[[1] Amcoff, J. (2012). Do rural districts die when their schools close? Evidence from Sweden around 2000. Educational Planning 20(3), 47–60.]Search in Google Scholar
[[2] Bailey, N. & Pill, M. (2015). Can the state empower communities through localism? An evaluation of recent approaches to neighbourhood governance in England. Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy 33(2), 289–304. DOI: 10.1068/c12331r.10.1068/c12331r]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[[3] Barakat, B. (2015). A ‘recipe for depopulation’? School closures and local population decline in Saxony. Population, Space and Place, 21(8), 735–753. DOI: 10.1002/psp.1853.10.1002/psp.1853]Search in Google Scholar
[[4] Barca, F., McCann, P. & Rodríguez-Pose, A. (2012). The case for regional development intervention: place-based versus place-neutral approaches. Journal of Regional Science. 52(1), 134–152. DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-9787.2011.00756.x.10.1111/j.1467-9787.2011.00756.x]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[[5] Bosworth, G. & Venhorst, V. (2018). Economic linkages between urban and rural regions – what´s in it for the rural? Regional Studies 52(8), 1075–1085. DOI: 10.1080/00343404.2017.1339868.10.1080/00343404.2017.1339868]Search in Google Scholar
[[6] Combes, P. P. & Overman, H. G. (2004). The spatial distribution of economic activities in the European Union. In Henderson, J. V. & Thisse, J. F., eds., Handbook of Regional and Urban Economics, Cities and Geography (pp. 2845–2909), Vol. 4. Amsterdam: Elsevier.10.1016/S1574-0080(04)80021-X]Search in Google Scholar
[[7] Copus, A. K. & de Lima, P. (2015). Territorial cohesion in rural Europe: the relational turn in rural development. London: Routledge.10.4324/9780203705001]Search in Google Scholar
[[8] Corey, E. K. & Wilson, M. (2006). Urban and Regional Technology Planning: Planning practice in the global knowledge economy. London: Routledge.10.4324/9780203799437]Search in Google Scholar
[[9] Dustmann, C. & Okatenko, A. (2014). Out-migration, wealth constraints, and the quality of local amenities. Journal of Development Economics 110, 52–63. DOI: 10.1016/j.jdeveco.2014.05.008.10.1016/j.jdeveco.2014.05.008]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[[10] Eger, J. M. (2009). Smart Growth, Smart Cities, and the Crisis at the Pump A Worldwide Phenomenon. I-WAYS - The Journal of E-Government Policy and Regulation 32(1), 47–53. DOI: 10.3233/IWA-2009-0164.10.3233/IWA-2009-0164]Search in Google Scholar
[[11] Elshof, H., Haartsen, T., Wissen, L. J. G. & Mulder, C. H. (2017). The influence of village attractiveness on flows of movers in a declining rural region. Journal of Rural Studies 56, 39–52. DOI: 10.1016/j.jrurstud.2017.07.004.10.1016/j.jrurstud.2017.07.004]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[[12] Etezadzadeh, Ch. (2016). Smart City – Future City? Smart City 2.0 as a Livable City and Future Market. Wiesbaden: Springer Fachmedien.10.1007/978-3-658-11017-8]Search in Google Scholar
[[13] Friedland, W. H. (1982). The end of rural society and the future of rural sociology. Rural Sociology 47, 589–608.]Search in Google Scholar
[[14] Graham, M. (2011). Time machines and virtual portals: the spatialities of the digital divide. Progress in Development Studies 11(3), 211–227. DOI: 10.1177/146499341001100303.10.1177/146499341001100303]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[[15] Halfacree, K. (2006). Rural space: constructing a three-fold architecture, In Cloke, P., Marsden, T. & Mooney, P. Handbook of Rural Studies. Thousand Oaks: Sage.10.4135/9781848608016.n4]Search in Google Scholar
[[16] Haupt, M. (2018). The Evolutionary Journey to Society 4.0. Society 4. On-line article. Available at: https://medium.com/society4/evolution-of-societies-93a5f0f9b31.]Search in Google Scholar
[[17] Haan, E., Meier, S., Haartsen, T. & Strijker, D. (2017). Defining „Success” of local citizens´ initiatives in maintaining public services in rural areas: A professional´s Perspective. Sociologia Ruralis 58(2), 312–330. DOI: 10.1111/soru.12173.10.1111/soru.12173]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[[18] Hite, J. (1997). The Thünen model and the new economic geography as a paradigm for rural development policy. Review of Agricultural Economics 19(2), 230–240. DOI: 10.2307/1349738.10.2307/1349738]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[[19] Hoggart, K. (1990). Let’s do away with rural. Journal of Rural Studies, 6(3), 245–257. DOI: 10.1016/0743-0167(90)90079-N.10.1016/0743-0167(90)90079-]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[[20] Kouřilová, J. (2018). Is a Basic School Important for a Local Development in Small Rural Villages? Case Study of the Stredocesky Region in the Czech Republic. In: Miczorek, W., ed., A World of Flows: Labour Mobility, Capital and Knowledge in an Age of Global Reversal and Regional Revival (pp. 104–105). Falmer Brighton: Regional Studies Association.]Search in Google Scholar
[[21] Malecki, E. J. (2003). Digital development in rural areas: potentials and pitfalls. Journal of Rural Studies 19(2), 201–214. DOI: 10.1016/S0743-0167(02)00068-2.10.1016/S0743-0167(02)00068-2]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[[22] Mitchell, W. (2007). Intelligent cities. UOC Papers 5. 4–9.]Search in Google Scholar
[[23] Naldi, L., Nilsson, P., Westlund, H. & Wixe, S. (2015). What is smart rural development? Journal of Rural Studies, 40, 90–101. DOI: 10.1016/j.jrurstud.2015.06.006.10.1016/j.jrurstud.2015.06.006]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[[24] Pant, L. P. & Odame, H. H. (2017). Broadband for a sustainable digital future of rural communities: A reflexive interactive assessment. Journal of Rural Studies, 54, 435–450. DOI: 10.1016/j.jrurstud.2016.09.003.10.1016/j.jrurstud.2016.09.003]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[[25] Pělucha, M. (2012). Venkov na prahu 21. století. Praha: Alfa nakladatelství.]Search in Google Scholar
[[26] Pelucha, M. & Kveton, V. (2017). The role of EU rural development policy in the neoproductivist agricultural paradigm. Regional Studies 51(12), 1860–1870, DOI: 10.1080/00343404.2017.1282608.10.1080/00343404.2017.1282608]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[[27] Pělucha, M. (2018). Reforma Společné zemědělské politiky EU [Background Document]. Praha: University of Economics.]Search in Google Scholar
[[28] Philip, L. J., Cottrill, C. & Farrington, J. (2015). “Two-speed” Scotland: patterns and implications of the digital divide in contemporary Scotland. Scottish Geographical Journal 131(3–4), 148–170. DOI: 10.1080/14702541.2015.1067327.10.1080/14702541.2015.1067327]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[[29] Riddlesden, D. & Singleton, A. D. (2014). Broadband speed equity: a new digital divide? Applied Geography 52, 25–33. DOI: 10.1016/j.apgeog.2014.04.008.10.1016/j.apgeog.2014.04.008]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[[30] Salemink, K., Strijker, D. & Bosworth, G. (2017). Rural development in the digital age: A systematic literature review on unequal ICT availability, adoption, and use in rural areas. Journal of Rural Studies 54, 360–371. DOI: 10.1016/j.jrurstud.2015.09.001.10.1016/j.jrurstud.2015.09.001]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[[31] Scott, M. (2013). Resilience: A conceptual lens for rural studies? Geography Compass 7(9), 597–610. DOI: 10.1111/gec3.12066.10.1111/gec3.12066]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[[32] Townsend, L., Sathiaseelan, A., Fairhurst, G. & Wallace, C. (2013). Enhanced broadband access as a solution to the social and economic problems of the rural digital divide. Local Economy: The Journal of the Local Economy Policy Unit 28(6), 580–595. DOI: 10.1177/0269094213496974.10.1177/0269094213496974]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[[33] Van Steen, P. J. M. & Pellenbarg, P. H. (2010). Population change and spatial transformation in the Netherlands. Tijdschrift voor economische en sociale geografie. 101(5), 612–618. DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-9663.2010.00636.x.10.1111/j.1467-9663.2010.00636.x]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[[34] Vaznoniené, G. & Pakeltiené, R. (2017). Methods for the assessment of rural social infrastructure needs. European Countryside, 9(3), 526–540. DOI: 10.1515/euco-2017-0031.10.1515/euco-2017-0031]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[[35] Woods, M. (2006). Redefining the „rural question”: the new „politics of the rural” and social policy. Social Policy & Administration 40(6), 579–595. DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-9515.2006.00521.x.10.1111/j.1467-9515.2006.00521.x]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[[36] Woods, M. 2011. Rural. London: Routledge.10.4324/9780203844304]Search in Google Scholar
[[37] Caballero, M. J., Taminich, I., Hoberg, Y., de Dinechin, F. & Mc.Mahon, M. (2005). Agriculture, Rural Development and Land Policies, [cit. 2019-02-20]. Available at: http://siteresources.worldbank.org/INTMEXICOINSPANISH/Resources/capitulo-8.pdf.]Search in Google Scholar
[[38] CERS (2016). The Central Register of Subsidies. Official database of subsidies provided to Czech municipalities.]Search in Google Scholar
[[39] CSO (2016). Selected socioeconomic indicators of municipalities in the Czech Republic. Czech Statistical Office.]Search in Google Scholar
[[40] Czech Telecommunication Office (2016). Data on Internet access in selected municipalities. Data were used in the ex-post evaluation of the RDP CR 2007-2013 in 2016.]Search in Google Scholar
[[41] ESPON (2017a). Shrinking rural regions in Europe – Towards smart and innovative approaches to regional development challenges in depopulating rural regions. ESPON, October 2017.]Search in Google Scholar
[[42] ESPON (2017b). Territorial Cooperation for the future of Europe. ESPON, Luxembourg, May 2018.]Search in Google Scholar
[[43] ESPON (2017c). The territorial and urban dimensions of the digital transition of public services. ESPON, Luxembourg, October 2017.]Search in Google Scholar
[[44] European Commission (2016). EU Action for SMART VILLAGES. Available on-line: https://ec.europa.eu/agriculture/sites/agriculture/files/rural-development-2014-2020/looking-ahead/rur-dev-small-villages_en.pdf.]Search in Google Scholar
[[45] European Commission (2017a). EU a Jednotný digitální trh. Directorate-General for Communication (European Commission), 2017. [online]. Available at: https://publications.europa.eu/en/publication-detail/-/publication/8084b7f3-6777-11e7-b2f2-01aa75ed71a1/language-cs.]Search in Google Scholar
[[46] European Commission (2017b). Industry 4.0 in agriculture: Focus on IoT aspects. Digital Transformation Monitor on-line available at https://ec.europa.eu/growth/tools-databases/dem/monitor/sites/default/files/DTM_Agriculture%204.0%20IoT%20v1.pdf [cit. 2018-12-05].]Search in Google Scholar
[[47] Eurostat (2018). Eurostat regional yearbook – 2018 edition. European Union, Luxembourg, August 2018.]Search in Google Scholar
[[48] Lund, S. & Manyika, J. (2016). Digital globalization: the new era of global flows. McKinsey Global Institute, March 2016. Available at: https://www.mckinsey.com/~/media/McKinsey/Business%20Functions/McKinsey%20Digital/Our%20Insights/Digital%20globalization%20The%20new%20era%20of%20global%20flows/MGI-Digital-globalization-Full-report.ashx.]Search in Google Scholar
[[49] Ministry of Agriculture of the Czech Republic (2012). Program rozvoje venkova České republiky na období 2007–2013 (Czech Rural Development Programme 2007–2013), Praha, September 2012, Ministerstvo zemědělství ČR.]Search in Google Scholar
[[50] Ministry of Agriculture (2016). Data for the measure III.2.1.2 of the Czech Rural Development Programme 2007–2013. Data were used in the ex-post evaluation of the RDP CR 2007-2013 in 2016.]Search in Google Scholar
[[51] Nieto, E. (2019). Smart Villages: A new concept for rural development. The Scitech Europa, 17th May 2019. On-line article available at: https://www.scitecheuropa.eu/smart-villages-rural-development/95112/.]Search in Google Scholar
[[52] OECD (2006). The New Rural Paradigm – Policies and Governance. OECD Rural Policy Reviews, Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development, ISBN 92-64-02390-9.]Search in Google Scholar
[[53] OECD (2010). Strategies to Improve Rural Service Delivery. OECD Publishing, Paris. http://dx.doi.org/10.1787/9789264083967-en.10.1787/9789264083967-en]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[[54] OECD (2014). Innovation and Modernising the Rural Economy. OECD Rural Policy Reviews. Paris: OECD Publishing.10.1787/9789264205390-en]Search in Google Scholar
[[55] OECD (2016). OECD Regions at a Glance 2016. OECD Publishing, Paris. ISBN 978-92-64-25679-8.10.1787/reg_glance-2016-en]Search in Google Scholar