[Black, T. 2003. The Relevant Alternatives Theory and Missed Clues. Australasian Journal of Philosophy 81: 96-106.10.1080/713659587]Search in Google Scholar
[Cohen, S. 1998. Contextualist Solutions to Epistemological Problems: Skepticism, Gettier, and the Lottery. Australasian Journal of Philosophy 76: 289-306.10.1080/00048409812348411]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Cohen, S. 2004. Reply to Baumann. Erkenntnis 61: 429-433.10.1007/s10670-004-9275-5]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[DeRose, K. 1996. Knowledge, Assertion, and Lotteries. Australasian Journal of Philosophy 74: 568-80.10.1080/00048409612347531]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Hawthorne, J. 2002. Lewis, the Lottery, and the Preface. Analysis 62: 242-251.10.1093/analys/62.3.242]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Hawthorne, J. 2004. Knowledge and Lotteries. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/0199269556.001.0001]Search in Google Scholar
[Lewis, D. 1979. Scorekeeping in a Language Game. Journal of Philosophical Logic 8: 339-359.10.1007/BF00258436]Search in Google Scholar
[Lewis, D. 1996. Elusive Knowledge. Australasian Journal of Philosophy 74: 549-567. Cited as reprinted in Papers in Metaphysics and Epistemology (pp. 418-445), Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1999.10.1080/00048409612347521]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Schaffer, J. 2001. Knowledge, Relevant Alternatives and Missed Clues. Analysis 61: 202-208.]Search in Google Scholar