This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Aymen R. A., Alhamzah, A., & Bilal, B. (2019). A Multi-Level Study of Influence Knowledge Management Small and Medium Enterprises. Polish Journal of Management Studies, 19(1), 21–31.AymenR. AAlhamzahABilalB.2019A Multi-Level Study of Influence Knowledge Management Small and Medium Enterprises191213110.17512/pjms.2019.19.1.02Search in Google Scholar
Bandarian, R. (2007). Evaluation of commercial potential of a new technology at the early stage of development with fuzzy logic. Journal of Technology Management and Innovation, 2(4), 73–85.BandarianR.2007Evaluation of commercial potential of a new technology at the early stage of development with fuzzy logic247385Search in Google Scholar
Bilovodska, О. А. (2018). Marketynhova polityka rozpodilu innovatsiynoyi produktsiyi promyslovykh pidpryyemstv [Marketing policy of distribution of innovative products of industrial enterprises]. Kyiv, Ukraine: Centr uchbovoi literatury.BilovodskaО. А2018Kyiv, UkraineCentr uchbovoi literaturySearch in Google Scholar
Blanc, B. L., & Bouillon, J. L. (2012). Organizational devices for knowledge management: Proposal for a crossover perspective between knowledge sciences and communication sciences. VINE: The journal of information and knowledge management systems, 42(3/4), 382–395. doi: 10.1108/03055721211267503BlancB. L.BouillonJ. L.2012Organizational devices for knowledge management: Proposal for a crossover perspective between knowledge sciences and communication sciences423/438239510.1108/03055721211267503Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Borjigen, C. (2015). Mass collaborative knowledge management: Towards the next generation of knowledge management studies. Program: Electronic Library and Information Systems, 49(3), 325–342.BorjigenC.2015Mass collaborative knowledge management: Towards the next generation of knowledge management studies49332534210.1108/PROG-02-2015-0023Search in Google Scholar
BreakFast (2016). Ukraina v Globalnom reytinge innovatsiy [Ukraine in the Global ranking of innovations]. Retrieved from http://www.break-fast.com.ua/ukrainav-mirovom-rejtinge-innovacij/BreakFast2016Retrieved from http://www.break-fast.com.ua/ukrainav-mirovom-rejtinge-innovacij/Search in Google Scholar
Bučková, J. (2015). Corporate culture as an important factor in the implementation of knowledge management. Forum Scientiae Oeconomia, 3(3), 51–61.BučkováJ2015Corporate culture as an important factor in the implementation of knowledge management335161Search in Google Scholar
Downs J. B., Hossfeld, O., & Velamuri, V. K. (2019). The EC-LQO five-factor framework: An alternative lens for business model innovation in highly knowledge-intensive industries. Managerial and Decision Economics, 40(3), 309–320.DownsJ. BHossfeldO.VelamuriV. K.2019The EC-LQO five-factor framework: An alternative lens for business model innovation in highly knowledge-intensive industries40330932010.1002/mde.3003Search in Google Scholar
European Innovation Scoreboard (2016). Retrieved from http://ec.europa.eu/growth/industry/innovation/facts-figures/scoreboards_en2016Retrieved from http://ec.europa.eu/growth/industry/innovation/facts-figures/scoreboards_enSearch in Google Scholar
European Innovation Scoreboard (2018). Retrieved from http://ec.europa.eu/growth/industry/innovation/facts-figures/scoreboards_en2018Retrieved from http://ec.europa.eu/growth/industry/innovation/facts-figures/scoreboards_enSearch in Google Scholar
Eurostat (2019). Retrieved from
https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat2019Retrieved from https://ec.europa.eu/eurostatSearch in Google Scholar
Fini, R., Rasmussen, E., Siegel, D., & Wiklund, J. (2018). Rethinking the Commercialization of Public Science: From Entrepreneurial Outcomes to Societal Impacts. Academy of Management Perspectives, 32(1). doi: 10.5465/amp.2017.0206FiniR.RasmussenE.SiegelD.WiklundJ.2018Rethinking the Commercialization of Public Science: From Entrepreneurial Outcomes to Societal Impacts32110.5465/amp.2017.0206Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Fitri, H., Nugraha, A. T., Hakimah, Y., & Manihuruk, Ch. (2019). Strategic Management of Organizational Knowledge and Competency Through Intellectual Capital. Polish Journal of Management Studies, 19(2), 132–141. doi: 10.17512/pjms.2019.19.2.11FitriH.NugrahaA. THakimahYManihurukCh2019Strategic Management of Organizational Knowledge and Competency Through Intellectual Capital19213214110.17512/pjms.2019.19.2.11Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Formánek, I. (2015). Knowledge management as an important part of strategic management. Forum Scientiae Oeconomia, 3(3), 45–50.FormánekI2015Knowledge management as an important part of strategic management334550Search in Google Scholar
Ibidunni, A. S., Olokundun, M. A., Motilewa, D. B., Atolagbe, T. M., & Osibanjo, O. A. (2018). Group-tacit knowledge and organisational effectiveness: analysis of effects using a mixed method approach. Business: Theory and Practice, 19, 135–145. doi: 10.3846/btp.2018.14IbidunniA. S.OlokundunM. A.MotilewaD. B.AtolagbeT. M.OsibanjoO. A.2018Group-tacit knowledge and organisational effectiveness: analysis of effects using a mixed method approach1913514510.3846/btp.2018.14Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Illiashenko, N. S. (2019). Upravlinnya vyperedzhayuchym innovatsiynym rozvytkom promyslovykh pidpryyemstv [Management of advanced innovative development of industrial enterprises]. Sumy, Ukraine: Trytoria.IlliashenkoN. S.2019Sumy, UkraineTrytoriaSearch in Google Scholar
Illiashenko, S., & Rot-Sierov, Y. (2016). Knowledge as a factor of organization’s competitive benefits: prospects for Ukraine. Economic Annals-ХХ, 156(1–2), 49–53.IlliashenkoS.Rot-SierovY.2016Knowledge as a factor of organization’s competitive benefits: prospects for Ukraine1561–2495310.21003/ea.V156-0011Search in Google Scholar
Industriya 4.0 v Ukrayini (2018). Industriya 4.0 v mashynobuduvanni. Stan v Ukrayini ta perspektyvy rozvytku [Industry 4.0 in machine-building industry. State of Ukraine and prospects for development]. Retrieved from https://industry4-0-ukraine.com.ua/Industriya 4.0 v Ukrayini2018Retrieved from https://industry4-0-ukraine.com.ua/Search in Google Scholar
Informator (2019). Bloomberg nazvav novu pozytsiyu Ukrayiny u reytynhu naybilʹsh innovatsiynykh ekonomik svitu [Bloomberg has announced Ukraine’s new ranking in the rating of the most innovative economies in the world]. Retrieved from https://informator.news/bloomberg-nazvav-novu-pozytsiyu-ukrajinyu-rejtynhu-najbilsh-innovatsijnyh-ekonomik-svitu/Informator2019Retrieved from https://informator.news/bloomberg-nazvav-novu-pozytsiyu-ukrajinyu-rejtynhu-najbilsh-innovatsijnyh-ekonomik-svitu/Search in Google Scholar
Instytut ekonomichnykh doslidzhenʹ ta politychnykh konsulʹtatsiy (2016). Shchorichna otsinka dilovoho klimatu [Annual assessment of the business climate]. Retrieved from http://www.ier.com.ua/ua/sme_development/ABCA?pid=6494Instytut ekonomichnykh doslidzhenʹ ta politychnykh konsulʹtatsiy2016Retrieved from http://www.ier.com.ua/ua/sme_development/ABCA?pid=6494Search in Google Scholar
Khedhaouria, A. & Jamal, A. (2015). Sourcing knowledge for innovation: knowledge reuse and creation in project teams. Journal of Knowledge Management, 19(5), 932–948.KhedhaouriaA.JamalA.2015Sourcing knowledge for innovation: knowledge reuse and creation in project teams19593294810.1108/JKM-01-2015-0039Search in Google Scholar
Kovtunenko, Yu. V. (2012). Osoblyvosti orhanizatsiyi protsesu komertsializatsiyi innovatsiynykh rozrobok vysokotekhnolohichnykh pidpryyemstv [Organization features of the commercialization process of high-tech enterprises’ innovations]. Pratsi Odesʹkoho politekhnichnoho universytetu, 2(39), 313–317.KovtunenkoYu. V2012Osoblyvosti orhanizatsiyi protsesu komertsializatsiyi innovatsiynykh rozrobok vysokotekhnolohichnykh pidpryyemstv [Organization features of the commercialization process of high-tech enterprises’ innovations]239313317Search in Google Scholar
Kuzmin A. E., & Kostsyk R. S. (2013). Vybir metodiv komertsializatsii innovatsiinoi produktsii pidpryiemstv [The choice of commercialization methods of enterprises innovative products]. Ekonomika ta derzhava, 9, 6–8.KuzminA. EKostsykR. S2013Vybir metodiv komertsializatsii innovatsiinoi produktsii pidpryiemstv [The choice of commercialization methods of enterprises innovative products]968Search in Google Scholar
Landry, R., & Amara, N. (2012). Elucidation and enhancement of knowledge and technology transfer business models. VINE: The Journal of Information and Knowledge Management Systems, 42(1), 94–116. doi: 10.1108/03055721211207789.LandryR.AmaraN.2012Elucidation and enhancement of knowledge and technology transfer business models4219411610.1108/03055721211207789Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Maceika, A., & Jančiauskas, B. (2012). Innovative knowledge: its origin, detachment and usage in production practice. Business: Theory and Practice, 13(3), 228–233. doi: 10.3846/btp.2012.24MaceikaA.JančiauskasB2012Innovative knowledge: its origin, detachment and usage in production practice13322823310.3846/btp.2012.24Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Majewska, M., & Szulczyńska, U. (2014). Methods and Practices of Tacit Knowledge Sharing Within an Enterprise: an Empirical Investigation. Oeconomia Copernicana, 5(2), 35–48. doi: 10.12775/OeC.2014.012MajewskaM.SzulczyńskaU2014Methods and Practices of Tacit Knowledge Sharing Within an Enterprise: an Empirical Investigation52354810.12775/OeC.2014.012Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Mardania, A., Nikoosokhanb, S., Moradib, M., & Doustarb, M. (2018). The Relationship Between Knowledge Management and Innovation Performance. The Journal of High Technology Management Research, 29(1), 12–26.MardaniaA.NikoosokhanbS.MoradibM.DoustarbM.2018The Relationship Between Knowledge Management and Innovation Performance291122610.1016/j.hitech.2018.04.002Search in Google Scholar
Markman, G. D., Siegel, D. S., & Wright, M. (2008). Research and Technology Commercialization. Journal of Management Studies, 45(8), 1401–1423.MarkmanG. D.SiegelD. S.WrightM.2008Research and Technology Commercialization4581401142310.1111/j.1467-6486.2008.00803.xSearch in Google Scholar
Massingham, P. (2014). An evaluation of knowledge management tools: Part 1 – managing knowledge resources. Journal of Knowledge Management, 18(6), 1075–1100. doi: 10.1108/JKM-11-2013-0449MassinghamP.2014An evaluation of knowledge management tools: Part 1 – managing knowledge resources1861075110010.1108/JKM-11-2013-0449Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Naqshbandib, M. M., & Jasimuddin, S. M. (2018). Knowledge-oriented leadership and open innovation: Role of knowledge management capability in France-based multinationals. International Business Review, 27(3), 701–713.NaqshbandibM. M.JasimuddinS. M.2018Knowledge-oriented leadership and open innovation: Role of knowledge management capability in France-based multinationals27370171310.1016/j.ibusrev.2017.12.001Search in Google Scholar
Olefirenko, O. M. (2016). Komertsializatsiya innovatsiy yak obyektyvnyy chynnyk efektyvnoho funktsionuvan-nya promyslovoho pidpryyemstva [Commercialization of innovations as an objective factor of effective functioning of an industrial enterprise]. Skhidna Yevropa: ekonomika, biznes ta upravlinnya, 5(05), 179–183.OlefirenkoO. M.2016Komertsializatsiya innovatsiy yak obyektyvnyy chynnyk efektyvnoho funktsionuvan-nya promyslovoho pidpryyemstva [Commercialization of innovations as an objective factor of effective functioning of an industrial enterprise]505179183Search in Google Scholar
Olefirenko, O. M. (2017). Upravlinnya komertsializatsiyeyu innovatsiy promyslovykh pidpryyemstv: aspekty zbutovoyi polityky [Management of commercialization of innovations of industrial enterprises: aspects of sales policy]. Sumy, Ukraine: Trytoria.OlefirenkoO. M.2017Sumy, UkraineTrytoriaSearch in Google Scholar
Prokopenko, O., Holmberg, R., & Omelyanenko, V. (2018). Information and communication technologies support for the participation of universities in innovation networks (comparative study). Innovative Marketing, 14(3), 17–29.ProkopenkoO.HolmbergR.OmelyanenkoV.2018Information and communication technologies support for the participation of universities in innovation networks (comparative study)143172910.21511/im.14(3).2018.03Search in Google Scholar
Ringel, M., Manly, J., & Möller, C. (2018). The Most Innovative Companies 2018. Retrieved from https://www.bcg.com/publications/collections/most-innovative-companies-2018RingelM.ManlyJMöllerC2018Retrieved from https://www.bcg.com/publications/collections/most-innovative-companies-2018Search in Google Scholar
Rot-Sierov, Ye. V. (2016). Rol i mistse znan u komertsializatsiyi innovatsiy yak instrumentu realizatsiyi potentsialu pidpryyemstva [The role and place of knowledge in the commercialization of innovations as a tool for realization of enterprise potential]. Prychornomorsʹki ekonomichni studiyi, 12(2), 33–37.Rot-SierovYe. V2016Rol i mistse znan u komertsializatsiyi innovatsiy yak instrumentu realizatsiyi potentsialu pidpryyemstva [The role and place of knowledge in the commercialization of innovations as a tool for realization of enterprise potential]1223337Search in Google Scholar
Shypulina, Yu. S. (2017). Upravlinnya rozvytkom innovatsiynoyi kulʹtury promyslovykh pidpryyemstv [Management of development of innovative culture of industrial enterprises]. Sumy, Ukraine: TOV “Trytoria”.ShypulinaYu. S2017Sumy, UkraineTOV “Trytoria”Search in Google Scholar
Soskin, O. I. (2014). Narodnyy kapitalizm: ekonomichna model dlya Ukrayiny [People’s capitalism: an economic model for Ukraine]. Kyiv, Ukraine: Vydavnyctvo “IST”.SoskinO. I.2014Kyiv, UkraineVydavnyctvo “IST”10.21003/Soskin_Monograph_NATIONAL_CAPITALISMSearch in Google Scholar
Stankiewicz, J. S., & Moczulska, M. (2015). The involvement of employees in knowledge management in the light of the research results. Oeconomia Copernicana, 6(2), 37–51. doi: 10.12775/OeC.2015.011StankiewiczJ. S.MoczulskaM.2015The involvement of employees in knowledge management in the light of the research results62375110.12775/OeC.2015.011Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
State Statistics Service of Ukraine [Derzhavna sluzhba statystyky Ukrayiny] (2019). Retrieved from http://www.ukrstat.gov.ua/State Statistics Service of Ukraine2019Retrieved from http://www.ukrstat.gov.ua/Search in Google Scholar
The Global Innovation Index (2019). Retrieved from https://www.globalinnovationindex.org/analysis-indicator.2019Retrieved from https://www.globalinnovationindex.org/analysis-indicator.Search in Google Scholar
Turkey: WIPO Releases (2018). World Intellectual Property Indicators Report. Retrieved from http://www.mondaq.com/turkey/x/782720/Trademark/WIPO+Releases+2018+World+Intellectual+Property+Indicators+ReportTurkey: WIPO Releases2018Retrieved from http://www.mondaq.com/turkey/x/782720/Trademark/WIPO+Releases+2018+World+Intellectual+Property+Indicators+ReportSearch in Google Scholar
Ukrstat (2018). Naukova ta innovatsiyna diyalnist Ukrayiny: statystychnyy zbirnyk [Scientific and innovative activity of Ukraine: statistical yearbook]. Kyiv, Ukraine: Derzhavna sluzhba statystyky Ukrayiny. Retrieved from https://ukrstat.org/uk/druk/publicat/kat_u/2018/zb/09/zb_nauka_2017.pdfUkrstat2018Kyiv, UkraineDerzhavna sluzhba statystyky UkrayinyRetrieved from https://ukrstat.org/uk/druk/publicat/kat_u/2018/zb/09/zb_nauka_2017.pdfSearch in Google Scholar
Ukrstat (2019). Naukova ta innovatsiyna diyalnist Ukrayiny: statystychnyy zbirnyk [Scientific and innovative activity of Ukraine: statistical yearbook]. Kyiv, Ukraine: Derzhavna sluzhba statystyky Ukrayiny. Retrieved from http://www.ukrstat.gov.ua/druk/publicat/kat_u/2019/zb/09/zb_nauka_2018.pdfUkrstat2019Kyiv, UkraineDerzhavna sluzhba statystyky UkrayinyRetrieved from http://www.ukrstat.gov.ua/druk/publicat/kat_u/2019/zb/09/zb_nauka_2018.pdfSearch in Google Scholar
World Intellectual Property Organization (2019). Retrieved from https://www3.wipo.int/ipstats/keysearch.htm?keyId=2312019Retrieved from https://www3.wipo.int/ipstats/keysearch.htm?keyId=231Search in Google Scholar
Yahiaei, M., & Hasanzadeh, A. (2018). Presentation a technology commercialization model in ICT knowledge base companies. Investment Knowledge, 7(26), 63–82.YahiaeiM.HasanzadehA.2018Presentation a technology commercialization model in ICT knowledge base companies7266382Search in Google Scholar
Zahra, S. A., Kaul, A., & Bolívar-Ramos, M. T. (2018). Why Corporate Science Commercialization Fails: Integrating Diverse Perspectives. Academy of Management Perspectives, 32(1). Retrieved from https://journals.aom.org/doi/10.5465/amp.2016.0132ZahraS. A.KaulABolívar-RamosM. T2018Why Corporate Science Commercialization Fails: Integrating Diverse Perspectives321Retrieved from https://journals.aom.org/doi/10.5465/amp.2016.013210.5465/amp.2016.0132Search in Google Scholar