60:263–271.Search in Google Scholar

77Podrázský, V., Remeš, J., Sloup, R., Pulkrab, K., Novotná, S., 2016: Douglas-fir – partial substitution for declining conifer timber supply–review of Czech data. Wood Research, 61:525–530.Search in Google Scholar

78Podrázský, V., Prknová, H. (eds.), 2019: Silvicultural, production and environmental potential of the main introduced tree species in the Czech Republic. Česká zemědělská univerzita v Praze, Kostelec nad Černými Lesy, Lesnická práce, 185 p.Search in Google Scholar

79Podrázský, V., Vacek, Z., Vacek, S., Vítámvás, J., Gallo, J., Prokůpková, A. et al., 2020: Production potential and structural variability of pine stands in the Czech Republic: Scots pine (Pinus sylvestris L.) vs. introduced pines – case study and problem review. Journal of Forest Science, 66:197–207.Search in Google Scholar

80Poleno, Z., Vacek, S., Podrázský, V., Remeš, J., Mikeska, M., Kobliha J. et al., 2007: Pěstování lesů II. Teoretická východiska pěstování lesů. [Silviculture II. Theoretical starting points of Silviculture]. Kostelec nad Černými lesy, Lesnická práce, 464 p. (In Czech).Search in Google Scholar

81Poleno, Z., Vacek, S., Podrázský, V., Remeš, J., Štefančík, I., Mikeska, M. et al., 2009: Pěstování lesů III. Praktické postupy pěstování lesů. [Silviculture III. Practical methods in silviculture]. Kostelec nad Černými lesy, Lesnická práce, 952 p. (In Czech).Search in Google Scholar

82Praciak, A. et al., 2013: The CABI Encyclopedia of Forest Trees. The CABI encyclopedia of forest trees. CABI Publishing, Oxfordshire, UK, 536 p.Search in Google Scholar

83Putalová, T., Vacek, Z., Vacek, S., Štefančík, I., Bulušek, D., Král, J., 2019: Tree-ring widths as an indicator of air pollution stress and climate conditions in different Norway spruce forest stands in the Krkonoše Mts. Central European Forestry Journal, 65:21–33.Search in Google Scholar

84Pyšek, P., Chytrý, M., Pergel, J., Sádlo, J. (eds.) 2017: Plant invasions in the Czech Republic. In: Flora and vegetation of the Czech Republic. Springer, Cham. Plant and vegetation, 14:339–399.Search in Google Scholar

85R Core Team, 2019: R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria.Search in Google Scholar

86Remeš, J., Bílek, L., Novák, J., Vacek, Z., Vacek, S., Putalová, T. et al., 2015: Diameter increment of beech in relation to social position of trees, climate characteristics and thinning intensity. Journal of Forest Science, 61:456–464.Search in Google Scholar

87Richardson, D. M., Rejmánek, M., 2011: Trees and shrubs as invasive alien species – a global review. Diversity and Distributions, 17:788–809.Search in Google Scholar

88Rosvall, O., Jansson, G., Andersson, B., Ericsson, T., Karlsson, B., Sonesson, J. et al., 2001: Genetiska vinster i nuvarande och framtida fröplantager och klonblandningar. Redogörelse, 1. Skogforsk, Uppsala. (In Swedish).Search in Google Scholar

89Rybníček, M., Čermák, P., Kolář, T., Přemyslovská, E., Žid, T., 2009: Influence of temperatures and precipitation on radial increment of Orlické hory Mts. spruce stands at altitudes over 800 m asl. Journal of Forest Science, 55:257–263.Search in Google Scholar

90Sander, C., Eckstein, D., Kyncl, J., Dobrý, J., 1995: The growth of spruce (Picea abies [L.] Karst.) in the Krkonoše Mountains as indicated by ring width and wood density. Annals of Forest Science, 52:401–410.Search in Google Scholar

91Schweingruber, F. H., 1996: Tree Rings and Environment Dendroecology. Swiss Federal Institute for Forest, Snow and Landscape Research, Birmensdorf, 609 p.Search in Google Scholar

92Selivanov, E., Hlaváčková, P., 2021: Methods for monetary valuation of ecosystem services: A scoping review. Journal of Forest Science, 67:499–511.Search in Google Scholar

93Slodičák, M. et al., 2005. Lesnické hospodaření v Jizerských horách. Hradec. Králové, Lesy České republiky; Jíloviště-Strnady, VÚLHM, 232 p. (In Czech).Search in Google Scholar

94Spiecker, H., 2004: Norway Spruce Conversion: Options and Consequences; European Forest Institute Research Report 18; Brill: Leiden, The Netherlands.Search in Google Scholar

95State of Europe’s Forests 2007: The MCPFE report on sustainable forest management in Europe. Available online: http://foresteurope.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/08/FE-EN.pdf (accessed on 22 November 2015).Search in Google Scholar

96Šefl, J., Mottlová, V., Schořálková, I., 2020: Bud blight (Gemmamyces piceae) in the eastern part of the Krušné hory Mountains. Journal of Forest Science, 66:309–3017.Search in Google Scholar

97Šimůnek, V., Vacek, Z., Vacek, S., 2020: Solar cycles in salvage logging: National data from the Czech Republic confirm significant correlation. Forests, 119:973.Search in Google Scholar

98Thompson, D., Harrington, F., 2005: Sitka Spruce (Picea sitchensis). In: Jain, S. M., Gupta, P. K. (eds.): Protocol for Somatic Embryogenesis in woody Plants. Netherlands, Springer.Search in Google Scholar

99Toth, D., Maitah, M., Maitah, K., Jarolínová, V., 2020: The impacts of calamity logging on the development of spruce wood prices in Czech forestry. Forests, 11:283.Search in Google Scholar

100Vacek, S., Lepš, J., 1987: Changes in the horizontal structure in a spruce forest over a 9-year period of pollutant exposure in the Krkonoše Mountains, Czechoslovakia. Forest Ecology and Management, 22:291–295.Search in Google Scholar

101Vacek, S., Zingari, P. C., Jeník, J., Simon, J., Smejkal, J. Vančura, K., 2003: Mountain forests of the Czech Republic. Prague: Ministry of Agriculture of the Czech Republic, 320 p.Search in Google Scholar

102Vacek, S., Vacek, Z., Ulbrichová, I., Remeš, J., Podrázský, V., Vach, M. et al., 2019a: The Effects of Fertilization on the Health Status, Nutrition and Growth of Norway Spruce Forests with Yellowing Symptoms. Scandinavian Journal of Forest Research, 34:267–281.Search in Google Scholar

103Vacek, S., Prokůpková, A., Vacek, Z., Bulušek, D., Šimůnek, V., Králíček, I. et al., 2019b: Growth response of mixed beech forests to climate change, various management and game pressure in Central Europe. Journal of Forest Science, 65:331–345.Search in Google Scholar

104Vacek, Z., Vacek, S., Prokůpková, A., Bulušek, D., Podrázský, V., Hůnová I. et al., 2020: Long-term effect of climate and air pollution on health status and growth of Norway spruce peaty forests in the Black Triangle region. Dendrobiology, 83:1–19.Search in Google Scholar

105Vančura, K., Prokůpková, A., Balušek, D., Šimůnek, V., Hájem, V., Králíček, I., 2020: Dynamics of mixed lowland forests in Central Bohemia over a 20-year period. Journal of Forest Science, 66:49–62.Search in Google Scholar

106Wein, K., 1930: Die erste Einführung nordamerikanischer Gehölze in Europa. Mitteilungen Deutsche Dendrologische Gesellschaft, 42:137–163. (In German).Search in Google Scholar

107Worrell, R., Malcolm, D. C., 1990a: Productivity of Sitka spruce in northern Britain 1. The effects of elevation and climate. Forestry, 63:105–118.Search in Google Scholar

108Worrell, R., Malcolm, D. C., 1990b: Productivity of Sitka spruce in northern Britain 2. Prediction from site factors. Forestry, 63:119–128.Search in Google Scholar

109Yamaguchi, D. K., 1991: A simple method for cross-dating increment cores from living trees. Canadian Journal of Forest Research, 21:414–416.Search in Google Scholar

110Zeidler, A., Borůvka, V., Černý, J., Baláš, M., 2022: Douglas-fir outperforms most commercial European soft-woods. Industrial Crops and Products, 181:114828.Search in Google Scholar