This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License.
van der Aalst, W. M. P. (2005). Business Alignment: Using Process Mining As a Tool for Delta Analysis and Conformance Testing. Requirements Engineering 10(3), 198-211. doi: 10.1007/s00766-005-0001-xvan der AalstW. M. P.2005Business Alignment: Using Process Mining As a Tool for Delta Analysis and Conformance Testing103198–21110.1007/s00766-005-0001-xOpen DOISearch in Google Scholar
van der Aalst, W. M. P. (2011). Process Mining: Discovery, Conformance and Enhancement of Business Processes. Berlin Heidelberg, Germany: Springer-Verlag.van der AalstW. M. P.2011Berlin Heidelberg, GermanySpringer-Verlag10.1007/978-3-642-19345-3Search in Google Scholar
van der Aalst, W. M. P. (2015). Extracting Event Data from Databases to Unleash Process Mining. In J. vom Brocke & T. Schmiedel (Eds.), BPM - Driving Innovation in a Digital World (pp. 105-128). Switzerland: Springer Cham (Management for Professionals).van der AalstW. M. P.2015Extracting Event Data from Databases to Unleash Process Miningvom BrockeJ.&SchmiedelT.105–128SwitzerlandSpringer Cham (Management for Professionals)Search in Google Scholar
van der Aalst, W. M. P. (2016). Process Mining: Data Science in Action 2nd edn. Berlin Heidelberg, Germany: Springer-Verlag.van der AalstW. M. P.20162nd ednBerlin Heidelberg, GermanySpringer-Verlag10.1007/978-3-662-49851-4Search in Google Scholar
van der et al. Aalst, W. M. P. (2011). Process Mining Manifesto. In F. Daniel, K. Barkaoui, & S. Dustdar (Eds.), Business Process Management Workshops. International Conference on Business Process Management (pp. 169-194). Berlin, Heidelberg, Germany: Springervan der et al. AalstW. M. P.2011Process Mining ManifestoDanielF.BarkaouiK.&DustdarS.169–194Berlin, Heidelberg, GermanySpringerSearch in Google Scholar
van der Aalst, W. M. P., Rubin, V., Verbeek, H. M. V., van Dongen, B. F., Kindler, E., & Günther, C. W. (2010). Process mining: a two-step approach to balance between underfitting and overfitting. Software & Systems Modeling 9(1), 87-111. doi: 10.1007/s10270-008-0106-zvan der AalstW. M. P.RubinV.VerbeekH. M. V.van DongenB. F.KindlerE.&GüntherC. W.2010Process mining: a two-step approach to balance between underfitting and overfitting9187–11110.1007/s10270-008-0106-zOpen DOISearch in Google Scholar
van der Aalst, W. M. P., Weijters, T., & Maruster, L. (2004). Workflow mining: discovering process models from event logs. IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering 16(9), 1128-1142. doi: 10.1109/TKDE.2004.47van der AalstW. M. P.WeijtersT.&MarusterL.2004Workflow mining: discovering process models from event logs1691128–114210.1109/TKDE.2004.47Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
van der Aalst, W. M. P., Weijters, T., & Maruster, L. (2004). Workflow mining: discovering process models from event logs. IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering 16(9), 1128-1142. doi: 10.1109/TKDE.2004.47van der AalstW. M. P.WeijtersT.&MarusterL.2004Workflow mining: discovering process models from event logs1691128–114210.1109/TKDE.2004.47Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Abar, S., Theodoropoulos, G. K., Lemarinier P., & O’Hare, G. M. P. (2017). Agent Based Modelling and Simulation tools: A review of the state-of-art software. Computer Science Review 24, 13-33. doi: 10.1016/j. cosrev.2017.03.001AbarS.TheodoropoulosG. K.LemarinierP.&O’HareG. M. P.2017Agent Based Modelling and Simulation tools: A review of the state-of-art software2413–3310.1016/j.cosrev.2017.03.001Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Agrawal, R., Gunopulos, D., & Leymann, F. (1998). Mining Process Models from Workflow Logs. In H. Schek, F. Saltor, I. Ramos, & G. Alonso (Eds.), Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Extending Database Technology (EDBT’98), Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol. 1377 (pp. 469-483), Berlin, Germany: Springer.AgrawalR.GunopulosD.&LeymannF.1998Mining Process Models from Workflow LogsSchekH.SaltorF.RamosI.&AlonsoG.469–483Berlin, GermanySpringerSearch in Google Scholar
AnyLogic (2019). Simulation modelling software tool. Retrieved from https://www.anylogic.comAnyLogic2019Retrieved fromhttps://www.anylogic.comSearch in Google Scholar
Augusto, A. Conforti, R., Dumas, M., La Rosa, M., Maggi, F. M., Marrella, A., Mecella, M., & Soo, A. (2017). Automated Discovery of Process Models from Event Logs: Review and Benchmark Retrieved from http://arxiv.org/abs/1705.02288AugustoA. Conforti, R.DumasM.La RosaM.MaggiF. M.MarrellaA.MecellaM.&SooA.2017Retrieved fromhttp://arxiv.org/abs/1705.02288Search in Google Scholar
Augusto, A., Conforti, R., Dumas, M., & La Rosa, M. (2017). Split Miner: Discovering Accurate and Simple Business Process Models from Event Logs. In 2017 IEEE International Conference on Data Mining (ICDM) (pp. 1-10), New Orleans, United States: IEEE.AugustoA.ConfortiR.DumasM.&La RosaM.2017Split Miner: Discovering Accurate and Simple Business Process Models from Event Logs1–10New Orleans, United StatesIEEESearch in Google Scholar
Augusto, A., Conforti, R., Dumas, M., La Rosa, M., & Bruno, G. (2018). Automated discovery of structured process models from event logs: The discover-and-structure approach. Data & Knowledge Engineering 117, 373-392. doi: 10.1016/j.datak.2018.04.007AugustoA.ConfortiR.DumasM.La RosaM.&BrunoG.2018Automated discovery of structured process models from event logs: The discover-and-structure approach117373–39210.1016/j.datak.2018.04.007Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Augusto, A., et al. (2019). Measuring Fitness and Precision of Automatically Discovered Process Models: A Principled and Scalable Approach Retrieved from https://minerva-access.unimelb.edu.au/bitstream/handle/11343/219723/main.pdfAugustoA.et al2019Retrieved fromhttps://minerva-access.unimelb.edu.au/bitstream/handle/11343/219723/main.pdfSearch in Google Scholar
Bannat, A., et al. (2011). Artificial Cognition in Production Systems. IEEE Transactions on Automation Science and Engineering 8(1), 148-174. doi: 10.1109/TASE.2010.2053534BannatA.et al2011Artificial Cognition in Production Systems81148–17410.1109/TASE.2010.2053534Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
BIMP (2019). Business Process Simulator. Retrieved from http://bimp.cs.ut.eeBIMP2019Retrieved fromhttp://bimp.cs.ut.eeSearch in Google Scholar
Boes, J., & Migeon, F. (2017). Self-organizing multi-agent systems for the control of complex systems. Journal of Systems and Software 134, 12-28. doi: 10.1016/j. jss.2017.08.038BoesJ.&MigeonF.2017Self-organizing multi-agent systems for the control of complex systems13412–2810.1016/j.jss.2017.08.038Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Borshchev, A., & Filippov, A. (2004). From System Dynamics and Discrete Event to Practical Agent Based Modeling: Reasons, Techniques, Tools Retrieved from https://www.researchgate.net/publication/233820565_From_System_Dynamics_and_Discrete_Event_to_Practical_Agent_Based_Modeling_Reasons_Techniques_ToolsBorshchevA.&FilippovA.2004Retrieved fromhttps://www.researchgate.net/publication/233820565_From_System_Dynamics_and_Discrete_Event_to_Practical_Agent_Based_Modeling_Reasons_Techniques_ToolsSearch in Google Scholar
van den Broucke, S. K. L. M., & De Weerdt, J. (2017). Fodina: A robust and flexible heuristic process discovery technique. Decision Support Systems 100, 109-118. doi: 10.1016/j.dss.2017.04.005van den BrouckeS. K. L. M.&De WeerdtJ.2017Fodina: A robust and flexible heuristic process discovery technique100109–11810.1016/j.dss.2017.04.005Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Buijs, J. C. A. M., van Dongen, B. F., & van der Aalst, W. M. P. (2012). On the Role of Fitness, Precision, Generalization and Simplicity in Process Discovery. In Meersman, et al. (Eds.), On the Move to Meaningful Internet Systems: OTM 2012. OTM Confederated International Conferences (pp. 305-322). Berlin, Heidelberg, Germany: Springer. doi: 10.1007/978-3-642-33606-5_19BuijsJ. C. A. M.van DongenB. F.&van der AalstW. M. P.2012On the Role of Fitness, Precision, Generalization and Simplicity in Process DiscoveryMeersmanet al. Eds305–322Berlin, Heidelberg, GermanySpringer10.1007/978-3-642-33606-5_19Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Buijs, J. C. A. M., Dongen, B. F. van, & Aalst, W. M. P. van der (2012). A genetic algorithm for discovering process trees. In 2012 IEEE Congress on Evolutionary Computation (pp. 1-8). Brisbane, Australia: IEEE. doi: 10.1109/CEC.2012.6256458BuijsJ. C. A. M.DongenB. F. van&AalstW. M. P. van der2012A genetic algorithm for discovering process trees1–8Brisbane, AustraliaIEEE10.1109/CEC.2012.6256458Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Buijs, J. C. a. M., van Dongen, B. F., & van der Aalst, W. M. P. (2014) Quality Dimensions in Process Discovery: The Importance of Fitness, Precision, Generalization and Simplicity. International Journal of Cooperative Information Systems 23(01), 1440001. doi: 10.1142/S0218843014400012BuijsJ. C. A. M.van DongenB. F.&van der AalstW. M. P.2014Quality Dimensions in Process Discovery: The Importance of Fitness, Precision, Generalization and Simplicity2301144000110.1142/S0218843014400012Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Buijs, J. C. A. M., van Dongen, B. F., & van der Aalst, W. M. P. (2014). Quality Dimensions in Process Discovery: The Importance of Fitness, Precision, Generalization and Simplicity. International Journal of Cooperative Information Systems 23(1), p. 1440001. doi: 10.1142/S0218843014400012BuijsJ. C. A. M.van DongenB. F.&van der AalstW. M. P.2014Quality Dimensions in Process Discovery: The Importance of Fitness, Precision, Generalization and Simplicity231144000110.1142/S0218843014400012Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Chan, W. K. V., Son, Y. J., & Macal, C. M. (2010). Agent-based simulation tutorial - simulation of emergent behavior and differences between agent-based simulation and discrete-event simulation. In Proceedings of the 2010 Winter Simulation Conference (pp. 135-150). Baltimore, United States: IEEE. doi: 10.1109/WSC.2010.5679168ChanW. K. V.SonY. J.&MacalC. M.2010Agent-based simulation tutorial - simulation of emergent behavior and differences between agent-based simulation and discrete-event simulation135–150Baltimore, United StatesIEEE10.1109/WSC.2010.5679168Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Claes, D., Oliehoek, F., Baier, H., & Tuyls, K. (2017). Decentralised Online Planning for Multi-Robot Warehouse Commissioning. In Proceedings of the 16th Conference on Autonomous Agents and MultiAgent Systems. Richland, SC: International Foundation for Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems (AAMAS ’17) (pp. 492-500). Richalnd, United States: SC.ClaesD.OliehoekF.BaierH.&TuylsK.2017Decentralised Online Planning for Multi-Robot Warehouse Commissioning492–500Richalnd, United StatesSCSearch in Google Scholar
Cook, J. E., & Wolf, E. L. (1998). Discovering Models of Software Processes from Event-Based Data. ACM Transactions on Software Engineering and Methodology 7, 215-249.CookJ. E.&WolfE. L.1998Discovering Models of Software Processes from Event-Based Data7215–24910.1145/287000.287001Search in Google Scholar
De Weerdt, J., De Backer, M., Vanthienen, J., & Baesens, B. (2012). A multi-dimensional quality assessment of state-of-the-art process discovery algorithms using real-life event logs. Information Systems 37(7), 654-676. doi: 10.1016/j.is.2012.02.004De WeerdtJ.De BackerM.VanthienenJ.&BaesensB.2012A multi-dimensional quality assessment of state-of-the-art process discovery algorithms using real-life event logs377654–67610.1016/j.is.2012.02.004Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Dinardo, G., Fabbiano, L., & Vacca, G. (2018). A smart and intuitive machine condition monitoring in the Industry 4.0 scenario. Measurement 126, 1-12. doi: 10.1016/j.measurement.2018.05.041DinardoG.FabbianoL.&VaccaG.2018A smart and intuitive machine condition monitoring in the Industry 4.0 scenario1261–1210.1016/j.measurement.2018.05.041Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
van Dongen, B. F., & van der Aalst, W. M. P. (2004). Multiphase Process Mining: Building Instance Graphs. In P. Atzeni, et al. (Eds.). Conceptual Modeling –ER 2004. International Conference on Conceptual Modeling (pp. 362-376). Berlin Heidelberg, Germany: Springer. doi: 10.1007/978-3-540-30464-7_29van DongenB. F.&van der AalstW. M. P.2004Multiphase Process Mining: Building Instance GraphsAtzeniP.et al. (Eds.)362–376Berlin Heidelberg, GermanySpringer10.1007/978-3-540-30464-7_29Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Doomun, R., & Vunka Jungum, N. (2008). Business process modelling, simulation and reengineering: call centres. Business Process Management Journal 14(6), 838-848.DoomunR.&Vunka JungumN.2008Business process modelling, simulation and reengineering: call centres146838–84810.1108/14637150810916017Search in Google Scholar
Goedertier, S., Martens, D., Vanthiene, J., Baesens, B. (2009). Robust Process Discovery with Artificial Negative Events. Journal of Machine Learning Research 10, 1305-1340.GoedertierS.MartensD.VanthieneJ.BaesensB.2009Robust Process Discovery with Artificial Negative Events101305–1340Search in Google Scholar
Gries, M., Kulkarni, C., Sauer, C., & Keutzer, K. (2003). Comparing analytical modeling with simulation for network processors: a case study. In Automation and Test in Europe Conference and Exhibition 2003 Design (pp. 256-261). Munich, Germany: IEEE. doi: 10.1109/DATE.2003.1253838GriesM.KulkarniC.SauerC.&KeutzerK.2003Comparing analytical modeling with simulation for network processors: a case study256–261Munich, GermanyIEEE10.1109/DATE.2003.1253838Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Günther, C. W., & van der Aalst, W. M. P. (2007). Fuzzy Mining – Adaptive Process Simplification Based on Multi-perspective Metrics. In G. Alonso, P. Dadam, & M. Rosemann, (Eds.), Business Process Management (pp. 328-343). Berlin Heidelberg, Germany: Springer.GüntherC. W.&van der AalstW. M. P.2007Fuzzy Mining – Adaptive Process Simplification Based on Multi-perspective MetricsAlonsoG.DadamP.&RosemannM.328–343Berlin Heidelberg, GermanySpringer10.1007/978-3-540-75183-0_24Search in Google Scholar
Guo, Q., Wen, L., Wang, Z., & Yu, P. S. (2015). Mining Invisible Tasks in Non-free-choice Constructs. In H. R. Motahari-Nezhad, J. Recker, & M. Weidlich, (Eds.). Business Process Management (pp. 109-125). Cham, Germany: Springer International Publishing.GuoQ.WenL.WangZ.&YuP. S.2015Mining Invisible Tasks in Non-free-choice ConstructsR. Motahari-NezhadH.ReckerJ.&WeidlichM.109–125Cham, GermanySpringer International Publishing10.1007/978-3-319-23063-4_7Search in Google Scholar
Hlupić, V., & Vukšić, V. B. (2004). Business Process Modelling Using SIMUL8. Retrieved from https://www.researchgate.net/publication/254419366_BUSINESS_PROCESS_MODELLING_USING_SIMUL8HlupićV.&VukšićV. B.2004Retrieved fromhttps://www.researchgate.net/publication/254419366_BUSINESS_PROCESS_MODELLING_USING_SIMUL8Search in Google Scholar
Hsieh, F.-S. (2015). Scheduling Sustainable Supply Chains based on Multi-agent Systems and Workflow Models. In 2015 10th International Conference on Intelligent Systems and Knowledge Engineering (pp. 252-259). New York, United States: IEEE.HsiehF.-S.2015Scheduling Sustainable Supply Chains based on Multi-agent Systems and Workflow Models252–259New York, United StatesIEEESearch in Google Scholar
Kelly, R. A., et al. (2013). Selecting among five common modelling approaches for integrated environmental assessment and management. Environmental Modelling & Software 47, 159-181. doi: 10.1016/j.envsoft.2013.05.005KellyR. A.et al2013Selecting among five common modelling approaches for integrated environmental assessment and management47159–18110.1016/j.envsoft.2013.05.005Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Kolberg, D., & Zühlke, D. (2015). Lean Automation enabled by Industry 4.0 Technologies. IFAC-PapersOnLine 48(3), 1870-1875. doi: 10.1016/j.ifacol.2015.06.359KolbergD.&ZühlkeD.2015Lean Automation enabled by Industry 4.0 Technologies4831870–187510.1016/j.ifacol.2015.06.359Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Kozma, T. (2017). Cooperation in the supply chain network. Forum Scientiae Oeconomia 5(3), 45-58.KozmaT.2017Cooperation in the supply chain network5345–58Search in Google Scholar
Leemans, S. J. J., Fahland, D., & van der Aalst, W. M. P. (2013a). Discovering Block-Structured Process Models from Event Logs - A Constructive Approach. In J.-M. Colom, & J. Desel, (Eds.), Application and Theory of Petri Nets and Concurrency. International Conference on Applications and Theory of Petri Nets and Concurrency (pp. 311-329). Berlin Heidelberg, Germany: Springer. doi: 10.1007/978-3-642-38697-8_17LeemansS. J. J.FahlandD.&van der AalstW. M. P.2013aDiscovering Block-Structured Process Models from Event Logs - A Constructive ApproachColomJ.-M.&DeselJ.311–329Berlin Heidelberg, GermanySpringer10.1007/978-3-642-38697-8_17Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Leemans, S. J. J., Fahland, D., & van der Aalst, W. M. P. (2013b). Discovering Block-Structured Process Models from Event Logs Containing Infrequent Behaviour. In N. Lohmann, M. Song, & P., Wohed (Eds.), Business Process Management Workshops. International Conference on Business Process Management (pp. 66-78). Berlin, Germany: Springer International Publishing. doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-06257-0_6LeemansS. J. J.FahlandD.&van der AalstW. M. P.2013bDiscovering Block-Structured Process Models from Event Logs Containing Infrequent BehaviourLohmannN.SongM.&WohedP.66–78Berlin, GermanySpringer International Publishing10.1007/978-3-319-06257-0_6Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Leemans, S. J. J., Fahland, D., & van der Aalst, W. M. P. (2014). Discovering Block-Structured Process Models from Incomplete Event Logs. In G. Ciardo, & E. Kindler (Eds.), Application and Theory of Petri Nets and Concurrency. International Conference on Applications and Theory of Petri Nets and Concurrency (pp. 91-110). Berlin, Germany: Springer International Publishing. doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-07734-5_6LeemansS. J. J.FahlandD.&van der AalstW. M. P.2014Discovering Block-Structured Process Models from Incomplete Event LogsCiardoG.&KindlerE.91–110Berlin, GermanySpringer International Publishing10.1007/978-3-319-07734-5_6Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Leemans, S. J. J., Fahland, D., & van der Aalst, W. M. P. (2015). Scalable Process Discovery with Guarantees. In K. Gaaloul, et al. (Eds.), Enterprise, Business-Process and Information Systems Modeling. International Conference on Enterprise (pp. 85-101). Berlin, Germany: Springer International Publishing. doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-19237-6_6LeemansS. J. J.FahlandD.&van der AalstW. M. P.2015Scalable Process Discovery with GuaranteesGaaloulK.et al. Eds85–101Berlin, GermanySpringer International Publishing10.1007/978-3-319-19237-6_6Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Leemans, S. J. J., Fahland, D., & van der Aalst, W. M. P. (2018). Scalable process discovery and conformance checking. Software & Systems Modeling 17(2), 599-631. doi: 10.1007/s10270-016-0545-xLeemansS. J. J.FahlandD.&van der AalstW. M. P.2018Scalable process discovery and conformance checking172599–63110.1007/s10270-016-0545-xOpen DOISearch in Google Scholar
Leitão, P., et al. (2016). Smart Agents in Industrial Cyber– Physical Systems. Proceedings of the IEEE 104(5), 1086-1101. doi: 10.1109/JPROC.2016.2521931LeitãoP.et al2016Smart Agents in Industrial Cyber– Physical Systems10451086–110110.1109/JPROC.2016.2521931Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Macal, C. M. (2010). To Agent-based Simulation from System Dynamics. In Proceedings of the Winter Simulation Conference (pp. 371-382). Baltimore, Maryland: WSC.MacalC. M.2010To Agent-based Simulation from System Dynamics371–382Baltimore, MarylandWSCSearch in Google Scholar
Macal, C. M., & North, M. J. (2008). Agent-based Modeling and Simulation: ABMS Examples. In Proceedings of the 40th Conference on Winter Simulation (pp. 101-112). Miami, Florida, United States: WSC.MacalC. M.&NorthM. J.2008Agent-based Modeling and Simulation: ABMS Examples101–112Miami, Florida, United StatesWSCSearch in Google Scholar
de Medeiros, A. K. A., van Dongen, B. F., van der Aalst, W. M. P., & Weijters, A. J. M. M. (2005). Process Mining: Extending the α-algorithm to Mine Short Loops Retrieved from https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/dd4b/bc6f1550fc6601b21bd83f5c5ff3b13a309d.pdfde MedeirosA. K. A.van DongenB. F.van der AalstW. M. P.&WeijtersA. J. M. M.2005Retrieved fromhttps://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/dd4b/bc6f1550fc6601b21bd83f5c5ff3b13a309d.pdfSearch in Google Scholar
de Medeiros, A. K. A., Weijters, A. J. M. M., & van der Aalst, W. M. P. (2007). Genetic process mining: an experimental evaluation. Data Mining and Knowledge Discovery 14(2), 245-304. doi: 10.1007/s10618-006-0061-7de MedeirosA. K. A.WeijtersA. J. M. M.&van der AalstW. M. P.2007Genetic process mining: an experimental evaluation142245–30410.1007/s10618-006-0061-7Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Nguyen, H., et al. (2016). Business Process Deviance Mining: Review and Evaluation Retrieved from http://arxiv.org/abs/1608.08252NguyenH.et al2016Retrieved fromhttp://arxiv.org/abs/1608.08252Search in Google Scholar
Pan, M., et al. (2015). Applying Industry 4.0 to the Jurong Island Eco-industrial Park. Energy Procedia 75, 1536-1541. doi: 10.1016/j.egypro.2015.07.313PanM.et al2015Applying Industry 4.0 to the Jurong Island Eco-industrial Park751536–154110.1016/j.egypro.2015.07.313Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Piccarozzi, M., Aquilani, B., & Gatti, C. (2018). Industry 4.0 in Management Studies: A Systematic Literature Review. Sustainability 10(10), 3821. doi: 10.3390/su10103821PiccarozziM.AquilaniB.&GattiC.2018Industry 4.0 in Management Studies: A Systematic Literature Review1010382110.3390/su10103821Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Pisching, M. A., et al. (2018). An architecture based on RAMI 4.0 to discover equipment to process operations required by products. Computers & Industrial Engineering 125, 574-591. doi: 10.1016/j.cie.2017.12.029PischingM. A.et al2018An architecture based on RAMI 4.0 to discover equipment to process operations required by products125574–59110.1016/j.cie.2017.12.029Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Pomarlan, M., & Bateman, J. (2018). Robot Program Construction via Grounded Natural Language Semantics & Simulation. In Proceedings of the 17th International Conference on Autonomous Agents and MultiAgent Systems (pp. 857-864). Richland, United States: International Foundation for Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems (AAMAS ’18).PomarlanM.&BatemanJ.2018Robot Program Construction via Grounded Natural Language Semantics & Simulation857–864Richland, United StatesInternational Foundation for Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems (AAMAS ’18)Search in Google Scholar
Qin, J., Liu, Y., & Grosvenor, R. (2016). A Categorical Framework of Manufacturing for Industry 4.0 and Beyond. Procedia CIRP 52, 173-178. doi: 10.1016/j.procir.2016.08.005QinJ.LiuY.&GrosvenorR.2016A Categorical Framework of Manufacturing for Industry 4.0 and Beyond52173–17810.1016/j.procir.2016.08.005Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Roblek, V., Meško, M., & Krapež, A. (2016). A Complex View of Industry 4.0. SAGE Open 6(2), 1-11. doi: 10.1177/2158244016653987RoblekV.MeškoM.&KrapežA.2016A Complex View of Industry 4.0621–1110.1177/2158244016653987Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Rodič, B. (2017). Industry 4.0 and the New Simulation Modelling Paradigm. Organizacija 50(3), 193-207. doi: 10.1515/orga-2017-0017RodičB.2017Industry 4.0 and the New Simulation Modelling Paradigm503193–20710.1515/orga-2017-0017Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Savaglio, C., et al. (2018). Agent-Based Computing in the Internet of Things: A Survey. In M. Ivanović, et al. (Eds.), Intelligent Distributed Computing XI (pp. 307-320), Cham, Germany: Springer International Publishing. doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-66379-1_27SavaglioC.et al2018Agent-Based Computing in the Internet of Things: A SurveyIvanovićM.et al. Eds307–320Cham, GermanySpringer International Publishing10.1007/978-3-319-66379-1_27Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Siebers, P. O., et al. (2010). Discrete-event simulation is dead, long live agent-based simulation!. Journal of Simulation 4(3), 204-210. doi: 10.1057/jos.2010.14SiebersP. O.et al2010Discrete-event simulation is dead, long live agent-based simulation!43204–21010.1057/jos.2010.14Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Ślusarczyk, B. (2018). Industry 4.0 : are we ready?, Polish Journal of Management Studies 17(1), 232-248. doi: 10.17512/pjms.2018.17.1.19ŚlusarczykB.2018Industry 4.0 : are we ready?171232–24810.17512/pjms.2018.17.1.19Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Sony, M. (2018). Industry 4.0 and lean management: a proposed integration model and research propositions. Production & Manufacturing Research 6(1), 416-432. doi: 10.1080/21693277.2018.1540949SonyM.2018Industry 4.0 and lean management: a proposed integration model and research propositions61416–43210.1080/21693277.2018.1540949Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Tiwari, A., Turner, C. J., & Majeed, B. (2008). A review of business process mining: State-of-the-art and future trends. ResearchGate 14(1), 5-22. doi: 10.1108/14637150810849373TiwariA.TurnerC. J.&MajeedB.2008A review of business process mining: State-of-the-art and future trends1415–2210.1108/14637150810849373Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Verbeek, H. M. W., & van der Aalst, W. M. P. (2015). Decomposed Process Mining: The ILP Case. In F. Fournier, & J. Mendling, (Eds.), Business Process Management Workshops (pp. 264-276). Berlin: Springer International Publishing.VerbeekH. M. W.&van der AalstW. M. P.2015Decomposed Process Mining: The ILP CaseFournierF.&MendlingJ.264–276BerlinSpringer International Publishing10.1007/978-3-319-15895-2_23Search in Google Scholar
Verbeek, H. M. W., van der Aalst, W. M. P., & Munoz-Gama, J. (2017). Divide and Conquer: A Tool Framework for Supporting Decomposed Discovery in Process Mining. The Computer Journal 60(11), 1649-1674. doi: 10.1093/comjnl/bxx040VerbeekH. M. W.van der AalstW. M. P.&Munoz-GamaJ.2017Divide and Conquer: A Tool Framework for Supporting Decomposed Discovery in Process Mining60111649–167410.1093/comjnl/bxx040Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Wan, J., et al. (2018). Toward Dynamic Resources Management for IoT-Based Manufacturing. IEEE Communications Magazine 56(2), 52-59. doi: 10.1109/MCOM.2018.1700629WanJ.et al2018Toward Dynamic Resources Management for IoT-Based Manufacturing56252–5910.1109/MCOM.2018.1700629Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Wang, S., et al. (2016). Towards smart factory for industry 4.0: a self-organized multi-agent system with big data based feedback and coordination. Computer Networks 101, 158-168 10WangS.et al2016Towards smart factory for industry 4.0: a self-organized multi-agent system with big data based feedback and coordination101158–16810Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Weijters, A. J. M. M., & Ribeiro, J. T. S. (2011). Flexible Heuristics Miner (FHM). In 2011 IEEE Symposium on Computational Intelligence and Data Mining (CIDM) (pp. 310-317). Paris, France: IEEE. doi: 10.1109/CIDM.2011.5949453WeijtersA. J. M. M.&RibeiroJ. T. S.2011Flexible Heuristics Miner (FHM)310–317Paris, FranceIEEE10.1109/CIDM.2011.5949453Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Weijters, A. J. M. M., van der Aalst, W.M.P., & Medeiros, A. K. A. D. (2006). Process Mining with the Heuristics-Miner Algorithm. Retrieved from http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.118.8288&rep=rep1&type=pdfWeijtersA. J. M. M.van der AalstW.M.P.&MedeirosA. K. A. D.2006Retrieved fromhttp://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.118.8288&rep=rep1&type=pdfSearch in Google Scholar
Wen, L., et al. (2007). Mining process models with non-free-choice constructs. Data Mining and Knowledge Discovery 15(2), 145-180. doi: 10.1007/s10618-007-0065-yWenL.et al2007Mining process models with non-free-choice constructs152145–18010.1007/s10618-007-0065-yOpen DOISearch in Google Scholar
Wen, L., Wang, J., & Sun, J. (2006). Detecting Implicit Dependencies Between Tasks from Event Logs. In Frontiers of WWW Research and Development - AP-Web 2006. Asia-Pacific Web Conference (pp. 591-603), Berlin, Heidelberg, Germany: Springer. doi: 10.1007/11610113_52WenL.WangJ.&SunJ.2006Detecting Implicit Dependencies Between Tasks from Event Logs591–603Berlin, Heidelberg, GermanySpringer10.1007/11610113_52Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
van der Werf, J. M. E. M., van Dongen, B. F., Hurkens, C.J., & Serebrenik, A. (2009). Process Discovery using Integer Linear Programming. Fundamenta Informaticae, 94(3-4), 387-412. doi: 10.3233/FI-2009-136van der WerfJ. M. E. M.van DongenB. F.HurkensC.J.&SerebrenikA.2009Process Discovery using Integer Linear Programming943-4387–41210.3233/FI-2009-136Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
van Zelst, S. J., et al. (2018). Discovering workflow nets using integer linear programming. Computing 100(5), 529–556. doi: 10.1007/s00607-017-0582-5van ZelstS. J.et al2018Discovering workflow nets using integer linear programming1005529–55610.1007/s00607-017-0582-5Open DOISearch in Google Scholar