This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License.
Altshuler, A. A., & Behn, R. D. (2010). Innovation in American government: Challenges, opportunities, and dilemmas Washington, United States: Brookings Institution Press.AltshulerA. A.&BehnR. D.2010Washington, United StatesBrookings Institution PressSearch in Google Scholar
Australian Public Service Commission. (2011). State of the Service Report: State of the Service Series 2010-11 Canberra, Australia: ACT.Australian Public Service Commission2011Canberra, AustraliaACTSearch in Google Scholar
Australian Public Service Commission. (2014). State of the Service Report: State of the Service Series 2013-2014 Canberra, Australia: ACT.Australian Public Service Commission2014Canberra, AustraliaACTSearch in Google Scholar
Australian Public Service Commission. (2016). State of the Service Report 2015-16 Canberra, Australia: ACT.Australian Public Service Commission2016Canberra, AustraliaACTSearch in Google Scholar
Australian Public Service Commission. (2017). State of the Service Report 2016-17 Canberra, Australia: ACT.Australian Public Service Commission2017Canberra, AustraliaACTSearch in Google Scholar
Barnett, J., Vasileiou, K., Djemil, F., Brooks, L., & Young, T. (2011). Understanding innovators’ experiences of barriers and facilitators in implementation and diffusion of healthcare service innovations: a qualitative study. BMC Health Services Research 11(1), 1-12.BarnettJ.VasileiouK.DjemilF.BrooksL.&YoungT.2011Understanding innovators’ experiences of barriers and facilitators in implementation and diffusion of healthcare service innovations: a qualitative study1111–1210.1186/1472-6963-11-342326542422176739Search in Google Scholar
Bason, C. (2010). Leading public sector innovation: Co-creating for a better society Bristol, United Kingdom: Bristol University Press.BasonC.2010Bristol, United KingdomBristol University Press10.2307/j.ctt9qgnsdSearch in Google Scholar
Bekkers, V., Edelenbos, J., & Steijn, B. (2011). Innovation in the public sector New York, United States: Palgrave Macmillan.BekkersV.EdelenbosJ.&SteijnB.2011New York, United StatesPalgrave Macmillan10.1057/9780230307520Search in Google Scholar
Berry, F. S., & Berry, W. D. (2007). Innovation and diffusion models in policy research. In P. A. Sabatier (Ed.), Theories of Policy Process (2nd ed.). Colorado, United States: Westview.BerryF. S.&BerryW. D.2007Innovation and diffusion models in policy researchInA. SabatierP.Ed2nd edColorado, United StatesWestviewSearch in Google Scholar
Bloch, C. (2010). Towards a conceptual framework for measuring public sector innovation. Measuring innovation in the public sector in the Nordic countries: Toward a common statistical approach‟“Copenhagen Manual”BlochC.2010Towards a conceptual framework for measuring public sector innovationSearch in Google Scholar
Borins, S. (2006). The challenge of innovation in government: Endowment for the business of government Arlington, United States: PricewaterhouseCoopers.BorinsS.2006Arlington, United StatesPricewaterhouseCoopersSearch in Google Scholar
Bowden, A. (2005). Knowledge for Free? Distributed Innovation as a Source of Learning. Public Policy and Administration 20(3), 56-68.BowdenA.2005Knowledge for Free? Distributed Innovation as a Source of Learning20356–6810.1177/095207670502000306Search in Google Scholar
Bowen, G. A. (2009). Document analysis as a qualitative research method. Qualitative Research Journal 9(2), 27-40.BowenG. A.2009Document analysis as a qualitative research method9227–4010.3316/QRJ0902027Search in Google Scholar
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology 3(2), 77-101.BraunV.&ClarkeV.2006Using thematic analysis in psychology3277–10110.1191/1478088706qp063oaSearch in Google Scholar
Bryman, A., & Bell, E. (2015). Business research methods Oxford, United States: Oxford University Press.BrymanA.&BellE.2015Oxford, United StatesOxford University PressSearch in Google Scholar
Creswell, J. W. (2013). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (4th ed.). Sage publications.CreswellJ. W.20134th edSage publicationsSearch in Google Scholar
Currie, G., Humphreys, M., Ucbasaran, D., & McManus, S. (2008). Entrepreneurial leadership in the English public sector: paradox or possibility? Public Administration 86(4), 987-1008.CurrieG.HumphreysM.UcbasaranD.&McManusS.2008Entrepreneurial leadership in the English public sector: paradox or possibility?864987–100810.1111/j.1467-9299.2008.00736.xSearch in Google Scholar
Damanpour, F., & Schneider, M. (2009). Characteristics of innovation and innovation adoption in public organizations: Assessing the role of managers. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory: J-PART 19(3), 495-522.DamanpourF.&SchneiderM.2009Characteristics of innovation and innovation adoption in public organizations: Assessing the role of managers193495–52210.1093/jopart/mun021Search in Google Scholar
Demircioglu, M. A. (2018). The Effects of Empowerment Practices on Perceived Barriers to Innovation: Evidence from Public Organizations. International Journal of Public Administration 41(15), 1302-1313.DemirciogluM. A.2018The Effects of Empowerment Practices on Perceived Barriers to Innovation: Evidence from Public Organizations41151302–131310.1080/01900692.2017.1387143Search in Google Scholar
Demircioglu, M. A., & Audretsch, D. B. (2017). Conditions for innovation in public sector organizations. Research Policy 46(9), 1681-1691.DemirciogluM. A.&AudretschD. B.2017Conditions for innovation in public sector organizations4691681–169110.1016/j.respol.2017.08.004Search in Google Scholar
Deschamps, J. P. (2005). Different leadership skills for different innovation strategies. Strategy & Leadership 33(5), 31-38.DeschampsJ. P.2005Different leadership skills for different innovation strategies33531–3810.1108/10878570510616861Search in Google Scholar
Easterby-Smith, M., Thorpe, R., & Jackson, P. R. (2012). Management research London, United Kingdom: Sage.Easterby-SmithM.ThorpeR.&JacksonP. R.2012London, United KingdomSageSearch in Google Scholar
Eggers, W. D., & Singh, S. K. (2009). The Public innovator’s playbook: Nurturing bold ideas in government Cambridge, United States: Ash Institute, Harvard Kennedy School.EggersW. D.&SinghS. K.2009Cambridge, United StatesAsh Institute, Harvard Kennedy SchoolSearch in Google Scholar
Elison, S., Ward, J., Davies, G., & Moody, M. (2014). Implementation of computer-assisted therapy for substance misuse: a qualitative study of Breaking Free Online using Roger’s diffusion of innovation theory. Drugs and Alcohol Today 14(4), 207-218.ElisonS.WardJ.DaviesG.&MoodyM.2014Implementation of computer-assisted therapy for substance misuse: a qualitative study of Breaking Free Online using Roger’s diffusion of innovation theory144207–21810.1108/DAT-05-2014-0025Search in Google Scholar
Evans, A. J., & Burger, V. L. J. (2016). An empirical investigation into innovation drivers and barriers in public sector organisations. International Journal of Innovation Science 8(4), 404-422.EvansA. J.&BurgerV. L. J.2016An empirical investigation into innovation drivers and barriers in public sector organisations84404–42210.1108/IJIS-06-2016-0006Search in Google Scholar
Fereday, J., & Muir-Cochrane, E. (2006). Demonstrating rigor using Thematic Analysis: A hybrid approach of inductive and deductive coding and theme development. International Journal of Qualitative Methods 5(1), 80-92.FeredayJ.&Muir-CochraneE.2006Demonstrating rigor using Thematic Analysis: A hybrid approach of inductive and deductive coding and theme development5180–9210.1177/160940690600500107Search in Google Scholar
Franza, R. M., & Grant, K. P. (2006). Improving federal to private sector technology transfer. Research Technology Management 49(3), 36-40.FranzaR. M.&GrantK. P.2006Improving federal to private sector technology transfer49336–4010.1080/08956308.2006.11657376Search in Google Scholar
Glor, E. D. (1998). What do we know about enhancing creativity and innovation? A review of literature. The Innovation Journal 3(1), 1-8.GlorE. D.1998What do we know about enhancing creativity and innovation? A review of literature311–8Search in Google Scholar
Golembiewski, R. T., & Vigoda, E. (2000). Organizational innovation and the science/craft of management. Current Topics in Management 5, 263-280.GolembiewskiR. T.&VigodaE.2000Organizational innovation and the science/craft of management5263–280Search in Google Scholar
Guest, G., Bunce, A., & Johnson, L. (2006). How Many Interviews Are Enough? An Experiment with Data Saturation and Variability. Field Methods 18(1), 59-82.GuestG.BunceA.&JohnsonL.2006How Many Interviews Are Enough? An Experiment with Data Saturation and Variability18159–8210.1177/1525822X05279903Search in Google Scholar
Hadfield, L. (2010). Balancing on the edge of the archive: the researcher’s role in collecting and preparing data to deposit. Timescapes Working Paper Series 2010(2), 60-74.HadfieldL.2010Balancing on the edge of the archive: the researcher’s role in collecting and preparing data to deposit2010260–74Search in Google Scholar
Hamson, N. (2004). Why innovation doesn’t work: and what to do about it. The Innovation Journal 9(1), 1-7.HamsonN.2004Why innovation doesn’t work: and what to do about it911–7Search in Google Scholar
Hsieh, H.-F., & Shannon, S. E. (2005). Three approaches to qualitative content analysis. Qualitative Health Research 15(9), 1277-1288.HsiehH.-F.&ShannonS. E.2005Three approaches to qualitative content analysis1591277–128810.1177/104973230527668716204405Search in Google Scholar
Kao, J. (2007). Innovation nation: How America is losing its innovation edge, why it matters, and what we can do to get it back New York, United States: Free Press.KaoJ.2007New York, United StatesFree PressSearch in Google Scholar
Kellough, J. E., & Nigro, L. G. (2002). Pay for performance in Georgia State Government: Employee perspectives on Georgia gain after 5 years. Review of Public Personnel Administration 22(2), 146-166.KelloughJ. E.&NigroL. G.2002Pay for performance in Georgia State Government: Employee perspectives on Georgia gain after 5 years222146–16610.1177/0734371X0202200206Search in Google Scholar
Kelly, G., Mulgan, G., & Muers, S. (2002). Creating public value: An analytical framework for public service reform London, United Kingdom: Strategy Unit, Cabinet Office.KellyG.MulganG.&MuersS.2002London, United KingdomStrategy Unit, Cabinet OfficeSearch in Google Scholar
Koch, P., & Hauknes, J. (2005). On innovation in the public sector: Academic Summary Report of Publin Oslo, Norway: NIFU STEP, Publin Report No. D20.KochP.&HauknesJ.2005Oslo, NorwayNIFU STEP, Publin Report No. D20Search in Google Scholar
Langergaard, L. L., & Scheuer, D. J. (2012). Towards a deeper understanding of public sector innovation. In A. L. Macaulay, I. Miles, J. Wilby, L. Y. Tan, L. Zhao, & B. Theodoulidis (Eds.), Case Studies in Service Innovation (pp. 167-193). New York, United States: Springer New York.LangergaardL. L.&ScheuerD. J.2012Towards a deeper understanding of public sector innovationInL. MacaulayA.MilesI.WilbyJ.Y. TanL.ZhaoL.&TheodoulidisB.Edspp167–193New York, United StatesSpringer New York10.1007/978-1-4614-1972-3_31Search in Google Scholar
Latham, J. R. (2014). Research design canvas: A framework for designing and aligning the “DNA” of your study Monument, Colorado: Leadership Plus Design, Ltd.LathamJ. R.2014Monument, ColoradoLeadership Plus Design, LtdSearch in Google Scholar
Management Advisory Committee [MAC]. (2010). Empowering change: Fostering innovation in the Australian public service Canberra, Australia: Australian Public Service Commission.Management Advisory Committee [MAC]2010Canberra, AustraliaAustralian Public Service CommissionSearch in Google Scholar
May, T. (2001). Social research Buckingham, United Kingdom: Open University Press.MayT.2001Buckingham, United KingdomOpen University PressSearch in Google Scholar
Miller, R. (1999). The Internet in twenty years: cyberspace, the next frontier? Foresight 1(5), 467-472.MillerR.1999The Internet in twenty years: cyberspace, the next frontier?15467–47210.1108/14636689910802359Search in Google Scholar
Moore, M., & Hartley, J. (2008). Innovations in governance. Public Management Review 10(1), 3-20.MooreM.&HartleyJ.2008Innovations in governance1013–2010.1080/14719030701763161Search in Google Scholar
Mulgan, G., & Albury, D. (2003). Innovation in the public sector London, United Kingdom: Cabinet office.MulganG.&AlburyD.2003London, United KingdomCabinet officeSearch in Google Scholar
Myers, M. D. (1994). A disaster for everyone to see: An interpretive analysis of a failed is project. Accounting, Management and Information Technologies 4(4), 185-201.MyersM. D.1994A disaster for everyone to see: An interpretive analysis of a failed is project44185–20110.1016/0959-8022(94)90022-1Search in Google Scholar
Napier, C. J. (1989). Research directions in accounting history. The British Accounting Review 21(3), 237-254.NapierC. J.1989Research directions in accounting history213237–25410.1016/0890-8389(89)90095-4Search in Google Scholar
Nathan, H., & Thomas, C. (2012). A thematic analysis of a leadership speaker series. Journal of Management Development 31(8), 826-844.NathanH.&ThomasC.2012A thematic analysis of a leadership speaker series318826–84410.1108/02621711211253277Search in Google Scholar
Neuman, W. L. (2005). Social research methods, quantitative and qualitative approaches (6th ed.). Boston, United States: Pearson.NeumanW. L.2005(6th ed.)Boston, United StatesPearsonSearch in Google Scholar
Page, S. (2005). What’s new about the new public management? Administrative change in the human services. Public Administration Review 65(6), 713-727.PageS.2005What’s new about the new public management? Administrative change in the human services656713–72710.1111/j.1540-6210.2005.00500.xSearch in Google Scholar
Pärna, O. (2014). Managerial and contextual factors influencing innovation in information technology-based public sector services: an exploratory cross-national study. (Doctoral Dissertation), University of Tartu.PärnaO.2014Doctoral DissertationUniversity of TartuSearch in Google Scholar
Pollach, I. (2012). Taming textual data: The contribution of corpus linguistics to computer-aided text analysis. Organizational Research Methods 15(2), 263-287.PollachI.2012Taming textual data: The contribution of corpus linguistics to computer-aided text analysis152263–28710.1177/1094428111417451Search in Google Scholar
Raipa, A., & Giedraityte, V. (2014). Innovation process barriers in public sector: A comparative analysis in Lithuania and the European Union. International Journal of Business and Management 9(10), 10-26.RaipaA.&GiedraityteV.2014Innovation process barriers in public sector: A comparative analysis in Lithuania and the European Union91010–2610.5539/ijbm.v9n10p10Search in Google Scholar
Saunders, M., Lewis, P., & Thornhill, A. (2003). Research methods for business students Harlow, United Kingdom: Prentice Hall.SaundersM.LewisP.&ThornhillA.2003Harlow, United KingdomPrentice HallSearch in Google Scholar
Setnikar, C., S., & Petkovšek, V. (2013). Private and public sector innovation and the importance of cross-sector collaboration. Journal of Applied Business Research 29(6), 1597-1606.SetnikarC. S.&PetkovšekV.2013Private and public sector innovation and the importance of cross-sector collaboration2961597–160610.19030/jabr.v29i6.8197Search in Google Scholar
Vaismoradi, M., Turunen, H., & Bondas, T. (2013). Content analysis and thematic analysis: Implications for conducting a qualitative descriptive study. Nursing & Health Sciences 15(3), 398-405.VaismoradiM.TurunenH.&BondasT.2013Content analysis and thematic analysis: Implications for conducting a qualitative descriptive study153398–40510.1111/nhs.1204823480423Search in Google Scholar
Varney, D. S. (2006). Service transformation: A better service for citizens and businesses, a better deal for the taxpayer London, United Kingdom: TSO.VarneyD. S.2006London, United KingdomTSOSearch in Google Scholar
Wipulanusat, W., Panuwatwanich, K., & Stewart, R. A. (2017a). Exploring leadership styles for innovation: an exploratory factor analysis. Engineering Management in Production and Services 9(1), 7-17.WipulanusatW.PanuwatwanichK.&StewartR. A.2017aExploring leadership styles for innovation: an exploratory factor analysis917–1710.1515/emj-2017-0001Search in Google Scholar
Wipulanusat, W., Panuwatwanich, K., & Stewart, R. A. (2017b). Statistical data analysis of culture for innovation using an open data set from the Australian Public Service. In A. Calì, P. Wood, N. Martin, & A. Poulovassilis (Eds.), Lecture Notes in Computer Science (Vol. 10365, pp. 78-89). Cham, Switzerland: Springer International Publishing.WipulanusatW.PanuwatwanichK.&StewartR. A.2017bStatistical data analysis of culture for innovation using an open data set from the Australian Public ServiceInCalìA.WoodP.MartinN.&PoulovassilisA.EdsVol. 10365pp78–89Cham, SwitzerlandSpringer International Publishing10.1007/978-3-319-60795-5_7Search in Google Scholar
Wipulanusat, W., Panuwatwanich, K., & Stewart, R. A. (2017c). Workplace innovation: Exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis for construct validation. Management and Production Engineering Review 8(2), 57-68.WipulanusatW.PanuwatwanichK.&StewartR. A.2017cWorkplace innovation: Exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis for construct validation8257–6810.1515/mper-2017-0018Search in Google Scholar
Wipulanusat, W., Panuwatwanich, K., & Stewart, R. A. (2018). Pathways to workplace innovation and career satisfaction in the public service: The role of leadership and culture. International Journal of Organizational Analysis 26(5), 890-914.WipulanusatW.PanuwatwanichK.&StewartR. A.2018Pathways to workplace innovation and career satisfaction in the public service: The role of leadership and culture265890–91410.1108/IJOA-03-2018-1376Search in Google Scholar
Yin, R. K. (2013). Case study research: Design and methods Beverly Hills, United States: Sage publications.YinR. K.2013Beverly Hills, United StatesSage publicationsSearch in Google Scholar