Okoljski Vidik Civilno-Vojaških Razmerij: Priložnosti In Izzivi Za Slovensko Vojsko

1 Balali-Mood, M., Naseri, K., Tahergorabi, Z., Khazdair, M. R., in Sadeghi, M., 2021. Toxic Mechanisms of Five Heavy Metals: Mercury, Lead, Chromium, Cadmium, and Arsenic. Frontiers in Pharmacology, 12, str. 1–19. DOI: 10.3389/fphar.2021.643972. Search in Google Scholar

2 Banuri, T., Prates, F. F., Martino, D., Murthy, I. K., Park, J., in Zenghelis, D. A., 2019. Drivers of Environmental Change. V P. Ekins, J. Gupta in P. Boileau (ur.), Global environment outlook GEO-6, str. 21-55. Cambridge University Press. Search in Google Scholar

3 Baršienė, J., Butrimavičienė, L., Grygiel, W., Lang, T., Michailovas, A., in Jackūnas, T., 2014. Environmental genotoxicity and cytotoxicity in flounder (Platichthys flesus), herring (Clupea harengus) and Atlantic cod (Gadus morhua) from chemical munitions dumping zones in the southern Baltic Sea. Marine Environmental Research, 96, str. 56–67. DOI: 10.1016/j.marenvres.2013.08.012, 20. januar 2024. Search in Google Scholar

4 Bearden, D. M., 2007. Exemptions from Environmental Law for the Department of Defense: Background and Issues for Congress. CRS Report for Congress. Congressional Research Service. https://apps.dtic.mil/sti/pdfs/ADA472908.pdf, 23. januar 2024. Search in Google Scholar

5 Bebler, A., 2005. Civil-Military Relations and Democratic Control of the Armed Forces in Slovenia. V A. Bebler (ur.), Sodobno vojaštvo in družba (str. 87–100). Ljubljana: Fakulteta za družbene vede. Search in Google Scholar

6 Beck, J. A., Gledhill, M., Schlosser, C., Stamer, B., Böttcher, C., Sternheim, J., Greinert, J., & Achterberg, P. E., 2018. Spread, Behavior, and Ecosystem Consequences of Conventional Munitions Compounds in Coastal Marine Waters. Frontiers in Marine Sciences, 5-141, str. 1–26. DOI: 10.3389/fmars.2018.00141. Search in Google Scholar

7 Butinar, Ž., Hvastja, Š., Kos, U. A., Kramberger, D., Lamper, A., Pirnat, T., in Lampret, L. R. (ur.)., 2020. Ugotavljanje in sanacija okoljske škode po pravilih nacionalnega, evropskega in mednarodnega prava. Ljubljana: Pravna fakulteta, Univerza v Ljubljani. https://www.pf.uni-lj.si/media/pkp.rezultat.2.pdf, 7. januar 2024. Search in Google Scholar

8 Commision of The European Communities, 1993. Green Paper on remedying environmental damage, COM (93) 47 final. http://aei.pitt.edu/950/1/environmental_damage_gp_COM_93_47.pdf, 2. januar 2024. Search in Google Scholar

9 Dandeker, C., 1990. Flexible Forces for the Twenty-First Century, Facing Uncertainty Report no. 1. Department of Leadership, Swedish National Defense College. Search in Google Scholar

10 Department of the Army, 2015. Environmental Considerations (Army Techniques Publication No. 3-34.5, Marine Corps Reference Publication No. 4-11B). https://irp.fas.org/doddir/army/atp3-34-5.pdf Environmental Protection Agency, 2008. Superfund Environmental Indicators Guidance Human Exposure Revisions. https://semspub.epa.gov/work/HQ/176152.pdf, 13. januar 2024. Search in Google Scholar

11 Environmental Protection Agency, 2024. Ecological Risk Assessment Glossary of Terms. https://ofmpub.epa.gov/sor_internet/registry/termreg/searchandretrieve/glossariesandkeywordlists/search.do?details=&glossaryName=Eco%20Risk%20Assessment%20Glossary, 17. januar 2024. Search in Google Scholar

12 Eurobarometer, 2020. The attitudes of Europeans towards the environment. https://europa.eu/eurobarometer/surveys/detail/2257, 20. februar 2024. Search in Google Scholar

13 Feaver, P. D., in Kohn, R. H. (ur.), 2001. Soldiers and Civilians: The Civil-Military Gap and American National Security. MIT Press. Search in Google Scholar

14 Fish, L., in Scharre, P., 2018. Protecting Warfighters from Blast Injury. Center for a New American Security. https://s3.us-east-1.amazonaws.com/files.cnas.org/documents/CNAS_Super-Soldiers_3_Warfighter-Blast-Injury_May-2018_FINAL.pdf?mtime=20180427105437&focal=none, 12. januar 2024. Search in Google Scholar

15 Furlan, B., 2015. Neučinkovitost vojske kot pokazatelj neustreznosti civilnega nadzora (2). Sodobni vojaški izzivi, 17-3, str. 11–23. Search in Google Scholar

16 Furlan, B., 2018. Reduction of risks for the development of civil-military conflicts. Sodobni vojaški izzivi, 20-4, str. 27–45. Search in Google Scholar

17 Garb, M., 2009. Divergentno in konvergentno v odnosu med vojsko in družbo. Teorija in praksa, 46-(1-2), str. 105–125. Search in Google Scholar

18 Generalštab Slovenske vojske, 2017. Direktiva št. 14-06: Varstvo okolja v Slovenski vojski. Search in Google Scholar

19 Generalštab Slovenske vojske, 2020. Standardni operativni postopek št. 14-0012: Varstvo okolja na vojaških vadiščih, streliščih in poligonih (GŠSV, št. 804-180/2020-1, z dne 2. 11. 2020). Search in Google Scholar

20 Government Accountability Office, 2006. Improvement Continues in DOD’s Reporting on Sustainable Ranges but Additional Time Is Needed to Fully Implement Key Initiatives. https://www.gao.gov/assets/gao-06-725r.pdf, 13. januar 2024. Search in Google Scholar

21 Hafner-Fink, M., Broder, Ž., Doušak, M., Zorman, R. F., Gerdina, O., Jagodic, A., Kecman, I., Kurdija, S., Miheljak, V., Pajnik, M., Uhan, S., Toš, N., Vovk, T., Zajšek, Š., in Malnar, B., 2021. Slovensko javno mnenje 2020/3 – Poročilo o izvedbi raziskave in sumarni pregled rezultatov. Center za raziskovanje javnega mnenja in množičnih komunikacij, Univerza v Ljubljani, Fakulteta za družbene vede. Search in Google Scholar

22 Hecker, J. H., 2011. Peace and Sustainable Development through Environmental Security. A Methodology for Environmental Security Assessments. Institute for Environmental Security. https://actionguide.info/static/media/filer_public/f4/6f/f46f2782-ac3b-4de2-b42f--244a72db39df/pub-2011-01_a_ies_espa_esa_methodology.pdf, 23. januar 2024. Search in Google Scholar

23 Hong, D.-S., 2008. The military and civil society in Korea. V G. Caforio, G. Kümmel, G. in B. Purkayastha (ur.), Armed Forces and Conflict Resolution: Sociological Perspectives, str. 239–256. Emerald Group Publishing Limited. DOI: 10.1016/S1572-8323(08)07013-6. Search in Google Scholar

24 Human Rights Council, 2018. Report of the Special Rapporteur on the issue of human rights obligations relating to the enjoyment of a safe, clean, healthy and sustainable environment, (A/HRC/37/59). https://documents.un.org/doc/undoc/gen/g18/017/42/pdf/g1801742.pdf?token=uBYa0VQfYVK35XjpEp&fe=true, 20. januar 2024. Search in Google Scholar

25 Jelušič, L., 1997. Legitimnost sodobnega vojaštva. Fakulteta za družbene vede. Search in Google Scholar

26 Joó, R., 1996. Who Guards the Guards? A Fundamental Question for Democratic Regimes. V R. Joó (ur.), The democratic control of armed forces (str. 6–12). Chaillot Papers. https://www.iss.europa.eu/sites/default/files/EUISSFiles/cp023e.pdf, 27. januar 2024. Search in Google Scholar

27 Kiss, Z. L., 1999. Changes of the Military Mind in Hungary: In the Miror of Empirical Data. V L. Jelušič in J. Selby (ur.), Defence restructuring and conversion: Sociocultural aspects (str. 214–273). European Commission, COST Action A10, Directorate-General Research. Search in Google Scholar

28 Kotnik-Dvojmoč, I., 2000. Preoblikovanje oboroženih sil sodobnih evropskih držav (študija primera Slovenije) [Doktorska disertacija]. Fakulteta za družbene vede. Search in Google Scholar

29 Kümmel, G., 2002. The Military and its Civilian Environment: Reflections on a Theory of Civil-Military Relations. Connections: The Quarterly Journal, 1-4), str. 63–82. http://connections-qj.org/system/files/01.4.06_kummel.pdf, 27. februar 2024. Search in Google Scholar

30 Lee Jenni, G. D., Peterson, M. N., Katz Jameson, J., in Cubbage, F. W., 2015. Military Perspectives on Public Relations Related to Environmental Issues. International Journal of Comparative Sociology, 27-4, str. 353–369. DOI: 10.1080/1062726X.2015.1027770. Search in Google Scholar

31 Light, S. E., 2014. The Military-Environmental Complex. Boston College Law Review, 55-3), str. 879–946. https://storage.googleapis.com/jnl-bcls-j-bclr-files/journals/1/articles/648/63ae8bd10920d.pdf, 13. februar 2024. Search in Google Scholar

32 Lima, D. R. S., Marcio, L. S. B., Neves, B. B., & Moreira, F. R., 2011. Impact of ammunition and military explosives on human health and the environment. Reviews on Environmental Health, 26-2), str. 101–110. DOI: 10.1515/reveh.2011.014. Search in Google Scholar

33 Macarol, B., 1993. Okoljski pojmi in njihova raba. Ujma, 93-7, str. 275–277. Search in Google Scholar

34 Malešič, M., 2023. Javnomnenjska zaznava okoljske varnosti v Sloveniji. Teorija in praksa, 60-4, str. 729–752. Search in Google Scholar

35 Manigart, P., 1998. Postmoderne vojaške organizacije: sociološka analiza. Teorija in praksa, 35-2, str. 362–369. Search in Google Scholar

36 Martel, R., Robertson, T. J., Doan, M. Q., Thiboutot, S., Ampleman, G., Provatas, A., in Jenkins, T., 2008. 2,4,6-Trinitrotoluene in soil and groundwater under a waste lagoon at the former Explosives Factory Maribyrnong (EFM), Victoria, Australia. Environmental Geology, 53-6, str. 1249–1259. DOI: 10.1007/s00254-007-0713-y. Search in Google Scholar

37 Matthews, J. A., Bridges, E. M., Caseldine, C. J., Luckman, A. J., Owen, G., Perry, A. H., Shakesby, R. A., Walsh, R. P. D., Whittaker, R. J., in Willis, K. J., 2003. Military impacts on environment. V J. A. Matthews (ur.), The Encyclopaedic Dictionary of Environmental Change. Hodder Education Publishers. Search in Google Scholar

38 McDiarmid, M. A., Engelhardt, S. M., Dorsey, C. D., Oliver, M., Gucer, P., Gaitens, J. M., Kane, R., Cernich, A., Kaup, B., Hoover, D., Gaspari, A. A., Shvartsbeyn, M., Brown, L., in Squibb, K. S. (2011). Longitudinal Health Surveillance in a Cohort of Gulf War Veterans 18 Years After First Exposure to Depleted Uranium. Journal of Toxicology and Environmental Health, Part A, 74, str. 678–691. DOI: 10.1080/15287394.2011.539138. Search in Google Scholar

39 Mesec, B., 1998. Uvod v kvalitativno raziskovanje v socialnem delu. Visoka šola za socialno delo. Search in Google Scholar

40 Mihalič, T., 1993. Problematika okolja in ukrepi ekološke politike v turizmu [Doktorska disertacija]. Ekonomska fakulteta. Search in Google Scholar

41 Ministrstvo za obrambo, 2013. Skupna Natova doktrina za varstvo okolja med vojaškimi aktivnostmi pod vodstvom NATA, SVS (Slovenski vojaški standard), STANAG 7141. Search in Google Scholar

42 Ministrstvo za obrambo, 2013a. Okoljevarstvene zahteve pri objektih in opremi za ravnanje z gorivi, SVS (Slovenski vojaški standard), STANAG 7102. Search in Google Scholar

43 Ministrstvo za obrambo, 2013b. Sistem ravnanja z okoljem v Natovih operacijah, SVS (Slovenski vojaški standard), STANAG 2583. Search in Google Scholar

44 Ministrstvo za obrambo, 2014. Skupne zahteve za ravnanje z odpadki med vojaškimi aktivnostmi pod vodstvom NATA, SVS (Slovenski vojaški standard), STANAG 2510. Search in Google Scholar

45 Ministrstvo za obrambo, 2015. Najboljše okoljske prakse za trajnostno rabo vojaških vadišč, SVS (Slovenski vojaški standard), STANAG 2594. Search in Google Scholar

46 Ministrstvo za obrambo, 2016. Okoljska podatkovna zbirka Natove baze med operacijami pod vodstvom NATA, SVS (Slovenski vojaški standard), STANAG 6500. Search in Google Scholar

47 Ministrstvo za obrambo, 2016a. Najboljše okoljske prakse in standardi za vojaške baze v Natovih operacijah, SVS (Slovenski vojaški standard), STANAG 2582. Search in Google Scholar

48 Ministrstvo za obrambo, 2023. Resolucija o splošnem dolgoročnem programu razvoja in opremljanja Slovenske vojske do leta 2040 (ReDPROSV40). https://www.gov.si/assets/ministrstva/MO/Dokumenti/resolucija40_brosura.pdf, 20. 2. 2024. Search in Google Scholar

49 Moskos, C. C. (2000). Towards a Postmodern Military: The United States as a Paradigm. In C. Moskos, J. A. Williams & D. R. Segal (Eds.). The Postmodern Military. Armed Forces After the Cold War (pp. 15). Oxford University Press. Search in Google Scholar

50 Nato Standardization Office, 2013. Environmental Protection Handling Requirements for Petroleum Handling Facilities and Equipment (STANAG 7102). Search in Google Scholar

51 Nato Standardization Office, 2018a. Joint NATO doctrine for environmental protection during NATO-led military activities (STANAG 7141). Search in Google Scholar

52 Nato Standardization Office, 2019. NATO Environmental File During NATO-led Military Activities (STANAG 6500). Search in Google Scholar

53 Nato Standardization Office, 2020. Best environmental protection practices for sustainability of military training areas (STANAG 2594). Search in Google Scholar

54 Nato Standardization Office, 2022a. Environmental Protection Best Practices and Standards for Military Camps in NATO Operations (STANAG 2582). Search in Google Scholar

55 Nato Standardization Office, 2024. Environmental management system in NATO military activities (STANAG 2583). Search in Google Scholar

56 Neuhauser, J. A., 2015. U.S. military responsibility for environmental cleanup in contingency environments. Environmental Law, 45-1, str. 129–179. Search in Google Scholar

57 North Atlantic Treaty Organization, 2019. NATO Encyclopedia. Environment – NATO’s stake. https://www.nato.int/nato_static_fl2014/assets/pdf/2020/1/pdf/2019-nato-encyclopedia-eng.pdf, 15. 2. 2024. Search in Google Scholar

58 Pion-Berlin, D., Croissant, A., in Kuehn, D., 2024. Introduction to the Research Handbook on Civil–Military Relations. V D. Pion-Berlin, A. Croissant in D. Kuehn (ur.), Research Handbook on Civil–Military Relations (str. 1–17). Edward Elgar Publishers. Search in Google Scholar

59 Prăvălie, R., 2014. Nuclear Weapons Tests and Environmental Consequences: A Global Perspective. Ambio. A Journal of Environment and Society, 43-6, str. 729–744. DOI: 10.1007/s13280-014-0491-1. Search in Google Scholar

60 Pravila službe v Slovenski vojski, 2009. Uradni list RS, (84/09). Search in Google Scholar

61 Prebilič, V., in Oder, K., 2004. Obrambni sistem in ekologija – vloga severnoatlantskega zavezništva. Teorija in praksa, 41(3-4), str. 599–615. Search in Google Scholar

62 Prosser, C. W., Sedivec, K. K., in Barker W. T., 2000. Tracked Vehicle Effects on Vegetation and Soil Characteristics. Journal of Range Management, 53-6, str. 666–670. DOI: 10.2307/4003164. Search in Google Scholar

63 Ricci M. E., Dain-Owens, A. P., Anderson, A. B., Jones, R. A., Howard, H. R., Effinger, A. M., in Fehmi, J. S., 2012. Index of Available Research on Military Impacts. Optimal Allocation of Land for Training and Non-training Uses. US Army Engineer Research and Development Center. Search in Google Scholar

64 Rodríguez-Artiles, J. F., Pérez-Zabaleta, A., in Labeaga-Azcona, J. M., 2019. Effects of noise emitted by military aircraft on housing close to an air base: the case of Gando air base (Spain). Revista Internacional de Contaminacion Ambiental, 35-1), str. 207–221. DOI: 10.20937/RICA.2019.35.01.15 Search in Google Scholar

65 Rodríguez-Eugenio, N., McLaughlin, M., in Pennock, D., 2018. Soil Pollution: a hidden reality. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. https://www.fao.org/3/I9183EN/i9183en.pdf, 27. januar 2024. Search in Google Scholar

66 RxList, 18. 2. 2024. Medical dictionary. Definition of toxicity. https://www.rxlist.com/toxicity/definition.htm, 23. maj 2024. Search in Google Scholar

67 Sanden, J., in Bachmann, S-D., 2013. Countering Hybrid Eco-threats to Global Security Under International Law: The Need for an Comprehensive Legal Approach. Liverpool Law Review, 34-3, str. 261–289. DOI: 10.1007/s10991-012-9120-x. Search in Google Scholar

68 Shields, P. (2015). Civil-military relations. In E. Berman, D. A. Bearfield & M. J. Dubnick (Eds.). Encyclopedia of Public Administration and Public Policy, 3rd Edition, str. 564–569. Routledge. Search in Google Scholar

69 Smit, H. A. P., 2020. Developing military environmental literacy in the South African Army through a dedicated military environmental management course. Scientia Militaria: South African Journal of Military Studies, 48-1, str. 75–96. DOI: 10.5787/48-1-1247. Search in Google Scholar

70 Smit, H. A. P., in Henrico, I., 2022. ‘Green’ militaries: the military-environment conundrum. V L. Sandham, C. Hansen in I. Meiklejohn (ur.), Proceedings of the Biennial Conference of the Society of South African Geographers and the Southern African Association of Geomorphologists, str. 46–61. Rhodes University. Search in Google Scholar

71 United Nations Environmental Programme, 2019. Global Environment Outlook 6. https://www.unep.org/resources/global-environment-outlook-6, 20. februar 2024. Search in Google Scholar

72 United Nations General Assembly, 2015. Transforming our world: the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development, (A/RES/70/1). https://documents-dds-ny.un.org/doc/UNDOC/GEN/N15/291/89/PDF/N1529189.pdf?OpenElement, 20. februar 2024. Search in Google Scholar

73 Van Antwerp, R. L., 2001. Encroachment Impacts on Army Installations and How to Deal with Them. Federal Facilities Environmental Journal, 12-2, str. 19–32. DOI: 10.1002/ffej.1002. Search in Google Scholar

74 Vennik, K., 2019. The Effect of Military Vehicles on Rut Formation on Estonian Soils and Natural Recovery of the Ruts [Doctoral dissertation]. Estonian University of Life Sciences. Search in Google Scholar

75 Yamamoto, M., Tomita, J., Sakaguchi, A., Ohtsuka, Y., Hoshi, M., in Apsalikov, K. N., 2010. Uranium isotopes in well water samples as drinking sources in some settlements around the Semipalatinsk Nuclear Test Site, Kazakhstan. Journal of Radioanalytical and Nuclear Chemistry, 284-2, str. 309–314. DOI: 10.1007/s10967-010-0463-2, 17. april 2024. Search in Google Scholar

76 Zakon o obrambi (ZObr). (2004, 2015, 2020). Uradni list RS, (103/04, 95/15, 139/20). Search in Google Scholar

77 Zakon o varstvu okolja (ZVO-2). (2022, 2023, 2024). Uradni list RS, (44/22, 18/23, 78/23, 23/24). Search in Google Scholar