<abstract xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">

<bold>Subject and purpose of work:</bold> The aim of the research was to determine the diversity of social development of all communes in the Podkarpackie province in two research periods of 2003 and 2013.
<bold>Materials and methods:</bold> All functions such as LHDI were tested. The variant was used to group communes in the variant, comparing the Hellwig’s Taxonomic Development Meter based on the results analysis. Selection of own diagnostics was done in a natural way using TMR measures.
<bold>Results:</bold> There is a positive decline in the number of communes in the lowest class by two units. At the same time, the number of four of two socially most developed groups decreased, and the number of communes with an average development level for growth. Communes that have maintained the position of socially the strongest in the region for years are: Krosno and Boguchwała. The largest increase over the analyzed years was recorded in Rzeszów, Trzebownisko, Przemyśl and Ostrów communes.
<bold>Conclusions:</bold> The indicator analysis shows that the province is developing. This development is very diverse in a particular society in the Podkarpacie region, central and north-west.
</abstract>

Subject and purpose of work: The aim of the research was to determine the diversity of social development of all communes in the Podkarpackie province in two research periods of 2003 and 2013.
Materials and methods: All functions such as LHDI were tested. The variant was used to group communes in the variant, comparing the Hellwig’s Taxonomic Development Meter based on the results analysis. Selection of own diagnostics was done in a natural way using TMR measures.
Results: There is a positive decline in the number of communes in the lowest class by two units. At the same time, the number of four of two socially most developed groups decreased, and the number of communes with an average development level for growth. Communes that have maintained the position of socially the strongest in the region for years are: Krosno and Boguchwała. The largest increase over the analyzed years was recorded in Rzeszów, Trzebownisko, Przemyśl and Ostrów communes.
Conclusions: The indicator analysis shows that the province is developing. This development is very diverse in a particular society in the Podkarpacie region, central and north-west.

Diversification of the Social Development of Podkarpackie Province Communes

Institute of Agricultural and Food Economics-National Research Institute

Economic and Regional Studies / Studia Ekonomiczne i Regionalne

This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License.

{"article-title":"Diversification of the Social Development of Podkarpackie Province Communes"}

Subject and purpose of work: The aim of the research was to determine the diversity of social development of all communes in the Podkarpackie province in two...

Diversification of the Social Development of Podkarpackie Province Communes

Data publikacji: 18 kwi 2019

Zakres stron: 45 - 55

Otrzymano: 01 sie 2018

Przyjęty: 01 sty 2019

DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/ers-2019-0005

Słowa kluczowe
Self-government, European Union, funds, social development, Podkarpacie

© 2019 Karol Sołek et al., published by Sciendo

This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License.

Diversification of the Social Development of Podkarpackie Province Communes

Data publikacji: 18 kwi 2019

Zakres stron: 45 - 55

Otrzymano: 01 sie 2018

Przyjęty: 01 sty 2019

DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/ers-2019-0005

Słowa kluczoweSelf-government, European Union, funds, social development, Podkarpacie

© 2019 Karol Sołek et al., published by Sciendo

This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License.

Słowa kluczowe
Self-government, European Union, funds, social development, Podkarpacie