<abstract xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p>The purpose of the third section of Kant’s <italic>Groundwork</italic> is to prove the possibility of the categorical imperative. In the end of the second section, Kant establishes that a proof like this is necessary to show that morality is ‘something’ and ‘not a chimerical idea without any truth’ or a ‘phantom’ (1785: 445). Since the categorical imperative was established as a synthetic <italic>a priori</italic> practical proposition, in order to prove its possibility it is necessary ‘to go beyond cognition of objects to a critique of the subject, that is, of pure practical reason’ (1785: 440). Kant names this kind of proof a <italic>deduction</italic>. The present paper intends to (1) show the argument whose purpose is to justify the categorical imperative; (2) show that the argument is a transcendental deduction; (3) present the argument as it is reconstructed by Allison, and (4) show that, although it seems compelling, the position of the commentator could not be accepted by Kant himself.</p></abstract>

The purpose of the third section of Kant’s Groundwork is to prove the possibility of the categorical imperative. In the end of the second section, Kant establishes that a proof like this is necessary to show that morality is ‘something’ and ‘not a chimerical idea without any truth’ or a ‘phantom’ (1785: 445). Since the categorical imperative was established as a synthetic a priori practical proposition, in order to prove its possibility it is necessary ‘to go beyond cognition of objects to a critique of the subject, that is, of pure practical reason’ (1785: 440). Kant names this kind of proof a deduction. The present paper intends to (1) show the argument whose purpose is to justify the categorical imperative; (2) show that the argument is a transcendental deduction; (3) present the argument as it is reconstructed by Allison, and (4) show that, although it seems compelling, the position of the commentator could not be accepted by Kant himself.

On the transcendental deduction in Kant’s <italic>Groundwork</italic> III

Disputatio

This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License.

On the transcendental deduction in Kant’s  III

The purpose of the third section of Kant’s Groundwork is to prove the possibility of the categorical imperative. In the end of the second section, Kant...

On the transcendental deduction in Kant’s Groundwork III

Data publikacji: 31 gru 2018

Zakres stron: 151 - 169

DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/disp-2011-0004

Słowa kluczowe
Kant, transcendental deduction, moral law, categorical imperative

© 2011 Marilia Espirito Santo, published by Sciendo

This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License.

On the transcendental deduction in Kant’s Groundwork III

Data publikacji: 31 gru 2018

Zakres stron: 151 - 169

DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/disp-2011-0004

Słowa kluczoweKant, transcendental deduction, moral law, categorical imperative

© 2011 Marilia Espirito Santo, published by Sciendo

This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License.

Słowa kluczowe
Kant, transcendental deduction, moral law, categorical imperative