Otwarty dostęp

Foliar application of polyamines improve some morphological and physiological characteristics of rose


Zacytuj

Figure 1

The effect of polyamine concentration on stem fresh weight of rose ‘Herbert Stevens’. Values followed by the same letter(s) do not differ significantly at p = 0.01.
The effect of polyamine concentration on stem fresh weight of rose ‘Herbert Stevens’. Values followed by the same letter(s) do not differ significantly at p = 0.01.

Figure 2

The effect of polyamine concentration on stem dry weight of rose ‘Herbert Stevens’. Values followed by the same letter(s) do not differ significantly at p = 0.01.
The effect of polyamine concentration on stem dry weight of rose ‘Herbert Stevens’. Values followed by the same letter(s) do not differ significantly at p = 0.01.

Figure 3

The effect of polyamine type on leaf thickness of rose ‘Herbert Stevens’. Values followed by the same letter(s) do not differ significantly at p = 0.05.
The effect of polyamine type on leaf thickness of rose ‘Herbert Stevens’. Values followed by the same letter(s) do not differ significantly at p = 0.05.

Figure 4

The effect of polyamine concentration on soluble sugar of rose ‘Herbert Stevens’. Values followed by the same letter(s) do not differ significantly at p = 0.01.
The effect of polyamine concentration on soluble sugar of rose ‘Herbert Stevens’. Values followed by the same letter(s) do not differ significantly at p = 0.01.

Figure 5

The effect of polyamine concentration on anthocyanin of rose ‘Herbert Stevens’. Values followed by the same letter(s) do not differ significantly at p = 0.05.
The effect of polyamine concentration on anthocyanin of rose ‘Herbert Stevens’. Values followed by the same letter(s) do not differ significantly at p = 0.05.

Figure 6

The interactive effect of type and concentration of polyamine on total phenol of rose ‘Herbert Stevens’. Values followed by the same letter(s) do not differ significantly at p = 0.01.
The interactive effect of type and concentration of polyamine on total phenol of rose ‘Herbert Stevens’. Values followed by the same letter(s) do not differ significantly at p = 0.01.

Figure 7

The interactive effect of type and concentration of polyamine on antioxidant capacity of rose ‘Herbert Stevens’. Values followed by the same letter(s) do not differ significantly at p = 0.01.
The interactive effect of type and concentration of polyamine on antioxidant capacity of rose ‘Herbert Stevens’. Values followed by the same letter(s) do not differ significantly at p = 0.01.

The effect of putrescine (Put), spermidine (Spd) and spermine (Spm) on some characteristics of rose ‘Herbert Stevens’.

Treatment Leaves dry weight (g) Leaves fresh weight (g) Leaf area (mm2) Number of leaves/plant Number of shoots/plant Plant height (cm)
Control 0.18 ± 0.03 c 0.44 ± 0.07 cd 2,604 ± 174.45 bc 19.60 ± 0.58 ab 4.30 ± 1.53 b 7.60 ± 1.16 bc
Put 1 mM 0.31 ± 0.03 a 0.71 ± 0.04 a 3,371 ± 235.56 a 22.60 ± 3.06 a 6.30 ± 1.53 a 16.60 ± 3.21 a
Put 2 mM 0.30 ± 0.03 a 0.72 ± 0.06 a 3,624 ± 395.18 a 14.60 ± 1.53 bc 3.60 ± 1.15 b 13.00 ± 4.36 ab
Put 4 mM 0.28 ± 0.05 ab 0.64 ± 0.09 ab 3,686 ± 339.37 a 18.30 ± 1.53 abc 4.30 ± 0.58 b 11.60 ± 1.53 abc
Spd 1 mM 0.15 ± 0.03 c 0.39 ± 0.06 d 2,285 ± 304.91 c 18.00 ± 2.65 abc 4.30 ± 0.58 b 10.00 ± 1.73 bc
Spd 2 mM 0.22 ± 0.02 bc 0.55 ± 0.08 bc 3,275 ± 322.75 ab 14.30 ± 2.52 c 3.60 ± 1.53 b 6.30 ± 1.53 c
Spd 4 mM 0.16 ± 0.012 c 0.42 ± 0.07 cd 2,649 ± 330.73 bc 22.00 ± 1.00 a 4.60 ± 1.53 b 9.00 ± 2.00 bc
Spm 1 mM 0.18 ± 0.04 c 0.45 ± 0.09 cd 2,357 ± 270.19 c 16.60 ± 2.08 bc 3.60 ± 1.15 b 7.60 ± 1.53 bc
Spm 2 mM 0.23 ± 0.04 abc 0.56 ± 0.11 bc 3,380 ± 76.81 a 15.00 ± 3.46 bc 3.60 ± 0.58 b 12.00 ± 2.00 ab
Spm 4 mM 0.22 ± 0.03 bc 0.55 ± 0.06 bc 3,435 ± 329.13 a 6.60 ± 2.08 d 3.60 ± 1.15 b 9.30 ± 1.53 bc
eISSN:
2083-5965
Język:
Angielski
Częstotliwość wydawania:
2 razy w roku
Dziedziny czasopisma:
Life Sciences, Plant Science, Zoology, Ecology, other