1. bookTom 10 (2019): Zeszyt 1 (June 2019)
Informacje o czasopiśmie
License
Format
Czasopismo
eISSN
2255-7547
Pierwsze wydanie
14 Jun 2012
Częstotliwość wydawania
2 razy w roku
Języki
Angielski
Otwarty dostęp

The Need for a Sustainable and Balanced Critical Approach in Book Reviews

Data publikacji: 13 Jun 2019
Tom & Zeszyt: Tom 10 (2019) - Zeszyt 1 (June 2019)
Zakres stron: 20 - 36
Informacje o czasopiśmie
License
Format
Czasopismo
eISSN
2255-7547
Pierwsze wydanie
14 Jun 2012
Częstotliwość wydawania
2 razy w roku
Języki
Angielski

Abrantes, A. (2005). Euphemism and co-operation in discourse. In E. Grillo, Power without dominations: Dialogism and the empowering property of communication (pp. 85–103). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Search in Google Scholar

Barker, C. (2001). Cultural studies and discourse analysis: A dialogue on language and identity. Sage.10.4135/9781446219249Search in Google Scholar

Branden, K. (2012). Sustainable education: basic principles and strategic recommendations. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 23(3), 285–304. doi: 10.1080/09243453.2012.67886510.1080/09243453.2012.678865Otwórz DOISearch in Google Scholar

Burridge, K., & Keith, A. (1991). Euphemism and dysphemism: Language used as shield and weapon. New York: Oxford University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Coates, J. (2015). Women, men and language: A sociolinguistic account of gender differences in language. Routledge.Search in Google Scholar

Fern Andex, E. (2015). Sex in language: Euphemistic and dysphemistic Metaphors in internet forums. London: Bloomsbury Publishing.Search in Google Scholar

Fernandes, E. (2008). Sex-related euphemism and dysphemism: An analysis in terms of conceptual metaphor. Atlantis, 30(2), 95–110.Search in Google Scholar

Franzenburg, G. (2017). Learning from the past for the future: How to make adult education sustainable. Discourse and Communication for Sustainable Education, 8(2), 57–65. doi: https://doi.org/10.1515/dcse-2017-001510.1515/dcse-2017-0015Otwórz DOISearch in Google Scholar

Hiller, K., & Reichhart, B. (2017). Motivation of civic education teachers-in-training in the field of education for sustainable development. Discourse and Communication for Sustainable Education, 8(1), 81–89. doi: https://doi.org/10.1515/dcse-2017-000610.1515/dcse-2017-0006Otwórz DOISearch in Google Scholar

Hyland, K. (2005). Stance and engagement: a model of interaction in academic discourse. Discourse Studies, 7(2), 173–192.10.1177/1461445605050365Search in Google Scholar

Li, B., & Xie, C. (2017). Sex in language: Euphemistic and dysphemistic Metaphors in internet forums. Australian Journal of Linguistics. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/07268602.2017.129126210.1080/07268602.2017.1291262Otwórz DOISearch in Google Scholar

Lindholm-Romantschuk, Y. (1998). Scholarly book reviewing in the social sciences and humanities: The flow of ideas within and amongst disciplines. Westport: CT: Green Press.Search in Google Scholar

McGlone, M., Beck, G., & Pfiester, A. (2007). Contamination and camouflage in euphemisms. Communication Monographs, 73(3), 261–282.10.1080/03637750600794296Search in Google Scholar

Moreno, A. I., & Suarez, L. (2008). A study of critical attitude across English and Spanish academic book reviews. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 7, 15–26.10.1016/j.jeap.2008.02.009Search in Google Scholar

Moreno, A., & Suarez, L. (2008). A study of critical attitude across English and Spanish academic book reviews. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 7, 15–26.10.1016/j.jeap.2008.02.009Search in Google Scholar

Obeng-Odoom, F. (2014). Why write book reviews? Australian Universities’ Review, 56(1), 78.Search in Google Scholar

Oinas, P., & Leppälä, S. (2013). Views on book reviews. Regional Studies, 47(10), 1785–1789.10.1080/00343404.2013.856530Search in Google Scholar

Pipere, A. (2016). Envisioning complexity: Towards a new conceptualization of educational research for sustainability. Discourse and Communication for Sustainable Education, 7(2), 68–91. doi: https://doi.org/10.1515/dcse-2016-001710.1515/dcse-2016-0017Otwórz DOISearch in Google Scholar

Rabab’ah, G., & Al-Qarni, A. (2012). Euphemism in Saudi Arabic and British English. Journal of Pragmatics, 44, 730–743.10.1016/j.pragma.2012.02.008Search in Google Scholar

Rawson, H. (1981). A dictionary of euphemism and other doubletalk. New York: Crown Publishers.Search in Google Scholar

Salager-Meyer, F. (2006). From “Mr. Guthrie is profoundly mistaken.” to “Our data do not seem to confirm the results of a previous study on.”: a diachronic study of polemicity in academic writing (1810–1995). Iberica, 1, 5–28.Search in Google Scholar

Salīte, I. (2008). Educational action research for sustainability: Constructing a vision for the future in teacher education. Journal of Teacher Education for Sustainability, 10, 5–16.10.2478/v10099-009-0021-6Search in Google Scholar

Saraceni, M. (2015). World Englishes: A critical analysis. Bloomsbury Publishing.Search in Google Scholar

Thompson, G., & Hunston, S. (2000). Evaluation in text. Authorial stance and the construction of discourse. In &. G. S. Hunston, Evaluation: an introduction (pp. 1–27). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Tracy, K. (1997). Constructing an academic book review. Human Studies, 20, 117–123.10.1023/A:1005358427074Search in Google Scholar

UNESCO. (2018). Education for Sustainable Development. Retrieved 11, 4, 2018 from UNESCO: https://en.unesco.org/themes/education-sustainable-development-esdSearch in Google Scholar

Polecane artykuły z Trend MD

Zaplanuj zdalną konferencję ze Sciendo