[
ABU-AKEL, A. et al. (2015): Oxytocin increases empathy to pain when adopting the other – but not the self-perspective. In: Social Neuroscience, 10(1), pp. 7–15.10.1080/17470919.2014.948637
]Search in Google Scholar
[
ADAMS, R. M. (1976): Motive utilitarianism. In: Journal of Philosophy, 73(14), pp. 467–481.10.2307/2025783
]Search in Google Scholar
[
AKITSUKI, Y. & DECETY, J. (2009): Social context and perceived agency affects empathy for pain: An event-related fMRI investigation. In: Neuroimage, 47(2), pp. 722–734.10.1016/j.neuroimage.2009.04.091
]Search in Google Scholar
[
BALES, R. E. (1971): Act-utilitarianism: Account of right making characteristics or decision-making procedure? In: American Philosophical Quarterly, 8(3), pp. 257–265.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
BARRAZA, J. (2010): The physiology of empathy: Living oxytocin to empathic responding, Dissertation. Claremont Graduate University, Proquest.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
BARTELS, A. et al. (2004): The neural correlates of maternal and romantic love. In: Neuroimage, 21(3), pp. 1155–1166.10.1016/j.neuroimage.2003.11.003
]Search in Google Scholar
[
BARTZ, J. et al. (2010): Oxytocin selectively improves empathic accuracy. In: Psychological Science, 21(10), pp. 1426–1428.10.1177/0956797610383439
]Search in Google Scholar
[
BARTZ, J. et al. (2011): Social effects of oxytocin in humans: context and person matter. In: Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 15(7), pp. 301–309.10.1016/j.tics.2011.05.002
]Search in Google Scholar
[
BENTHAM, J. (1789/1961): An introduction to the principles of morals and legislation. New York: Doubleday.10.1093/oseo/instance.00077240
]Search in Google Scholar
[
BOLT, I. & SCHERNER, M. (2009): Psychopharmaceutical enhancers: Enhancing identity? In: Neuroethics, 2, pp. 103–111.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
BOS, P. et al. (2012): Acute effects of steroid hormones and neuropeptides on human social-emotional behaviour: A review of single administration studies. In: Frontiers in Neuroendocrinology, 33(1), pp. 17–35.10.1016/j.yfrne.2011.01.002
]Search in Google Scholar
[
BRADLEY, B. (2005): Virtue consequentialism. In: Utilitas, 17(3), pp. 282–298.10.1017/S0953820805001652
]Search in Google Scholar
[
BRANDT, R. (1979): A theory of the good and the right. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
BRINK, D. O. (1986): Utilitarian morality and the personal point of view. In: The Journal of Philosophy, 83(8), pp. 417–438.10.2307/2026328
]Search in Google Scholar
[
CARTER, C. (2003): Developmental consequences of oxytocin. In: Physiology and Behaviour, 79(3), pp. 383–397.10.1016/S0031-9384(03)00151-3
]Search in Google Scholar
[
CROCKETT, M. J. (2014): Moral bioenhancement: Neuroscientific perspective. In: Journal of Medical Ethics, 40(6), pp. 370–371.10.1136/medethics-2012-101096
]Search in Google Scholar
[
DE DREU, C. et al. (2010): The neuropeptide oxytocin regulates parochial altruism in intergroup conflict among humans. In: Science, 328(5984), pp. 1408–1411.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
DECLERCK, C. et al. (2010): Oxytocin and cooperation under conditions of uncertainty: The modulating role of incentives and social information. In: Hormones and Behaviour, 57(3), pp. 368–374.10.1016/j.yhbeh.2010.01.006
]Search in Google Scholar
[
DeWALL, C. et al. (2013): When the love hormone leads to violence: Oxytocin increases intimate partner violence inclinations among high trait aggressive people. In: Social Psychological and Personality Science, 5(6), pp. 691–697.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
DOLEN, G. et al. (2013): Social reward requires coordinated activity of nucleus accumbens oxytocin and serotonin. In: Nature, 501(7466), pp. 179–184.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
DOMES, G. et al. (2007): Oxytocin improves ‘mind-reading’ in humans. In: Biological Psychiatry, 61(6), pp. 731–733.10.1016/j.biopsych.2006.07.015
]Search in Google Scholar
[
DRIVER, J. (2001): Uneasy virtue. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511498770
]Search in Google Scholar
[
EARP, B., DOUGLAS, T. & SAVULESCU, J. (2018): Moral enhancement. In: L. Johnson & K. Rommenfanger (eds.): The Routledge handbook of neuroethics. London: Routledge, pp. 166–184.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
ELLIS, B. (1981): Retrospective and prospective utilitarianism. In: Nous, 15(3), pp. 325-339.10.2307/2215436
]Search in Google Scholar
[
FELDMAN, F. (2012): True and useful: On the structure of a two-level normative theory. In: Utilitas, 24(2), pp. 151–171.10.1017/S0953820812000155
]Search in Google Scholar
[
FOCQUAERT, F. & SCHERMER, M. (2015): Moral enhancement: Do means matter morally? In: Neuroethics, 8(2), pp. 139–151.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
FOOT, P. (1967): The problem of abortion and the doctrine of the double effect. In: Oxford Review, 5, pp. 5–15.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
FREGNI, F. et al. (2005): Anodal transcranial direct current stimulation of prefrontal cortex enhances working memory. In: Experimental Brain Research, 166(1), pp. 23–30.10.1007/s00221-005-2334-6
]Search in Google Scholar
[
FRIED, C. (1978): Right and wrong. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.10.4159/harvard.9780674332508
]Search in Google Scholar
[
GLOVER, J. (1977): Causing death and saving lives. London: Penguin Books.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
GUASTELLA, A. J. et al. (2008): Oxytocin increases gaze to the eye region of human faces. In: Biological Psychiatry, 63(1), pp. 3–5.10.1016/j.biopsych.2007.06.026
]Search in Google Scholar
[
HARE, R. M. (1981): Moral thinking: Its levels, method and point. Oxford: Clarendon Press.10.1093/0198246609.001.0001
]Search in Google Scholar
[
HARRIS, J. (2011): Moral enhancement and freedom. In: Bioethics, 25(2), pp. 102–111.10.1111/j.1467-8519.2010.01854.x
]Search in Google Scholar
[
HARSANYI, J. C. (1977/1978): Rule utilitarianism and decision theory. In: H. W. Gottinger & W. Leinfellner (eds.): Decision Theory and Social Ethics: Issues in Social Choice. Dordrecht: D. Reidel Publishing Company, pp. 3–31.10.1007/978-94-009-9838-4_1
]Search in Google Scholar
[
HASTINGS, P. D. et al. (2014): The neurobiological bases of empathic concern for others. In: K. Killen & J. Smetana (eds.): Handbook of moral development. Hove, East Sussex: Psychology Press, pp. 411–434.10.4324/9780203581957.ch19
]Search in Google Scholar
[
HODGSON, D. H. (1967): Consequences of utilitarianism. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
HOLLANDER, E. et al. (2007): Oxytocin increases retention of social cognition in autism. In: Biological Psychiatry, 61(4), pp. 498–503.10.1016/j.biopsych.2006.05.030
]Search in Google Scholar
[
HOSKING, J. et al. (2017): Disrupted prefrontal regulation of striatal subjective value signals in psychopathy. In: Neuron, 95(1), pp. 221–231.10.1016/j.neuron.2017.06.030
]Search in Google Scholar
[
HOWARD-SNYDER, F. (1997): The rejection of objective consequentialism. In: Utilitas, 9(2), pp. 241–248.10.1017/S0953820800005306
]Search in Google Scholar
[
HUDSON, J. L. (1989): Subjectivisation in ethics. In: American Philosophical Quarterly, 26(3), pp. 221–229.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
JACKSON, F. (1991): Decision-theoretic consequentialism and the nearest and dearest objection. In: Ethics, 101(3), pp. 461–482.10.1086/293312
]Search in Google Scholar
[
HULERMANN, R. et al. (2010): Oxytocin enhances amygdala-dependent, socially reinforced and emotional empathy in humans. In: Journal of Neuroscience, 30(14), pp. 4999–5007.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
HURKA, T. (2001): Virtue, vice, and value. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/0195137167.001.0001
]Search in Google Scholar
[
INSEL, T. R. & RERNALD, R. D. (2004): How the brain processes social information: Searching for the social brain. In: Annual Review of Neuroscience, 27(1), pp. 697–722.10.1146/annurev.neuro.27.070203.144148
]Search in Google Scholar
[
JAMIESON, D. (2007): When utilitarians should be virtue theorists. In: Utilitas, 19(2), pp. 160–183.10.1017/S0953820807002452
]Search in Google Scholar
[
JOHNSON, C. D. (1991): Moral legislation: A legal-political model for indirect consequentialist reasoning. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
KOSFELD, M. et al. (2005): Oxytocin increases trust in humans. In: Nature, 435(7042), pp. 673–676.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
LEVIN, S. B. (2021): Posthuman bliss? The failed promise of transhumanism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/oso/9780190051495.001.0001
]Search in Google Scholar
[
MARSH, A. et al. (2010): Oxytocin improves specific recognition of positive facial expressions. In: Psychopharmacology, 209(3), pp. 225–232.10.1007/s00213-010-1780-4
]Search in Google Scholar
[
McCLOSKEY, H. J. (1957): An examination of restricted utilitarianism. In: Philosophical Review, 66(4), pp. 466–485.10.2307/2182745
]Search in Google Scholar
[
MILL, J. S. (1859): On Liberty. New York: Norton.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
MILL, J. S. (1861): Utilitarianism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
MYRICK, H. et al. (2004): Modafinil: preclinical, clinical, and post-marketing surveillance – A review of abuse liability issues. In: Annals of Clinical Psychiatry, 16(2), pp. 1001–1009.10.1080/10401230490453743
]Search in Google Scholar
[
MORHENN, V. B. et al. (2008): Monetary sacrifice among strangers is mediated by endogenous oxytocin release after physical contact. In: Evolution and Human Behaviour, 29(6), pp. 375–383.10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2008.04.004
]Search in Google Scholar
[
NAGEL, T. (1986): The view from nowhere. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
NIELSEN, K. (1972): Traditional morality and utilitarianism. In: Ethics, 82(3), pp. 219–231.10.1086/291845
]Search in Google Scholar
[
PARFIT, D. (1984): Reasons and persons. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
PERSSON, I. (2008): A consequentialist distinction between what we ought to do and ought to try. In: Utilitas, 20(3), pp. 348–355.10.1017/S0953820808003191
]Search in Google Scholar
[
PETTIT, P. (1986): Social holism and moral theory. In: Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, 86, pp. 173–197.10.1093/aristotelian/86.1.173
]Search in Google Scholar
[
PETTIT, P. (1988): The consequentialist can recognise rights. In: Philosophical Quarterly, 38(150), pp. 42–55.10.2307/2220266
]Search in Google Scholar
[
RAILTON, P. (1984/1988): Alienation, consequentialism and the demands of morality. In: S. Scheffler (ed.): Consequentialism and its critics. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 93–133.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
REYES, T. & MATEO, J. (2008): Oxytocin and cooperation: Cooperation with non-kin associated with mechanisms for affiliation. In: Journal of Social, Evolutionary, and Cultural Psychology (Special issue of the Proceedings of the 2nd Annual Meeting of the North Eastern Evolutionary Psychology Society), 2(4), pp. 234–246.10.1037/h0099342
]Search in Google Scholar
[
RODRIGUES, S. et al. (2009): Oxytocin receptor genetic variation relates to empathy and stress reactivity in humans. In: Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 106(50), pp. 21437–21441.10.1073/pnas.0909579106
]Search in Google Scholar
[
SANDERG, A. (2011): Cognition enhancement: Upgrading the brain. In: J. Savulescu, R. Meulen & G. Kahane (eds.): Enhancing human capacities. New Jersey: Wiley-Blackwell, pp. 71–91.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
SCHAEFER, G. (2015): Direct vs. indirect moral enhancement. In: Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal, 25(3), pp. 261–289.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
SEN, A. (1985): Well-being, agency and freedom. In the Dewey Lectures 1984. In: Journal of Philosophy, 82(4), pp. 169–221.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
SEN, A. (2009): The idea of justice. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.10.4159/9780674054578
]Search in Google Scholar
[
SHAMAY-TSOORY, S. et al. (2009): Intranasal administration of oxytocin increases envy and schadenfreude (gloating). In: Biological Psychiatry, 66(9), pp. 864–870.10.1016/j.biopsych.2009.06.009
]Search in Google Scholar
[
SHAW, E. (2014): Direct brain interventions and responsibility enhancement. In: Criminal Law and Philosophy, 8(1), pp.1–20.10.1007/s11572-012-9152-2
]Search in Google Scholar
[
SIDGWICK, H. (1874/1907): The methods of ethics, 1st ed. London: Macmillan.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
SMART, J. J. C. (1973): An outline of a system of utilitarian ethics. In: J. J. C. Smart & B. Williams: Utilitarianism: For and against. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 3–74.10.1017/CBO9780511840852.001
]Search in Google Scholar
[
SMITH, H. M. (1988): Making moral decisions. In: Nous, 22(1), pp. 89–108.10.2307/2215557
]Search in Google Scholar
[
STAHL, S. (2006): Essential psychopharmacology: Neuroscientific basis and practical applications. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
THOMSON, J. J. (1976): Killing, letting die, and the trolley problem. In: The Monist, 59(2), pp. 204–217.10.5840/monist197659224
]Search in Google Scholar
[
VINCENT, N. (2011): Capacitarianism, responsibility and restored mental capacities. In: L. Klaming & B. van den Berg (eds.): Technologies on the stand: Legal and ethical questions in neuroscience and robotics. Nijmegen: Wolf Legal Publishers, pp. 41–65.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
WILLIAMS, B. (1973): A critique of utilitarianism. In: J. J. C. Smart & B. Williams: Utilitarianism: For and against. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 77–150.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
ZAK, P. J. (2008): Moral markets: The critical role of values in the economy. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
ZAK, P. J. et al. (2004): The neurobiology of trust. In: Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 1032, pp. 224–227.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
ZAK, P. J. et al. (2005): Oxytocin is associated with human trustworthiness. In: Hormones and Behaviour, 48(5), pp. 522–527.10.1016/j.yhbeh.2005.07.009
]Search in Google Scholar
[
ZAK, P. J. et al. (2007): Oxytocin increases Generosity in Humans. In: Public Library of Science ONE, 2(11), p. e1128.10.1371/journal.pone.0001128
]Search in Google Scholar