This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Acheson, N. (2010). Welfare state reform, compacts and restructuring relations between the state and the voluntary sector: Reflections on Northern Ireland’s experience. Voluntary Sector Review, 1(2), 175–192. https://doi.org/10.1332/204080510X511238AchesonN. (2010). Welfare state reform, compacts and restructuring relations between the state and the voluntary sector: Reflections on Northern Ireland’s experience. , 1(2), 175–192. https://doi.org/10.1332/204080510X511238Search in Google Scholar
Alcock, P. (2016). From partnership to the Big Society: The third sector policy regime in the UK. Nonprofit Policy Forum, 7(2), 95–116. https://doi.org/10.1515/npf-2015-0022AlcockP. (2016). From partnership to the Big Society: The third sector policy regime in the UK. , 7(2), 95–116. https://doi.org/10.1515/npf-2015-0022Search in Google Scholar
Ansell, C., Doberstein, C., Henderson, H., Siddiki, S., & ‘t Hart, P. (2020). Understanding inclusion in collaborative governance: A mixed methods approach. Policy and Society, 39(4), 570–591. https://doi.org/10.1080/14494035.2020.1785726AnsellC.DobersteinC.HendersonH.SiddikiS.‘tHartP. (2020). Understanding inclusion in collaborative governance: A mixed methods approach. , 39(4), 570–591. https://doi.org/10.1080/14494035.2020.1785726Search in Google Scholar
Ansell, C., & Gash, A. (2007). Collaborative governance in theory and practice. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 18(4), 543–571. https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/mum032AnsellC.GashA. (2007). Collaborative governance in theory and practice. , 18(4), 543–571. https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/mum032Search in Google Scholar
Ansell, C., & Gash, A. L. (2018). Collaborative platforms as a governance strategy. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 28(1), 16–32. https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/mux030AnsellC.GashA. L. (2018). Collaborative platforms as a governance strategy. , 28(1), 16–32. https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/mux030Search in Google Scholar
Ansell, C., & Miura, S. (2020). Can the power of platforms be harnessed for governance? Public Administration, 98(1), 261–276. https://doi.org/10.1111/padm.12636AnsellC.MiuraS. (2020). Can the power of platforms be harnessed for governance?, 98(1), 261–276. https://doi.org/10.1111/padm.12636Search in Google Scholar
Arvidson, M., Johansson, H., Johansson, S., & Nordfeldt, M. (2018). Local civil society regimes: Liberal, corporatist and social democratic civil society regimes in Swedish metropolitan cities. Voluntary Sector Review, 9(1), 3–20. https://doi.org/10.1332/204080518X15199961331635ArvidsonM.JohanssonH.JohanssonS.NordfeldtM. (2018). Local civil society regimes: Liberal, corporatist and social democratic civil society regimes in Swedish metropolitan cities. , 9(1), 3–20. https://doi.org/10.1332/204080518X15199961331635Search in Google Scholar
Batory, A., & Svensson, S. (2019). The fuzzy concept of collaborative governance: A systematic review of the state of the art. Central European Journal of Public Policy, 13(2), 28-39. https://doi.org/10.2478/cejpp-2019-0008BatoryA.SvenssonS. (2019). The fuzzy concept of collaborative governance: A systematic review of the state of the art. , 13(2), 28-39. https://doi.org/10.2478/cejpp-2019-0008Search in Google Scholar
Blatt, F., & Schlaufer, C. (2021). The influence of civil society on Ukrainian anti-corruption policy after the Maidan. Central European Journal of Public Policy, 15(1), 15-13. https://doi.org/10.2478/cejpp-2021-0001BlattF.SchlauferC. (2021). The influence of civil society on Ukrainian anti-corruption policy after the Maidan. , 15(1), 15-13. https://doi.org/10.2478/cejpp-2021-0001Search in Google Scholar
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oaBraunV.ClarkeV. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. , 3(2), 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oaSearch in Google Scholar
Brock, K. L. (2020). Government and non-profit collaboration in times of deliverology, policy innovation laboratories and hubs, and new public governance. VOLUNTAS: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations, 31(2), 257–270. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11266-019-00145-0BrockK. L. (2020). Government and non-profit collaboration in times of deliverology, policy innovation laboratories and hubs, and new public governance. , 31(2), 257–270. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11266-019-00145-0Search in Google Scholar
Bryman, A. (2016). Social Research Methods, Oxford University Press.BrymanA. (2016). , Oxford University Press.Search in Google Scholar
Butcher, J., Casey, J., & Dalton, B. (2012). An Australian national compact – Something old, something new? Nonprofit Policy Forum, 3(2), 5. https://doi.org/10.1515/2154-3348.1038ButcherJ.CaseyJ.DaltonB. (2012). An Australian national compact – Something old, something new? , 3(2), 5. https://doi.org/10.1515/2154-3348.1038Search in Google Scholar
Campomori, F., & Ambrosini, M. (2020). Multilevel governance in trouble: The implementation of asylum seekers’ reception in Italy as a battleground. Comparative Migration Studies, 8(1), 22. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40878-020-00178-1CampomoriF.AmbrosiniM. (2020). Multilevel governance in trouble: The implementation of asylum seekers’ reception in Italy as a battleground. , 8(1), 22. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40878-020-00178-1Search in Google Scholar
Carboni, J. L., Siddiki, S., Koski, C., & Sadiq, A.-A. (2017). Using network analysis to identify key actors in collaborative governance processes. Nonprofit Policy Forum, 8(2), 133–145. https://doi.org/10.1515/npf-2017-0012CarboniJ. L.SiddikiS.KoskiC.SadiqA.-A. (2017). Using network analysis to identify key actors in collaborative governance processes. , 8(2), 133–145. https://doi.org/10.1515/npf-2017-0012Search in Google Scholar
Casey, J., Dalton, B., Melville, R., & Onyx, J. (2010). Strengthening government–nonprofit relations: International experiences with compacts. Voluntary Sector Review, 1(1), 59–76. https://doi.org/10.1332/204080510X497019CaseyJ.DaltonB.MelvilleR.OnyxJ. (2010). Strengthening government–nonprofit relations: International experiences with compacts. , 1(1), 59–76. https://doi.org/10.1332/204080510X497019Search in Google Scholar
Coule, T. M., & Bennett, E. (2018). State–voluntary relations in contemporary welfare systems: New politics or voluntary action as usual? Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 47(4_suppl), 139S–158S. https://doi.org/10.1177/0899764018755507CouleT. M.BennettE. (2018). State–voluntary relations in contemporary welfare systems: New politics or voluntary action as usual? , 47(4_suppl), 139S–158S. https://doi.org/10.1177/0899764018755507Search in Google Scholar
Craig, G., Taylor, M., Carlton, N., Garbutt, R., Kimberlee, R., Lepine, E., & Syed, A. (2005). The paradox of compacts: Monitoring the impact of compacts. London: Home Office.CraigG.TaylorM.CarltonN.GarbuttR.KimberleeR.LepineE.SyedA. (2005). . London: Home Office.Search in Google Scholar
Davies, J. S. (2007). The limits of partnership: An exit-action strategy for local democratic inclusion. Political Studies, 55(4), 779–800. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9248.2007.00677.xDaviesJ. S. (2007). The limits of partnership: An exit-action strategy for local democratic inclusion. , 55(4), 779–800. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9248.2007.00677.xSearch in Google Scholar
Eikenberry, A. M., & Kluver, J. D. (2004). The marketization of the nonprofit sector: Civil society at risk? Public Administration Review, 64(2), 132–140. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6210.2004.00355.xEikenberryA. M.KluverJ. D. (2004). The marketization of the nonprofit sector: Civil society at risk? , 64(2), 132–140. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6210.2004.00355.xSearch in Google Scholar
Emerson, K., Nabatchi, T., & Balogh, S. (2011). An integrative framework for collaborative governance. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 22(1), 1–29. https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/mur011EmersonK.NabatchiT.BaloghS. (2011). An integrative framework for collaborative governance. , 22(1), 1–29. https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/mur011Search in Google Scholar
Futrell, R. (2003). Technical adversarialism and participatory collaboration in the US chemical weapons disposal program. Science, Technology, & Human Values, 28(4), 451–482. https://doi.org/10.1177/0162243903252762FutrellR. (2003). Technical adversarialism and participatory collaboration in the US chemical weapons disposal program. , 28(4), 451–482. https://doi.org/10.1177/0162243903252762Search in Google Scholar
Fyfe, N. R. (2005). Making space for “neo-communitarianism”? The third sector, state and civil society in the UK. Antipode, 37(3), 536–557. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0066-4812.2005.00510.xFyfeN. R. (2005). Making space for “neo-communitarianism”? , 37(3), 536–557. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0066-4812.2005.00510.xSearch in Google Scholar
Gash, A. (2016). Collaborative Governance. Handbook on Theories of Governance. Edward Elgar Publishing, Cheltenham, UK.GashA. (2016). . Edward Elgar Publishing, Cheltenham, UK.Search in Google Scholar
Gustafsson, K., & Johansson, J. (2018). A worthy reception? Ambivalences in social work with refugees and migrants in Sweden. Advances in Social Work, 18(3), 983–1004. https://doi.org/10.18060/21656GustafssonK.JohanssonJ. (2018). A worthy reception? Ambivalences in social work with refugees and migrants in Sweden. , 18(3), 983–1004. https://doi.org/10.18060/21656Search in Google Scholar
Hansen, C. (2019). Solidarity in diversity: Activism as a pathway of migrant emplacement in Malmö, Malmö University, Sweden.HansenC. (2019). , Malmö University, Sweden.Search in Google Scholar
Johansson, H., & Johansson, M. (2012). From a ‘liberal’ to a ‘social democratic’ welfare state: The translation of the English compact into a Swedish context. Nonprofit Policy Forum, 3(2), 6. https://doi.org/10.1515/2154-3348.1057JohanssonH.JohanssonM. (2012). From a ‘liberal’ to a ‘social democratic’ welfare state: The translation of the English compact into a Swedish context. , 3(2), 6. https://doi.org/10.1515/2154-3348.1057Search in Google Scholar
Johansson, H., Kassman, A., & Scaramuzzino, R. (2011). Staten och det civila samhällets organisationer i ett föränderligt välfärdssamhälle: Perspektiv på en överenskommelse: andra tematiska studien, juni 2011. Överenskommelsen, Sweden.JohanssonH.KassmanA.ScaramuzzinoR. (2011). , juni2011. Överenskommelsen, Sweden.Search in Google Scholar
Johansson, M. (2011). I dialogens namn-idén om en överenskommelse mellan regeringen och ideella organisationer, Linneaus University. Sweden.JohanssonM. (2011). , Linneaus University. Sweden.Search in Google Scholar
Jönsson, A., Scaramuzzino, R. (2016). Samverkan mellan stat, region och civilsamhäller för nyanländas etablering. En utvärdering av projektet NAD i Skåne. Lund Socialhögskolan, Sweden.JönssonA.ScaramuzzinoR. (2016). Samverkan mellan stat, region och civilsamhäller för nyanländas etablering. . Lund Socialhögskolan, Sweden.Search in Google Scholar
Karlsson, M., & Vamstad, J. (2020). New deeds for new needs: Civil society action against poverty in Sweden. VOLUNTAS: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations, 31(5), 1025–1036. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11266-018-9964-3KarlssonM.VamstadJ. (2020). New deeds for new needs: Civil society action against poverty in Sweden. , 31(5), 1025–1036. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11266-018-9964-3Search in Google Scholar
Klockmo, C., & Bostedt, G. (2015). Med målet att skapa samverkan mellan idéburen och offentlig sektor: det första steget. Kommunförbundet Västernorrland, Sweden.KlockmoC.BostedtG. (2015). . Kommunförbundet Västernorrland, Sweden.Search in Google Scholar
Laforest, R., & Orsini, M. (2005). Evidence-based engagement in the voluntary sector: Lessons from Canada. Social Policy & Administration, 39(5), 481–497. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9515.2005.00451.xLaforestR.OrsiniM. (2005). Evidence-based engagement in the voluntary sector: Lessons from Canada. , 39(5), 481–497. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9515.2005.00451.xSearch in Google Scholar
Malmöandan. (2017). Överenskommelse för samverkan mellan idéburen sektor i Malmö och Malmö stad. För ökad demokrati, delaktighet och jämlikhet i Malmö. Malmöandan, Sweden.Malmöandan. (2017). Överenskommelse för samverkan mellan idéburen sektor i Malmö och Malmö stad. . Malmöandan, Sweden.Search in Google Scholar
Malmöandan. (2020). Överenskommelsen Malmöandan. Samarbetsplan ideburen sektor och Malmöstad. Malmöandan, Sweden.Malmöandan. (2020). Överenskommelsen Malmöandan. . Malmöandan, Sweden.Search in Google Scholar
Malmöandan. (n.d.). Samarbetsplan - idéburen sektor och Malmö stad 2018–2022.Malmöandan. (n.d.)..Search in Google Scholar
Nemec, J., Svidroňová, M., & Kovács, É. (2019). Welfare Co-Production: Hungarian and Slovak Reality. Journal of Public Administration and Policy, (12)2, 195-215. https://doi.org/10.2478/nispa-2019-0019NemecJ.SvidroňováM.KovácsÉ. (2019). Welfare Co-Production: Hungarian and Slovak Reality. , (12)2, 195-215. https://doi.org/10.2478/nispa-2019-0019Search in Google Scholar
Morison, J. (2000). The government-voluntary sector compacts: Governance, governmentality, and civil society. Journal of Law and Society, 27(1), 98–132. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-6478.00148MorisonJ. (2000). The government-voluntary sector compacts: Governance, governmentality, and civil society. , 27(1), 98–132. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-6478.00148Search in Google Scholar
Nordfeldt, M. (2012). Förväntningar och spridning: en sammanfattande studie av den nationella överenskommelsens tre första år: del tre i uppföljningen av Överenskommelsen mellan regeringen, idéburna organisationer inom det sociala området och Sveriges kommuner och landsting. Överenskommelsen, Sweden.NordfeldtM. (2012). . Överenskommelsen, Sweden.Search in Google Scholar
Purdy, J. M. (2012). A framework for assessing power in collaborative governance processes. Public Administration Review, 72(3), 409–417. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6210.2011.02525.xPurdyJ. M. (2012). A framework for assessing power in collaborative governance processes. , 72(3), 409–417. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6210.2011.02525.xSearch in Google Scholar
Reuter, M. (2012). Överenskommelsen som spegel och arena. Betraktelser över ett avtal i tiden. i Civilsamhället i samhällskontraktet: En antologi om vad som står på spel, 217–244. European Civil Society Press, Stockholm.ReuterM. (2012). Överenskommelsen som spegel och arena. , 217–244. European Civil Society Press, Stockholm.Search in Google Scholar
Reuter, M., Wijkström, F., & von Essen, J. (2012). Policy tools or mirrors of politics. Government-voluntary sector compacts in the post-welfare state age. Nonprofit Policy Forum, 3(2), 2. https://doi.org/10.1515/2154-3348.1062ReuterM.WijkströmF.von EssenJ. (2012). Policy tools or mirrors of politics. Government-voluntary sector compacts in the post-welfare state age. , 3(2), 2. https://doi.org/10.1515/2154-3348.1062Search in Google Scholar
Sjöberg, K. (2018). Ankomst Malmö: röster om flyktningmottagandet hösten 2015. Malmö stad, Sweden.SjöbergK. (2018). . Malmö stad, Sweden.Search in Google Scholar
Smith, S. R. (2012). Government-voluntary sector compacts reconsidered. Nonprofit Policy Forum, 3(2). https://doi.org/10.1515/2154-3348.1064SmithS. R. (2012). Government-voluntary sector compacts reconsidered. , 3(2). https://doi.org/10.1515/2154-3348.1064Search in Google Scholar
Stigendal, M., & Östergren, P. O. (Eds.). (2013). Malmös väg mot en hållbar framtid. Hälsa, välfärd och rättvisa (3rd ed.). Kommissonen för ett socialt hållbart Malmö, Sweden.StigendalM.ÖstergrenP. O. (Eds.). (2013). (3rd ed.). Kommissonen för ett socialt hållbart Malmö, Sweden.Search in Google Scholar
Waardenburg, M. (2020). Understanding the microfoundations of government–civil society relations. VOLUNTAS: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations, 32, 548–560. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11266-020-00221-wWaardenburgM. (2020). Understanding the microfoundations of government–civil society relations. , 32, 548–560. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11266-020-00221-wSearch in Google Scholar
Weber, E. P. (2003). Bringing society back in: Grassroots ecosystem management, accountability, and sustainable communities. MIT Press, Cambridge.WeberE. P. (2003). . MIT Press, Cambridge.Search in Google Scholar
Wijkström, F. (2000). Changing focus or changing role? The Swedish nonprofit sector in the 1990s. German Policy Studies/Politikfeldanalyse, 1(2), 161–188.WijkströmF. (2000). Changing focus or changing role? The Swedish nonprofit sector in the 1990s. , 1(2), 161–188.Search in Google Scholar
Wijkström, F. (2007). The role of civil society. The case of Sweden in international comparison, 2004(19).WijkströmF. (2007). The role of civil society. , 2004(19).Search in Google Scholar
von Essen, J. (2019). The shifting meanings of popular engagement in Swedish society. VOLUNTAS: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations, 30(1), 29–40. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11266-019-00089-5von EssenJ. (2019). The shifting meanings of popular engagement in Swedish society. , 30(1), 29–40. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11266-019-00089-5Search in Google Scholar
Zimmeck, M. (2010). The compact 10 years on: Government’s approach to partnership with the voluntary and community sector in England. Voluntary Sector Review, 1(1), 125–133. https://doi.org/10.1332/204080510X497082ZimmeckM. (2010). The compact 10 years on: Government’s approach to partnership with the voluntary and community sector in England. , 1(1), 125–133. https://doi.org/10.1332/204080510X497082Search in Google Scholar
Åberg, P. (2015). Myths and traditions as constraints or resources? Path dependency and decoupling strategies among civil society organizations. Journal of Civil Society, 11(1), 19–38. https://doi.org/10.1080/17448689.2015.1009695ÅbergP. (2015). Myths and traditions as constraints or resources? Path dependency and decoupling strategies among civil society organizations. , 11(1), 19–38. https://doi.org/10.1080/17448689.2015.1009695Search in Google Scholar