1. bookTom 12 (2020): Zeszyt 59 (December 2020)
Informacje o czasopiśmie
License
Format
Czasopismo
eISSN
2182-2875
Pierwsze wydanie
16 Apr 2017
Częstotliwość wydawania
4 razy w roku
Języki
Angielski
access type Otwarty dostęp

The Proportionality Argument and the Problem of Widespread Causal Overdetermination

Data publikacji: 13 Mar 2021
Zakres stron: 331 - 355
Informacje o czasopiśmie
License
Format
Czasopismo
eISSN
2182-2875
Pierwsze wydanie
16 Apr 2017
Częstotliwość wydawania
4 razy w roku
Języki
Angielski
Abstract

The consensus is that repeatable artworks cannot be identified with particular material individuals. A perennial temptation is to identify them with types, broadly construed. Such identification, however, faces the so-called “Creation Problem.” This problem stems from the fact that, on the one hand, it seems reasonable to accept the claims that (1) repeatable artworks are types, (2) types cannot be created, and (3) repeatable artworks are created, but, on the other hand, these claims are mutually inconsistent. A possible solution to the Creation Problem is to argue that claim (2) can be rejected because (a) the only motivation for it is that a type, being abstract, cannot stand in causal relations, but (b) this motivation is ungrounded, since types can, in fact, stand in such relations. Clearly, in order for this solution to be successful, it is necessary to substantiate the possibility of types to be causally efficacious. In this essay, I examine an attempt to do this with the help of Yablo’s principle of proportionality, which has been undertaken by Walters (2013) and, more recently, Juvshik (2018). Although the argument they advance may seem to provide strong support for the causal efficacy of types, I think it actually fails to do this. To explain why this is so, I first show that this argument commits us to the existence of widespread causal overdetermination involving types and then argue that this commitment is both epistemically and ontologically problematic.

Keywords

Aliyev, Alexey. 2019. What is an instance of an artwork. Estetika 26: 163–85.10.33134/eeja.187Search in Google Scholar

Alward, Peter. 2004. The spoken work. Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 62: 331–7.10.1111/j.1540-594X.2004.00166.xSearch in Google Scholar

Aquinas, Thomas. 1485. The Summa Theologica. New York: Catholic Way Publishing, 2014.Search in Google Scholar

Baker, Alan. 2016. Simplicity. In The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Edited by Edward N. Zalta. URL = <https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/win2016/entries/simplicity/>Search in Google Scholar

Brock, Stuart. 2002. Fictionalism about fictional characters. Noûs 36: 1–21.10.1111/1468-0068.00358Search in Google Scholar

Collingwood, R. G. 1958. The Principles of Art. New York: Oxford University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Currie, Gregory. 1989. An Ontology of Art. New York: St. Martin’s Press.10.1007/978-1-349-20038-2Search in Google Scholar

Davies, David. 2009. Dodd on the ‘audibility’ of musical works. British Journal of Aesthetics 49: 99–108.10.1093/aesthj/ayp001Search in Google Scholar

Davies, David. 2010. Multiple instances and multiple ‘instances.’ British Journal of Aesthetics 50: 411–26.10.1093/aesthj/ayq030Search in Google Scholar

Davies, David. 2015. Varying impressions. The Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 73: 81–92.10.1111/jaac.12139Search in Google Scholar

Deutsch, Harry. 1991. The creation problem. Topoi 10: 209–25.10.1007/BF00141341Search in Google Scholar

Dodd, Julian. 2000. Musical works as eternal types. British Journal of Aesthetics 40: 424–40.10.1093/bjaesthetics/40.4.424Search in Google Scholar

Dodd, Julian. 2007. Works of Music: An Essay in Ontology. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Howell, Robert. 1979. Fictional objects: how they are and how they aren’t. Poetics 8: 129–77.10.1016/0304-422X(79)90018-4Search in Google Scholar

Jackson, Frank & Pettit, Philip. 1990. Program explanation: a general perspective. Analysis 50: 99–108.10.1093/analys/50.2.107Search in Google Scholar

Juvshik, Tim. 2018. Abstract objects, causal efficacy, and causal exclusion. Erkenntnis 83: 805–27.Search in Google Scholar

Kivy, Peter. 1983. Platonism in music. Grazer Philosophische Studien 19: 109–29.10.5840/gps19831922Search in Google Scholar

Levinson, Jerrold. 1980. What a musical work is. Journal of Philosophy 77: 5–28.10.2307/2025596Search in Google Scholar

Mag Uidhir, Christy. 2013. Art & Art-Attempts. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199665778.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

Predelli, Stefano. 2001. Musical ontology and the argument from creation. British Journal of Aesthetics 41: 279–92.10.1093/bjaesthetics/41.3.279Search in Google Scholar

Sartre, Jean-Paul. 2004. The Imaginary: A Phenomenological Psychology of the Imagination. Routledge.Search in Google Scholar

Sider, Ted. 2003. What’s so bad about overdetermination? Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 67: 719–26.10.1111/j.1933-1592.2003.tb00321.xSearch in Google Scholar

Sober, Elliott. 2015. Ockham’s Razor: A User’s Manual. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Van Inwagen, Peter. 1977. Creatures of fiction. American Philosophical Quarterly 14: 299–308.Search in Google Scholar

Walters, Lee. 2013. Repeatable artworks as created types. British Journal of Aesthetics 53 (4): 461–77.10.1093/aesthj/ayt026Search in Google Scholar

Wetzel, Linda. 2008. Types and Tokens: An Essay on Universals. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.10.7551/mitpress/9780262013017.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

Wolterstorff, Nicholas. 1975. Toward an ontology of art works. Noûs 9: 115–42.10.2307/2214597Search in Google Scholar

Wolterstorff, Nicholas. 1980. Works and Worlds of Art. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Search in Google Scholar

Yablo, Stephen. 1992. Mental causation. The Philosophical Review 101: 245–80.10.2307/2185535Search in Google Scholar

Yablo, Stephen. 1997. Wide causation. Philosophical Perspectives 11: 251–81.10.1111/0029-4624.31.s11.12Search in Google Scholar

Polecane artykuły z Trend MD

Zaplanuj zdalną konferencję ze Sciendo