Virtual Laboratories in the Teaching of Mechanical Technology

[1] Saranya A.K. A Critical Study on the Efficiency of Microsoft Teams in Online Education. In: Gayathri R, editor. Efficacy of Microsoft Teams during COVID-19. A SurveyPublisher: Bonfring Publication; 2020. ISBN: 9789389515282. Search in Google Scholar

[2] Sudarsana IK, Made Anggara Putra IB, Temon Astawa IN, Lali Yogantara IW. The use of Google classroom in the learning process. 1st Int Conf Advance Sci Innov (ICASI). IOP Conf Series, J Phys: Conf Series 1175;2019. DOI: 10.1088/1742-6596/1175/1/012160. Search in Google Scholar

[3] Dhawan S. Online learning: A Panacea in the time of COVID-19 crisis. J Educational Technol Systems. 2020;49(1):5-22. DOI: 10.1177/0047239520934018. Search in Google Scholar

[4] Handke J, Schäfer AM. E-Learning, E-Teaching und E-Assessment in der Hochschullehre. Eine Anleitung. Oldenbourg, München; 2012. ISBN: 9783486708004. Search in Google Scholar

[5] Swan K. Virtual interactivity: design factors affecting student satisfaction and perceived learning in asynchronous online courses. Distance Educ. 2001;22(2):306-31. DOI: 10.1080/0158791010220208. Search in Google Scholar

[6] Saritepeci M, Cakir H. The effect of blended learning environments on student motivation and student engagement: A study on social studies course. In: Education and Science. 2015. DOI: 10.15390/EB.2015.2592. Search in Google Scholar

[7] Heinze A, Procter Ch. Online communication and information technology education. J Information Technol Educ. 2006;5:235-49. DOI: 10.28945/245. Search in Google Scholar

[8] Major Š, Hubálovská M, Wacławek M. Using the Raspberry Pi microcomputers in STEM education in technically oriented high schools. Chem Didact Ecol Metrol. 2021;26(1-2):73-88. DOI: 10.2478/cdem-2021-0006. Search in Google Scholar

[9] Major Š, Hubálovska M, Loskot R. Alternative forms of laboratory teaching during the lockdown period caused by the COVID-19 pandemic. Int J Information Educ Technol 2022;12(11):1737-47. DOI: 10.18178/ijiet.2022.12.11.1731 Search in Google Scholar

[10] Mohr-Schroeder MJ, Cavalcanti M, Blyman K. STEM Education: Understanding the Changing Landscape. In: Sahin A, editor. A Practice-based Model of STEM Teaching: Stem Students on the Stage (SOS)™. Sense Publishers, Netherlands; 2015. ISBN: 9789463000192. DOI: 10.1007/978-94-6300-019-2_1. Search in Google Scholar

[11] Yilmaz H. A study of determination of benchmarks during the new formation of integrated STEM leader preparation program. European J STEM Educ. 2022;7(1):10. DOI:10.20897/ejsteme/12634. Search in Google Scholar

[12] English LD. STEM education K-12: perspectives on integration. Int J STEM Education. 2016:3:3. DOI: 10.1186/s40594-016-0036-1. Search in Google Scholar

[13] Becker K, Park K. Effects of integrative approaches among science, technology, engineering and mathematics (STEM) subjects on students learning: a preliminary meta-analysis. Am J Educational Res. 2014;2(10):862-75. DOI: 10.12691/education-2-10-4. Search in Google Scholar

[14] Asghar A, Ellington R, Rice E, Johnson F, Prime G. Supporting STEM education in secondary science contexts. Interdiscipl J Problem-Based Learning. 2012;6(2):85-125. DOI: 10.7771/1541-5015.1349. Search in Google Scholar

[15] Falloon G, Hatzigianni M, Bower M, Forbes A, Stevenson M. Understanding K-12 STEM education: A framework for developing STEM literacy. J Sci Educat Technol. 2020;29:369-85. DOI: 10.1007/s10956-020-09823-x. Search in Google Scholar

[16] Simpson A, Bouhafa Y. Youths’ and adults’ identity in STEM: A systematic literature review. J STEM Educat Res. 2020;3:167-94. DOI: 10.1007/s41979-020-00034-y. Search in Google Scholar

[17] Li Y. International Journal of STEM Education - a platform to promote STEM education and research worldwide. Int J STEM Education. 2014:1. DOI: 10.1186/2196-7822-1-1. Search in Google Scholar

[18] Sanders M. STEM, STEM Education, STEMmania, The Technology Teacher. 2009;68:20-6. Available from: www.teachmeteamwork.com/files/sanders.istem.ed.ttt.istem.ed.def.pdf. Search in Google Scholar

[19] Bozkurt A, Ucar H, Hasan, G. Durak, Idil S. The current state of the art in STEM research: A systematic review study. Cypriot J Educational Sci. 2019;14:374-83. DOI: 10.18844/cjes.v14i3.3447. Search in Google Scholar

[20] McComas WF. Construction of Scientific Knowledge. In: McComas WF, editor. The Language of Science Education: An Expanded Glossary of Key Terms and Concepts in Science Teaching and Learning. 2014. pp. 26. DOI: 10.1007/978-94-6209-497-0. Search in Google Scholar

[21] Paul KM, Maltese AV, Valdivia SD. Development and validation of the role identity surveys in engineering (RIS-E) and STEM (RIS-STEM) for elementary students. Int J STEM Educat. 2020;7:45. DOI: 10.1186/s40594-020-00243-2. Search in Google Scholar

[22] Ng O, Shi L, Ting F. Exploring differences in primary students’ geometry learning outcomes in two technology-enhanced environments: dynamic geometry and 3D printing. Int J STEM Education. 2020;7:50. DOI: 10.1186/s40594-020-00244-1. Search in Google Scholar

[23] Malcom SM, Chubin DE, Jesse JK. Standing Our Ground: A Guidebook for STEM Educators in the Post-Michigan Era. Am Associat Advancement Sci. 2004. Available from: www.aaas.org/sites/default/files/Capacity_Center/1_Front_Matter.pdf. Search in Google Scholar

[24] Teitelbaum MS. Falling Behind?: Boom, Bust, and the Global Race for Scientific Talent. Princeton University Press. 2014. DOI: 10.2307/j.ctt5hhq5c. Search in Google Scholar

[25] Teitelbaum MS. STEM, Immigration, and Controversy: Does the U.S. have enough STEM Workers? Available from: https://arefiles.ucdavis.edu/uploads/filer_public/2014/11/04/teitelbaumoctober9.pdf. Search in Google Scholar

[26] Hasanah U. Key definitions of STEM Education: Literature review. Interdiscipl J Environ Sci Education. 2020;16(3):e2217. DOI: 10.29333/IJESE/8336. Search in Google Scholar

[27] Juškaite L. The Impact of the Virtual Laboratory on the Physics Learning Process: Society. Integration. Education Proc Internat Sci Conf. Vol. V, May 24th - 25th, 2019:159-68. DOI: 10.17770/sie2019vol5.3804. Search in Google Scholar

[28] Tatli Z, Ayas A. Effect of virtual chemistry laboratory on students achievement. Educational Technol Soc. 2013;16:159-70. Available from: www.jstor.org/stable/10.2307/jeductechsoci.16.1.159. Search in Google Scholar

[29] Potkonjak V, Gardner M, Callaghan V, Mattila P, Guetl C, Petrovičs C, et al. Virtual laboratories for education in science, technology, and engineering. Computer Education. 2016;95:309-27. DOI: 10.1016/j.compedu.2016.02.002. Search in Google Scholar

[30] Kolb DA. Experiential Learning. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall; 1984. ISBN: 0132952610. Search in Google Scholar

[31] Moon JA. A Handbook of Reflective and Experiential Learning: Theory and Practice. Taylor Francis Group; 2005. DOI: 10.4324/9780203416150. Search in Google Scholar

[32] Stavenga de Jong JA, Wierstra RFA, Hermanussen J. An exploration of the relationship between academic and experiential learning approaches in vocational education. British J Educational Psychology. 2006;76(1):155-69. DOI: 10.1348/000709905X42932. Search in Google Scholar

[33] Beckett G, Slater T. Global Perspectives on Project-Based Language Learning, Teaching, and Assessment: Key Approaches, Technology Tools, and Frameworks. Oxon: Routledge; 2019. ISBN: 978103208821. Search in Google Scholar

[34] Yasseri D, Finley P, Patrick M, Mayfield BE, Davis DW, Thompson P, et al. The hard work of soft skills: augmenting the project-based learning experience with interdisciplinary teamwork, Instructional Sci. 2018;46:457-88. DOI: 10.1007/s11251-017-9438-9. Search in Google Scholar

[35] Hye-Jung L, Cheolil L. Peer evaluation in blended team project-based learning: What do students find important? J Educational Technol Soc. 2012;15(4):214-24. Search in Google Scholar

[36] Perrault EK, Albert CA. Utilizing project-based learning to increase sustainability attitudes among students. Appl Environ Education Communication. 2017;17(2):96-105. DOI: 10.1080/1533015X.2017.1366882 Search in Google Scholar

[37] Beard C. The Experiential Learning Toolkit: Blending Practice with Concepts. 2nd Edition. London, New York, Delhi: Kogan Page; 2012. ISBN: 9780749450786. Search in Google Scholar

[38] Ahannad F. Self-directed learning: A core concept in adult education. Online J Distance Education e-Learning. 2023;11(3):2956-62. DOI: 10.1155/2020/3816132. Search in Google Scholar

[39] Clark J. White G. Experiential learning: A definitive edge in the job market. Am J Business Education. 2010;3(2):115-8. DOI: 10.19030/ajbe.v3i2.390. Search in Google Scholar

[40] Itin CM. Reasserting the philosophy of experiential education as a vehicle for change in the 21st century. J Phys Education. 1999;22(2):91-8. DOI: 10.1177/105382599902200206. Search in Google Scholar

[41] Boud D, Cohen R, Walker D. Using Experience for Learning. Society for Research into Higher Education and Open University Press, 1993. ISBN: 9780335190959. Search in Google Scholar

[42] Beard C. Experiential Learning Design: Theoretical Foundations and Effective Principles. 1st Edition. Routledge: Kindle Edition; 2022. ISBN: 9780367466534. Search in Google Scholar

[43] De Graaff E, Kolmos A. Characteristics of problem-based learning. Int J Eng Education. 2003;19(5):657-62. Available from: www.ijee.ie/articles/Vol19-5/IJEE1450.pdf. Search in Google Scholar

[44] Kolodner JL, Camp PJ, Crismond D, Fasse B, Gray J, Holbrook J, et al. Problem-based learning meets case-based reasoning in the middle-school science classroom: Putting learning by design TM into practice. J Learning Sci. 2009;12(4):495-547. DOI: 10.1207/S15327809JLS1204_2. Search in Google Scholar

[45] Chang GW, Yeh Z-M, Pan S.-Y, Liao C-C, Chang H-M. A progressive design approach to enhance project-based learning in applied electronics through an optoelectornic ensing project. IEEE Trans Education. 2008;51(2):220-33. DOI: 10.1109/TE.2007.907321. Search in Google Scholar

[47] Jonassen D, Strobel J, Lee CB. Everyday problem solving in engineering: Lessons for engineering educators. J Eng Education. 2006;95(2):139-51. DOI: 10.1002/j.2168-9830.2006.tb00885.x. Search in Google Scholar

[48] Stiwne EE, Alves MG. Higher education and employability of graduates: will Bologna make a difference? Europ Educational Res J. 2010;9(1):32-44. DOI: 10.2304/eerj.2010.9.1.32. Search in Google Scholar

[49] Chu KWS. Inquiry project-based learning with a partnership of three types of teachers and the school librarian. J Am Soc Information Sci Technol. 2009;60(8):1671-86. DOI: 10.1002/asi.21084. Search in Google Scholar

[50] Razzouk R, Shute V. What is design thinking and why is it important? Rev Educational Res. 2012;82(3):330-48. DOI:10.3102/0034654312457429. Search in Google Scholar

[51] Alexander S. Flexible Learning in Higher Education. In: Peterson P, Baker E, McGaws B, editors. International Encyclopedia of Education (Third ed.). Oxford: Elsevier; 2010. pp. 441-7. DOI: 10.1016/B978-0-08-044894-7.00868-X. Search in Google Scholar

[52] Schindler LA, Burkholder GJ, Morad OA, Marsh C. Computer-based technology and student engagement: a critical review of the literature. Int J Educational Technol Higher Education. 2017;14(1):25. DOI: 10.1186/s41239-017-0063-0. Search in Google Scholar

[53] Rusek M, Vojíř K, Šubová Š. Lower-secondary school chemistry textbooks’ didactic equipment. Chem Didact Ecol Metrol. 2020;25(1-2):69-77. DOI: 10.2478/cdem-2020-0004. Search in Google Scholar

[54] Rusek M, Chroustová K, Bílek M, Skřehot P, Hon Z. Conditions for experimental activities at elementary and high schools from chemistry teachers’ point of view. Chem Didact Ecol Metrol. 2020;25(1-2):93-100. DOI: 10.2478/cdem-2020-0006. Search in Google Scholar

[55] Rusek M, Vosyková L. Evaluation of Czech non-chemical vocational school chemistry textbooks’ text difficulty. Chem Didact Ecol Metrol. 2021;26(1-2):99-108. DOI: 0.2478/cdem-2021-0008. Search in Google Scholar

[56] Kramarová L, Prokša M. Pupils’ preconceptions about heat, temperature and energy. Chem Didact Ecol Metrol. 2020;25(1-2):79-91. DOI: 10.2478/cdem-2020-0005. Search in Google Scholar

[57] Rusek M, Sakhnini S, Bílek M. Experiments safety - The state of art at schools in Czechia. Chem Didact Ecol Metrol. 2022;27(1-2):153-63. DOI: 10.2478/cdem-2022-0009. Search in Google Scholar

[58] Simeonov V. Didactical principles of environmental monitoring. Chem Didact Ecol Metrol. 2019;24(1-2):99-106. DOI: 10.2478/cdem-2019-0008. Search in Google Scholar

[59] Frontasyeva M, Kamnev A. Ecology and society. Impacted ecosystems. Part I. Chem Didact Ecol Metrol. 2018;23(1-2):7-29. DOI: 10.1515/cdem-2018-0001. Search in Google Scholar

[60] Krzeszowski S. Evaluation of the usefulness of selected computer programs in the context of educating students of the environmental engineering. Chem Didact Ecol Metrol. 2016;20(1-2):31-7. DOI: 10.1515/cdem-2015-0003. Search in Google Scholar

[61] Kalpakjian S, Schmid S. Manufacturing Engineering and Technology. International edition. 4th ed. Prentice Hall; 2001. ISBN: 0130174408. Search in Google Scholar

[62] Bralla JG. Design for Manufacturability Handbook. New York: McGraw-Hill: 1999. ISBN: 0852969767. Search in Google Scholar

[63] Degarmo EP, Black JT, Kohser RA. Materials and Processes in Manufacturing (9th ed.). Wiley; 2003. ISBN: 0471656534. Search in Google Scholar

[64] Halliday D, Resnick R, Walker J. Fundamental of Physics. John Wiley Sons Inc; 2013. ISBN: 9781118230725. Search in Google Scholar