Zacytuj

1. Arnež, M., Belak, E., Bučar, N., Nemec, M., Rutar, K., Zupanc, L. (2018). Transition to WEB data collection in household surveys at SURS – what have we learned so far. Q2018 - European Conference on Quality in Official Statistics, Kraków, Poland, 26-29 June 2018. Search in Google Scholar

2. Bayart, C., Bonnel, P. (2010). The mixing of survey modes: application to Lyon web and face-to-face household travel survey. 2th World Conference on Transportation Research, Lisbon, 11-15 July 2010. Search in Google Scholar

3. Bayart, C., Bonnel, P. (2015). How to Combine Survey Media (Web, Telephone, Face-to-Face): Lyon and Rhône-alps Case Study. Transportation Research Procedia, Vol. 11, pp. 118-135.10.1016/j.trpro.2015.12.011 Search in Google Scholar

4. Berzelak, J. (2014). Mode effects in web surveys. Ph.D. dissertation, Faculty for social sciences, University of Ljubljana, Ljubljana. Search in Google Scholar

5. Bonnel, P., Bayart, C., Smith, B. (2015). Workshop Synthesis: Comparing and Combining Survey Modes. Transportation Research Procedia, Vol. 11, pp. 108-117.10.1016/j.trpro.2015.12.010 Search in Google Scholar

6. Bučar, N., Belak, E., Arnež, M., Rutar, K. (2018). Nonresponse in Web Surveys in Official Statistics. International Workshop on Household Survey Nonresponse, Budapest, Hungary, 22-24 August 2018. Search in Google Scholar

7. Center for Transport Analytics (2019). The Danish National Travel Survey. Available at https://www.cta.man.dtu.dk/english/national-travel-survey [28 October 2020]. Search in Google Scholar

8. De Leeuw, E. (2018). Mixed-mode: Past, present, and future. Survey Research Methods, Vol. 12, No. 2, pp. 75-89. Search in Google Scholar

9. Eurostat (2018), Eurostat Guidelines on Passenger Mobility Statistics. Eurostat, Luxembourg. Search in Google Scholar

10. Hox, J., de Leeuw, E., Klausch, T. (2017). Mixed mode research: issues in design and analysis. In Total survey error in practice, Biemer, P. et al. (Eds.), Wiley, Hoboken, NJ, pp. 511–530.10.1002/9781119041702.ch23 Search in Google Scholar

11. Klausch, T. (2014). Informed design of mixed-mode surveys: evaluating mode effects on measurement and selection error. Ph.D. Dissertation, Utrecht University. Available at https://dspace.library.uu.nl/handle/1874/300673 [26 November 2020]. Search in Google Scholar

12. Martin, P., Lynn, P. (2011). The Effects of Mixed Mode Survey Designs on Simple and Complex Analyses. ISER Working Paper Series, No. 2011-28, ISER, University of Essex, Colchester. Available at https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:ese:iserwp:2011-28 [26 November 2020]. Search in Google Scholar

13. Škafar, A. (2018). Passenger mobility and road traffic. Final Report. SURS, Ljubljana, Slovenia. Search in Google Scholar

14. Škafar, A. (2019a). Methodological Explanation on Daily Passenger Mobility. SURS, Ljubljana, Slovenia. Search in Google Scholar

15. Škafar, A. (2019b). Standardno poročilo o kakovosti za raziskovanje Dnevna mobilnost potnikov (2017). Quality Report, SURS, Ljubljana, Slovenia. Search in Google Scholar

16. Statistics Netherlands (2016). Transport and mobility 2016. Statistics Netherlands, The Hague/Heerlen/Bonaire. Search in Google Scholar

17. Transport Analysis (2019). The Swedish National Travel survey. Available at https://www.trafa.se/en/travel-survey/travel-survey [28 October 2020]. Search in Google Scholar