Otwarty dostęp

Clinical nursing visual health education pathway for patients with perianal abscess†

Ye-Qi He
Ye-Qi He
, 
Xu-Xia Che
Xu-Xia Che
, 
En-Jie Zhu
En-Jie Zhu
, 
He-Ye Jin
He-Ye Jin
 oraz 
Li-Chao Bao
Li-Chao Bao
   | 31 gru 2022
Frontiers of Nursing's Cover Image
O artykule
Poprzedni artykuł
Następny artykuł
Zacytuj
Article Category: Original Article
Data publikacji: 31 gru 2022
Zakres stron: 371 - 377
Otrzymano: 03 kwi 2022
Przyjęty: 31 sie 2022
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/fon-2022-0047
Słowa kluczowe
© 2022 Ye-Qi He et al., published by Sciendo
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Figure 1.

Between group comparison of VAS scores before and after intervention. Note: ***There were significant differences in VAS scores in the experimental group before and after intervention (P < 0.001); **There were significant differences in VAS scores in the control group before and after intervention (P < 0.01); *There were significant differences in VAS scores between the two groups after intervention (P < 0.05); VAS, visual analog scale.
Between group comparison of VAS scores before and after intervention. Note: ***There were significant differences in VAS scores in the experimental group before and after intervention (P < 0.001); **There were significant differences in VAS scores in the control group before and after intervention (P < 0.01); *There were significant differences in VAS scores between the two groups after intervention (P < 0.05); VAS, visual analog scale.

Figure 2.

Between group comparison of clinical nursing quality. Note: **There were significant differences in nursing responsibility between the two groups (P < 0.05); *indicates that there were significant differences in nursing skills between the two groups (P < 0.05); *There were significant differences in nursing ability between the two groups (P < 0.05).
Between group comparison of clinical nursing quality. Note: **There were significant differences in nursing responsibility between the two groups (P < 0.05); *indicates that there were significant differences in nursing skills between the two groups (P < 0.05); *There were significant differences in nursing ability between the two groups (P < 0.05).

Between group comparison of clinical nursing satisfaction, n (%) (n = 40).

Groups Experimental group Control group X2 P
Very satisfied 25 (62.5) 18 (45.0)
Satisfied 12 (30.0) 12 (30.0)
Unsatisfied 3 (7.5) 10 (25.0)
Overall satisfied 37 (92.5) 30 (75.0) 4.501 0.034

Between group comparison of perianal abscess related knowledge scores, n (%) (n = 40).

Group Experimental group Control group X2 P
Good mastery 23 (57.5) 9 (22.5)
Basic mastery 15 (37.5) 19 (47.5)
Non-mastery 2 (5.0) 12 (30.0)
Mastery rate 38 (95.0) 28 (70.0) 8.658 0.003

Comparison of general information between the two groups (n = 40).

Types Experimental group Control group P
Gender, n (%) 0.499
    Male 24 (60.0) 21 (52.5)
    Female 16 (40.0) 19 (47.5)
Average age, years 41.8 ± 7.5 40.2 ± 8.2 0.728
Average height, cm 165.72 ± 8.72 166.32 ± 7.36 0.875
BMI, kg/m2 21.32 ± 1.76 20.92 ± 1.93 0.937
eISSN:
2544-8994
Język:
Angielski
Częstotliwość wydawania:
4 razy w roku
Dziedziny czasopisma:
Medycyna, Zawody pomocnicze, pielęgniarstwo
Kanał RSS czasopisma