[
Ahmed, Y.; J. Windle, and Lynch, O. 2021. “Introduction: ‘Nothing About Us Without Us’, a History and Application for Criminology.” In Giving Voice to Diversity in Criminological Research: Nothing about Us without Us’, edited by O. Lynch, J. Windle, and Y. Ahmed, 3–16. Policy Press.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Arnstein, S. R. 1969. “A Ladder of Citizen Participation.” Journal of the American Institute of Planners 35 (4): 216–24. DOI:10/cvct7d.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Baxter, B. 2005. A Theory of Ecological Justice. London: Routledge.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Berti, E., Monsarrat, S.; Munk, M.; Jarvie, S. and Svenning, J.-C. 2020. “Body Size Is a Good Proxy for Vertebrate Charisma.” Biological Conservation 251: 108790. DOI:10/ghjjcd.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Bresnihan, P. 2016a. “The More-Than-Human Commons: From Commons to Commoning.” In Space, Power and the Commons, edited by S. Kirwan, L. Dawney, and J. Brigstocke, 93–112. Abingdon: Routledge.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Brockington, D.; Duffy, R. and Igoe, J. 2010. Nature Unbound: Conservation, Capitalism and the Future of Protected Areas. London: Earthscan.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Camacho, A. E. 2010. “Assisted Migration: Redefining Nature and Natural Resource Law under Climate Change.” Yale Journal on Regulation 27 (2): 171–256.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Charlton, J. I. 1998. Nothing About Us Without Us: Disability Oppression and Empowerment. Berkeley: University of California Press.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Conly, S. 2013. Against Autonomy: Justifying Coercive Paternalism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Cooke, B., and Lane, R. 2018. “Plant–Human Commoning: Navigating Enclosure, Neoliberal Conservation, and Plant Mobility in Exurban Landscapes.” Annals of the American Association of Geographers 108 (6): 1715–31. DOI:10/gdg5fj.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Dawney, L.; Kirwan, S. and Birgstocke, J. 2016. “The Promise of the Commons.” In Space, Power and the Commons, edited by S. Kirwan, L. Dawney, and J. Brigstocke, 1–27. Abingdon: Routledge.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Dayton, P. K.; Tegner, M. J.; Edwards, P. B. and Riser, K. L. 1998. “Sliding Baselines, Ghosts, and Reduced Expectations in Kelp Forest Communities.” Ecological Applications 8 (2): 14. DOI:10/c9gjh4.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
De La Cadena, M. 2010. “Indigenous Cosmopolitics in the Andes: Conceptual Reflections Beyond ‘Politics.’” Cultural Anthropology 25 (2): 334–70. DOI:10/dfqprq.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Díaz, S.; Demissew, S.; Carabias, J.; Joly, C.; Lonsdale, M.; Ash, N.; Larigauderie, A. et al. 2015. “The IPBES Conceptual Framework: Connecting Nature and People.” Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability 14: 1–16. DOI:10/f3m44k.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Donaldson, S. 2020. “Animal Agora: Animal Citizens and the Democratic Challenge.” Social Theory and Practice 46 (4): 709–35. DOI:10/ggz8x9.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Frank, B. and Glikman, J. A. 2019. “Human–Wildlife Conflicts and the Need to Include Coexistence.” In Human-Wildlife Interactions: Turning Conflict into Coexistence, edited by B. Frank, J. A. Glikman, and S. Marchini, 1–19. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Giraud, E. and Hollin, G. 2017. “Laboratory Beagles and Affective Co-Productions of Knowledge.” In Participatory Research in More-than-Human Worlds, edited by M. Bastian, O. Jones, N. Moore, and E. Roe, 163–77. Abingdon: Routledge.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Hernandez-Santin, C.; Amati, M.; Bekessy, S. and Desha, C. 2023. “Integrating Biodiversity as a Non-Human Stakeholder Within Urban Development.” Landscape and Urban Planning 232: 104678. DOI:10/grwwhh.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Holland, A.; Gibbons, P.; Thompson, J. and Roudavski, S. 2023. “Modelling and Design of Habitat Features: Will Manufactured Poles Replace Living Trees as Perch Sites for Birds?” Sustainability 15 (9): 7588. DOI:10/gr7jqf.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Holland, A. and Roudavski, S. 2024. “Participatory Design for Multispecies Cohabitation: By Trees, for Birds, with Humans.” In Designing More-than-Human Smart Cities: Beyond Sustainability, Towards Cohabitation, edited by S. Heitlinger, M. Foth, and R. Clarke, 93–128. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI:10/m7z3.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Kaplan, G. 2015. Bird Minds: Cognition and Behaviour of Australian Native Birds. Melbourne: CSIRO.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Kareiva, P.; Lalasz, R. and M. Marvier 2011. “Conservation in the Anthropocene: Beyond Solitude and Fragility.” Breakthrough Journal 2.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Kropotkin, P. (1902) 2012. Mutual Aid: A Factor of Evolution. Mineola: Dover.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Lenton, T. and Watson, A. J. 2011. Revolutions That Made the Earth. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Lorimer, J. 2007. “Nonhuman Charisma.” Environment and Planning D: Society and Space 25 (5): 911–32. DOI:10/frpzfs.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Margules, C. R. and Presseym, R. L. 2000. “Systematic Conservation Planning.” Nature 405 (6783): 243–53. DOI:10/dn4xdx.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Margulis, L. and Sagan, D. 2010. “Sentient Symphony.” In The Nature of Life: Classical and Contemporary Perspectives from Philosophy and Science, edited by M. A. Bedau and C. E. Cleland, 340–54. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Mouffe, C. 2005. On the Political. London: Routledge.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Parker, D.; Roudavski, S.; Isaac, B. and Bradsworth, N. 2022. “Toward Interspecies Art and Design: Prosthetic Habitat-Structures in Human-Owl Cultures.” Leonardo 55 (4): 351–56. DOI:10/hwkm.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Parker, D.; Soanes, K. and Roudavski, S. 2022. “Interspecies Cultures and Future Design.” Transpositiones 1 (1): 183–236. DOI:10/gpvsfs.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Rigby, K. 2018. “Feathering the Multispecies Nest: Green Cities, Convivial Spaces.” Rachel Carson Center Perspectives, no. 1: 73–80.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Roudavski, S. 2018. “Notes on More-than-Human Architecture.” In Undesign: Critical Practices at the Intersection of Art and Design, edited by G. Coombs, A. McNamara, and G. Sade, 24–37. Abingdon: Routledge. DOI:10/czr8.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Roudavski, S. 2020. “Multispecies Cohabitation and Future Design.” In Proceedings of Design Research Society (DRS) 2020 International Conference: Synergy, edited by S. Boess, M. Cheung, and R. Cain, 731–50. London: Design Research Society. DOI:10/ghj48x.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Roudavski, S. 2021. “Interspecies Design.” In Cambridge Companion to Literature and the Anthropocene, edited by J. Parham, 147–62. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Roudavski, S. and Holland, A. 2023. “Tree Designers and Bird Clients.” Landscape Architecture Australia, no. 177: 38–43. DOI:10/gthkkz.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Rutten, J.; Holland, A. and Roudavski, S. 2024. “Plants as Designers of Better Futures: Can Humans Let Them Lead?” Plant Perspectives 2 (1). DOI:10/gt5ds6.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Saltz, D. and Cohen, S. 2023. “Naturalness and Principle Pluralism in Conservation.” Conservation Biology 37 (6): e14137. DOI:10/gt9jsq.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Voinov, A. and Bousquet, F. 2010. “Modelling with Stakeholders.” Environmental Modelling & Software 25 (11): 1268–81. DOI:10/ftj569.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Washington, H.; Piccolo, J.; Gomez-Baggethun, E.; Kopnina, H. and Alberro, H. 2021. “The Trouble with Anthropocentric Hubris, with Examples from Conservation.” Conservation 1 (4): 285–98. DOI:10/jdjj.
]Search in Google Scholar
Profil Orcid