[Armstrong, D. M. 2001. Universals as Attributes. In Metaphysics: Contemporary Readings, ed. by Michael Loux. New York: Routledge.]Search in Google Scholar
[Armstrong, D.M. 1997. A World of States of Affairs. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511583308]Search in Google Scholar
[Armstrong, D.M. 1989. Universals: An Opinionated Introduction. Boulder: Westview Press.]Search in Google Scholar
[Campbell, Keith. 1990. Abstract Particulars. Cambridge: Blackwell.]Search in Google Scholar
[Chisholm, Roderick. 1996. A Realist Theory of Categories. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.]Search in Google Scholar
[Clark, B. L.1981. A Calculus of Individuals Based on ‘Connection’. Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic 22:204–218.10.1305/ndjfl/1093883455]Search in Google Scholar
[Esfeld, Michael. 2003. Do Relations Required Underlying Intrinsic Properties? A Physical Argument for a Metaphysics of Relations. Metaphysica. Vol. 4, No. 1:5–25]Search in Google Scholar
[Grossmann, Reinhardt. 1992. The Existence of the World. New York: Routledge.]Search in Google Scholar
[Grünbaum, Adolf. 2001a. Zeno’s Metrical Paradox of Extension. In Zeno’s Paradoxes, ed. by Salmon, Wesley, Indianapolis: Hackett.]Search in Google Scholar
[Grünbaum, Adolf. 2001b. Modern Science and Refutation of the Paradoxes of Zeno. In Zeno’s Paradoxes, ed. by Salmon, Wesley, Indianapolis: Hackett.]Search in Google Scholar
[Grünbaum, Adolf. 1952. A Consistent Conception of the Extended Linear Continuum As An Aggregate of Unextended Elements. Philosophy of Science XIX:288–306.10.1086/287213]Search in Google Scholar
[Grupp, Jeffrey. 2005. The R-Theory of Time, or Replacement Presentism: The Buddhist Philosophy of Time. Indian International Journal of Buddhist Studies forthcoming.]Search in Google Scholar
[Grupp, Jeffrey. forthcoming. The Impossibility of Relations Between Non-Collocated Spatial Objects and Non-Identical Topological Spaces. Axiomathes. Forthcoming (in press). (This paper can be read at www.abstractatom.com.)]Search in Google Scholar
[Grupp, Jeffrey. 2003. The Impossibility of an Exemplification Tie Between Particulars and Universals. Metaphysica: The International Journal for Ontology and Metaphysics. Vol. 4, No. 1: 27–38. (This paper can be read at www.abstractatom.com.)]Search in Google Scholar
[Hudson, Hud. 2001. A Materialist Metaphysics of the Human Person. Ithaca: Cornell Univeristy Press.10.7591/9781501725715]Search in Google Scholar
[Jones, Vaughan, and Moscovici, Henri. 1997. Review of Noncommutative Geometry by Alain Connes. Notices of the AMS 44:792–799.]Search in Google Scholar
[Jubien, Michael. 1997. Contemporary Metaphysics, Blackwell: Malden.]Search in Google Scholar
[Kane, George. 2000. Supersymmetry. Cambridge: Perseus Publishing.]Search in Google Scholar
[Lesniewski, Andrew. 1997. Noncommutative Geometry. Notices of the AMS 44:800–805.]Search in Google Scholar
[Loux, Michael. 1998. Metaphysics: A Contemporary Introduction. New York: Routledge.]Search in Google Scholar
[Lowe, E.J. 2002. A Survey of Metaphysics. New York: Oxford University Press.]Search in Google Scholar
[Madore, J. 2000. An Introduction to Noncommutative Geometry and its Physical Applications, second edition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511569357]Search in Google Scholar
[Markosian, Ned. 1998. Simples. Australasian Journal of Philosophy 76:213–26.10.1080/00048409812348361]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[McDaniel, Kris. 2002. Extended Simples, Shape, and Space. 2nd Annual Princeton-Rutgers Graduate Student Philosophy Conference.]Search in Google Scholar
[McDaniel, Kris. 2003. Against MaxCon Simples. Australasian Journal of Philosophy 81:265–275.]Search in Google Scholar
[Mellor, D. H. 1991. Properties and Predicates. In Matters of Metaphysics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.]Search in Google Scholar
[Mellor, D. H. 1992. There Are No Conjunctive Universals. Analysis 52:97–105.10.1093/analys/52.2.97]Search in Google Scholar
[Merricks, Trenton. 2001. Objects and Persons. New York: Oxford University Press.10.1093/0199245363.001.0001]Search in Google Scholar
[Moreland, J. P. 2001. Universals. Montreal and Kingston: McGill-Queen’s University Press.]Search in Google Scholar
[Phillips, Stephen H. 1995. Classical Indian Metaphysics. Chicago: Open Court.]Search in Google Scholar
[Pyle, Andrew. 1995. Atomism and Its Critics. Bristol: Thoemmes Press.]Search in Google Scholar
[Smith, Quentin. 1995. Time, Change, and Freedom. New York: Routledge.]Search in Google Scholar
[Smith, Quentin. 1993. Language and Time. New York: Oxford University Press.]Search in Google Scholar
[Vallicella, William. 2000. Three Conceptions of States of Affairs. Nous, 34, 2:237–259.10.1111/0029-4624.00209]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[van Inwagen, Peter. 1990. Material Beings. Cornell University Press: Ithaca.]Search in Google Scholar
[Wolterstrorff, Nicholas. 1970. On Universals. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.]Search in Google Scholar
[Zimmerman, Dean. 1996a. Indivisible Parts and Extended Objects: Some Philosophical Episodes from Topology’s Prehistory. The Monist. 79:148–180.10.5840/monist19967918]Search in Google Scholar
[Zimmerman, Dean. 1996b. Could Extended Objects Be Made Out of Simple Parts? An Argument for ‘Atomless Gunk.’ Philosophy and Phenomenological Research Vol. LVI, No. 1:1–29.10.2307/2108463]Search in Google Scholar
