Two Distinct Nutritional Assessment Tools Have Dissimilar Outcomes in a Sample of Older Adult Patients With Cancer
, , , , , oraz | 30 paź 2022
O artykule
Article Category: Research Article
Data publikacji: 30 paź 2022
Zakres stron: 30 - 37
Otrzymano: 17 maj 2022
Przyjęty: 23 cze 2022
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/fco-2021-0016
Słowa kluczowe
© 2022 Tatiane Correia Rios et al., published by Sciendo
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3
Figure 1:
Figure 2:
Figure 3:
Concurrence analysis for the categories ‘Well nourished’, ‘At risk or moderately malnourished’, and ‘Severely malnourished’ using the PG-SGA and MNA tools in the population investigated.
| 217 (80.4%) | 51 (18.9%) | 2 (0.7%) | 270 (62.5%) | 0.453 | 0.000 | |
| 43 (33.3%) | 81 (62.8%) | 5 (3.9%) | 129 (29.9%) | |||
| 4 (12.1%) | 16 (48.5%) | 13 (39.4%) | 33 (7.6%) | |||
| 264 (61.1%) | 148 (34.3%) | 20 (4.6%) | 432 | |||
Poisson regression analysis and multiple predictors of nutritional status, as defined by the PG-SGA, calculated for the population investigated.
| 1.63 (1.08 – 2.47) | 0.020 | - | - | |
| 2.52 (1.59 – 3.98) | 0.000 | - | - | |
| 2.55 (1.68 – 3.88) | 0.000 | - | - | |
| 1.81 (1.22 – 2.70) | 0.003 | 1.54 (1.01 – 2.35) | 0.043 | |
| 3.26 (2.38 – 4.47) | 0.000 | 2.00 (1.40 – 2.87) | 0.000 | |
| 2.65 (1.67 – 4.19) | 0.000 | - | - | |
| 2.22 (1.24 – 4.00) | 0.008 | - | - | |
| 1.72 (1.14 – 2.60) | 0.100 | - | - | |
| 2.03 (0.90 – 4.60) | 0.088 | - | - | |
| 2.29 (1.43 – 3.65) | 0.001 | - | - | |
| 2.21 (1.56 – 3.14) | 0.000 | - | - | |
| 4.98 (3.43 – 7.21) | 0.000 | 4.00 (2.70 – 5.92) | 0.000 | |
| 3.75 (2.67 – 5.24) | 0.000 | - | - | |
| 1.73 (1.20 – 2.50) | 0.003 |