Assessing the Potential of Social Innovation and Local Agenda-Setting within Rural Development Programmes: Insights from Austrian Leader Regions

[1] Albrechts, L. (2010). Transformative practices: where strategic spatial planning meets social innovation. In Oosterlynck, S., Van den Broeck, J., Albrechts, L., Moulaert, F. & Verhetsel, A., eds., Strategic Spatial Projects. Catalysts for Change. New York: Routledge. Search in Google Scholar

[2] Baur, N. (2011). Mixing process-generated data in market sociology. Quality & Quantity 45(6), 1233–1251. DOI: 10.1007/s11135-009-9288-x.10.1007/s11135-009-9288-x Search in Google Scholar

[3] Angermuller, J. (2018). “Accumulating Discursive Capital, Valuating Subject Positions.” From Marx to Foucault. Critical Discourse Studies 15(4), 414–425. DOI: 10.1080/17405904.2018.1457551.10.1080/17405904.2018.1457551 Search in Google Scholar

[4] Baker, S. & Mehmood, A. (2015). Social innovation and the governance of sustainable places. Local Environment: The International Journal of Justice and Sustainability, 20(3), 321–334. DOI: 10.1080/13549839.2013.842964.10.1080/13549839.2013.842964 Search in Google Scholar

[5] Baur, N. & Lahusen, C. (2005). Sampling Process-Generated Data in Order to Trace Social Change: The Case of Newspapers. In: van Dijkum, C., Blasius, J. & Durand, C., eds., Recent Developments and Applications in Social Research Methodology (pp. 1–24). Opladen: Verlag Barbara Budrich. Search in Google Scholar

[6] Biggs, R., Westley, F. R. & Carpenter, S. R. (2010). Navigating the back loop: fostering social innovation and transformation in ecosystem management. Ecology and Society 15(2), 9.10.5751/ES-03411-150209 Search in Google Scholar

[7] Bock, B. B. (2016). Rural marginalisation and the role of social innovation; a turn towards nexogenous development and rural reconnection. Sociologia Ruralis, 56(4), 552–573. DOI: 10.1111/soru.1119.10.1111/soru.12119 Search in Google Scholar

[8] Bock, B. B. (2019). Rurality and multi-level governance: marginal rural areas inciting community governance. In Scott, M., Gallent, N. & Gkartzios, M., eds., Routledge Companion to Rural Planning (pp. 103–113). Oxon/New York, NY: Routledge.10.4324/9781315102375-11 Search in Google Scholar

[9] Bosworth, G., Annibal, I., Carrol,l T., Price, L., Sellick, J. & Shepherd, J. (2016). Empowering Local Action through Neo-Endogenous Development; The Case of LEADER in England. Sociologia Ruralis 56(3), 427–449. DOI: 10.1111/soru.12089.10.1111/soru.12089 Search in Google Scholar

[10] Brenner, N. (2004). New state spaces: Urban governance and the rescaling of statehood. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199270057.001.0001 Search in Google Scholar

[11] Bumbalová, M., Takáč, I., Tvrdoňová, J. & Valach, M. (2016). Are stakeholders in Slovakia ready for community-led local development? Case study findings. European Countryside, 8(2), 160–174. DOI: 10.1515/euco-2016-0013.10.1515/euco-2016-0013 Search in Google Scholar

[12] Cañete, J. A., Navarro, F. & Cejudo, E. (2018). Territorially unequal rural development: the cases of the LEADER Initiative and the PRODER Programme in Andalusia (Spain). European Planning Studies, 26(4), 726–744. DOI: 10.1080/09654313.2018.1424118.10.1080/09654313.2018.1424118 Search in Google Scholar

[13] Castro-Arce, K. & Vanclay, F. (2020). Transformative social innovation for sustainable rural development: An analytical framework to assist community-based initiatives. Journal of Rural Studies (74), 45–54. DOI: 10.1016/j.jrurstud.2019.11.010.10.1016/j.jrurstud.2019.11.010 Search in Google Scholar

[14] Chatzichristos, G. & Nagopoulos, N. (2020). Regional Institutional Arenas for Social Innovation: A Mixed Methods Research. Journal of Social Entrepreneurship: 12(3), 315–337. DOI: 10.1080/19420676.2019.1705378.10.1080/19420676.2019.1705378 Search in Google Scholar

[15] Chatzichristos, G. & Nagopoulos, N. (2021). Socially innovative spatial planning: insights from within and beyond a LEADER framework. European Planning Studies, 29(8), 1419–1437. DOI: 10.1080/09654313.2020.1867510.10.1080/09654313.2020.1867510 Search in Google Scholar

[16] Cheshire, L. (2006). Governing rural development: discourses and practices of self-help in Australian rural policy. Aldershot: Ashgate Publishing. Search in Google Scholar

[17] Chevalier, P., Mačiulytė, J., Razafimahefa, L. & Dedeire, M. (2017). The LEADER programme as a model of institutional transfer: Learning from its local implementation in France and Lithuania. European Countryside, 9(2), 317–341. DOI: 10.1515/euco-2017-0020.10.1515/euco-2017-0020 Search in Google Scholar

[18] Christmann, G. B. (2016). Analysing changes in discursive constructions of rural areas in the context of demographic change: towards counterpoints in the dominant discourse on “dying villages”. Comparative Population Studies-Zeitschrift für Bevölkerungswissenschaft 41(3–4), 359–378. DOI: 10.12765/CPoS-2017-03en.10.12765/CPoS-2017-03 Search in Google Scholar

[19] Convery, I., Soane, I., Dutson, T. & Shaw, H. (2010) Mainstreaming LEADER delivery of the RDR in Cumbria: an interpretative phenomenological analysis. Sociologia Ruralis, 50(4), 370–391. DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-9523.2010.00519.x.10.1111/j.1467-9523.2010.00519.x Search in Google Scholar

[20] Copus, A., Courtney, P., Dax, T., Meredith, D., Noguera, J., Shucksmith, M. & Talbot, H. (2011). EDORA: European Development Opportunities for Rural Areas [Final Report]. Luxembourg & Inverness: ESPON & UHI Millennium Institute. Search in Google Scholar

[21] Dargan, L. & Shucksmith, M. (2008). LEADER and innovation. Sociologia Ruralis 48(3), 274–291. DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-9523.2008.00463.x.10.1111/j.1467-9523.2008.00463.x Search in Google Scholar

[22] Dax, T. & Oedl-Wieser, T. (2016) Rural innovation activities as a means for changing development perspectives – An assessment of more than two decades of promoting LEADER initiatives across the European Union. Studies in Agricultural Economics 118(1), 30–37. DOI: 10.7896/j.1535.10.7896/j.1535 Search in Google Scholar

[23] Dax, T., Strahl, W., Kirwan, J. & Maye, D. (2016). The Leader programme 2007–2013: Enabling or disabling social innovation and neo-endogenous development? Insights from Austria and Ireland. European Urban and Regional Studies 23(1), 56–68. DOI: 10.1177/0969776413490425.10.1177/0969776413490425 Search in Google Scholar

[24] De Rubertis, S. (2020). Foreword. In Cejudo, E. & Navarro, F., eds., Neo-endogenous Development in European Rural Areas (pp. V–XI). Cham: Springer. Search in Google Scholar

[25] Domanski, D., Howaldt, J. & Kaletka, C. (2020). A comprehensive concept of social innovation and its implications for the local context – on the growing importance of social innovation ecosystems and infrastructures, European Planning Studies 28(3), 454–474. DOI: 10.1080/09654313.2019.1639397.10.1080/09654313.2019.1639397 Search in Google Scholar

[26] Esparcia, J. & Abbasi, F. (2020). Territorial Governance and Rural Development: Challenge or Reality? In Cejudo, E. & Navarro, F., eds., Neo-endogenous Development in European Rural Areas (pp. 33–60). Cham: Springer.10.1007/978-3-030-33463-5_3 Search in Google Scholar

[27] Feichtinger, J. & Pregernig, M. (2005). Participation and/or/versus sustainability? Tensions between procedural and substantive goals in two local agenda 21 processes in Sweden and Austria. European Environment, 15(4), 212–227. DOI: 10.1002/eet.386.10.1002/eet.386 Search in Google Scholar

[28] Gallent, N. & Gkartzios, M. (2019). Defining rurality and the scope of rural planning. In Scott, M., Gallent N. & Gkartzios M., eds., The Routledge companion to rural planning (pp. 17–27). Oxon/New York, NY: Routledge.10.4324/9781315102375-3 Search in Google Scholar

[29] Garcia, M., Eizaguirre, S. & Pradel, M. (2010). Theorising governance in social innovation dynamics and strategies. In Moulaert, F., MacCallum, D., Mehmood, A. & Hamdouch, A., eds., Social Innovation: Collective Action, Social Learning and Transdisciplinary Research (pp. 31–40). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar. Search in Google Scholar

[30] Gerhardter, G. & Gruber, M. (2001). Regionalförderung als Lernprozess, Evaluierung der Förderungen des Bundeskanzleramtes für eigenständige Regionalentwicklung. Vienna: Bundeskanzleramt. Search in Google Scholar

[31] Godenhjelm, S., Lundin, R. A. & Sjöblom, S. (2015). Projectification in the public sector–the case of the European Union. International Journal of Managing Projects in Business 8(2), 324–348. DOI: 10.1108/IJMPB-05-2014-0049.10.1108/IJMPB-05-2014-0049 Search in Google Scholar

[32] Gstach, I. (2014). The Austrian social festival Keep the Ball Rolling in a peripheral region of Upper Styria. European Countryside, 6(1) 36–49. DOI: 10.2478/euco-2014-0004.10.2478/euco-2014-0004 Search in Google Scholar

[33] Hergesell, J., Baur, N. & Braunisch, L. (2020). Process-Oriented Sampling. Canadian Review of Sociology/Revue canadienne de sociologie 57(2), 1–21. DOI: 10.1111/cars.12281.10.1111/cars.1228132428363 Search in Google Scholar

[34] Keller, R. (2013). Doing Discourse Research. An Introduction for Social Scientists. London: Sage.10.4135/9781473957640 Search in Google Scholar

[35] Kumpulainen, K. (2016). The Village of the Year Competition Constructing an Ideal Model of a Rural Community in Finland. Sociální studia/Social Studies 13(2), 55–71. DOI: 10.5817/SOC2016-2-55.10.5817/SOC2016-2-55 Search in Google Scholar

[36] Kumpulainen, K. (2017). The discursive construction of an active rural community. Community Development Journal 52(4), 611–627. DOI: 10.1093/cdj/bsw009.10.1093/cdj/bsw009 Search in Google Scholar

[37] Lapping, M. B. & Scott, M. (2019). The evolution of rural planning in the Global North. In Scott, M., Gallent, N. & Gkartzios, M., eds., Routledge Companion to Rural Planning (pp. 28–45). Oxon/New York, NY: Routledge.10.4324/9781315102375-4 Search in Google Scholar

[38] Mayring, P. (2014). Qualitative content analysis: theoretical foundation, basic procedures and software solution. In: Bikner-Ahsbahs, A., Knipping, C. & Presmeg, N., eds., Approaches to Qualitative Research in Mathematics Education. Advances in Mathematics Education (pp. 365–380). Springer: Dordrecht. DOI: 10.1007/978-94-017-9181-6_13.10.1007/978-94-017-9181-6_13 Search in Google Scholar

[39] Moulaert, F. & Nussbaumer, J. (2005). The social region: beyond the territorial dynamics of the learning economy. European Urban and Regional Studies 12(1), 45–64. DOI: 10.1177/0969776405048500.10.1177/0969776405048500 Search in Google Scholar

[40] Narodoslawsky, M. & Grabher, A. (2001). Austria from eco-social market economy to LA21. In Lafferty, W. M., ed., Sustainable Communities in Europe (pp. 206–224). London: Earthscan. Search in Google Scholar

[41] Navarro, F. A., Woods, M. & Cejudo, E. (2015). The LEADER initiative has been a victim of its own success. The decline of the bottom-up approach in rural development programmes. The cases of Wales and Andalusia. Sociologia Ruralis 56(2), 270–288. DOI: 10.1111/soru.12079.10.1111/soru.12079 Search in Google Scholar

[42] Neumeier, S. (2012). Why do social innovations in rural development matter and should they be considered more seriously in rural development research? Proposal for a stronger focus on social innovations in rural development research. Sociologia Ruralis 52(1), 48–69. DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-9523.2011.00553.x.10.1111/j.1467-9523.2011.00553.x Search in Google Scholar

[43] Neumeier, S. (2017). Social innovation in rural development: identifying the key factors of success. The Geographical Journal 183(1), 34–46. DOI: 10.1111/geoj.12180.10.1111/geoj.12180 Search in Google Scholar

[44] Ney, S. (2014). The governance of social innovation: Connecting meso and macro levels of analysis. In Jones, M. D., Shanahan, E. A., McBeth, M. K., eds., The Science of Stories (pp. 207–234). New York: Palgrave Macmillan. DOI: 10.1057/9781137485861_10.10.1057/9781137485861_10 Search in Google Scholar

[45] Noack, A. & Federwisch, T. (2019). Social Innovation in Rural Regions: Urban Impulses and Cross-Border Constellations of Actors. Sociologia Ruralis 59(1), 92–112. DOI: 10.1111/soru. 12216.10.1111/soru.12216 Search in Google Scholar

[46] Novikova, M. (2021). Transformative Social Innovation in Rural Areas: Insights from a Rural Development Initiative in the Portuguese Region of Baixo Alentejo. European Countryside, 13(1), 71–90. DOI: 10.2478/euco-2021-0005.10.2478/euco-2021-0005 Search in Google Scholar

[47] Oedl-Wieser, T., Strahl, W. & Dax, T. (2010). The LEADER programme 2007–2013: refocusing towards agriculture-oriented activities as a consequence of ‘mainstreaming’ innovative rural action in Austria [unpublished conference paper]. Retrieved from http://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/94622/files/EAAE_paper_TOW_WS_TD_final_version.pdf. Last accessed: 26.01.2022. Search in Google Scholar

[48] Oosterlynck, S., Albrechts, L. & Van den Broeck, J. (2010). Strategic spatial planning through strategic projects. In Oosterlynck, S., Van den Broeck, J., Albrechts, L., Moulaert, F. & Verhetsel, A., eds., Strategic spatial projects. Catalysts for Change (unpaged). London: Routledge.10.4324/9780203839485 Search in Google Scholar

[49] Oosterlynck, S., Novy, A. & Kazepov, Y. (2019). Conclusion: Local social innovation and welfare reform. In Oosterlynck, S., Novy, A., Kazepov, Y., eds., Local Social Innovation to Combat Poverty and Exclusion: A Critical Appraisal (pp. 217–228). Bristol: Policy Press.10.2307/j.ctvs32tpj.15 Search in Google Scholar

[50] Plüschke-Altof, B. (2017). The Question of Responsibility: (De-) Peripheralising Rural Spaces in Post-Socialist Estonia. European Spatial Research and Policy 24(2), 59–75. DOI: 10.1515/esrp-2017-0009.10.1515/esrp-2017-0009 Search in Google Scholar

[51] Pollerman, K. (2014). Processes of Cooperation in Rural Areas: Obstacles, Driving Forces, and Options for Encouragement. In Kasabov, E., ed., Rural Cooperation in Europe (pp. 210–227). Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.10.1057/9781137348890_10 Search in Google Scholar

[52] Pollermann, K., Aubert, F., Berriet-Solliec, M., Laidin, C., Lépicier, D., Pham, H. V., Raue, P. & Schnaut, G. (2020). LEADER as a European policy for rural development in a multilevel governance framework: A comparison of the implementation in France, Germany and Italy. European Countryside, 12(2), 156–178. DOI: 10.2478/euco-2020-0009.10.2478/euco-2020-0009 Search in Google Scholar

[53] Ray, C. (1997). Towards a theory of the dialectic of local rural development within the European Union. Sociologia Ruralis 37(3), 345–362. DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-9523.1997.tb00055.x.10.1111/j.1467-9523.1997.tb00055.x Search in Google Scholar

[54] Ray, C. (2000). The EU LEADER programme: rural development laboratory. Sociologia Ruralis, 40(2), 163–171. DOI: 10.1111/1467-9523-00138.10.1111/1467-9523.00138 Search in Google Scholar

[55] Richter, R. (2019). Rural social enterprises as embedded intermediaries: The innovative power of connecting rural communities with supra-regional networks. Journal of Rural Studies 70, 179–187. DOI: 10.1016/j.jrurstud.2017.12.005.10.1016/j.jrurstud.2017.12.005 Search in Google Scholar

[56] Schwarz, M., Birke, M. & Beerheide, E. (2010). Die Bedeutung sozialer Innovationen für eine nachhaltige Entwicklung. In Howaldt, J. & Jacobsen, H., eds. Soziale Innovation. Auf dem Weg zu einem postindustriellen Innovationsparadigma (pp. 165–180). Wiesbaden: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften.10.1007/978-3-531-92469-4_9 Search in Google Scholar

[57] Scott, M., Gallent, N. & Gkartzios, M. (2019a). New horizons in rural planning. In Scott, M., Gallent, N. & Gkartzios, M., eds., Routledge Companion to Rural Planning (pp. 1–12). London: Routledge.10.4324/9781315102375-1 Search in Google Scholar

[58] Scott, M., Gallent, N. & Gkartzios, M. (2019b). Part I Concepts and foundations: Introduction. In Scott, M., Gallent, N. & Gkartzios, M., eds., Routledge Companion to Rural Planning (pp. 13–16). London: Routledge.10.4324/9781315102375 Search in Google Scholar

[59] Servillo, L. (2019). Tailored polities in the shadow of the state’s hierarchy. The CLLD implementation and a future research agenda. European Planning Studies, 27(4), 678–698. DOI: 10.1080/09654313.2019.1569595.10.1080/09654313.2019.1569595 Search in Google Scholar

[60] Sjöblom, S. & Godenhjelm, S. (2009). Project proliferation and governance—implications for environmental management. Journal of Environmental Policy & Planning 11(3), 169–185. DOI: 10.1080/15239080903033762.10.1080/15239080903033762 Search in Google Scholar

[61] Stoustrup, S. W. (2021). The re-coding of rural development rationality: tracing EU Governmentality and Europeanisation at the local level. European Planning Studies. DOI: 10.1080/09654313.2021.2009776.10.1080/09654313.2021.2009776 Search in Google Scholar

[62] Stoustrup, S. W. (2022). A rural laboratory in the Austrian alm—Tracing the contingent processes fostering social innovation at the local level. Sociologia Ruralis, 62, 542–563. DOI: 10.1111/soru.12372.10.1111/soru.12372 Search in Google Scholar

[63] Van Der Ploeg, J. D., Renting, H., Brunori, G., Knickel, K., Mannion, J., Marsden, T., De Roest, K., Sevilla-Guzmán, E. & Ventura, F. (2000). Rural Development: From Practices and Policies towards Theory. Sociologia Ruralis 40(4), 391–408. DOI: 10.1111/1467-9523.00156.10.1111/1467-9523.00156 Search in Google Scholar

[64] Woods, M. (2013). Rural development, globalisation and European regional policy: Perspectives from the DERREG Project. Geographia Polonica 86(2), 99–109. DOI: 10.7163/GPol.2013.11.10.7163/GPol.2013.11 Search in Google Scholar

[65] Agenda 21-Netzwerk Oberösterreich (2008). Zehn Gemeinden ziehen an einem Strang. Pp. 5 in Magazin21 1. (Linz: Oö. Akademie für Umwelt und Natur beim Amt der Oö. Landesregierung). Search in Google Scholar

[66] Agenda 21-Netzwerk Oberösterreich (2022). Gemeinden und Regionen. https://www.agenda21-ooe.at/ueber-uns/gemeinden-und-regionen. Accessed 16.06.2022. Search in Google Scholar

[67] Bureau of European Policy Advisers. 2011. Empowering people, driving change: Social Innovation in the European Union. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union. Available online at: https://ec.europa.eu/migrant-integration/library-document/empowering-people-driving-change-social-innovation-european-union_en. Search in Google Scholar

[68] European Commission (2013). “Guide to Social Innovation”. Directorate-General for Regional and Urban Policy, Publications Office. Available online at: https://data.europa.eu/doi/10.2776/72046. Search in Google Scholar

[69] Glamurs (2015). Green Lifestyles, Alternative Models and Upscaling Regional Sustainability (GLAMURS). https://glamurs.eu/. Accessed 06.06.2022 (note: the website seems to experience technical issues). Search in Google Scholar

[70] Gradl, J. (2003). Die Hausaufgaben sehr gut gemacht. Pp. 2 in Verband Mühlviertler Alm, Verein für Regional- und Tourismusentwicklung Almpost 01 (Unterweißenbach, Regionalverband Mühlviertler Alm). Available online: https://muehlviertleralm.at/fileadmin/template01/uploads/service/almpost/Almpost01_2003.pdf Accessed 25.11.2020. Search in Google Scholar

[71] Gradl, J. (2013). Tu was – der Funke hat gezündet. Pp. 2 in Verband Mühlviertler Alm, Verein für Regional- und Tourismusentwicklung Almpost 39. Unterweißenbach: Regionalverband Mühlviertler Alm). Available online: https://muehlviertleralm.at/fileadmin/template01/uploads/service/almpost/Almpost39_2013.pdf Accessed 25.11.2020. Search in Google Scholar

[72] LAG-Management Mühlviertler Kernland (n.d.) Begegnen. Beteiligen. Bewegen. KERNLAND 2020 – Lokale Entwicklungsstrategie 2014–2020 Region Mühlviertler Kernland. Freistadt: LAG Mühlviertler Kernland. Search in Google Scholar

[73] LAG-Management Perg-Strudengau (2021). Lokale Entwicklungsstrategie 2014-2020 Region Perg-Strudengau – Miteinander gestalten. Zusammen wachsen. Waldhausen im Strudengau: Geschäftsstelle der LAG Perg-Strudengau. Search in Google Scholar

[74] LAG Perg-Strudengau (n.d./a?). Projekte 2007 bis 2013. http://www.region-strudengau.at/index.aspx?rubriknr=6536 Accessed 01.08.2021. Search in Google Scholar

[75] LAG Perg-Strudengau (n.d./b?). Projekte 20014 bis 2020. http://www.region-strudengau.at/index.aspx?rubriknr=8584 Accessed 01.08.2021. Search in Google Scholar

[76] LAG Verband MÜHLVIERTLER ALM (2021). Bewerbung als Lokale Aktionsgruppe Lokale Entwicklungsstrategie Leader 2014–2020 & Übergangsjahre 2021–2022. Unterweißenbach: Verband Mühlviertler. Search in Google Scholar

[77] Land Oberösterreich (n.d.). Nutzen und Charakteristika von LEADER. https://www.land-oberoesterreich.gv.at/90939.htm. Accessed 16.06.2022. Search in Google Scholar

[78] OÖ. Landesausstellung (2022). FESTE FEIERN STIFT WALDHAUSEN. https://landesausstellung.at/archiv/ooe-landesausstellung-2002 Accessed 29.11.2021. Search in Google Scholar

[79] ÖAR-Regionalberatung (2009). Fünfundzwanzig Jahre ÖAR. In Fidlschuster, L., Hummelbrunner, R. & Scheer, G. (eds.). Impulse newsletter 01. Wien: ÖAR-Regionalberatung GmbH. Search in Google Scholar

[80] ÖROK (2002). Ex-post-Evaluierung der Ziel 5b-und LEADER II-Programme 1995–1999 in Österreich. ÖROK–Publikation Nr. 161, Band II–LEADER II. Wien: ÖROK. Search in Google Scholar

[81] Regionalentwicklungsverein Donau-Böhmerwald (n.d./a). Pumptrack & Skillpark St. Johann am Wimberg. https://www.donauboehmerwald.info/projekte/pumptrack_skillpark_st_johann_am_wimberg/. Accessed 29.11.2021. Search in Google Scholar

[82] Regionalentwicklungsverein Donau-Böhmerwald (n.d./b). Projekte. https://www.donauboehmerwald.info/projekte/. Accessed 01.08.2021. Search in Google Scholar

[83] Regionalverein LEADER Donau-Böhmerwald (2021). LEADER Periode 2014–2020. Anpassung Lokale Entwicklungsstrategie der Donau-Böhmerwald Region: „Gemeinsam die Lebensqualität in der Dreiländer-Region stärken“. (No publisher information). Search in Google Scholar

[84] Regionalverein Mühlviertler Kernland (n.d./a). Genehmigte Projekte 07–13. https://www.leader-kernland.at/index.aspx?rubriknr=6797. Accessed 01.08.2021. Search in Google Scholar

[85] Regionalverein Mühlviertler Kernland (n.d./b). Aktuell bewilligte Leader-Projekte. https://www.leader-kernland.at/index.aspx?rubriknr=9119. Accessed 01.08.2021. Search in Google Scholar

[86] Regionalverein Mühlviertler Kernland (n.d./c). Think! Tank region 2018 – Festival für Regionale Vordenkerinnen. https://http://2018.thinktankregion.at/. Accessed 29.11.2021. Search in Google Scholar

[87] Verband Mühlviertler Alm (2009). DIE ALM ZIEHT SEIT 1993 AN EINEM STRANG Die Mühlviertler Alm. Available online: https://muehlviertleralm.at/ueber-uns/ganzheitliche-regionalentwicklung/. Accessed 20.11.2020. Search in Google Scholar

[88] Verband Mühlviertler Alm (2019a). Leaderprojekte 2007–2013. https://muehlviertleralm.at/projekte/leaderprojekte-2007-2013/. Accessed 01.08.2021. Search in Google Scholar

[89] Verband Mühlviertler Alm (2019b). Leaderprojekte 2014–2020. https://muehlviertleralm.at/projekte/leaderprojekte-2014-2020/. Accessed 01.08.2021. Search in Google Scholar