<abstract xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">

<bold>Subject and purpose of work:</bold> Using renewable organic material for energy generation exhibits an increasing trend globally, also in Hungary. The aim of the Renewable Energy Action Plan of the European Union is to increase the share of energy production from renewable resources to 32% by 2030. At present, renewable energy sources represent 10.2% of Hungary’s primary energy consumption.
<bold>Materials and methods:</bold> This study has examined the financial feasibility of two companies in Kunság region in Hungary that participate in the renewable energy production market with different types of technologies, that of a biogas facility and a short rotation energy forest plantation. As financial incentives for the establishment and propagation of bioenergy producing enterprises are offered both in the EU and Hungary, calculations are presented both with and without subsidies.
<bold>Results:</bold> The results show that regardless of the production method, without subsidies, none of the businesses could make a profit in the period under review.
<bold>Conclusions:</bold> The main reasons behind unprofitable operations are the initial high capital outlay, high logistics costs, immature technological solutions and suppressed purchasing prices.
</abstract>

Subject and purpose of work: Using renewable organic material for energy generation exhibits an increasing trend globally, also in Hungary. The aim of the Renewable Energy Action Plan of the European Union is to increase the share of energy production from renewable resources to 32% by 2030. At present, renewable energy sources represent 10.2% of Hungary’s primary energy consumption.
Materials and methods: This study has examined the financial feasibility of two companies in Kunság region in Hungary that participate in the renewable energy production market with different types of technologies, that of a biogas facility and a short rotation energy forest plantation. As financial incentives for the establishment and propagation of bioenergy producing enterprises are offered both in the EU and Hungary, calculations are presented both with and without subsidies.
Results: The results show that regardless of the production method, without subsidies, none of the businesses could make a profit in the period under review.
Conclusions: The main reasons behind unprofitable operations are the initial high capital outlay, high logistics costs, immature technological solutions and suppressed purchasing prices.

Comparison of the Return on Investment of Two Energy Production Companies in Hungary Using Different Biomass-Based Technologies

Economic and Regional Studies / Studia Ekonomiczne i Regionalne

This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Subject and purpose of work: Using renewable organic material for energy generation exhibits an increasing trend globally, also in Hungary. The aim of the...

Comparison of the Return on Investment of Two Energy Production Companies in Hungary Using Different Biomass-Based Technologies

Data publikacji: 28 wrz 2022

Zakres stron: 398 - 408

Otrzymano: 01 lip 2022

Przyjęty: 01 lip 2022

DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/ers-2022-0027

Słowa kluczowe
energy, biomass, financial feasibility, Hungary

© 2022 Zsuz sanna Deak, published by Sciendo

This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Comparison of the Return on Investment of Two Energy Production Companies in Hungary Using Different Biomass-Based Technologies

Data publikacji: 28 wrz 2022

Zakres stron: 398 - 408

Otrzymano: 01 lip 2022

Przyjęty: 01 lip 2022

DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/ers-2022-0027

Słowa kluczoweenergy, biomass, financial feasibility, Hungary

© 2022 Zsuz sanna Deak, published by Sciendo

This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Słowa kluczowe
energy, biomass, financial feasibility, Hungary