The Leader Approach Across The European Union: One Method of Rural Development, Many Forms of Implementation

[1] Arabatzis, G., Aggelopoulos, S. & Tsiantikoudis, S. (2010). Rural development and LEADER+ in Greece: evaluation of local action groups. Journal of Food, Agriculture & Environment, 8(1), 302–307.Search in Google Scholar

[2] Böcher, M. (2008). Regional Governance and Rural Development in Germany: the Implementation of LEADER+. Sociologia Ruralis, 48(4), 372–388. DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-9523.2008.00468.x.10.1111/j.1467-9523.2008.00468.xOpen DOISearch in Google Scholar

[3] Boukalova, K., Kolarova, A. & Lostak, M. (2016). Tracing shift in Czech rural development paradigm (Reflections of Local Action Groups in the media). Agricultural Economics – Czech, 62(4), 149–159. DOI: 10.17221/102/2015-AGRICECON.10.17221/102/2015-AGRICECONSearch in Google Scholar

[4] Buller, H. (2000). Re-Creating Rural Territories: LEADER in France. Rural Sociology, 40(2), 190–199. DOI: 10.1111/1467-9523.00141.10.1111/1467-9523.00141Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

[5] Bumbalová, M., Takáč, I., Tvrdoňová, J. & Valach, M. (2016). Are stakeholders in Slovakia ready for community-led local development? Case study findings. European Countryside, 8(2), 160–174. DOI: 10.1515/euco-2016-0013.10.1515/euco-2016-0013Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

[6] Cañete, J. A., Navarro, F. & Cejudo, E. (2018). Territorially unequal rural development: the cases of the LEADER Initiative and the PRODER Programme in Andalusia (Spain). European Planning Studies 26(4), 726–744. DOI: 10.1080/09654313.2018.1424118.10.1080/09654313.2018.1424118Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

[7] Chevalier, P., Mačiulyté, J., Razafimahefa, L. & Dedeire, M. (2017). The leader programme as a model of institutional transfer: learning from its local implementation in France and Lithuania. European Countryside 9(2), 317–341. DOI: 10.1515/euco-2017-0020.10.1515/euco-2017-0020Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

[8] Chevalier, P. & Maurel, M.-C. (2010). Program leader w krajach europy srodkowej. Wieś I Rolnictwo, 149(4), 26–41.Search in Google Scholar

[9] Chevalier, P. (2012). What effect does national regulation have on LEADER programming in the EU-27? Wieś I Rolnictwo, 156(3), 9–29.Search in Google Scholar

[10] Convery, I., Soane, I., Dutson, T. & Shaw, H. (2010). Mainstreaming LEADER Delivery of the RDR in Cumbria: An Interpretative Phenomenological Analysis. Sociologia Ruralis, 50(4), 372–391. DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-9523.2010.00519.x.10.1111/j.1467-9523.2010.00519.xSearch in Google Scholar

[11] Dargan, L. & Shucksmith, M. (2008). LEADER and Innovation. Sociologia Ruralis, 48(3), 274–291. DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-9523.2008.00463.x.10.1111/j.1467-9523.2008.00463.xOpen DOISearch in Google Scholar

[12] Dax, T. & Oedl-wieser, T. (2016). Rural innovation activities as a means for changing development perspectives – An assessment of more than two decades of promoting LEADER initiatives across the European Union. Studies in Agricultural Economics, 118, 30–37. DOI: 10.7896/j.1535.10.7896/j.1535Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

[13] Dax, T., Strahl, W., Kirwan, J. & Maye, D. (2016). The Leader programme 2007–2013: Enabling or disabling social innovation and neo-endogenous development? Insights from Austria and Ireland. European Urban and Regional Studies, 23(1), 56–68. DOI: 10.1177/0969776413490425.10.1177/0969776413490425Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

[14] Delin, M. (2012). The role of farmers in Local Action Groups: The case of the national network of the Local Action Groups. Agricultural Economics – Czech, 58(9), 433–442.10.17221/148/2011-AGRICECONSearch in Google Scholar

[15] Fakowski, J. (2013). Political accountability and governance in rural areas: Some evidence from the Pilot Programme LEADER+ in Poland. Journal of Rural Studies, 32, 70–79. DOI: 10.1016/j.jrurstud.2013.04.008.10.1016/j.jrurstud.2013.04.008Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

[16] Furmankiewicz, M. (2012). Leader+ territorial governance in Poland: successes and failures as a rational choice effect. Tijdschrift Voor Economische en Sociale Geografie, 103(3), 261–275. DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-9663.2011.00680.x.10.1111/j.1467-9663.2011.00680.xOpen DOISearch in Google Scholar

[17] Furmankiewicz, M., Thompson, N. & Zielin, M. (2010). Area-based partnerships in rural Poland: The post-accession experience. Journal of Rural Studies, 26(1), 52–62. DOI: 10.1016/j.jrurstud.2009.05.001.10.1016/j.jrurstud.2009.05.001Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

[18] Granberg, L., Andersson, K., Kovách, I. eds. (2015). Evaluating the European Approach to Rural Development: Grassroots Experiences of the LEADER Programme. Farnham: Ashgate.Search in Google Scholar

[19] Hudečková, H. & Lošťák, M. (2008). LEADER in the Czech Republic and the farming sector. Agricultural Economics – Czech, 54(12), 555–565.10.17221/289-AGRICECONSearch in Google Scholar

[20] Jančák, V., Chromý, P., Marada, M., Havlíček, T. & Vondráčková, P. (2010). Sociální kapitál jako faktor rozvoje periferních oblastí: Analýza vybraných složek sociálního kapitálu v typově odlišnŷh periferiích Česka. Geografie, 115(2), 207–222.10.37040/geografie2010115020207Search in Google Scholar

[21] Kovách, I. (2000). LEADER, a New Social Order, and the Central- and East-European Countries. Sociologia Ruralis, 40(2), 181–189. DOI: 10.1111/1467-9523.00140.10.1111/1467-9523.00140Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

[22] Lošťák, M. & Hudečková, H. (2008). Agriculture and farming related activities: their actors and position in the LEADER approach. Agricultural Economics – Czech, 54(6), 245–262.10.17221/280-AGRICECONSearch in Google Scholar

[23] Lošťák, M., & Hudečková, H. (2010). Preliminary impacts of the LEADER+ approach in the Czech Republic. Agricultural Economics – Czech, 56(6), 249–265.10.17221/27/2010-AGRICECONSearch in Google Scholar

[24] Lowe, P. (2000). The Challenges for Rural Development in Europe. In: Williams, E., ed., Conference Proceedings: 5^th European Conference on Higher Agricultural Education. From Production Agriculture to Rural Development (pp. 19–31). University of Plymouth.Search in Google Scholar

[25] Lukić, A. & Obad, O. (2016). New Actors in Rural Development – The LEADER Approach and Projectification in Rural Croatia. Sociologija I Prostor, 54(1), 71–90. DOI: 10.5673/sip.54.1.4.10.5673/sip.54.1.4Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

[26] Macken-Walsh, A. & Curtin, C. (2012). Governance and Rural Development: The Case of the Rural Partnership Programme (RPP) in Post-Socialist Lithuania. Sociologia Ruralis, 53(2), 246–264. DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-9523.2012.00578.x.10.1111/j.1467-9523.2012.00578.xOpen DOISearch in Google Scholar

[27] Majerová, V. (2009). Local Initiatives Functioning as a Condition of Rural Development of the Czech Countryside. Eastern European Countryside, 9(1), 127–149. DOI: 10.2478/v10130-009-0008-2.10.2478/v10130-009-0008-2Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

[28] Margarian, A. (2013). A Constructive Critique of the Endogenous Development. Approach in the European Support of Rural Areas. Growth and Change, 44(1), 1–29. DOI: 10.1111/grow.12000.10.1111/grow.12000Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

[29] Marquardt, D., Möllers, J. & Buchenrieder, G. (2012). Social Networks and Rural Development: LEADER in Romania. Sociologia Ruralis, 52(4), 398–431. DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-9523.2012.00571.x.10.1111/j.1467-9523.2012.00571.xOpen DOISearch in Google Scholar

[30] Masot, A. N. & Alonso, G. C. (2017). 25 years of the leader initiative as European rural development policy: the case of Extremadura (SW Spain). European Countryside 9(2), 302–316. DOI: 10.1515/euco-2017-0019.10.1515/euco-2017-0019Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

[31] Maurel, M.-C. (2008). Local development stakeholders and the European model: learning the leader approach in the new member states. Sociologicky časopis, 44(3), 511–529.10.13060/00380288.2008.44.3.04Search in Google Scholar

[32] Navarro, F. A., Woods, M. & Cejudo, E. (2015). The LEADER Initiative has been a Victim of its own Success. The Decline of the Bottom-Up Approach in Rural Development Programmes. The Cases of Wales and Andalusia. Sociologia Ruralis 56(2), 270–288. DOI: 10.1111/soru.12079.10.1111/soru.12079Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

[33] Nevěděl, L. & Horák, M. (2015). Operation of the selected local action group. Acta Universitatis Agriculturae et Silviculturae Mendelianae Brunensis, 63(1), 347–352. DOI: 10.11118/actaun201563010347.10.11118/actaun201563010347Search in Google Scholar

[34] Osti, G. (2000). LEADER and partnerships: the case of Italy. Sociologia Ruralis, 40(2), 172–180. DOI: 10.1111/1467-9523.00139.10.1111/1467-9523.00139Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

[35] Papadopoulou, E., Hasanagas, N. & Harvey, D. (2011). Analysis of rural development policy networks in Greece: Is LEADER really different? Land Use Policy, 28(4), 663–673. DOI: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2010.11.005.10.1016/j.landusepol.2010.11.005Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

[36] Perlín, R., Kučerová, S. & Kučera, Z. (2010). Typologie venkovského prostoru Česka. Geografie, 115(2), 161–187.10.37040/geografie2010115020161Search in Google Scholar

[37] Pisani, E., Franceschetti, G., Secco, L., Christoforou, A., eds. (2017). Social Capital and Local Development: From Theory to Empirics. Cham: Springer.10.1007/978-3-319-54277-5Search in Google Scholar

[38] Pollermann, K., Raue, P. & Schnaut, G. (2013). Rural Development experiences in Germany: opportunities and obstacles in fostering smart places through LEADER. Studies in Agricultural Economics, 115(2), 1–7.10.7896/j.1228Search in Google Scholar

[39] Pospěch, P. (2014). Discursive no man’s land: Analysing the discourse of the rural in the transitional Czech Republic. Journal of Rural Studies, 34, 96–107. DOI: 10.1016/j.jrurstud.2014.01.006.10.1016/j.jrurstud.2014.01.006Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

[40] Ray, C. (2000). The EU LEADER Programme: Rural Development Laboratory. Sociologia Ruralis 40(2), 163–171. DOI: 10.1111/1467-9523.00138.10.1111/1467-9523.00138Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

[41] Rizzo, F. (2013). Leader Policy Practices and Landscapes in the Light of the Agency-Structure Debate: Evidence from Leader Local Action Groups in Italy and in Finland. European Countryside 5(3), 232–250. DOI: 10.2478/euco-2013-0015.10.2478/euco-2013-0015Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

[42] Svobodová, H. (2015). Do the Czech local action groups respect the leader method? Acta Universitatis Agriculturae et Silviculturae Mendelianae Brunensis, 63(5), 1769–1777. DOI: 10.11118/actaun201563051769.10.11118/actaun201563051769Search in Google Scholar

[43] Šťastná, M. & Vaishar, A. (2017). The relationship between public transport and the progressive development of rural areas. Land Use Policy, 67, 107–114. DOI: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2017.05.022.10.1016/j.landusepol.2017.05.022Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

[44] Thuesen, A. A. & Nielsen, N. C. (2014). A territorial perspective on EU´s leader approach in Denmark: the added value of community-led local development of rural and coastal areas in a multi-level governance settings. European Countryside 6(4), 307–326. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/euco-2014-0017.10.2478/euco-2014-0017Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

[45] Volk, A. & Bojnec, Š. (2014). Local action groups and the LEADER co-financing of rural development projects in Slovenia. Agricultural Economics – Czech, 60(8), 364–375.10.17221/180/2013-AGRICECONSearch in Google Scholar

[46] Tulla, A. F., Vera, A., Valldeperas, N. & Guirado, C. (2017). New approaches to sustainable rural development: Social farming as an opportunity in Europe? Human Geographies – Journal of Studies and Research in Human Geography, 11(1), 2067–2284. DOI: 10.5719/hgeo.2017.111.2.10.5719/hgeo.2017.111.2Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

[47] Woods, M. & Mcdonagh, J. (2011). Europe and the world: globalization and rural development (editorial). European Countryside 3(3), 153–163. DOI: 10.2478/v10091-012-0001-z.10.2478/v10091-012-0001-zOpen DOISearch in Google Scholar

[48] European Network for Rural Development (2015a). Financial and physical indicators 2007-2013. Available at: http://enrd.ec.europa.eu/policy-in-action/rural-development-policy-infigures/rdp-monitoring-indicator-tables/financial-and-physical-indicators_en. Accessed on 1st March 2017.Search in Google Scholar

[49] European Network for Rural Development (2015b). Output indicators 2007–2013. Available at: http://enrd.ec.europa.eu/policy-in-action/rural-development-policy-in-figures/rdpmonitoring-indicator-tables/output-indicators_en). Accessed on 1st March 2017.Search in Google Scholar

[50] EUROSTAT (2017a). Eurostat regional yearbook – 2017 edition. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union.Search in Google Scholar

[51] EUROSTAT (2017b). Statistics – Comparative price levels of consumer goods and services. Available at: http://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/statistics-explained/index.php/Comparative_price_levels_of_consumer_goods_and_services). Accessed on 6th March 2018.Search in Google Scholar

[52] EUROSTAT (2018). Territorial typologies. Available at: http://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/statistics-explained/index.php/Territorial_typologies. Accessed on 13th February 2018.Search in Google Scholar