[
Article 29 Data Protecton Working Party, Opinion 03/2013 on Purpose limitation: [online]. Available at: htps://ec.europa.eu/justice/article-29/documentation/opinion-recommendation/files/2013/wp203_en.pdf
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Article 29 Working Party opinion 05/2014 on Anonymisation Techniques, 10 April 2014 (WP 216).
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union OJ C 326, 26.10.2012, pp. 391–407.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Consolidated version of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union OJ C 326, 26.10.2012, pp. 47–390.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Directive (EU) 2019/1024 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 20 June 2019 on open data and the re-use of public sector information Directive (EU) 2019/1024 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 20 June 2019 on open data and the reuse of public sector information PE/28/2019/REV/1.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
DUCUING, Ch. The regulation of ‘data’: a new trend in the legislation of the European Union? 06 April 2021 [online]. Available at: https://www.law.kuleuven.be/citip/blog/the-regulation-of-data-a-new-trend-in-the-legislation-of-the-european-union/
]Search in Google Scholar
[
European Commission, ‘Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament and the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions: A European Strategy for Data’ (2020) 6.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
European Commission, ‘Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament and the Council: Guidance on the Regulation on a Framework for the Free Flow of Non-Personal Data in the European Union COM(2019) 250 Final’ (2019).
]Search in Google Scholar
[
EDPB-EDPS Joint Opinion 03/2021 on the Proposal for a Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council on European Data Governance (Data Governance Act) (2021).
]Search in Google Scholar
[
EDPB-EDPS Joint Opinion 03/2021 on the Proposal for a Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council on European Data Governance (Data Governance Act)’ (2021).
]Search in Google Scholar
[
GRAEF, I., GELLER, R., HUSOVEC, M. Towards a Holistic Regulatory Approach for the European Data Economy: Why the Illusive Notion of Non-Personal Data Is Counterproductive to Data Innovation. (September 27, 2018). TILEC Discussion Paper No. 2018-029 [online]. Available at: https://ssrn.com/abstract=325618910.2139/ssrn.3256189
]Search in Google Scholar
[
HAMUĽÁK, O., VARDANYAN, L., KOCHARYAN, H. The Global Reach of the Right to be Forgotten through the Lenses of the Court of Justice of the European Union. Czech Yearbook of Public and Private International Law. 2021, vol. 12, p. 211.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
HAMUĽÁK, O., KISS, L. N., GÁBRIŠ, T., KOCHARYAN, H. “This Content is not Available in your Country” A General Summary on Geo-Blocking in and Outside the European Union. International and Comparative Law Review. 2021, vol. 21, no. 1, pp. 153–183, https://doi.org/10.2478/iclr-2021-0006.10.2478/iclr-2021-0006
]Search in Google Scholar
[
KOCHARYAN, H., VARDANYAN, L., HAMUĽÁK, O., KERIKMÄE, T. Critical Views on the Right to Be Forgotten After the Entry Into Force of the GDPR: Is it Able to Effectively Ensure Our Privacy? International and Comparative Law Review. 2021, vol. 21, no. 2, pp. 96–115. https://doi.org/10.2478/iclr-2021-0015.10.2478/iclr-2021-0015
]Search in Google Scholar
[
NARAYANAN, A. and FELTEN, Ew. No Silver Bullet: De-Identification Still Doesn’t Work. (9 July 2014) [online]. Available at: https://freedom-to-tinker.com/2014/07/09/no-silver-bullet-de-identification-still-doesnt-work/
]Search in Google Scholar
[
OHM, P. Broken Promises of Privacy: Responding to the Surprising Failure of Anonymization, UCLA Law Review, Vol. 57, 2010, p. 1701 [online]. Available at: www.epic.org/privacy/reidentification/ohm_article.pdf
]Search in Google Scholar
[
PAPAKONSTANTINOU, V., DE HERT, P. Post GDPR EU laws and their GDPR mimesis. DGA, DSA, DMA and the EU regulation of AI/1 April 2021 [online]. Available at: https://europeanlawblog.eu/2021/04/01/post-gdpr-eu-laws-and-their-gdpr-mimesisdga-dsa-dma-and-the-eu-regulation-of-ai/
]Search in Google Scholar
[
PAVELEK, O., ZAJÍČKOVÁ, D. Personal Data Protection in the Decision-Making of the CJEU Before and After the Lisbon Treaty. Baltic Journal of European Studies. Sciendo, vol. 11(2), 2021, p. 167.10.2478/bjes-2021-0020
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Proposal for a Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council on a Single Market For Digital Services (Digital Services Act) and amending Directive 2000/31/EC COM/2020/825 final.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Proposal for a Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council on contestable and fair markets in the digital sector (Digital Markets Act) COM/2020/842 final.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Regulation (EU) 2016/679 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 27 April 2016 on the protection of natural persons with regard to the processing of personal data and on the free movement of such data, and repealing Directive 95/46/EC [2016] OJ L 119/2016.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Regulation (EU) 2018/1807 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 14 November 2018 on a framework for the free flow of non-personal data in the European Union (Text with EEA relevance.) PE/53/2018/REV/1OJ L 303, 28.11.2018, pp. 59–68.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Regulation (EU) 2018/1807 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 14 November 2018 on a framework for the free flow of non-personal data in the European Union (Text with EEA relevance.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Judgment of the Court of 5 June 2018. Unabhängiges Landeszentrum für Datenschutz Schleswig-Holstein v Wirtschaftsakademie Schleswig-Holstein GmbH. C-210/16, EU:C:2018:388.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Judgment of the Court of 6 November 2003. Criminal proceedings against Bodil Lindqvist. Case C-101/01.EU:C:2003:596.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 24 September 2019 Google LLC, successor in law to Google Inc. v Commission nationale de l‘informatique et des libertés (CNIL). Case C-507/17, ECLI:EU:C:2019:772.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber), 13 May 2014 Google Spain SL and Google Inc. v Agencia Española de Protección de Datos (AEPD) and Mario Costeja González. C-131/12, EU:C:2014:317.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 6 October 2015. Maximillian Schrems v Data Protection Commissioner Case C-362/14, EU:C:2015:650.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 19 October 2016. Patrick Breyer v Bundesrepublik Deutschland Case C-582/14. EU:C:2016:779.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 9 March 2017. Camera di Commercio, Industria, Artigianato e Agricoltura di Lecce v Salvatore Manni Case C-398/15, EU:C:2017:197.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 5 June 2018. Unabhängiges Landeszentrum für Datenschutz Schleswig-Holstein v Wirtschaftsakademie Schleswig-Holstein GmbH. Case C-210/16, EU:C:2018:388.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 14 February 2019. Sergejs Buivids v. Datu valsts inspekcija. C-345/17, EU:C:2019:131.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 29 July 2019. Fashion ID GmbH & Co.KG v Verbraucherzentrale NRW eV Oberlandesgericht Düsseldorf Case C-40/17, ECLI:EU:C:2019:629.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Guidelines 05/2020 on consent under Regulation 2016/679 Version 1.1 Adopted on 4 May 2020 [online]. Available at: https://edpb.europa.eu
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 16 July 2020. Data Protection Commissioner v Facebook Ireland Limited and Maximillian Schrems C-311/18, ECLI:EU:C:2020:559.
]Search in Google Scholar
