This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License.
Ahmos, D. P., Duchon, D., McDaniel, R. R. Jr, & Huonker, J. W. (2002). What a Mess! Participation as a Simple Managerial Rule to ‘Complexify’ Organizations. Journal of Management Studies 39(2), 189-206. doi: 10.1111/1467-6486.00288AhmosD. P.DuchonD.McDanielR. R. Jr&HuonkerJ. W.2002What a Mess! Participation as a Simple Managerial Rule to ‘Complexify’ Organizations39218920610.1111/1467-6486.00288Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Ashkenas, R. (2007). Simplicity-Minded Management. Harvard Business Review 85(12), 101-109.AshkenasR.2007Simplicity-Minded Management8512101109Search in Google Scholar
Bieńkowska, A., & Tworek, K. (2019). Job performance model based on Employees’ Dynamic Capabilities (EDC) Raporty Wydziału Informatyki i Zarządzania Politechniki Wrocławskiej, Ser. PRE nr 7 [Reports of the Faculty of Computer Science and Management of the Wrocław University Science of Technology, Ser. PRE No. 7].BieńkowskaA.&TworekK.2019Raporty Wydziału Informatyki i Zarządzania Politechniki Wrocławskiej, Ser. PRE nr 7 [Reports of the Faculty of Computer Science and Management of the Wrocław University Science of Technology, Ser. PRE No. 7]Search in Google Scholar
Bodell, L. (2016). Why Simple Wins: Escape the Complexity Trap and Get to Work That Matters Routledge.BodellL.2016Routledge10.4324/9781315212616Search in Google Scholar
Brandes, D. (2013). Einfach managen: Komplexität vermeiden, reduzieren und beherrschen Frankfurt, Germany: Redline Verlag.BrandesD.2013Frankfurt, GermanyRedline VerlagSearch in Google Scholar
Burns, T., & Stalker, G. M. (1961). The management of innovation London, Great Britain: Tavistock.BurnsT.&StalkerG. M.1961London, Great BritainTavistockSearch in Google Scholar
Campos, L. M. S., de Melo Heizen, D. A., Verdinelli, M. A., & Cauchick, M. P. A. (2015). Environmental performance indicators: A study on ISO 14001 certified companies. Journal of Cleaner Production 99, 286-296. doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.03.019CamposL. M. S.de Melo HeizenD. A.VerdinelliM. A.&CauchickM. P. A.2015Environmental performance indicators: A study on ISO 14001 certified companies9928629610.1016/j.jclepro.2015.03.019Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Collinson, S., & Jay, M. (2012). From Complexity to Simplicity: Unleash Your Organisation’s Potential Palgrave Macmillan.CollinsonS.&JayM.2012Palgrave Macmillan10.1057/9781137006226Search in Google Scholar
Crane, A., Palazzo, G., Spence, L. J., & Matten, D. (2014). Contesting the value of “creating shared value”. California Management Review 56(2), 130-153. doi: 10.1525/cmr.2014.56.2.130CraneA.PalazzoG.SpenceL. J.&MattenD.2014Contesting the value of “creating shared value”56213015310.1525/cmr.2014.56.2.130Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Croasmun, J. T., & Ostrom, L. (2011). Using Likert-Type Scales in the Social Sciences. Journal of Adult Education 40(1), 19-22.CroasmunJ. T.&OstromL.2011Using Likert-Type Scales in the Social Sciences4011922Search in Google Scholar
Crozier, M. (1993). Przedsiębiorstwo na podsłuchuL’Entreprise à l’écoute Warszawa, Poland: PWE.CrozierM.1993L’Entreprise à l’écouteWarszawa, PolandPWESearch in Google Scholar
Cunha, M. P., & Rego, A. (2010). Complexity, Simplicity, Simplexity. European Management Journal, 28 85-94. doi: 10.1016/j.emj.2009.04.006CunhaM. P.&RegoA.2010Complexity, Simplicity, Simplexity28859410.1016/j.emj.2009.04.006Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Donaldson, L. (2001). The contingency theory of organizations Sage Publications.DonaldsonL.2001Sage Publications10.4135/9781452229249Search in Google Scholar
Donaldson, L. (2006). The contingency theory of organizational design: challenges and opportunities. In R. M. Burton, B. Eriksen, D. D. Håkonsson, & C. C. Snow (Eds.), Organization Design. The Evolving State-of-the-Art (pp. 19-40). Boston: Springer. Retrieved from https://link.springer.com/book/10.1007/0-387-34173-0DonaldsonL.2006The contingency theory of organizational design: challenges and opportunitiesBurtonR. M.EriksenB.HåkonssonD. D.&SnowC. C.1940BostonSpringerRetrieved fromhttps://link.springer.com/book/10.1007/0-387-34173-010.1007/0-387-34173-0_2Search in Google Scholar
Drucker, P. (1993). The Practice of Management New York, United States: Harper Business.DruckerP.1993New York, United StatesHarper BusinessSearch in Google Scholar
Eisenhardt, K. H., & Sull, D. N. (2001). Strategy as Simple Rules. Harvard Business Review, 79(1), 106-116.EisenhardtK. H.&SullD. N.2001Strategy as Simple Rules791106116Search in Google Scholar
Fuchs, C., & Diamantopoulos, A. (2009). Using single-item measures for construct measurement in management research: Conceptual issues and application guidelines. Die Betriebswirtschaft 69(2), 195-210. Retrieved from https://temme.wiwi.uni-wuppertal.de/fileadmin/_migrated/content_uploads/fuchs_diamantopoulos_2009.pdfFuchsC.&DiamantopoulosA.2009Using single-item measures for construct measurement in management research: Conceptual issues and application guidelines692195210Retrieved fromhttps://temme.wiwi.uni-wuppertal.de/fileadmin/_migrated/content_uploads/fuchs_diamantopoulos_2009.pdfSearch in Google Scholar
Gribbin J. (2004). Deep Simplicity: Chaos, Complexity and the Emergence of Life London, Great Britain: Allen-Lane.GribbinJ.2004London, Great BritainAllen-LaneSearch in Google Scholar
Hamann, P. M. (2017). Towards a contingency theory of corporate planning: a systematic literature review. Management Review Quarterly 67(4), 227-289. Retrieved from https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11301-017-0132-4HamannP. M.2017Towards a contingency theory of corporate planning: a systematic literature review674227289Retrieved fromhttps://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11301-017-0132-410.1007/s11301-017-0132-4Search in Google Scholar
Hamel, G. (2008). The future of management. Human Resource Management International Digest, 16(6). doi:10.1108/hrmid.2008.04416fae.001HamelG.2008The future of management16610.1108/hrmid.2008.04416fae.001Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Hartley, J. (2014). Some thoughts on Likert-type scales. International Journal of Clinical and Health Psychology, 14(1), 83-86. doi: 10.1016/S1697-2600(14)70040-7HartleyJ.2014Some thoughts on Likert-type scales141838610.1016/S1697-2600(14)70040-7Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Hase, S. (2002), Simplicity in complexity: Capable people and capable organisations need each other Paper presented at the Australian Vocational Education and Training Association conference, Melbourne, April.HaseS.2002Paper presented at the Australian Vocational Education and Training Association conferenceMelbourneSearch in Google Scholar
Hopej, M., Kamiński, R., Tworek, K., Walecka-Jankowska, K., & Zgrzywa-Ziemak, A. (2017). Community-oriented culture and simple organizational structure. Organization and Management, 4A 75-93. Retrieved from http://kolegia.sgh.waw.pl/pl/KZiF/czasopisma/oik/numery/Documents/2017_NR_4A_(179).pdfHopejM.KamińskiR.TworekK.Walecka-JankowskaK.&Zgrzywa-ZiemakA.2017Community-oriented culture and simple organizational structure4A7593Retrieved fromhttp://kolegia.sgh.waw.pl/pl/KZiF/czasopisma/oik/numery/Documents/2017_NR_4A_(179).pdfSearch in Google Scholar
Hopej-Kamińska, M., Zgrzywa-Ziemak, A., Hopej, M., Kamiński, R., & Martan, J. (2015). Simplicity as a Feature of an Organizational Structure. Argumenta Oeconomica, 1(34), 259-276. doi: 10.15611/aoe.2015.1.10Hopej-KamińskaM.Zgrzywa-ZiemakA.HopejM.KamińskiR.&MartanJ.2015Simplicity as a Feature of an Organizational Structure13425927610.15611/aoe.2015.1.10Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Leff, S., & Zolkos, R. (2015). Taming organisational complexity – start at the top A report from The Economist Intelligence Unit. Retrieved from https://eiuperspectives.economist.com/sites/default/files/EIU_SAP_Taming%20organisational%20complexity_PDF_0.pdfLeffS.&ZolkosR.2015A report from The Economist Intelligence Unit. Retrieved fromhttps://eiuperspectives.economist.com/sites/default/files/EIU_SAP_Taming%20organisational%20complexity_PDF_0.pdfSearch in Google Scholar
Lumpkin, G. T., & Dess, G. G. (1995). Simplicity as a Strategy-making Process: The Effects of Stage of Organizational Development and Environment on Performance. Academy of Management Journal 38(5), 1386-1407. doi: 10.5465/256862LumpkinG. T.&DessG. G.1995Simplicity as a Strategy-making Process: The Effects of Stage of Organizational Development and Environment on Performance3851386140710.5465/256862Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Maeda, J. (2006). The Laws of Simplicity. Design, Technology, Business, Life Cambridge, Great Britain: MIT Press.MaedaJ.2006Cambridge, Great BritainMIT PressSearch in Google Scholar
Maletic, M., Maletic, D., Dahlgaard, J., Dahlgaard-Park, S. M., & Gomišcek, B. (2015). Do corporate sustainability practices enhance organizational economic performance? International Journal of Quality and Service Sciences 7(2), 184-200. doi: https://doi.org/10.1108/IJQSS-02-2015-0025MaleticM.MaleticD.DahlgaardJ.Dahlgaard-ParkS. M.&GomišcekB.2015Do corporate sustainability practices enhance organizational economic performance?72184200https://doi.org/10.1108/IJQSS-02-2015-002510.1108/IJQSS-02-2015-0025Search in Google Scholar
Marion, R. (1999). The edge of organization: Chaos and complexity theories of formal social systems SAGE. doi: 10.4135/9781452234052MarionR.1999SAGE10.4135/9781452234052Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Matić, I. (2012). Measuring the effects of learning on business performances: Proposed performance measurement model. The Journal of American Academy of Business, Cambridge, 18(1), 278-284. Retrieved from http://www.jaabc.com/Jaabc18-1September-2012Matic.htmlMatićI.2012Measuring the effects of learning on business performances: Proposed performance measurement model181278284Retrieved fromhttp://www.jaabc.com/Jaabc18-1September-2012Matic.htmlSearch in Google Scholar
McAdam, R., Miller, K., & McSorley, C. (2019). Towards a contingency theory perspective of quality management in enabling strategic alignment. International Journal of Production Economics 207, 195-209. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2016.07.003McAdamR.MillerK.&McSorleyC.2019Towards a contingency theory perspective of quality management in enabling strategic alignment207195209https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2016.07.00310.1016/j.ijpe.2016.07.003Search in Google Scholar
Miller, D. (1993). The Architecture of Simplicity. The Academy of Management Review, 18(1), 116-138. doi: 10.5465/amr.1993.3997509MillerD.1993The Architecture of Simplicity18111613810.5465/amr.1993.3997509Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Mintzberg, H. (1979). The Structuring of Organizations: A Synthesis of the Research New Jersey, United States: Prentice Hall.MintzbergH.1979New Jersey, United StatesPrentice HallSearch in Google Scholar
Morrish, J. (2008). Simplicity: Not as Easy as it Looks. Management Today, April 43-45.MorrishJ.2008Simplicity: Not as Easy as it Looks4345Search in Google Scholar
Osbert-Pociecha, G. (2013). Zmiany upraszczające w organizacji – wyniki badań sondażowych [Simplifying changes in the organization – results of survey research]. Nauki o Zarządzaniu, 4(17), 95-108. Retrieved from http://cejsh.icm.edu.pl/cejsh/element/bwmeta1.element.desklight-78d3caad-72f8-4bb8-a554-d6f40bd961a1?q=bwmeta1.element.desklight-33961a22-3c1e-43be-8f3f-6e62c8de0b32;7&qt=CHILDREN-STATELESSOsbert-PociechaG.2013Zmiany upraszczające w organizacji – wyniki badań sondażowych [Simplifying changes in the organization – results of survey research]41795108Retrieved fromhttp://cejsh.icm.edu.pl/cejsh/element/bwmeta1.element.desklight-78d3caad-72f8-4bb8-a554-d6f40bd961a1?q=bwmeta1.element.desklight-33961a22-3c1e-43be-8f3f-6e62c8de0b32;7&qt=CHILDREN-STATELESSSearch in Google Scholar
Peters, T., & Waterman, R. (2004). In Search of Excellence: Lessons from America’s Best-Run Companies New York, United States: Harper Business Essentials.PetersT.&WatermanR.2004New York, United StatesHarper Business EssentialsSearch in Google Scholar
Sandlin, J. A., & Walther, C. S. (2009). Complicated Simplicity. Moral Identity Formation and Social Movement Learning in the Voluntary Simplicity Movement. Adult Education Quarterly, 59(4), 298-317. doi: 10.1177/0741713609334137SandlinJ. A.&WaltherC. S.2009Complicated Simplicity. Moral Identity Formation and Social Movement Learning in the Voluntary Simplicity Movement59429831710.1177/0741713609334137Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Scherer, J., Hartschen, M., Bruegger, C., & Hagmann, P. J. (2013). Simplicity for Business Success! Strategies for Simple Products, Services and Processes Offenbach, Germany: Verlag.SchererJ.HartschenM.BrueggerC.&HagmannP. J.2013Offenbach, GermanyVerlagSearch in Google Scholar
Segall, K. (2013). Insanely Simple: The Obsession That Drives Apple’s Success New York, United States: Penguin Group.SegallK.2013New York, United StatesPenguin GroupSearch in Google Scholar
Segall, K. (2016). Think simple: how smart leaders defeat complexity New York, United States: Penguin.SegallK.2016New York, United StatesPenguinSearch in Google Scholar
Stephenson, J., & Weil, S. (1992). Four themes in educating for capability. Quality in Learning. A Capability Approach in Higher Education London, Great Britain: Kogan Page.StephensonJ.&WeilS.1992London, Great BritainKogan PageSearch in Google Scholar
Welch, J., & Welch, S. (2005). Winning New York, United States: Harper Business.WelchJ.&WelchS.2005New York, United StatesHarper BusinessSearch in Google Scholar