Empowering Women-Led Innovations: Key Players In Realising The Long-Term Vision For Rural Areas

[1] Ahl, H. (2018). The equality work that needs to be done. In Ahl, H., Bergmo-Prvulovic, I. & Kilhammar, K., eds., Human Resource Management: A Nordic Perspective (pp. 105–118). Abingdon-on-Thames: Routledge. Search in Google Scholar

[2] Atterton, J. (2016). Invigorating the New Rural Economy: Entrepreneurship and Innovation. In Shucksmith, M. & Brown, D., eds. Routledge International Handbook of Rural Studies (pp. 217– 235). Abingdon-on-Thames: Routledge. Search in Google Scholar

[3] Ayala, J. C. & Manzano, G. (2014). The resilience of the entrepreneur Influence on the success of the business. A longitudinal analysis. Journal of Economic Psychology, 42, 126–135. DOI: 10.1016/j.joep.2014.02.004. Search in Google Scholar

[4] Audretsch, D., Belitski, M. & Brush, C. (2020). Innovation in women-led firms: an empirical analysis. Economics of Innovation and New Technology, 31(1–2), 90–110. DOI: 10.1080/10438599.2020.1843992. Search in Google Scholar

[5] Banerjee, S., dos Santos, L. L. & Hulgård, L. (2023). Intersectional knowledge as rural social innovation. Journal of Rural Studies, 99, 252–261. DOI: 10.1016/j.jrurstud.2021.04.007. Search in Google Scholar

[6] Beck, S., Sheila, J., Stirling, A. & Polzin, C. (2021). The governance of sociotechnical transformations to sustainability. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability, 49, 143–152. DOI: 10.1016/j.cosust.2021.04.010. Search in Google Scholar

[7] Belghiti-Mahut, S., Lafont, A. & Yousfi, O. (2016). Gender gap in innovation: a confused link? Journal of Innovation Economics & Management, 19, 159–177. DOI: 10.3917/jie.019.0159. Search in Google Scholar

[8] Bibri, S. E. (2018). Backcasting in futures studies: a synthesized scholarly and planning approach to strategic smart sustainable city development. European Journal of Futures Research, 6, 13. DOI: 10.1186/s40309-018-0142-z. Search in Google Scholar

[9] Blais, M. (2012). Y a-t-il un ‘cycle de la violence antiféministe?’ Les effets de l’antiféminisme selon les féministes québécoises. Recherche Féministes/Cahiers du Genre, 25(1), 127–149. DOI: 10.3917/cdge.052.0167. Search in Google Scholar

[10] Boström, M. (2012). A missing pillar? Challenges in theorizing and practicing social sustainability: introduction to the special issue. Sustainability: Science, Practice and Policy, 8(1), 3–14. DOI: 10.1080/15487733.2012.11908080. Search in Google Scholar

[11] Bradshaw, S., Castellino, J. & Diop, B. (2017). Women’s role in economic development: overcoming the constraints. In Besada, H., McMillan Polonenko, L. & Agarwall, M., eds. Did the Millennium Development Goals Work? (pp. 191–216). Bristol: Policy Press. DOI: 10.46692/9781447335719.009. Search in Google Scholar

[12] Bruno, I. (2014). Benchmarking. In: Michalos, A. C., ed. Encyclopedia of Quality of Life and Well-Being Research (pp. 363–368). Dordrecht: Springer. Search in Google Scholar

[13] Bullock, R. & Tegbaru, A. (2019). Women's agency in changing contexts: A case study of innovation processes in Western Kenya. Geoforum, 105, 78–88. DOI: 10.1016/j.geoforum.2019.07.007. Search in Google Scholar

[14] Butler, J. (1990). Gender trouble: feminism and the subversion of identity. London: Routledge. Search in Google Scholar

[15] Butzin, A. & Terstriep, J. (2023). Strengthening place attachment through place-sensitive participatory regional policy in a less developed region. European Planning Studies, 31(12), 2510–2530. DOI: 10.1080/09654313.2022.2156274. Search in Google Scholar

[16] Camp, R. C. (1989). Benchmarking: The search for industry best practices that lead to superior performance. Milwaukee, WI: ASQC Quality Press. Search in Google Scholar

[17] Carayannis, E. G. & Stewart, M. R. (2013). Obsessed maniacs and clairvoyant oracles: empirically validated patterns of entrepreneurial behaviour. Journal of Innovation and Entrepreneurship, 2(2). DOI: 10.1186/2192-5372-2-2. Search in Google Scholar

[18] Cho, S., Crenshaw, K. W. & McCall, L. (2013). Toward a Field of Intersectionality Studies: Theory, Applications, and Praxis. Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society, 38(4), 785–810. DOI: 10.1086/669608. Search in Google Scholar

[19] Cornwall, A. (2016). Women's empowerment: What works? Journal of International Development, 28(3), 342–359. DOI: 10.1002/jid.3210. Search in Google Scholar

[20] Cornwall, A. & Rivas, A. M. (2015). From ‘gender equality and women’s empowerment’ to global justice: Reclaiming a transformative agenda for gender and development. Third World Quarterly 36(2), 396–415. DOI: 10.1080/01436597.2015.1013341. Search in Google Scholar

[21] Dalla Torre, C., Ravazzoli, E., Dijkshoorn-Dekker, M., Polman, N., Melnykovych, M., Pisani, E., Gori, F., Da Re, R., Vicentini, K. & Secco, L. (2020). The Role of Agency in the Emergence and Development of Social Innovations in Rural Areas. Analysis of Two Cases of Social Farming in Italy and The Netherlands. Sustainability, 12(11), 4440. DOI: 10.3390/su12114440. Search in Google Scholar

[22] Dargan, L. & Shucksmith, M. (2008). LEADER and Innovation. Sociologia Ruralis, 48 (3), 274–291. DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-9523.2008.00463.x. Search in Google Scholar

[23] Dedehayir, O., Mäkinen, S. J. & Ortt, J. R. (2022). Innovation ecosystems as structures: Actor roles, timing of their entrance, and interactions. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 183, 121875. DOI: 10.1016/j.techfore.2022.121875. Search in Google Scholar

[24] DeFelice, K. A. & Diller, J. W. (2019). Intersectional feminism and behavior analysis. Behavior Analysis in Practice, 12(4), 831–838. DOI: 10.1007/s40617-019-00341-w. Search in Google Scholar

[25] Demartini, P. (2018). Innovative Female-Led Startups. Do Women in Business Underperform? Administrative Sciences, 8(4), 70. DOI: 10.3390/admsci.8040070. Search in Google Scholar

[26] Diamanti, G. & Duncan, J. (2023). Gender and Agriculture: Policy tensions behind the EU gender gap. Wageningen University and Research. Search in Google Scholar

[27] Edwards-Schachter, M. (2018). The nature and variety of innovation. International Journal of Innovation Studies, 2(2), 65–79. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijis.2018.08.004. Search in Google Scholar

[28] Eleutério, R. P. & van Amstel, F. (2020). Matters of Care in Designing a Feminist Coalition. In Del Gaudio, Ch. & Parra-Agudelo, L., eds., PDC '20: Proceedings of the 16th Participatory Design Conference 2020 not paged. New York: Association for Computer Machinery. DOI: 10.1145/3384772.3385157. Search in Google Scholar

[29] Elomäki, A. & Kantola, J. (2022). Gender, Power and Corporatism: Complex Relationships and Analytical Perspectives. An (other) introduction to the special issue. Politique européenne 74(4), 38–52. DOI: 10.3917/poeu.074.0038. Search in Google Scholar

[30] Esparcia, J. (2014). Innovation and networks in rural areas. An analysis from European innovative projects, Journal of Rural Studies, 34, 1–14. DOI: 10.1016/j.jrurstud.2013.12.004. Search in Google Scholar

[31] Ferraresi, G. (2018). Sistemi territoriali di socioeconomie locali: il paradigma neorurale come fondamento. Scienze del territorio, 6, 70–76. DOI: 10.13128/Scienze_Territorio-24368Galliano. Search in Google Scholar

[32] Farrell, M., Sarkki, S., Holloway, L., Weir, L., Heikkinen, H., Lépy, É., Fransala, J., Nolan, N., McGuinness, N., von Muenchhausen, S., Santacruz, M., Herrera, E., Perello, M., Vingelli, G., Farrell, T., Garces Ortiz, S., Kinsella, A., Oprea, A., Incze, L., Mikolič, S., Kuhmonen, T., Korthals Altes, W., Šťastná, M., Vaishar, A., Zloch. J. (forthcoming). D1.1 FLIARA Conceptual Framework. Search in Google Scholar

[33] Fhlatharta, A. M. N. & Farrell, M. (2017). Unravelling the strands of ‘patriarchy’in rural innovation: A study of female innovators and their contribution to rural Connemara. Journal of Rural Studies, 54, 15–27. DOI: 10.1016/j.jrurstud.2017.05.002. Search in Google Scholar

[34] Foster, C. & Heeks, R. (2013). Conceptualising Inclusive Innovation: Modifying Systems of Innovation Frameworks to Understand Diffusion of New Technology to Low Income Consumers, European Journal of Development Research, 25(3), 333–355. DOI: 10.1057/ejdr.2013.7. Search in Google Scholar

[35] Fraser, N. (1998). Social justice in the age of identity politics: Redistribution, recognition, participation [Discussion Paper, No. FS I 98–108]. Berlin: Wissenschaftszentrum für Sozialforschung. Search in Google Scholar

[36] Freshwater, D. (2012). Rural Innovation – Crucial, But Rarely Systemic [Working paper] Lexington: University of Kentucky. Search in Google Scholar

[37] Freshwater, D. (2016). Economic Transformation: Understanding the Determinants of Rural Growth. In Shucksmith, M. & Brown, D, eds., Routledge International Handbook of Rural Studies [pp. 142– 151]. Abingdon-on-Thames: Routledge. Search in Google Scholar

[38] Galliano, D., Gonçalves, A. & Triboulet, P. (2017). Eco-Innovations in Rural Territories: Organizational Dynamics and Resource Mobilization in Low Density Areas. Journal of Innovation Economics and Management, 3(24), 35–62. DOI: 10.3917/jie.pr1.0014. Search in Google Scholar

[39] Gkartzios, M. & Lowe, P. (2019). Revisiting neo-endogenous rural development. In Scott, M., Gallent, N. & Gkartzios, M., eds., The Routledge companion to rural planning (pp. 159–169). Abingdon-on-Thames: Routledge. Search in Google Scholar

[40] Granstrand, O. & Holgersson, M. (2020). Innovation ecosystems: A conceptual review and a new definition. Technovation, 90–91, 102098. DOI: 10.1016/j.technovation.2019.102098. Search in Google Scholar

[41] Grin, J., Rotmans, J. & Schot, J. (2010). Transitions to Sustainable Development: New Directions in the Study of Long-Term Transformative Change. Abingdon-on-Thames: Routledge. Search in Google Scholar

[42] Hadden, J. & Seybert, L. A. (2016). What’s in a Norm? Mapping the Norm Definition Process in the Debate on Sustainable Development. Global Governance: A Review of Multilateralism and International Organizations, 22(2), 249–268. DOI: 10.1163/19426720-02202005. Search in Google Scholar

[43] Haji Ali, N., Muhamad, S., Jalil, M. & Man, M. (2018). Empowering Rural Women Entrepreneurs Through Social Innovation Model. International Journal of Business and Economic Affairs, 3(6), 253– 259. Search in Google Scholar

[44] Haug, R. (2018). Transformation towards sustainability: a conceptual framework. Sustainability Science, 13(3), 697–710. DOI: 10.1007/s11625-017-0513-1. Search in Google Scholar

[45] Hautamäki, A. & Oksanen, K. (2016). Sustainable Innovation: Solving Wicked Problems Through Innovation. In Mention, A. L. & Torkkeli, M., eds., Open Innovation: A Multifaced Perspective (pp. 87– 110). Singapore: World Scientific. DOI: 10.1142/9789814719186_0005. Search in Google Scholar

[46] Heijman, W., Hagelaar, G. & Heide, C. (2007). Rural resilience as a new development concept. In Dries, L., Heijman, W., Jongeneel, R., Purnhagen, K. & Wesseler, J., eds., EU Bioeconomy Economics and Policies: Volume II (pp. 195–211). Cham: Palgrave Macmillan. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-28642-2_11. Search in Google Scholar

[47] Holmberg, J. (1998). Backcasting: a natural step in operationalizing sustainable development. Greener Manage International, 23, 30–51. Search in Google Scholar

[48] Huang, Y., Li, P., Wang, J. & Li, K. (2022). Innovativeness and entrepreneurial performance of female entrepreneurs. Journal of Innovation & Knowledge, 7(4), 100257. DOI: 10.1016/j.jik.2022.100257. Search in Google Scholar

[49] Jiménez, A. (2018). Inclusive innovation from the lenses of situated agency: insights from innovation hubs in the UK and Zambia. Innovation and Development, 9(1), 41–64. DOI: 10.1080/215793X.2018.1445412. Search in Google Scholar

[50] Kamberidou, I. (2020). “Distinguished” women entrepreneurs in the digital economy and the multitasking whirlpool. Journal of Innovation and Entrepreneurship, 9, 3. DOI: 10.1186/s13731-020-0114-y. Search in Google Scholar

[51] Kline, S. J. (1985). Innovation Is Not a Linear Process, Research Management, 28(4), 36–45. Search in Google Scholar

[52] Könnölä, T., Eloranta, V., Turunen, T. & Salo, A. (2021). Transformative governance of innovation ecosystems. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 173, 121106. DOI: 10.1016/j.techfore.2021.121106. Search in Google Scholar

[53] Lyytimäki, J., Teperi, A. M., Jylhä, K. M., da Silva Vieira, R. & Mervaala, E. (2023). Dark side of resilience: systemic unsustainability. Frontiers in Sustainability, 4, 1241553. DOI: 10.3389/frsus.2023.1241553. Search in Google Scholar

[54] Leach, M., Rockström, J., Raskin, P., Scoones, I., Stirling, A. C., Smith, A., Thompson, J., Millstone, E., Ely, A., Arond, E. & Folke, C. (2012). Transforming innovation for sustainability. Ecology and Society, 17(2). DOI: 10.5751/ES-04933-170211. Search in Google Scholar

[55] Le Loarne-Lemaire, S., Bertrand, G., Razgallah, M., Maalaoui, A. & Kallmuenzer, A. (2021). Women in innovation processes as a solution to climate change: A systematic literature review and an agenda for future research. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 164, 120440. DOI: 10.1016/j.techfore.2020.120440. Search in Google Scholar

[56] Lindberg, M., Forsberg, L. & Karlberg, H. (2015). Gendered social innovation – a theoretical lens for analysing structural transformation in organisations and society. International Journal of Social Entrepreneurship and Innovation, 3(6), 472–483. DOI: 10.1504/IJSEI.2015.073540. Search in Google Scholar

[57] Maestripieri, L. (2017). Does Social Innovation Reduce the Economic Marginalization of Women? Insights from the Case of Italian Solidarity Purchasing Groups. Journal of Social Entrepreneurship, 8(3), 320–337. DOI: 10.1080/19420676.2017.1364289. Search in Google Scholar

[58] Maguirre, M. V., Ruelas, G. C. & Torre, C. G. D. L. (2016). Women empowerment through social innovation in indigenous social enterprises. Revista de Administração Mackenzie, 17(6), 164–190. DOI: 10.1590/1678-69712016/administracao.v17n6p164-190. Search in Google Scholar

[59] Mari, M., Poggesi, S., Abatecola, G. & Essers, C. (2024). Women entrepreneurs and innovation: Retrospect and prospect, Journal of Innovation & Knowledge, 9(3). DOI: 10.1016/j.jik.2024.100519. Search in Google Scholar

[60] Mariani, L., Trivellato, B., Martini, M. & Marafioti, E. (2022). Achieving sustainable development goals through collaborative innovation: Evidence from four European initiatives. Journal of Business Ethics, 180(4), 1075–1095. DOI: 10.1007/s10551-022-05193-z. Search in Google Scholar

[61] Mehan, A., Mostafavi, S. (2023). Building Resilient Communities Over Time. In Brears, R. C., ed., The Palgrave Encyclopedia of Urban and Regional Futures (pp. 99–103). Cham: Palgrave Macmillan. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-87745-3_322. Search in Google Scholar

[62] Meyers, D. T. (2002). Gender Identity and Women's Agency: Culture, Norms, and Internalized Oppression Revisited. In Meyers, D. T., ed., Gender in the Mirror: Cultural Imagery and Women's Agency (pp. 3–29). Oxford University Press. Search in Google Scholar

[63] Monllor i Rico, N. & Fuller, A. M. (2016). Newcomers to farming: towards a new rurality in Europe, Documents d’Anàlisi Geogràfica, 62(3), 531–551. DOI: 10.556/rev/dag.376. Search in Google Scholar

[64] Moulaert, F., Maccallum, D., Van den Broeck, P. & Cabeza, M. (2019). Bottom-Linked Governance and Socially Innovative Political Transformation. In Howaldt, J., Kaletka, Ch., Schröder, A. & Zirngiebl, M., eds., Atlas of Social Innovation – a World of New Practices (pp. 62–65). München: Oekom. Search in Google Scholar

[65] Mulgan, G. (2006). The process of social innovation. Innovations: Technology, Governance, Globalization, 1(2), 145–162. DOI: 10.1162/itgg.2006.1.2.145. Search in Google Scholar

[66] Müller, S. & Korsgaard, S. (2018). Resources and bridging: the role of spatial context in rural entrepreneurship. Entrepreneurship and Regional Development, 30(1–2) 224–255. DOI: 10.1080/08985626.2017.1402092. Search in Google Scholar

[67] Ní Fhlatharta, A. & Farrell, M. (2017). Unravelling the strands of ‘patriarchy’ in rural innovation: A study of female innovators and their contribution to rural Connemara. Journal of Rural Studies, 54, 15–27. DOI: 10.1016/j.jrurstud.2017.05.002. Search in Google Scholar

[68] Norman, D. A. & Verganti, R. (2014). Incremental and Radical Innovation: Design Research vs. Technology and Meaning Change. Design Issues, 30(1), 78–96. DOI: 10.1162/DESI_a_00250. Search in Google Scholar

[69] Owalla, B., Vorley, T. & Smith, H., eds., (2022). Gender, Diversity and Innovation: Concepts, Policy and Practice. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing. Search in Google Scholar

[70] Pecis, L. (2016). Doing and undoing gender in innovation: Femininities and masculinities in inno&vation processes. Human Relations, 69(11), 2117–2140. DOI: 10.1177/0018726716634445. Search in Google Scholar

[71] Pecis, L. & Berglund, K. (2021). Hidden in the limelight: A feminist engagement with innovation studies. Organization, 28(6), 993–1017. DOI: 10.1177/13505084211015380. Search in Google Scholar

[72] Pihlajamäki, M., Sarkki, S., Haapasaari, P. (2018). Food security and safety in fisheries governance – A case study on Baltic herring. Marine Policy 97, 211–219. DOI: 10.1016/j.marpol.2018.06.003. Search in Google Scholar

[73] Ranga, M., Etzkowitz, H. (2010). Athena in the World of Techne: The Gender Dimension of Technology, Innovation and Entrepreneurship. Journal of Technology Management and Innovation 5(1), 1–12. DOI: 10.4067/S0718-27242010000100001. Search in Google Scholar

[74] Ravazzoli, E., Dalla Torre, C., Da Re, R., Marini Govigli, V., Secco, L., Górriz-Mifsud, E., Pisani, E., Barlagne, C., Baselice, A., Bengoumi, M., Dijskhoorn-Dekker, M., Labidi, A., Lopolito, A., Melnykovych, M., Perlik, M., Polman, N., Sarkki, S., Vassilopoulos, A., Koundouri, P. & Nijnik, M. (2021). Can social innovation make a change in European and Mediterranean marginalized areas? Social innovation impact assessment in agriculture, fisheries, forestry, and rural development. Sustainability, 13(4), 1823. DOI: 10.3390/su13041823. Search in Google Scholar

[75] Reed, M. S., Graves, A., Dandy, N., Posthumus, H., Hubacek, K., Morris, J., Prell, C., Quinn, C. H. & Stringer, L. C. (2009). Who's in and why? A typology of stakeholder analysis methods for natural resource management. Journal of Environmental Management, 90(5), 1933–1949. DOI: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2009.01.001. Search in Google Scholar

[76] Richter, R. (2019). Rural social enterprises as embedded intermediaries: The innovative power of connecting rural communities with supra-regional networks. Journal of Rural Studies, 70, 179–187. DOI: 10.1016/j.jrurstud.2017.12.005. Search in Google Scholar

[77] Ritter-Hayashi, D., Vermeulen, P. & Knoben, J. (2019). Is this a man’s world? The effect of gender diversity and gender equality on firm innovativeness. Plos One, 14(9), e0222443. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0222443. Search in Google Scholar

[78] Rossister, M. (1993). The Matthew Matilda Effect in Science. Social Studies in Science 23(2), 325–341. Search in Google Scholar

[79] Sarkki, S., Dalla Torre, C., Fransala, J., Živojinović, I., Ludvig, A., Górriz-Mifsud, E., Melnykovych, M., Sfeir, P. R., Arbia, L., Bengoumi, M., Chorti, H., Gramm, V., López Marco, L., Ravazzoli, E. & Nijnik, M. (2021). Reconstructive social innovation cycles in women-led initiatives in rural areas. Sustainability, 13(3), 1231. DOI: 10.3390/SU13031231. Search in Google Scholar

[80] Slaughter, R. A. (1993). Futures concepts. Futures 25(3), 289–314. DOI: 10.1016/0016-3287(93)90138-J. Search in Google Scholar

[81] Schipper, E. L. F. (2020). Maladaptation: When Adaptation to Climate Change Goes Very Wrong. One Earth, 3(4), 409–414. DOI: 10.1016-/j.oneear.2020.09.014. Search in Google Scholar

[82] Schmitt, F., Sundermeier, J., Bohn, N. & Morassi Sasso, A. (2020). Spotlight on Women in Tech: Fostering an Inclusive Workforce when Exploring and Exploiting Digital Innovation Potentials. In ICIS 2020 Proceedings, 6. Atlanta, GA: Association for Information Systems. Search in Google Scholar

[83] Shucksmith, M. (2010). Disintegrated rural development? Neo-endogenous rural development, planning, and place-shaping in diffused power contexts. Sociologia Ruralis, 50(1), 1–14. DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-9523.2009.00497.x. Search in Google Scholar

[84] Shreeves, R. & Zamfir, L. (2023). Women in politics in the EU: State of play. Strasbourg: European Parliament. Search in Google Scholar

[85] Silvestre, B. S. & Ţîrcă, D. M. (2019). Innovations for sustainable development: Moving toward a sustainable future. Journal of Cleaner Production, 208, 325–332. DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.09.244. Search in Google Scholar

[86] Smith, T. & Kimmel, M. (2005). The Hidden Discourse of Masculinity in Gender Discrimination Law. Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society, 30(3), 1827–1849. DOI: 10.1086/427524. Search in Google Scholar

[87] Sundermeier, J., Wessel, L. & Davidson, E. (2018). Can Digital Innovation Alter the Landscape of Women's Entrepreneurship? In Thirty Ninth International Conference on Information Systems, Atlanta, GA: Association for Information Systems. Search in Google Scholar

[88] Suseno, Y. & Abbott, L. (2021). Women entrepreneurs' digital social innovation: Linking gender, entrepreneurship, social innovation and information systems. Information Systems Journal, 31, 717– 744. DOI: 10.1111/isj.12327. Search in Google Scholar

[89] Sweetman, C. (2013). Introduction, Feminist Solidarity and Collective Action. Gender and Development, 21(2), 217–229. DOI: 10.1080/13552074.2013.819176. Search in Google Scholar

[90] Taylor, S. P. (2017). What is innovation? A study of the definitions, academic models and applicability of innovation to an example of social housing in England. Open Journal of Social Sciences, 5(11), 128– 146. DOI: 10.4236/jss.2017.511010. Search in Google Scholar

[91] Tödtling, F. & Trippl, M. (2018). Regional innovation policies for new path development–beyond neo-liberal and traditional systemic views. European Planning Studies, 26(9), 1779–1795. DOI: 10.1080/09654313.2018.1457140. Search in Google Scholar

[92] Braun, J. von & Gatzweiler, F. W. (2014). Marginality—An Overview and Implications for Policy. In von Braun, J. & Gatzweiler, F., eds., Marginality (pp. 1–26). Dordrecht: Springer. DOI: 10.1007/978-94-007-7061-4_1. Search in Google Scholar

[93] Wilson, G. A. & Burton, R. J. (2015). ‘Neo-productivist’ agriculture: Spatio-temporal versus structuralist perspectives. Journal of Rural Studies, 38, 52–64. DOI: 10.1016/j.jrurstud.2015.02.003. Search in Google Scholar

[94] Yin, X., Chen, J. & Li, J. (2022). Rural innovation system: Revitalize the countryside for sustainable development. Journal of Rural Studies, 93, 471–478. DOI: 10.1016/j.jrurstud.2019.10.014. Search in Google Scholar

[95] Yuval-Davis, N. (2006). Intersectionality and Feminist Politics. European Journal of Women's Studies, 13(3), 193–209. DOI: 10.1177/135050680606575. Search in Google Scholar

[96] Zastempowski, M. & Cyfert, S. (2021). Impact of entrepreneur's gender on innovation activities. The perspective of small businesses. PLoS One, 16(10), e0258661. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0258661. Search in Google Scholar

[97] Zeb, A. & Ihsan, A. (2020). Innovation and the entrepreneurial performance in women-owned small and medium-sized enterprises in Pakistan. Women's Studies International Forum, 79, 102342. DOI: 10.1016/j.wsif.2020.102342. Search in Google Scholar

[98] Council of Europe (2015). Gender Equality Commission. Council of Europe, European Commission. https://rm.coe.int/16805a1cb6. Search in Google Scholar

[99] EIP-AGRI. Agricultural Knowledge and Innovation System. (2021). URL:https://ec.europa.eu/eip/agriculture/sites/default/files/eip. Search in Google Scholar

[100] European Commission (2021a). Long-Term Vision For Rural Areas: for stronger, connected, resilient, prosperous EU rural areas. https://ec.europa.eu/commission/presscorner/detail/en/ip_21_3162. Search in Google Scholar

[101] European Commission (2021b). Rural Vision: Action Plan. https://rural-vision.europa.eu/action-plan_en. Search in Google Scholar

[102] European Commission (no date). Rural Pact Community Platform. https://ruralpact.rural-vision.europa.eu/rural-pact_en. Search in Google Scholar

[103] European Council (2023). A long-term vision for the EU's rural areas: Council approves conclusions. Press Release, November 20^th. https://www.consilium.europa.eu/en/press/press-releases/2023/11/20/a-long-term-vision-for-the-eu-s-rural-areas-council-approves-conclusions/. Search in Google Scholar

[104] Eurostat (2021). Gender pay gap statistics. https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/statistics-explained/index.php?title=Gender_pay_gap_statistics. Search in Google Scholar

[105] EU SCAR AKIS (2019). Preparing for Future AKIS in Europe. Brussels, European Commission. Search in Google Scholar

[106] GFRAS (2016). The New Extensionist Learning Kit. Global Forum for Rural Advisory Services. Search in Google Scholar

[107] OECD (2014). Innovation and Modernising the Rural Economy. OECD Rural Policy Reviews. OECD Publishing. Retrieved on 11/06/2019 from https://dx.doi.org/10.1787/9789264205390-en. Search in Google Scholar

[108] United Nations (2015). "Goal 5: Gender Equality." In Transforming our World: The 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development. Search in Google Scholar

[109] Council of Europe (2016). Gender Equality Glossary. https://rm.coe.int/16805e55eb. Search in Google Scholar

[110] United Nations (2015). Transforming our worlds: The 2030 agenda for sustainable development. New York. Search in Google Scholar

[111] UN Women (2013). The role of women in rural development, food production and poverty eradication. At: https://www.unwomen.org/en/news/in-focus/rural-women-day/2013. Search in Google Scholar