Otwarty dostęp

Abuse Liability Assessment of the RELX Infinity® Electronic Nicotine Delivery System Among Adult Smokers and Electronic Nicotine Delivery System Users

, , , ,  oraz   
22 lip 2025

Zacytuj
Pobierz okładkę

Figure 1.

Overview of study designs. In both studies, subjects underwent an 8-h ad libitum (AL) use session, after which they abstained from any nicotine product use for 10–13 h prior to nicotine pharmacokinetic (PK) sessions the following day. This sequence was followed once for each study product, in a randomized order. Each product use study period was completed over approximately 24 h. Subjects were confined to the clinic site throughout the assessments.
Overview of study designs. In both studies, subjects underwent an 8-h ad libitum (AL) use session, after which they abstained from any nicotine product use for 10–13 h prior to nicotine pharmacokinetic (PK) sessions the following day. This sequence was followed once for each study product, in a randomized order. Each product use study period was completed over approximately 24 h. Subjects were confined to the clinic site throughout the assessments.

Figure 2.

Mean baseline-adjusted plasma nicotine concentration-time profiles in (a) smokers (Study 1) and (b) ENDS users (Study 2). Error bars have been removed for clarity; for variability estimates refer to Table 2.
Mean baseline-adjusted plasma nicotine concentration-time profiles in (a) smokers (Study 1) and (b) ENDS users (Study 2). Error bars have been removed for clarity; for variability estimates refer to Table 2.

Figure 3.

Mean urge to smoke/vape VAS scores over time profiles in (a) smokers (Study 1) and (b) ENDS users (Study 2). Error bars have been removed for clarity; for variability estimates refer to Table 4.
Mean urge to smoke/vape VAS scores over time profiles in (a) smokers (Study 1) and (b) ENDS users (Study 2). Error bars have been removed for clarity; for variability estimates refer to Table 4.

Statistical comparisons of subjective effects measures between Infinity Tobacco and Infinity Menthol and comparator products_ Statistically significant p values are shown in bold text_

Infinity Tobacco vs comparator Infinity Menthol vs comparator
Difference 95% CI (%) p value Difference 95% CI (%) p value
Usual brand cigarette (Study 1)
Urge to smoke Emax_R 13.4 (5.35) a 2.7–24.0 0.0142 11.8 (5.34) a 1.2–22.3 0.0300
Urge to smoke TEmax_R 0.0 (−6.5–5.0) b −4.00–4.00 1.0000 0.0 (−8.0–12.5) b −6.00–5.00 0.9920
mPES Satisfaction −1.6 (0.29) a −2.2–−1.1 <0.0001 −1.4 (0.29) a −1.9–−0.8 <0.0001
mPES Psychological reward −0.9 (0.22) a −1.4–−0.5 <0.0001 −0.7 (0.22) a −1.2–−0.3 0.0018
mPES Relief −1.4 (0.26) a −1.9–−0.9 <0.0001 −1.3 (0.26) a −1.9–−0.8 <0.0001
mPES Aversion 0.3 (−0.50–0.63) c −0.25 – 0.50 0.3075 0.2 (0.119) d −0.04 – 0.44 0.1045
mPES Concern for dependence −1.6 (0.30) d −2.25–−1.02 <0.0001 −1.7 (0.30) d −2.26–−1.06 <0.0001
Product liking −23.00 (−58.00–−12.00) c −49.00–−15.00 <0.0001 −22.00(−61.00–−5.00) c −33.00–−8.00 <0.0001
Future intent to use −27.6 (6.66) d −41.12–−14.15 0.0002 −23.0 (−49.00–−1.00) c −34.00–−4.00 0.0012
Nicotine gum (Study 1)
Urge to smoke Emax_R −6.0 (5.39) a −16.6–4.7 0.2725 −7.6 (5.36) a −18.2–3.1 0.1611
Urge to smoke TEmax_R −22.5 (−39.0–−10.0)b −32.50–−14.00 <0.0001 −17.5 (−34.0–−4.0) b −28.00–−7.50 0.0006
mPES Satisfaction 0.6 (0.29) a 0.1–1.2 0.0336 0.9 (0.29) a 0.3–1.5 0.0026
mPES Psychological reward 0.6 (0.23) a 0.1–1.0 0.0169 0.8 (0.23) a 0.3–1.2 0.0009
mPES Relief 0.7 (0.27) a 0.2–1.3 0.0070 0.8 (0.27) a 0.3–1.3 0.0040
mPES Aversion −0.3 (−1.13–0.25) c −0.75–0.25 0.1516 −0.2 (0.180) d −0.56–0.17 0.2912
mPES Concern for dependence 1.0 (1.00–3.00) c −1.00–4.00 0.0923 1.0 (0.00 – 2.00) c 1.00–2.00 0.0768
Product liking 9.08 (5.875) d −2.843–21.010 0.1311 11.81 (6.603) d −1.580–25.202 0.0821
Future intent to use 16.9 (8.42) d −0.17–34.05 0.0522 15.1 (8.86) d −2.90–33.12 0.0972
Usual brand ENDS (Study 2)
Urge to vape Emax_R −0.8 (4.22) a −9.3–7.7 0.8451 2.6 (4.24) a −5.9–11.1 0.5427
Urge to vape TEmax_R 0.0 (−5.0–15.0) b −4.00–14.00 0.8434 4.0 (−1.5–13.0) b −1.50–12.50 0.1706
mPES Satisfaction −0.8 (0.33) a −1.4–−0.1 0.0238 0.0 (0.34) a −0.6–0.7 0.9421
mPES Psychological reward −0.40 (−1.20–0.40) c −1.200–0.400 0.3833 0.20 (−0.60–0.80) c −0.600–0.800 0.8145
mPES Relief 0.01 (0.313) d −0.636–0.652 0.9806 0.20 (−0.80–1.00) c −0.400–0.800 0.6776
mPES Aversion 0.05 (0.272) d −0.512–0.608 0.8610 −0.25 (−0.75–0.63) c −0.750–0.500 0.8238
mPES Concern for dependence −0.15 (0.336) d −0.846–0.538 0.6510 −1.00 (−2.50–2.00) c −3.000–3.000 0.3877
Product liking Emax −11.9 (6.85) a −25.6–1.9 0.0885 1.8 (6.89) a −12.0–15.6 0.7946
Future intent to use −13.5 (6.82) d −27.58–0.50 0.0581 3.0 (−3.00–11.00) c −3.00–11.00 0.8318

Subject demographics by study_

Summary statistics / characteristics Study 1 - Smokers Study 2 - ENDS Users
N Number 41 29
Age, years a Mean (SD) 39.9 (9.51) 39.8 (11.09)
Sex, n (%) Male 24 (58.5) 17 (58.6)
Female 17 (41.5) 12 (41.4)
Race, n (%) White 27 (65.9) 13 (44.8)
Black or African 13 (31.7) 14 (48.3)
American
American Indian or Alaska Native 0 (0) 1 (3.4)
Other 1 (2.4) 1 (3.4)
Ethnicity, n (%) Not Hispanic or 39 (95.1) 24 (82.8)
Latino
Hispanic or Latino 2 (4.9) 5 (17.2)
Body mass index (kg/m2) Mean (SD) 29.1 (4.86) 26.6 (4.84)
PS[E]CDI total score b Mean (SD) 12.1 (2.8) 11.4 (3.6)

Statistical comparison of baseline-adjusted plasma nicotine pharmacokinetic parameters between Infinity Tobacco and Infinity Menthol and comparator products_ Statistically significant p values are shown in bold text_

Infinity Tobacco vs comparator Infinity Menthol vs comparator
Geometric LSmeans Ratio (%) 90% CI (%) p value Geometric LSmeans Ratio (%) 90% CI (%) p value
Usual brand cigarette (Study 1)
Cmax (ng/mL) 48.3 35.74–65.19 0.0001 45.2 33.36–61.28 < 0.0001
AUC(0–15) (ng×min/mL) 47.4 34.13–65.92 0.0003 44.5 31.99–61.86 < 0.0001
AUC(0–120) (ng×min/mL) 45.5 34.95–59.20 < 0.0001 43.0 33.02–56.03 < 0.0001
Tmax (min) 0.8 (−0.5–2.5) 0.00–1.50 0.0833 0.0 (−1.5–1.0) −1.00–1.00 0.8504
Nicotine gum (Study 1)
Cmax (ng/mL) 185.6 137.31–250.99 0.0010 173.9 128.31–235.66 0.0032
AUC(0–15) (ng×min/mL) 1426.1 1027.58–1979.30 < 0.0001 1337.5 964.61–1854.61 < 0.0001
AUC(0–120) (ng×min/mL) 107.1 82.05–139.68 0.6715 101.2 77.55–132.16 0.9393
Tmax (min) −30.0 (−34.0–−26.0) −33.00–−27.00 < 0.0001 −32.5 (−36.0–−27.0) −34.00–−28.50 < 0.0001
Usual brand ENDS (Study 2)
Cmax (ng/mL) 109.3 88.71–134.65 0.4784 109.4 88.45–135.20 0.4829
AUC(0–15) (ng×min/mL) 104.7 83.93–130.55 0.7295 107.5 86.08–134.23 0.5874
AUC(0–120) (ng×min/mL) 98.2 83.79–115.05 0.8466 103.2 87.98–121.08 0.7405
Tmax (min) 0.0 (−2.5–3.0) −2.00–2.50 0.9053 −0.5 (−3.0–5.5) −2.50–3.00 0.7752

Baseline-adjusted plasma nicotine pharmacokinetic parameters by study and product_

Parameter (units) Study 1 - Smokers Study 2 - ENDS Users
Infinity Tobacco Infinity Menthol Usual brand cigarette Nicotine gum Infinity Tobacco Infinity Menthol Usual brand ENDS
N 35 a 34 37 b 37 c 27 d 25 e 25 f
Cmax(ng/mL) 18.5 (100.2%) 16.6 (84.9%) 27.0 (60.5%) 7.5 (56.2%) 21.2 (72.5%) 18.2 (51.4%) 16.8 (79.7%)
Tmax(min) 6.0 (2.0, 15.0) 6.0 (2.0, 120.0) 7.0 (2.0, 12.0) 35.0 (15.0,122.0) 8.0 (4.0, 123.0) 8.0 (4.0, 123.0) 8.0 (4.0, 28.0)
AUC(0–15)(ng×min/mL) 171.6 (88.3%) 153.5 (80.2%) 246.00 (50.6%) 12.1 (102.3%) 190.2 (64.4%) 173.5 (51.5%) 160.4 (66.2%)
AUC(0–120)(ng×min/mL) 676.5 (76.2%) 634.1 (76.8%) 1074.8 (31.9%) 530.7 (59.7%) 1046.2 (54.5%) 990.9 (52.0%) 1008.1 (57.2%)

Subjective effects questionnaires by study and product_

Study 1 - Smokers Study 2 - ENDS Users
Infinity Tobacco Infinity Menthol Usual brand cigarette Nicotine gum Infinity Tobacco Infinity Menthol Usual brand ENDS
Urge to smoke/vape [mean (SD)] a
N 38 38 b 38 37 29 c 28 d 25
Emax_R −49.2 (37.57) −53.0 (32.29) −60.5 (31.41) −48.2 (33.83) −41.9 (28.32) −36.8 (29.20) −43.2 (29.52)
TEmax_R 10.0 (2, 60) 5.0 (2, 120) 10.0 (2, 120) 30.0 (5, 120) 5.0 (2, 60) 10.0 (2, 120) 5.0 (2, 120)
AOE(0–15) −8.3 (8.57) −9.3 (6.84) −10.4 (7.22) −4.8 (5.58) −6.1 (5.98) −5.6 (6.61) −5.8 (5.76) d
AOE(0–120) −52.2 (72.28) −56.5 (49.92) −69.1 (65.39) −54.0 (48.46) −28.1 (49.20) −38.4 (54.30) −32.8 (39.34)
Modified product evaluation scale [mean (SD)]
N 39 39 38 36 29 28 26
Satisfaction 3.5 (1.43) 3.8 (1.62) 5.2 (1.63) 2.9 (1.19) 3.8 (1.78) 4.6 (1.58) 4.5 (1.86)
Psychological reward 3.1 (1.38) 3.3 (1.26) 4.1 (1.46) 2.5 (1.10) 3.2 (1.54) 3.7 (1.68) 3.6 (1.76)
Aversion 1.4 (0.46) 1.6 (0.63) 1.4 (0.67) 1.8 (0.96) 1.7 (1.00) 1.7 (1.35) 1.7 (0.85)
Relief 4.2 (1.44) 4.3 (1.45) 5.6 (1.20) 3.5 (1.49) 4.2 (1.48) 4.8 (1.35) 4.2 (1.64)
Concerned for dependence 1.9 (1.48) 1.9 (1.34) 3.6 (2.25) 1.5 (0.81) 2.4 (1.70) 2.3 (2.09) 2.2 (1.58)
Product liking [mean (SD)]
N 38 38 38 37 29 28 25
Emax 56.2 (32.40) 59.6 (35.59) 89.2 (17.15) 47.3 (29.64) 63.8 (32.91) 77.5 (23.95) 74.4 (25.49)
Future intent to use
N 39 39 38 36 29 28 26
Mean (SD) 53.2 (33.26) 51.8 (37.32) 81.7 (24.69) 37.6 (34.15) 55.6 (36.27) 76.5 (28.19) 68.8 (32.99)
Frequency Counts
  0–49, n (%) 13 (33.3) 14 (35.9) 4 (10.5) 17 (43.6) 11 (37.9) 5 (17.2) 7 (26.9)
  50, n (%) 5 (12.8) 3 (7.7) 0 (0) 2 (5.1) 2 (6.9) 2 (6.9) 1 (3.8)
  51–100, n (%) 21 (53.8) 22 (56.4) 34 (89.5) 17 (43.6) 16 (55.2) 21 (72.4) 18 (69.2)
Język:
Angielski
Częstotliwość wydawania:
4 razy w roku
Dziedziny czasopisma:
Wiedza ogólna, Nauki biologiczne, Nauki biologiczne, inne, Fizyka, Fizyka, inne