Otwarty dostęp

Developing a Tool for Quality and Accreditation of a New Generation University in the Digitalized Society: The Case of a Thematic-Technical University


Zacytuj

[1]Antal, Natalie, Kingma, Bruce, Moore, Duncan and Streeter, Deborah. (2014). University-wide entrepreneurship education. In, Innovative pathways for university entrepreneurship in the 21st century. Published online: 07 October. 227-254. https://doi.org/10.1108/S1048-47362014000002400910.1108/S1048-473620140000024009Search in Google Scholar

[2]Artut, Perihan Dinç and Bal, Ayten Pinar. (2018). Learning implementations about cooperative learning method, a case study in Turkey. International Journal of Progressive Education, 14(6), 168-176.10.29329/ijpe.2018.179.13Search in Google Scholar

[3]Bacanlı, Hasan et al. (2016). Being a university student in turkey: A comparative study in the context of city people, Turkish and international students. Journal of Higher Education. 6(2), 49–61.10.2399/yod.16.007Search in Google Scholar

[4]Baker, Geoff and Henson, Debra. (2010). Promoting employability skills development in a research-intensive university. Education + Training. 52(1), 62-75.10.1108/00400911011017681Search in Google Scholar

[5]Barbeau, Joseph E. (1973). Cooperative education in America - its historical development, 1906-1971. 231p. Northeastern Univ., Boston.https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED083913.pdf, (Access: April 5, 2019).Search in Google Scholar

[6]Bizri, Rima, Hammoud, Jamil, Stouhi, Marwa, Hammoud, Manar. (2019). The entrepreneurial university: a proposed model for developing nations. Journal of Management Development. 38(5), 383-404.10.1108/JMD-11-2018-0347Search in Google Scholar

[7]Block, Madeleine and Khvatova, Tatiana. (2017). University transformation: Explaining policy-making and trends in higher education in Russia. Journal of Management Development. 36(6), 761-779, https://doi.org/10.1108/JMD-01-2016-0020.10.1108/JMD-01-2016-0020Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

[8]Bruton, Alex. (2014). Innovating university-based entrepreneurship in order to inform innovation for the 21st century. In, Innovative pathways for university entrepreneurship in the 21st century, Published online: 7 October, 145-170.10.1108/S1048-473620140000024006Search in Google Scholar

[9]Cedefop. (2016). Application of learning outcomes approaches across Europe: A comparative study., Cedefop reference series, No. 105, 201p.http://www.cedefop.europa.eu/files/3074_en.pdf, (Accessed: April 1, 2019).Search in Google Scholar

[10]Cedercreutz, Kettil and Cates, Cheryl. (2010). Cooperative education at the University of Cincinnati: A strategic asset in evolution. Peer Review, 12(4),https://www.aacu.org/publications-research/periodicals/cooperative-education-university-cincinnati-strategic-asset, (Accessed: April 1, 2019).Search in Google Scholar

[11]Chapleo, Chris and Sims, Chris. (2010). Stakeholder analysis in higher education. Perspectives, January, 14, 12-20.10.1080/13603100903458034Search in Google Scholar

[12]Cozza, Barbara and Blessinger, Patrick. (2016a). Innovative approaches in university partnerships: An Introduction to university partnerships for academic and program development. In, University partnerships for academic programs and professional development. Published online: 17 August. 3-17. https://doi.org/10.1108/S2055-36412016000000700110.1108/S2055-364120160000007001Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

[13]Cozza, Barbara and Blessinger, Patrick. (2016b). Pioneering approaches in university partnerships: An introduction to university partnerships for international development. In, University partnerships for international development. Published online: 12 December. 3-17. https://doi.org/10.1108/S2055-36412016000000800110.1108/S2055-364120160000008001Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

[14]Deus, Rafael Mattos, Battistelle, Rosane Aparecida Gomesand da Silva, Gustavo Henrique Ribeiro. (2016). Sustainability insights from the mission statements of leading Brazilian universities. International Journal of Educational Management. 30(3), 403-415.10.1108/IJEM-05-2014-0065Search in Google Scholar

[15]Dewing, Ian P. and Williams, Bernard C. (1995). The role of audit committees in UK universities. Managerial Auditing Journal. 10(6), 10-16, https://doi.org/10.1108/02686909510088369.10.1108/02686909510088369Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

[16]Drewery, David, Nevison, Colleen and Pretti, T. Judene. (2016). The influence of cooperative education and reflection upon previous work experiences on university graduates’ vocational self-concept. Education + Training, 58(2), 179-192.10.1108/ET-06-2015-0042Search in Google Scholar

[17]EC. (2008). TUNING - Generic competences,http://www.relint.deusto.es/TuningProject/index.htm, (Erişim, 1 Eylül 2018).Search in Google Scholar

[18]EC. (2010). Europe 2020: European strategy for smart, sustainable and inclusive growth.http://ec.europa.eu/eu2020/pdf/COMPLET%20EN%20BARROSO%20%20%20007%20-%20Europe%202020%20-%20EN%20version.pdf, (Erişim, 26 Eylül 2018).Search in Google Scholar

[19]EHEA. (1998). Sorbonne Joint Declaration.Search in Google Scholar

[20]EHEA. (2018a). European higher education area and Bologna Process.http://ehea.info/page-qualification-frameworks, (Erişim, 1 Nisan 2019).Search in Google Scholar

[21]EHEA. (2018b). The European higher education area in 2018.https://eacea.ec.europa.eu/national-policies/eurydice/sites/eurydice/files/bologna_internet_0.pdf, (Erişim, 3 Eylül 2018).Search in Google Scholar

[22]EHEA. (2019). The Bologna process revisited: The future of the European higher education area.http://ehea.info/media.ehea.info/file/2015_Yerevan/71/1/Bologna_Process_Revisited_Future_of_the_EHEA_Final_613711.pdf, (Erişim, 1 Nisan 2019).Search in Google Scholar

[23]Erdoğan, Armağan and Toprak, Metin. (2012). Governance of higher education in Turkey. Leadership and governance in higher education, 3, 95-120.Search in Google Scholar

[24]Erdoğan, Armağan and Toprak, Metin. (2014). What kind of higher education? References, scope and tools. Yeni Turkiye, 58(May-June), 707-718.Search in Google Scholar

[25]Estébanez, Raquel Pérez. (2017). An approachment to cooperative learning in higher education, comparative study of teaching methods in engineering. EURASIA Journal of Mathematics Science and Technology Education, 13(5),1331–1340.10.12973/eurasia.2017.00673aSearch in Google Scholar

[26]Estermann, Thomas and Jorgensen, Thomas. (2019). Enabling frameworks: What universities need in the age of open innovation?https://www.eua.eu/resources/expert-voices/102:enabling-frameworks-what-universities-need-in-the-age-of-open-innovation.html (Accessed: June 24, 2019).Search in Google Scholar

[27]Etzkowitz, Henry and Dzisah, James. (2013). Bottom-up Triple Helix: science policy in the states of the USA. Journal of Knowledge-based Innovation in China. 5(2), 80-96.10.1108/JKIC-03-2013-0004Search in Google Scholar

[28]Farnsworth, Terry. (1970). How to select external courses. Industrial and Commercial Training, 2(6), 262-264.10.1108/eb003068Search in Google Scholar

[29]Galvão, Anderson et al. (2017). A quadruple helix model of entrepreneurship, innovation and stages of economic development. Review of International Business and Strategy. 27(2), 261-282.10.1108/RIBS-01-2017-0003Search in Google Scholar

[30]Gartland, Clare Elizabeth and Smith, Christine. (2018). Supporting progression to HE: the role of colleges and vocational courses. Education + Training, 60(6), 637-650.10.1108/ET-02-2018-0053Search in Google Scholar

[31]Haddara, Mahmoud and Skanes, Heather. (2007). A reflection on cooperative education, from experience to experiential learning. Asia-Pacific Journal of Cooperative Education, 8(1), 67-76.Search in Google Scholar

[32]Hasan, Mahmudul, Khan, Eijaz Ahmed and Un Nabi, Noor. (2017). Entrepreneurial education at university level and entrepreneurship development, Education + Training. 59(7/8), 888-906.10.1108/ET-01-2016-0020Search in Google Scholar

[33]Holtzman, Diane and Kraft, Ellen. (2011). Skills needed in the 21st century workplace: A comparison of feedback from undergraduate business alumni and employers with a national study. Business Education & Accreditation, 3(1), 61-76.Search in Google Scholar

[34]Johnson, David W., Johnson, Roger T. and Holubec, Edythe Johnson. (2008). The new circles of learning: Cooperation in the classroom, Edina, MN, Interaction Book Company.10.5926/arepj1962.47.0_29Search in Google Scholar

[35]Johnson, David W., Johnson, Roger T. and Smith, Karl A. (2013). Cooperative learning: Improving university instruction by basing practice on validated theory, University of Minnesota, 26p., (Accessed: September 1, 2018).Search in Google Scholar

[36]Kireçci, Mehmet Akif et al. (2016). “The internationalization of higher education in Turkey: Creating an index”. Education and Science, 41(187),1-28.10.15390/EB.2016.6223Search in Google Scholar

[37]Kotosz, Balazs et al. (2016). How to measure the local economic impact of universities? Methodological Overview. Online athttps://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/73725/MPRA Paper No. 73725, posted 23 September 2016 09:04 UTC.Search in Google Scholar

[38]Kulkarni, Sharvari and Kulkarni, D.G. (2019). Gap analysis of Soft skills in the curriculum of higher education: A case study of management institutes in Karnataka. Advances in Management, 12(1), 64-67.Search in Google Scholar

[39]Lee, JungEun. (2011). The capitalization of knowledge: A triple helix of university-industry-government. Journal of Educational Administration. 49(3), 345-348.10.1108/09578231111129136Search in Google Scholar

[40]Liu, Chunlin and Kong, Lanlan. (2015). Government-driven university-industry linkages in an emerging country: the case of China. Journal of Science & Technology Policy Management, 6(3), 263-282.10.1108/JSTPM-02-2015-0008Search in Google Scholar

[41]Liu, Ye. (2012). Does entrepreneurial university really exist in China? A case from Huazhong University of Science and Technology. Journal of Knowledge-based Innovation in China. 4(2), 88-103.10.1108/17561411211235703Search in Google Scholar

[42]Lombardi, Rosa, Massaro, Maurizio, Dumay, John and Nappo, Fabio. (2019). Entrepreneurial universities and strategy: the case of the University of Bari. Management Decision, https://doi.org/10.1108/MD-06-2018-0690.10.1108/MD-06-2018-0690Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

[43]Lu, Lucy. (2008). Creating knowledge-based innovation in China: The strategic implications of triple helix model. Journal of Technology Management in China. 3(3), 249-263.10.1108/17468770810916168Search in Google Scholar

[44]Macpherson, Reynold J.S. (1997). The centre for professional development at the University of Auckland: Towards creating networks of moral obligations. International Journal of Educational Management, 11(6), 260-267.10.1108/09513549710186849Search in Google Scholar

[45]Marri, H.B. Grieve, R.J., Gunasekaran, A. and Kobu, B. (2002). Government-industry-university collaboration on the successful implementation of CIM in SMEs: An empirical analysis. Logistics Information Management. 15(2), 105-114.10.1108/09576050210413980Search in Google Scholar

[46]McRae, Norah and Ramji, Karima. (2017). Intercultural competency development curriculum: A strategy for internationalizing work-integrated learning for the 21st century global village. Work-Integrated Learning in the 21st Century, Published online: 29 August, 129-143.10.1108/S1479-367920170000032008Search in Google Scholar

[47]Murphy, Anne. (2011). The capitalization of knowledge: A triple helix of university-industry-government. Leadership & Organization Development Journal. 32(6), 648-651.10.1108/01437731111161102Search in Google Scholar

[48]OECD-IMHE. (2009). Higher education management and policy, programme on institutional management.http://www.oecd.org/education/imhe/50309916.pdf, (Erişim,1 Eylül 2018).Search in Google Scholar

[49]Olsson, Ulf. (2016). Open courses and MOOCs as professional development – is the openness a hindrance? Education + Training. 58(2), 229-243.10.1108/ET-01-2015-0006Search in Google Scholar

[50]Ostim Technical University. (2018). The Statute of the Ostim Technical University. Official Gazette, December.Search in Google Scholar

[51]Otala, Leenamaija. (1994). Industry-university partnership: implementing lifelong learning. Journal of European Industrial Training, 18(8), pp.13-18.10.1108/03090599410068033Search in Google Scholar

[52]Patton, Narelle. (2017). Driving change, students shaping and reshaping work-integrated learning spaces. Work-Integrated Learning in the 21st Century. Published online: 29 August, 163-176.10.1108/S1479-367920170000032010Search in Google Scholar

[53]Piirainen, Kalle Artturi, Andersen, Allan Dahl and Andersen, Per Dannemand. (2016). Foresight and the third mission of universities: the case for innovation system foresight. Foresight. 18(1), 24-40.10.1108/FS-04-2014-0026Search in Google Scholar

[54]Poon, Joanna and Brownlow, Michael. (2015). Development of students’ commercial awareness within the curriculum of professionally accredited courses: A case study of property courses. Education + Training, 57(4), 405-428.10.1108/ET-12-2013-0145Search in Google Scholar

[55]Reyes, Charisse N. (2016). Framing the entrepreneurial university: the case of the National University of Singapore. Journal of Entrepreneurship in Emerging Economies. 8(2), 134-161.10.1108/JEEE-09-2015-0046Search in Google Scholar

[56]Rubens, Arthur, Spigarelli, Francesca, Cavicchi, Alessio and Rinaldi, Chiara. (2017). Universities’ third mission and the entrepreneurial university and the challenges they bring to higher education institutions. Journal of Enterprising Communities: People and Places in the Global Economy. 11(03), 354-372.10.1108/JEC-01-2017-0006Search in Google Scholar

[57]Savignon, Andrea Bonomi, Corvo, Luigi. (2018). Government–third sector relations and the triple helix approach: Patterns in the Italian social innovation ecosystem, Studies in Public and Non-Profit Governance. 6, 95-109.10.1108/S2051-663020180000006005Search in Google Scholar

[58]Scalia, Massimo et al. (2018). Governance for sustainability: a triple-helix model. Sustainability Science. Published online: May 11. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11625-018-0567-0.10.1007/s11625-018-0567-0Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

[59]Shapiro, Hanne, Lauritzen, John René Keller and Irving, Pat. (2011). Emerging skills and competences- a transatlantic study: EU-US study for the European Commission, October, Danish Technological Institute, 141p.Search in Google Scholar

[60]Sheety, Alia et al. (2016). University partnerships for academic program and professional development, building faculty capacity for 21st century teaching and learning. University Partnerships for Academic Programs and Professional Development. Published online: 17 August, 221-241.10.1108/S2055-364120160000007022Search in Google Scholar

[61]Striukova, Ludmila and Rayna, Thierry. (2015). University-industry knowledge exchange: An exploratory study of open innovation in UK universities. European Journal of Innovation Management, 18(4), 471-492.10.1108/EJIM-10-2013-0098Search in Google Scholar

[62]Sumanjeet, Singh. (2012). Developing e-skills for competitiveness, growth and employment in the 21st century: The European perspective. International Journal of Development Issues, 11(1), 37-59.10.1108/14468951211213859Search in Google Scholar

[63]Toprak, Metin and Bayraktar, Yüksel. (2017). Corporate governance practices of Turkey, A critical review, The IUP Journal of Corporate Governance, XVI(2), 54-75.Search in Google Scholar

[64]Toprak, Metin and Erdoğan, Armağan. (2012). Lifelong Learning: Concept, policy, instruments and implementation. Journal of Higher Education and Science, 2(2), 69-91.10.5961/jhes.2012.036Search in Google Scholar

[65]Toprak, Metin and Erdoğan, Armağan. (2013). European approach to graduate studies. 6th national graduate education symposium proceedings. Sakarya University Institute of Educational Sciences. 10-36.Search in Google Scholar

[66]Toprak, Metin et al. (2019). New generation university: An organizational and functional governance model proposal for a thematic-technical university. Journal of Higher Education. Forthcoming, (2019 fall).Search in Google Scholar

[67]Toprak, Metin, Erdoğan, Armağan and Açıkgöz, Ömer. (2013). Field qualifications: A framework suggestion. The New Educational Review. 31(1), 153-164.10.15804/tner.13.31.1.13Search in Google Scholar

[68]Ughetto, Elisa. (2007). Foresight as a triple helix of industry, university and government relations. Foresight. 9(5), 14-22.10.1108/14636680710821061Search in Google Scholar

[69]van Weenen, Hans. (2000). Towards a vision of a sustainable university. International Journal of Sustainability in Higher Education, 1(1), 20-34.10.1108/1467 630010307075Search in Google Scholar

[70]Wagenaar, Robert. (2016). Modernisation of education II, education policy and programme, innovation, EIT and MSCA. Developing future skills in higher education, ET2020 – Peer learning activity (PLA). Brussels, 25-26 February, Key Findings, http://cced-complete.com/documentation/developing_future_skills_in_higher_education_eng.pdf, (Accessed: September 10, 2018).Search in Google Scholar

[71]Wagner, Tony. (2009). The global achievement gap. New York, Perseus Books Group, 344p. https://archive.org/details/globalachievemen00wagn/page/n5, (Accessed: April 15, 2019).Search in Google Scholar

[72]Yang, Yan and Holgaard, Jette Egelund. (2012). The important role of civil society groups in eco-innovation: a triple helix perspective. Journal of Knowledge-based Innovation in China. 4(2), 132-148.10.1108/17561411211235730Search in Google Scholar

[73] Zhou, Chunyan. (2008). Emergence of the entrepreneurial university in evolution of the triple helix: The case of Northeastern University in China. Journal of Technology Management in China. 3(1), 109-126.10.1108/17468770810851539Search in Google Scholar

eISSN:
2303-5013
Język:
Angielski