[
Alsyouf, I., 2007. The role of maintenance in improving companies’ productivity and profitability, International Journal of Production Economics, 105(1), 70-78, DOI:10.1016/j.ijpe.2004.06.05710.1016/j.ijpe.2004.06.057
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Annet, J., Stanton, N.A., 2000. Task analysis, Taylor & Francis, London 2000.10.1201/9781482289275
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Antti, S, Mats, D., 2011. Costs of poor maintenance, Journal of Quality in Maintenance Engineering, 17(1), 63-73.10.1108/13552511111116259
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Aven, T., 2008. Risk Analysis: Assessing Uncertainties Beyond Expected Values and Probabilities, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., 2008.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Bell, J., Holroyd J., 2009. Review of human reliability assessment methods, Health and Safety Laboratory, Research Report RR679, HSE.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Bird, F., Germain, G.,1985. Practical Loss Control Leadership, International Loss Control Institute, Georgia, USA.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Blaise, J.C., Levrat, E., Iung, B., 2014. Process approach-based methodology for safe maintenance operation: From concepts to SPRiMI software prototype, Safety Science, 70, 99-113, DOI:10.1016/j.ssci.2014.05.00810.1016/j.ssci.2014.05.008
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Branford, K., Naikar, N., Hopkins, A., 2009. Guidelines for AcciMap analysis, [In:] A. Hopkins (Ed.) Learning from high reliability organizations, CCH Australia, Sydney, 193-212.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
BSI, 2010. BS EN 13306: 2010, Maintenance – Maintenance terminology, BSI Standards Publication, CEN, Brussels.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Carrillo-Castrillo, J.A., Rubio-Romero, J.C., Guadix, J., Onieva, L., 2015. Risk assessment of maintenance operations: the analysis of performing task and accident mechanism, International Journal of Injury Control and Safety Promotion, 22(3), 267-277.10.1080/17457300.2014.93919625179119
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Carvalho, F., Melo, R., 2013, Reliability in Risk Assessment: Evaluation of the Stability and Reproducibility in the use of semi-quantitative assessment methods, International Symposium on Occupational Safety and Hygiene - SHO 2013, Guimarães, Portugal, 2013, p.80-81.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Caputo, A.C., Pelagagge, P.M., Salini, P., 2013. AHP-based methodology for selecting safety devices of industrial machinery, Safety Science, 53, 202-218, DOI:10.1016/j.ssci.2012.10.00610.1016/j.ssci.2012.10.006
]Search in Google Scholar
[
CCPS, 1985. Guidelines for Hazard Evaluation Procedures, Center for Chemical Process Safety, American Institute of Chemical Engineers, New York.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
CCPS, 2011. Guidelines for Auditing Process Safety Management Systems (2nd Edition), Center for Chemical Process Safety (CCPS), Wiley, USA.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
CISHC, 1977, A Guide to Hazard and Operability Studies, Chemical Industry and Safety Council, Chemical Industries Association, London, 1977.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Cox, L.A., 2008, What’s wrong with Risk Matrices? Risk Analysis, 2008, 28, 497-511.10.1111/j.1539-6924.2008.01030.x18419665
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Crespo Márquez, A., Moreu de León, P., Gómez Fernández, J.F., Parra Márquez, C., López Campos, M., 2009. The maintenance management framework: A practical view to maintenance management, Journal of Quality in Maintenance Engineering, 15(2), 167-178, DOI:10.1108/1355251091096111010.1108/13552510910961110
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Ding, S.H., Kamaruddin, S., Azid, I.A., 2014. Maintenance policy selection model – a case study in the palm oil industry, Journal of Manufacturing Technology Management, 25(3), 415-435.10.1108/JMTM-03-2012-0032
]Search in Google Scholar
[
DOE, 1999. Conducting Accident Investigations (version 2), U.S. Department of Energy, USA.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Duijm, N.J., 2009. Safety-barrier diagrams as a safety management tool, Reliability Engineering and System Safety, 94, 332-341.10.1016/j.ress.2008.03.031
]Search in Google Scholar
[
FAA: System Safety Handbook, Federal Aviation Administration, Washington, DC, USA, 2000.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
EASHW, 2010. Safe maintenance in practice, Publications Office of the European Union, Luxembourg, 2010.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Evenéus, P., Rollenhagen, C.2007. In-depth investigation based on a systemic MTO perspective in Vattenfall hydro plants, [In:] The 4th EADAC Symposium, Chengdu, China.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Ferry, T.S., 1988, Modern Accident Investigation and Analysis (2nd ed.), John Wiley & Sons Inc., New York.10.1002/9780470172230
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Gertman, D.I., Blackman, H.S., 1994. Human Reliability and Safety Analysis Data Handbook, John Wiley & Sons, New York.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Grabara, J., 2019. Health and Safety Management in the Aspects of Singularity, 9th International Conference on Manufacturing Science and Education - MSE 2019 “Trends in New Industrial Revolution”(MSE 2019), Sibiu, Romania, Vol.290, DOI: 10.1051/matecconf/20192901201410.1051/matecconf/201929012014
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Gyekye, S.A., 2005. Workers’ perceptions of workplace safety and job satisfaction, International Journal of Occupational Safety and Ergonomics (JOSE), 11(3), 291-302.10.1080/10803548.2005.11076650
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Haddon, W. Jr., 1980. The basic strategies for reducing damage from hazards of all kinds, Hazard Prevention, 16, 8-12.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Hale, A.R., Heming, B.H.J., Carthey, J., Kirwan, B., 1997. Modelling of safety management systems, Safety Science, 26, 121-140.10.1016/S0925-7535(97)00034-9
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Hammer, W., 1972. Handbook of system and product safety, Prentice Hall Inc., New Jersey.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Harms-Ringdahl, L., 2000, Assessment of safety functions at an industrial workplace – a case study, [In:] M.P. Cottam, D.W. Harvey, R.P. Pape, J. Tait, (Eds.): Foresight and Precaution, ESREL 2000, Balkema, Edinburgh, s.1373-1378
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Harms-Ringdahl, L., 2001. Safety analysis – Principles and practice in occupational safety, (Second edition), Taylor & Francis, London.10.4324/9780203302736
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Harms-Ringdahl, L., 2013. Guide to safety analysis for accident prevention, IRS Riskhantering AB, Stockholm, Sweden.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Heinrich, H.W., Petersen, D., Roos, N., 1980. Industrial Accident Prevention (5th Ed.), McGraw-Hill, New York.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Hendrick, K., Benner, L., 1987. Investigating accidents with STEP, Marcel Dekker Inc., New York.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Hollnagel, E., 1998. Cognitive Reliability and Error Analysis Method – CREAM, Elsevier Science, Oxford, England.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Hollnagel, E. Speziali, J., 2008. Study on Developments in Accident Investigation Methods: A survey of the State-of-the Art, Ski Report 2008:50.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
HSE, 2008, Five steps to risk assessment, Health and Safety Executive, Great Britain.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
IEC, 1995. Dependability management – Risk analysis of technological systems (IEC 300-3-9), International Electrotechnical Commission, Geneva.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
IEC/ISO 31010: 2009, Risk management – Risk assessment techniques, CENELEC, Brussels.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
ILO, 1988. Major Hazard Control. A practical manual, International Labour Office, Geneva.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Johnson, W.G., 1980. MORT Safety assurance systems, Marcel Dekker, New York.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Kapustka, K., Ziegmann, G., Klimecka-Tatar, D., Ostrega, M., 2020. Identification of health risks from harmful chemical agents–review concerning bisphenol A in workplace, Production Engineering Archives, 26(2), 45-49, DOI:10.30657 /pea.2020.26.1010.30657/pea.2020.26.10
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Kelly, T.P., McDermid, J.A., 2001. A systematic approach to safety case maintenance, Reliability Engineering & System Safety, 71(3), 271-284.10.1016/S0951-8320(00)00079-X
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Kirwan, B., 1994. A guide to practical human reliability assessment, Taylor & Francis Ltd., London.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Kirwan B., Ainsworth L.K. (Eds.), 1993. A Guide to Task Analysis, Taylor & Francis, Washington, D.C., USA.10.1201/b16826
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Kiseľáková, D., Hairul, Gallo, P., Gallo, P., Čabinová, V., Onuferová, E., 2020. Total quality management as managerial tool of competitiveness in enterprises worldwide, Polish Journal of Management Studies, 21(2), 195-209, DOI:10.17512/pjms.2020.21.2.1410.17512/pjms.2020.21.2.14
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Kjellén U., 1984. The deviation concept in occupational accident control – Definition and classification, Accident Analysis and Prevention, 16, 289-306.10.1016/0001-4575(84)90023-X
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Kučera, M., Kopčanová, S., 2020. Lubricant analysis as the most useful tool in the proactive maintenance philosophies of a machinery and its components, Management Systems in Production Engineering, 28(3), 196-201, DOI:10.2478/mspe-2020-002910.2478/mspe-2020-0029
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Lees, F.P., 1996. Loss prevention in the process industries (2nd Ed.), Butterworth-Heinemann, Oxford.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Leong, T.K., Zakuan, N., Saman, M.Z.M., 2012. Quality management maintenance and practices – technical and non-technical approaches, Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences, 65, 688-696.10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.11.185
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Leveson, N.G., 2004. A new accident model for engineering safer systems, Safety Science, 42(4), 237-270.10.1016/S0925-7535(03)00047-X
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Lind, S., Nenonen, S., 2008. Occupational risks in industrial maintenance, Journal of Quality in Maintenance Engineering, 14(2),194-204, DOI:10.1108/1355251081087768310.1108/13552510810877683
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Liyanage, J.P., Badurdeen, F., Chandima Ratnayake, R.M., 2009. Industrial Asset Maintenance and Sustainability Performance: Economical, Environmental and Societal Implications, [in:] M. Ben-Daya, S.O. Duffuaa, A. Raouf, J. Knezevic, D. Ait-Kadi (eds.) Handbook of Maintenance Management and Engineering (pp.665-693), Springer.10.1007/978-1-84882-472-0_24
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Löfsten, H., 1999. Management of industrial maintenance-economic evaluation of maintenance policies, International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 19(7), 716-737, DOI:10.1108/0144357991027168310.1108/01443579910271683
]Search in Google Scholar
[
McElroy, F. (Ed.), 1974. Accident Prevention Manual for Industrial Operations (7th Ed.), National Safety Council, USA.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Niciejewska, M., Kiriliuk, O., 2020. Occupational health and safety management in small size enterprises, with particular emphasis on hazards identification, Production Engineering Archives, 26(4), 195-201, DOI:10.30657/pea.2020.26.3410.30657/pea.2020.26.34
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Parida, A., Chattopadhyay, G., 2007. Development of a multi-criteria hierarchical framework for maintenance performance measurement (MPM), Journal of Quality in Maintenance Engineering, 13(3), 241-258, DOI:10.1108/1355251071078027610.1108/13552510710780276
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Pollard, J., Heberger, J., Dempsey, P.G., 2014. Maintenance and repair injuries in US mining, Journal of Quality in Maintenance Engineering, 20(1), 20-31.10.1108/JQME-02-2013-0008
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Rasmussen, J., 1997. Risk management in a dynamic society: A modelling problem, Safety Science, 27, 183-213.10.1016/S0925-7535(97)00052-0
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Rasmussen, J., Svedung, I., 2000. Proactive risk management in a dynamic society, Swedish Rescue Services Agency, Karlstad.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Rausand M., Høyland A., 2004. System Reliability Theory; Models, Statistical Methods and Applications (2nd edition), Wiley, New York..
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Reason, J., Hobbs, A., 2003. Managing Maintenance Error – A Practical Guide, Ashgate Publishing Company, Burlington, VT.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Ruuhilehto, K., 1993. The management oversight and risk tree (MORT), [In:] J. Suokas, V. Rouhiainen (Eds.): Quality Management of Safety and Risk Analysis, Elsevier, Amsterdam.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Sheikhalishahi, M., Pintelon, L., Azadeh, A., 2016. Human factors in maintenance: a review, Journal of Quality in Maintenance Engineering, 22(3), 218-237.10.1108/JQME-12-2015-0064
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Sklet, S., 2004. Comparison of some selected methods for accident investigation, Journal of Hazardous Materials, 111, 29-37.10.1016/j.jhazmat.2004.02.00515231345
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Stadnicka, D., Antosz, K., Chandima Ratnayake, R.M., 2014. Development of an empirical formula for machine classification: Prioritization of maintenance tasks, Safety Science, 34-41, http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2013.10.02010.1016/j.ssci.2013.10.020
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Stanton, N.A., Salmon, P.M., Walker, G.H., Baber, C., Jenkins, D.P., 2005. Human factors methods: a practical guide for engineering and design, Ashgate Pub. Co., Aldershot, England, 2005.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Svenson, O., 1991. The accident evolution and barrier function (AEB) model applied to incident analysis in the processing industries, Risk Analysis, 11, 499-507.10.1111/j.1539-6924.1991.tb00635.x1947355
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Tabor, J. 2014. Maintenance Management and Occupational Safety in Manufacturing Organizations, Polish Journal of Management Studies, 10(2), 225-235.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Taylor, J.R., 1994. Risk analysis for process plan, pipelines and transport, E&FN Spon, London.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Teplická, K., Hurná, S., 2021. New approach of costs of Quality according their trend of during long period in industrial enterprises in SMEs, Management Systems in Production Engineering, 29(1), 20-26, DOI:10.2478/mspe-2021-000310.2478/mspe-2021-0003
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Tsang, A.H.C., 2002. Strategic dimensions of maintenance management, Journal of Quality in Maintenance Engineering, 8(1), 17-39, DOI:10.1108/1355251021042057710.1108/13552510210420577
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Vesely, W., Goldberg, F., Roberts, N.H., Haasl, D., 1981. Fault Tree Handbook. (NUREG–0492) Nuclear Regulatory Commission. Washington, USA.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Wang, L., Chu, J., Wu, J., 2007. Selection of optimum maintenance strategies based on a fuzzy analytical hierarchy process, International Journal of Production Economics, 107(1), 151-163, DOI:10.1016/j.ijpe.2006.08.00510.1016/j.ijpe.2006.08.005
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Woźny, A., 2020. Selected problems of managing work safety - case study, Production Engineering Archives, 26(3), 99-103, DOI:10.30657/pea.2020.26.2010.30657/pea.2020.26.20
]Search in Google Scholar
