[
Aldred R. 2013. Incompetent or Too Competent? Negotiating Everyday Cycling Identities in a Motor Dominated Society. Mobilities, 8, 2: 252–271.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Apasnore P., Ismail K., Kassim A. 2017. Bicycle-vehicle interactions at mid-sections of mixed traffic streets: Examining passing distance and bicycle comfort perception. Accident Analysis and Prevention, 106: 141–148.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Balkmar D. 2020. Cycling politics: imaging sustainable cycling futures in Sweden. Applied Mobilities, 5, 3: 324–340.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Balkmar D., Summerton J. 2017. Contested mobilities: politics, strategies and visions in Swedish bicycle activism. Applied Mobilities, 2, 2: 151–165.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Batterbury S. 2016. Environmental Activism and Social Networks: Campaigning for Bicycles and Alternative Transport in West London. The Annals of American Academy of Political and Social Science, 590, 1: 150–169.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Blickstein S. 2008. Critical mass: bicycling towards a more sustainable city. Clark University.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Blickstein S., Hanson S. 2001. Critical mass: forging a politics of sustainable mobility in the information age. Transportation, 28: 347–362.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Bruno M., Dekker H.-J., Lindberg Lemos L. 2021. Mobility protests in the Netherlands of the 1970s: Activism, innovation, and transitions. Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions, 40: 521–535.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Carlsson C. 2002. Critical mass: bicycling’s defiant celebration. AK Press, Oakland.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Castaneda P. 2019. From the Right to Mobility to the Right to the Mobile City: Playfulness and Mobilities in Bogota’s Cycling Activism. Antipode, 52, 1: 58–77.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Dekker H.-J. 2022. Zwischen Protest und Gegenexpertise: Nutzererlebnis, Aktivismus und das Entstehen der stadtischen Redwegenetze in den Niderlanden seit 1970 / Between Protest and Counter-Expertise: User Knowledge, Activism, and the Making of Urban Cycling Networks in the Netherlands since the 1970s. NTM Zeitschrift fur Geschichte der Wissenschaften, Technik und Medizin, 30: 281–309.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Duarte F., Prokopiuck M., Fujioka K. 2014. ‘No bicycle lanes!’ Shouted the cyclists. A controversial bicycle project in Curitiba, Brazil. Transport Policy, 32: 180–185.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Fernandez-Heredia A., Fernandez-Sanchez G. 2020. Processes of civic participation in the implementation of sustainable urban mobility systems. Case Studies on Transport Policy, 8, 2: 471–483.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Furness Z. 2005. Biketivism and Technology: Historical Reflections and Appropriations. Social Epistemology, 19, 4: 401–417.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Furness Z. 2007. Critical Mass, Urban Space and Velomobility. Mobilities, 2, 2: 299–319.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Gamble J. 2017. Experimental Infrastructure: Experiences in Bicycling in Quito, Ecuador. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 41, 1: 162–180.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Garcia-Herrera R., Garcia-Meneses P.M. 2020. Social Cycling: Critical Mass through a Mobile App. Frontiers in Sustainable Cities, 2: 36.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Gotschi T., Garrard J., Giles-Corti B. 2016. Cycling as a Part of Daily Life: A Review of Health Perspectives. Transport Reviews, 36, 1: 45–71.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Horton D. 2006. Environmentalism and the bicycle. Environmental Politics, 15, 1: 41–58.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Hou J. 2020. Guerilla urbanism: urban design and the practices of resistance. Urban Design International, 25: 117–125.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Johnson J., Masucci M., Chin J., Signer Kroeker M.A. 2022. Is the medium the message? Exploring the intersection of social media and collective action in the San Jose Bike Party. Annals of Leisure Research: 1–17.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Kopf S. 2015. Urban grassroots, anti-politics and modernity: Bike activism in Belgrade. [in:] K. Jacobsson (ed.) Urban grassroots movements in Central and Eastern Europe. Routledge, London and New York: 99–118.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Koszowski C., Gerike R., Hubrich S., Gotschi T., Pohle M., Wittwer R. 2018. Active Mobility: Bringing Together Transport Planning, Urban Planning, and Public Health. [in:] B. Muller, G. Meyer (eds), Towards User-Centric Transport in Europe. Lecture Notes in Mobility. Springer, Cham: 149–171.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Kwiatkowski M.A., Karbowiński, Ł. 2023. Leksykon polityki rowerowej [Lexicon of Cycling Policy]. Wydawnictwo Naukowe Uniwersytetu Mikołaja Kopernika, Toruń.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Leyendecker K., Cox. P. 2022. Cycle campaigning for a just city. Transportation Research Interdisciplinary Perspectives, 15: 100678.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Luhtakallio E. 2018. Group formation, styles, and grammars of commonality in local activism. The British Journal of Sociology, 70, 4: 1159–1178.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Marshall W.E., Duvall A.L., Main, D.S. 2016. Large-scale tactical urbanism: the Denver bike share system. Journal of Urbanism: International Research on Placemaking and Urban Sustainability, 9, 2: 135–147.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Mrkajić V., Anguelovski I. 2016. Planning for sustainable mobility in transition cities: Cycling losses and hopes of revival in Novi Sad, Serbia. Cities, 52: 66–78.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Nello-Daekin S. 2022. Exploring traffic evaporation: Findings from tactical urbanism interventions in Barcelona. Case Studies on Transport Policy, 10, 4: 2430–2442.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Oja P., Titze S., Bauman A., de Geus B., Krenn P., Reger-Nash B., Kohlberger T. 2011. Health benefits of cycling: a systematic review. Scandinavian Journal of Medicine & Science in Sports, 21, 4: 496–509.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Olszewski P., Szagała P., Rabczenko D., Zielińska A. 2019. Investigating safety of vulnerable road users in selected EU countries. Journal of Safety Research, 68: 49–57.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Piatkowski D., Bopp M. 2021. Increasing Bicycling for Transportation: A Systematic Review of the Literature. Journal of Urban Planning and Development, 147, 2.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Pisoni E., Christidis P., Navajas Cawood E. 2022. Active mobility versus motorized transport? User choices and benefits for the society. Science of the Total Environment, 806, 2: 150627.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Pucher J., Buehler R., Seinen M. 2011. Bicycling renaissance in North America? An update and re-appraisal of cycling trends and policies. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 45, 6: 451–475.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Pucher J., Komanoff C., Schimek P. 1999. Bicycling renaissance in North America? Recent trends and alternative policies to promote bicycling. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 33 7–8: 625–654.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Radzimski A., Gadziński J. 2019. Travel Behaviour in a Post-Socialist City. European Spatial Research and Policy, 26, 1: 43–60.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Rigal A. 2021. Cycling Interaction Rituals in the Conflict against the Car. From the Bike Subculture to the City Scale and Beyond. Applied Mobilities, 8, 2: 113–128.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Roberts C. 2020. Into a Headwind: Canadian cycle commuting and the growth of sustainable practices in hostile political contexts. Energy Research & Social Science, 70: 101679.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Sahandifar P., Makoundou C., Fahlstedt M., Sangiorgi C., Johansson K., Wallqvist V., Kleiven S. 2022. A rubberized impact absorbing pavement can reduce the head injury risk in vulnerable road users: A bicycle and a pedestrian accident case study. Traffic Injury Prevention, 23, 5: 315–320.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Schneider R.J. 2013. Theory of routine mode choice decisions: An operational framework to increase sustainable transportation. Transport Policy, 25: 128–137.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Silva P. 2016. Tactical urbanism: Towards an evolutionary cities’ approach? Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design, 43, 6: 1040–1051.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Sosa Lopez O. 2021. Bicycle policy in Mexico City: Urban Experiments and Differentiated Citizenship. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 45, 3: 477–497.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Stehlin J. 2014. Regulating Inclusion: Spatial Form, Social Process, and the Normalization of Cycling Practice in the USA. Mobilities, 9, 1: 21–41.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Stehlin J. 2015. Cycles of investment: bicycle infrastructure, gentrification, and the restructuring of the San Francisco Bay Area. Environment and Planning A, 47, 1: 121–137.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Stehlin J. 2019. Cyclescapes of the Unequal City: Bicycle Infrastructure and Uneven Development. University of Minnesota Press.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Stehlin J., Tarr, A. 2017. Think regionally, act locally? Gardening, cycling, and the horizon of urban spatial politics. Urban Geography, 38, 9: 1329–1351.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Sunio V., Peckson P., Ugay J.C. 2021. How urban social movements are leveraging social media to promote dignified mobility as a basic human right. Case Studies on Transport Policy, 9, 1: 68–79.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Udvarhelyi E. 2009. Reclaiming the streets – Redefining democracy: The politics of the critical mass bicycle movement in Budapest. Hungarian Studies, 23, 1: 121–145.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Webb D. 2018. Tactical Urbanism: Delineating a Critical Praxis. Planning Theory & Practice, 19, 1: 58–73.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Williams D.M. 2018. Happiness and freedom in direct action: critical mass bike rides as ecstatic ritual, play, and temporary autonomous zones. Leisure Studies, 37, 5: 589–602.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Yannis G., Nikolaou D., Laiou A., Strumer Y.A., Buttler I., Jankowska-Karpa D. 2020. Vulnerable road users: Cross-cultural perspectives on performance and attitudes. IATSS Research, 44, 3: 220–229.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
https://akadera.bialystok.pl/bialostocka-rowerowa-masakrytyczna-znowu-przejedzie-przez-miasto/
]Search in Google Scholar
[
https://masa.bydgoszcz.pl/category/masa-krytyczna/
]Search in Google Scholar
[
https://www.bytom.pl/czas-wolny/rowerem
]Search in Google Scholar
[
http://www.masa.czest.pl/index.php/masy-krytyczne-2022
]Search in Google Scholar
[
https://rowerowe-gliwice.pl/statystyki/imprezy-rowerowew-2022-roku
]Search in Google Scholar
[
https://www.rowerowygorzow.pl/wydarzenia/nadchodzace/
]Search in Google Scholar
[
https://www.facebook.com/kieleckamasa
]Search in Google Scholar
[
https://www.facebook.com/LubelskaMasaKrytyczna/
]Search in Google Scholar
[
https://masakrytyczna.org/o-masie/
]Search in Google Scholar
[
https://www.facebook.com/stowarzyszenierowerowepiasta/
]Search in Google Scholar
[
https://www.facebook.com/masakrytyczna
]Search in Google Scholar
[
https://www.facebook.com/ZaglebiowskaMasa/
]Search in Google Scholar
[
https://wszczecinie.pl/po-dlugiej-przerwie-masa-krytycznapowraca-do-szczecina-czas-inwestowac-w-rowery-ipociagi-a-nie-parkingi-i-autostrady/41489
]Search in Google Scholar
[
https://rowerowytorun.com.pl/art/8/rowerowa-masakrytyczna-w-toruniu.html
]Search in Google Scholar
[
http://wrower.pl/miasto/masa-krytyczna-wwarszawie,2336.html
]Search in Google Scholar
[
https://www.facebook.com/MasaKrytycznaWroclaw/
]Search in Google Scholar
[
https://www.facebook.com/RoweremDoPrzodu
]Search in Google Scholar
[
http://www.rowerowy.bytom.pl/?page_id=277
]Search in Google Scholar
| 11 cze 2024