Spatial resolution of unmanned aerial vehicles acquired imagery as a result of different processing conditions

Cramer, M., 2013: The UAV@LGL BW Project – A NMCA Case Study. In: Fritsch, D. (ed.): Photogram-metric Week 2013. Wichmann/VDE Verlag, Belin & Offenbach, p. 165–179.10.1127/1432-8364/2013/0195Search in Google Scholar

Cramer, M., Zhang, S., 2020: Quality Assessment of High-Resolution UAV Imagery and Products. In: 40. Wissenschaftlich-Technische Jahrestagung der DGPF in Stuttgart, p. 33–46.Search in Google Scholar

Dabrowski, R., Jenerowicz, A., 2015: Portable Imagery Quality Assessment Test Field for UAV Sensors. In: The International Archives of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences -ISPRS Archives, 40:117–122.10.5194/isprsarchives-XL-1-W4-117-2015Search in Google Scholar

Dabrowski, R., Orych, A., Jenerowicz, A., Walczykowski, P., 2015: Preliminary Results from the Portable Imagery Quality Assessment Test Field (PIQuAT) of UAV Imagery for Imagery Reconnaissance Purposes. In: The International Archives of the Photo-grammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences – ISPRS Archives, 40:111–115.10.5194/isprsarchives-XL-1-W4-111-2015Search in Google Scholar

Harvey, P., 2016: ExifTool. Available in: http://exiftool.org.Search in Google Scholar

Honkavaara, E., Jaakkola, J., Markelin, L., Becker, S., 2006a: Evaluation of Resolving Power and MTF of DMC. In: The International Archives of the Photo-grammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences – ISPRS Archives, 36:1–6.Search in Google Scholar

Honkavaara, E., Jaakkola, J., Markelin, L., Peltoniemi, J., Ahokas, E., Becker, S., 2006b: Complete Photogrammetric System Calibration and Evaluation in the Sjökulla Test Field – Case Study With Dmc Abstract. In: Proceedings of EuroSDR Commission I and ISPRS Working Group 1/3 Workshop Euro-COW 2006, 6 p.Search in Google Scholar

Klouček, T., Komárek, J., Surový, P., Hrach, K., Janata, P., Vašíček, B., 2019: The Use of UAV Mounted Sensors for Precise Detection of Bark Beetle Infestation. Remote Sensing, 11:1–17.10.3390/rs11131561Search in Google Scholar

Lee, J., Sung, S., 2016: Evaluating Spatial Resolution for Quality Assurance of UAV Images. Spatial Information Research, 24:141–154.10.1007/s41324-016-0015-0Search in Google Scholar

Lim, P. C., Kim, T., Na, S. Il, Lee, K. Do, Ahn, H. Y., et al., 2018a: Analysis of Uav Image Quality Using Edge Analysis. In: The International Archives of the Photo-grammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences – ISPRS Archives, 42:425–32.Search in Google Scholar

Lim, P. C., Seo, J., Kim, T., 2018b: Extraction of UAV Image Sharpness Index Using Edge Target Analysis. Korean Journal of Remote Sensing, 34:905–23.Search in Google Scholar

Long, J. A., 2020: Jtools: Analysis and Presentation of Social Scientific Data. Available in: https://cran.r-project.org/package=jtoolsSearch in Google Scholar

Meißner, H., Cramer, M., Reulke, R., 2018: Towards Standardized Evaluation of Image Quality for Airborne Camera Systems. In: The International Archives of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences - ISPRS Archives, 42:295–300.10.5194/isprs-archives-XLII-1-295-2018Search in Google Scholar

Meißner, H., Cramer, M., Reulke, R., 2020: Evaluation of Structures and Methods for Resolution Determination of Remote Sensing Sensors. Lecture Notes in Computer Science (Including Subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics), 11994 LNCS: 59–69.10.1007/978-3-030-39770-8_5Search in Google Scholar

Orych, A., 2015: Review of Methods for Determining the Spatial Resolution of UAV Sensors. In: The International Archives of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences - ISPRS Archives. 40:391–395.10.5194/isprsarchives-XL-1-W4-391-2015Search in Google Scholar

Pricope, N. G., Mapes, K. L., Woodward, K. D., Olsen, S. F., Britton Baxley, J., 2019: Multi-Sensor Assessment of the Effects of Varying Processing Parameters on Uas Product Accuracy and Quality. Drones, 3:1–17.10.3390/drones3030063Search in Google Scholar

R Core Team 2020: R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. Available in: https://www.r-project.org/Search in Google Scholar

RStudio Team 2019: RStudio: Integrated Development Environment for R. Available in: https://www.rstudio.com/Search in Google Scholar

Schneider, C. A., Rasband, W. S., Eliceiri, K. W., 2012: NIH Image to ImageJ: 25 Years of Image Analysis. Nature Methods, 9:671–675.10.1038/nmeth.2089555454222930834Search in Google Scholar

Stöcker, C., Koeva, M., Nex, F., 2018: Deliverable 4.2 Data Quality Assessment of UAV-Based Products for Land Tenure Recording. H2020 its4land 687828, 55 p.Search in Google Scholar

Wickham, H., 2016: Ggplot2: Elegant Graphics for Data Analysis. Springer-Verlag New York, 213 p.10.1007/978-3-319-24277-4_9Search in Google Scholar

Wickham, H., Hester, J., 2020: Readr: Read Rectangular Text Data. Available in: https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=readrSearch in Google Scholar

• Bioeconomy perception by students of different study programs – study from Slovakia

• Growth of Scots pine (Pinus sylvestris L.) stands on soils with close bedding of crystalline parent rocks in Central Polissya, Ukraine

• Population genetic diversity in Quercus robur and Ulmus laevis in Southern Urals (Russia): a comparatively study of adults and progeny in localities with contrast forest cover

• Indicators of caesium 137 concentration in forest litter and health status of pines (Pinus sylvestris L.) in the Chernobyl zone

• Woodland planting on UK pasture land is not economically feasible, yet is more profitable than some traditional farming practices

• Radial increment and defoliation of Pinus sylvestris (L.) on sandy soils relate to summer temperatures and ground water level