[1. Abrahams JJ, Hayt MW, Rock R. Sinus lift procedure of the maxilla in patients with inadequate bone for dental implants: radiographic appearance // AJR, 2000; 174: 1289-1292.]Search in Google Scholar
[2. Soardi CM, Spinato S, Zaffe D, Wang HL. Atrophic maxillary floor augmentation by mineralized human bone allograft in sinus of different size: an histologic and histomorphometric analysis // Clin Oral Impl Res, 2011; 22: 560-566.]Search in Google Scholar
[3. Tosta M, Cortes ARG, CorreaL, Pinto Jr DDS, Tumenas I, Katchburian E. Histological and histomorphometric evaluation of a synthetic bone substitute for maxillary sinus grafting in humans // Clin Oral Impl Res, 2011;00: 1-5.]Search in Google Scholar
[4. Cabazas-Mojon J, Barona-Dorado C, Gomez- Moreno G, Fernandez-Caliz F, Martinez-Gonzales JM. Meta-analytic study of implant survival following sinus augmentation // Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal, 2012; 17: 135-139.]Search in Google Scholar
[5. Del Fabro M, Corbella S, Weinstein T, Ceresoli V, Taschieri S. Implant survival rates after osteomemediated maxillary sinus augmentation: a literature review // Clin Implant Dent Relat Res, 2012; 14: 159-168.]Search in Google Scholar
[6. Nkenke E, Stelzle F. Clinical outcomes of sinus floor augmentation for implant placement using autogenous bone or bone substitutes: a systhemic review // Clin Oral Impl Res, 2009; 20: 124-133.]Search in Google Scholar
[7. Pramstraller M, Farina R, Franceschetti G, Pramstraller C, Trombelli L. Ridge dimensions of the edentulous posterior maxilla: a retrospective analysis of a cohort of 127 patients using computerized tomography data // Clin Oral Impl Res, 2011; 22: 54-61.]Search in Google Scholar
[8. Farina R, Pramstraller M, Franceschetti G, Pramstraller C, Trombelli L. Alveolar ridge dimensions in maxillary posterior sextants: a retrospective comparative study of dentate and edentulous sites using computerized tomography data // Clin Oral Impl Res, 2011; 22: 1138-1144.]Search in Google Scholar
[9. Harris D, Buser D, Dula K, Grondahl K, Harris D, Jacobs R, Lekholm U, Nakienly R, Van Steenberghe D, Van Der Stelt P. E.O.A. Guidlines for the use of diagnostic imaging in implant dentistry. A consensus workshop organized by the European Association for Osseointegration in Trinity College Dublin // Clin Oral Impl Res, 2002; 13: 566-570.]Search in Google Scholar
[10. European Commission. Radiation Protection No. 172. Cone beam CT for dental and maxillofacial radiology. Evidence based guidelines // Directorate - General for Energy, Directorate D - Nuclear Energy, Unit D4 - Radiation Protection, 2012; 71-76.]Search in Google Scholar
[11. Van den Bergh JPA, Ten Bruggenkate CM, Disch FJM, Tuinzing DB. Anatomical aspects of sinus floor elevations // Clin Oral Impl Res, 2000; 11: 256-265.]Search in Google Scholar
[12. Hodez C, Griffaton-Taillandier C, Benisimon I. Cone-beam imaging: applications in ENT // European Annals of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck diseases, 2011; 128: 65-78.]Search in Google Scholar
[13. Soardi CM, Zaffe D, Motroni A, Wang HL. Quantitative comparison of cone beam computed tomography and microradiography in the evaluation of bone density after maxillary sinus augmentation: a preliminary study // Clin Implant Dent Relat Res, 2012; doi: 10.1111/cid.12016.10.1111/cid.1201623157713]Search in Google Scholar
[14. Kaufman E. Maxillary sinus elevation surgery: an overview // J Esthet Restor Dent, 2003; 15: 272-283.]Search in Google Scholar
[15. Listl S, Faggion CM Jr. An economic evaluation of different sinus lift techniques // J Clin Periodontol, 2010; 37: 777-787 ]Search in Google Scholar
