[[1] Aguilera, M. K.; Merchant, A.; Shah, M.; et al.: Sinfonia: a new paradigm for building scalable distributed systems. In Proceedings of twenty-first ACM SIGOPS symposium on Operating systems principles, SOSP ’07, New York, NY, USA: ACM, 2007, pp. 159-174.]Search in Google Scholar
[[2] Bocchino, R. L.; Adve, V. S.; Chamberlain, B. L.: Software transactionalmemory for large scale clusters. In Proceedings of the 13th ACM SIGPLAN Symposium on Principles and practice of parallel programming, PPoPP ’08, New York, NY, USA: ACM, 2008, pp. 247-258.]Search in Google Scholar
[[3] Burckhardt, S.; Baldassin, A.; Leijen, D.: Concurrent programming with revisions and isolation types. In Proceedings of the ACM international conference on Object oriented programming systems languages and applications, OOPSLA ’10, New York, NY, USA: ACM, 2010, pp. 691-707.]Search in Google Scholar
[[4] Burckhardt, S.; Fahndrich, M.; Leijen, D.; et al.: Eventually Consistent Transactions. In Proceedings of the 22n European Symposium on Programming (ESOP), Springer, March 2012.10.1007/978-3-642-28869-2_4]Search in Google Scholar
[[5] Couceiro, M.; Romano, P.; Carvalho, N.; et al.: D2STM: Dependable Distributed Software Transactional Memory. In Proceedings of the 2009 15th IEEE pacific Rim International Symposium on Dependable Computing, PRDC ’09, Washington, DC, USA: IEEE Computer Society, 2009, pp. 307-313.]Search in Google Scholar
[[6] Gilbert, S.; Lynch, N.: Brewer’s conjecture and the feasibility of consistent, available, partition-tolerant web services. SIGACT News, volume 33, num. 2, June 2002: pp. 51-59.10.1145/564585.564601]Search in Google Scholar
[[7] Herlihy, M.; Moss, J. E. B.: Transactional memory: architectural support for lock-free data structures. SIGARCH Comput. Archit. News, volume 21, num. 2, May 1993: pp. 289-300.10.1145/173682.165164]Search in Google Scholar
[[8] Herlihy, M.; Koskinen, E.: Transactional boosting: a methodology for highlyconcurrent transactional objects. In Proceedings of the 13th ACM SIGPLAN Symposium on Principles and practice of parallel programming, PPoPP ’08, New York, NY, USA: ACM, 2008, pp. 207-216.]Search in Google Scholar
[[9] Koskinen, E.; Parkinson, M.; Herlihy, M.: Coarse-grained transactions. In Pro- ceedings of the 37th annual ACM SIGPLAN-SIGACT symposium on Principles of programming languages, POPL ’10, New York, NY, USA: ACM, 2010, pp. 19-30.]Search in Google Scholar
[[10] Kotselidis, C.; Ansari, M.; Jarvis, K.; et al.: DiSTM: A Software Transactional Memory Framework for Clusters. In Proceedings of the 2008 37th International Conference on Parallel Processing, ICPP ’08,Washington, DC, USA: IEEE Computer Society, 2008, pp. 51-58.]Search in Google Scholar
[[11] Kulkarni, M.; Pingali, K.; Walter, B.; et al.: Optimistic parallelism requires abstractions. In Proceedings of the 2007 ACM SIGPLAN conference on Pro- gramming language design and implementation, PLDI ’07, New York, NY, USA: ACM, 2007, pp. 211-222.]Search in Google Scholar
[[12] Lee, J.; Dash, A.; Tucker, S.; et al.: Fault-Tolerant Distributed Transactional Memory. Under review for Transactions on Programming Languages and Systems.]Search in Google Scholar
[[13] Manassiev, K.; Mihailescu, M.; Amza, C.: Exploiting distributed version concurrency in a transactionalmemory cluster. In Proceedings of the eleventh ACM SIG- PLAN symposium on Principles and practice of parallel programming, PPoPP ’06, New York, NY, USA: ACM, 2006, pp. 198-208.]Search in Google Scholar
[[14] Mesaros, V.; Collet, R.; Glynn, K.; et al.: A Transactional System for Structured Overlay Networks. March 2005.]Search in Google Scholar
[[15] M¨uller, M.-F.; M¨oller, K.-T.; Sch¨ottner, M.: Commit Protocols for a Distributed Transactional Memory. In Proc. of the 2010 International Conference on Par- allel and Distributed Computing, Applications and Technologies, PDCAT ’10, Washington, DC, USA: IEEE Computer Society, 2010, pp. 1-10.]Search in Google Scholar
[[16] Ni, Y.; Menon, V. S.; Adl-Tabatabai, A.-R.; et al.: Open nesting in software transactional memory. In Proceedings of the 12th ACM SIGPLAN symposium on Principles and practice of parallel programming, PPoPP 07, New York, NY, USA: ACM, 2007, pp. 68-78.]Search in Google Scholar
[[17] Pauloviˇc, A; N´avrat, P.: Designing a Software TransactionalMemory for Peer-to- Peer Systems. In New Trends in Databases and Information Systems, Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, volume 185, Springer, 2013, pp.395-401. 10.1007/978-3-642-32518-2_37]Search in Google Scholar
[[18] Pratt-Szeliga, P.; Fawcet, J.: p2pstm: A Peer-to-Peer Software Transactional Memory. Technical report, Syracuse University, Syracuse, NY, 2010.]Search in Google Scholar
[[19] Shavit, N.; Touitou, D.: Software transactional memory. In Proceedings of the fourteenth annual ACM symposium on Principles of distributed computing, PODC ’95, New York, NY, USA: ACM, 1995, pp. 204-213.]Search in Google Scholar
