[
Ädel, Annelie. Metadiscourse in L1 and L2 English. Vol. 24. Amsterdam:Benjamins, 2006. Print.10.1075/scl.24
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Al-Ali, Mohammed N., and Yara B. Sahawneh. “Rhetorical and Textual Organization of English and Arabic PhD Dissertation Abstracts in Linguistics.” SKY Journal of Linguistics 24 (2011): 7-39. Web. 1 Oct. 2022.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Ali, Zuraina, et al. “Ten Interesting Facts about OnVac: A Tool to Learn Engineering and Technology Vocabulary.” International Journal of Language Education and Applied Linguistics 1 (2014): 33-44. Web. 1 Oct. 2022.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Anthony, Laurence. “AntConc Version 4.0.11.” Tokyo: Waseda U, 2022. Web. 1 Oct. 2022.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Behnam, Biook, and Jafar Zamanian. “Genre Analysis of Oxford and Tabriz Applied Linguistics Research Article Abstracts: From Move Structure to Transitivity Analysis.” The Journal of Applied Linguistics 6.12 (2015): 41-59. Web. 1 Oct. 2022.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Bolton, Kingsley. “The Sociolinguistics of Hong Kong and the Space for Hong Kong English.” World Englishes 19.3 (2000): 265-285. Print.10.1111/1467-971X.00179
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Breeze, Ruth. “Issues of Persuasion in Academic Law Abstracts.” Revista Alicantina de Estudios Ingleses 22 (2009): 11-26. Web. 1 Oct. 2022.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Buckingham, Louisa. “Development of English Academic Writing Competence by Turkish Scholars.” International Journal of Doctoral Studies 3 (2008): 1-18. Web. 1 Oct. 2022.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Busa, Maria. “The Use of Metadiscourse in Abstracts: A Comparison between Economics and Psychology Abstracts.” Dialogue within Discourse Communities. Ed. Julia Bamford and Marina Bondi. Tübingen: Niemeyer, 2005. 3-47. Print.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Cao, Yan, and Richard Xiao. “A Multi-dimensional Contrastive Study of English Abstracts by Native and Non-native Writers.” Corpora 8.2 (2013): 209-234. Web. 1 Oct. 2022.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Çandarlı, Duygu. “A Cross-cultural Investigation of English and Turkish Research Article Abstracts in Educational Sciences.” Studies about Languages 20 (2012): 12-17. Web. 1 Oct. 2022.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Chen, Ming, and Hui Zhou. “Comparison-and-Contrast in Research Articles of Applied Linguistics: A Frame-based Analysis.” Lingua 276 (2022). Web. 1 Oct. 2022.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Dahl, Trine. “Textual Metadiscourse in Research Articles: A Marker of National Culture or of Academic Discipline?” Journal of Pragmatics 36.10 (2004): 1807-1825. Print.10.1016/j.pragma.2004.05.004
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Darmi, Ramiaida. “The Effects of the Application of Cummins’ Model on Learners’ Language Use.” International Journal of Language Education and Applied Linguistics 1 (2014): 1-8. Web. 1 Oct. 2022.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
East-West Cultural Passage. “Aims and Scope.” Web. 1 Sept. 2022.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Escudero, Moisés Perales, and John M. Swales. “Tracing Convergence and Divergence in Pairs of Spanish and English Research Article Abstracts.” Ibérica 21 (2011): 49-70. Web. 1 Oct. 2022.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Friginal, Eric, and Sabah Slebi Mustafa. “A Comparison of US-based and Iraqi English Research Article Abstracts Using Corpora.” Journal of English for Academic Purposes 25 (2017): 45-57. Web. 1 Oct. 2022.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Golebiowski, Zofia. “Prominent Messages in Education and Applied Linguistic Abstracts: How Do Authors Appeal to Their Prospective Readers?” Journal of Pragmatics 41.4 (2009): 753-769. Print.10.1016/j.pragma.2008.10.009
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Hashim, Azirah. “Malaysian English.” English in Southeast Asia: Features, Policy and Language in Use. Ed. Ee-Ling Low and Azirah Hashim. Amsterdam: Benjamins, 2012. 55-74. Print.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Higgins, Christina. “Ownership” of English in the Outer Circle: An Alternative to the NS-NNS Dichotomy.” TESOL Quarterly 37.4 (2003): 615-644. Print.10.2307/3588215
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Hu, Guangwei, and Feng Cao. “Hedging and Boosting in Abstracts of Applied Linguistics Articles: A Comparative Study of English-and Chinese-medium Journals.” Journal of Pragmatics 43.11 (2011): 2795-2809. Print.10.1016/j.pragma.2011.04.007
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Hu, Jingjing, and Xuesong Andy Gao. “Linguistic Demands in English-language Science Textbooks in Hong Kong.” The Asian Journal of Applied Linguistics 5.1 (2018): 170-180. Web. 1 Oct. 2022.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Hyland, Ken. “Hedges, Boosters and Lexical Invisibility: Noticing Modifiers in Academic Texts.” Language Awareness 9.4 (2000): 179-197. Print.10.1080/09658410008667145
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Hyland, Ken. “Talking to the Academy: Forms of Hedging in Science Research Articles.” Written Communication 13.2 (1996): 251-281. Print.10.1177/0741088396013002004
]Search in Google Scholar
[
IBM. “IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows, Version 20.0.” New York: IBM, 2011. Web. 1 Sept. 2022.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Imm, Tan Siew. “Lexical Borrowing from Chinese Languages in Malaysian English.” World Englishes 28.4 (2009): 451-484. Print.10.1111/j.1467-971X.2009.01607.x
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Kachru, Braj B. “Models for Non-native Englishes.” The Other Tongue: English across Cultures 2 (1992): 48-74. Print.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Kader, Mohamed Ismail bin Abdul, Neda Begi, and Reza Vaghi. “A Corpus-based Study of Malaysian ESL learners’ Use of Modals in Argumentative Compositions.” English Language Teaching 6.9 (2013): 146-157. Web. 1 Oct. 2022.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Khojasteh, Laleh, and Reza Kafipour. “Are Modal Auxiliaries in Malaysian English Language Textbooks in Line with Their Usage in Real Language?.” English Language Teaching 5.2 (2012): 68-77. Web. 1 Oct. 2022.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Ki, Kung Wan. “The Modal of Obligation and Necessity “Must” in Hong Kong English.” 2010-2011. The Chinese University of Hong-Kong. Department of Linguistics and Modern Languages. Web. 1 Oct. 2022.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Kohn, Kurt. “Global Englishes and the Pedagogical Challenge of Developing One’s Own Voice.” Asian Englishes (2022): 1-13. Web. 1 Oct. 2022.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Kortmann, Bernd, and Benedikt Szmrecsanyi. “Global Synopsis: Morphological and Syntactic Variation in English.” A Handbook of Varieties of English. Ed. Bernd Kortmann, Kate Burridge, Rajend Mesthrie, and Edgard Schneider.Berlin: De Gruyter, 2004. 1142-1202. Print.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Kwan, Yu Hang. “The Teaching of Additive Connectives: An Evaluation of Current English Grammar Textbooks in Hong Kong.” The Asian Journal of Applied Linguistics 4.2 (2017): 161-172. Web. 1 Oct. 2022.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Lakoff, George. “Hedges: A Study in Meaning Criteria and the Logic of Fuzzy Concepts.” Contemporary Research in Philosophical Logic and Linguistic Semantics. The University of Western Ontario Series in Philosophy of Science. Vol 4. Ed. David Hockney, William Harper, and Barbara Freed. Dordrecht: Springer, 1975. 221-271. Print.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Lee, Jackie F. K., and Peter Collins. “On the Usage of Have, Dare, Need, Ought and Used to in Australian English and Hong Kong English.” World Englishes 23.4 (2004): 501-513. Print.10.1111/j.0083-2919.2004.00374.x
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Lee, Jackie FK, and Xinghong Li. “Cultural Representation in English Language Textbooks: A Comparison of Textbooks Used in Mainland China and Hong Kong.” Pedagogy, Culture & Society 28.4 (2020): 605-623. Web. 1 Oct. 2022.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Lee, Yong-hun, and Ki-suk Jun. “The Inner Circle vs. the Outer Circle or British English vs. American English.” Proceedings of the 30th Pacific Asia Conference on Language, Information and Computation: Posters. 2016. Web. 1 Oct. 2022.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Li, David C. S. “Two Decades of Decolonization and Renationalization: The Evolutionary Dynamics of Hong Kong English and an Update of Its Functions and Status.” Asian Englishes 20.1 (2018): 2-14. Web. 1 Oct. 2022.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Ling, Sii Mee Ling, and Chen Siew Eng. “Types of English Literature Teaching Approaches Preferred by Teachers in Secondary Schools in Miri, Sarawak.” International Journal of Language Education and Applied Linguistics 4 (2016): 1-14. Web. 1 Oct. 2022.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Lorés, Rosa. “On RA Abstracts: From Rhetorical Structure to Thematic Organization.” English for Academic Purposes 23 (2004): 280-302. Print.10.1016/j.esp.2003.06.001
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Lorés-Sanz, Rosa. “ELF in the Making? Simplification and Hybridity in Abstract Writing.” Journal of English as a Lingua Franca 5.1 (2016): 53-81. Web. 1 Oct. 2022.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Martín, Pedro Martín. “Personal Attribution in English and Spanish Scientific Texts.” BELLS: Barcelona English Language and Literature Studies 12 (2003). Web. 1 Oct. 2022.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
McManus, Kevin, Rosamond Mitchell, and Nicole Tracy-Ventura. “A Longitudinal Study of Advanced Learners’ Linguistic Development before, during, and after Study Abroad.” Applied Linguistics 42.1 (2021): 136-163. Web. 1 Oct. 2022.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Milton, John C. “Elements of a Written Interlanguage: A Computational and Corpus-based Study of Institutional Influences on the Acquisition of English by Hong Kong Chinese Students.” 2001. Researchgate. Web. 1 Oct. 2022.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Mukundan, Jayakaran, and Laleh Khojasteh. “Modal Auxiliary Verbs in Prescribed Malaysian English Textbooks.” English Language Teaching 4.1 (2011): 79-89. Web. 1 Oct. 2022.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Porto, Lucía Loureiro. “Linguistic Democratization in HKE across Registers: The Effects of Prescriptivism.” Research in Corpus Linguistics 9.2 (2021): 64-89. Web. 1 Oct. 2022.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Qian, David D., and Mingwei Pan. “Politeness in Business Communication: Investigating English Modal Sequences in Chinese Learners’ Letter Writing.” RELC Journal 50.1 (2019): 20-36. Web. 1 Oct. 2022.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Rajagopalan, Kanavillil. “The Complex Mosaic of Englishes.” English Today 32.1 (2016): 60-61. Web. 1 Oct. 2022.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Romanovska, Liudmila, et al. “Personal Reflection Development as Means of Forming Culture of Scientific Text Perception by Humanitarians.” BRAIN. Broad Research in Artificial Intelligence and Neuroscience 11.4 (2021): 118-131. Web. 1 Oct. 2022.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Rowley-Jolivet, Elizabeth, and Shirley Carter-Thomas. “Genre Awareness and Rhetorical Appropriacy: Manipulation of Information Structure by NS and NNS Scientists in the International Conference Setting.” English for Specific Purposes 24.1 (2005): 41-64. Print.10.1016/j.esp.2003.09.003
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Salles-Bernal, Soluna. “Synchronic Analysis of the Progressive Aspect in Three Varieties of Asian Englishes.” Miscelánea: A Journal of English and American Studies 51 (2015): 87-107. Web. 1 Oct. 2022.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Sandhu, Priti. “The Interactional and Narrative Construction of Normative and Resistant Discourses about Hindi and English.” Applied Linguistics 35.1 (2014): 29-47. Web. 1 Oct. 2022.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Schneider, Edgar W. Postcolonial English: Varieties around the World. Cambridge UP, 2007. Print.10.1017/CBO9780511618901
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Seoane, Elena. “World Englishes Today.” World Englishes: New Theoretical and Methodological Considerations. Ed. Elena Seoane and Cristina Suárez-Gómez. Amsterdam: Benjamins, 1-15. Print.10.1075/veaw.g57.01seo
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Steinhauer, Karsten. “Event-related Potentials (ERPs) in Second Language Research: A Brief Introduction to the Technique, a Selected Review, and an Invitation to Reconsider Critical Periods in L2.” Applied Linguistics 35.4 (2014): 393-417. Web. 1 Oct. 2022.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Stotesbury, Hilkka. “Evaluation in Research Article Abstracts in the Narrative and Hard Sciences.” Journal of English for Academic Purposes 2.4 (2003): 327-341. Print.10.1016/S1475-1585(03)00049-3
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Swales, John M., and Christine B. Feak. “From Text to Task: Putting Research on Abstracts to Work.” English for Professional and Academic Purposes. Ed. Miguel F. Ruiz-Garrido, Juan C. Palmer-Silveira, and Inmaculada Fortanet-Gómez. Utrecht: Brill, 2010. 169-182. Print.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Vassileva, Irena. “Commitment and Detachment in English and Bulgarian Academic Writing.” English for Specific Purposes 20.1 (2001): 83-102. Print.10.1016/S0889-4906(99)00029-0
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Villalibre, Eduardo Coto. “The ‘Fading’ of the Definitory Characteristics of Get-Passives: An Outer Circle Innovation?” English and American Studies in Spain: New Developments and Trends. Ed. Alberto Lázaro Lafuente and María Dolores Porto Requejo. Alcalá de Henares: Universidad de Alcalá, 2015. 181-188. Print.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Wee, Lian-Hee. “Phonological Patterns in the Englishes of Singapore and Hong Kong.” World Englishes 27.3-4 (2008): 480-501. Print.10.1111/j.1467-971X.2008.00580.x
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Xiao, Richard. “Multidimensional Analysis and the Study of World Englishes.” World Englishes 28.4 (2009): 421-450. Print.10.1111/j.1467-971X.2009.01606.x
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Zhou, Sijia, Ting Wen, and Shu Deng. “Applying Corpus-based Genre Analysis into the Teaching of Academic Chinese Writing.” International Journal of Chinese Language Teaching 3.1 (2022): 87-104. Web. 1 Oct. 2022.
]Search in Google Scholar
