[1. Kobatake, H., M. Murakami, H. Takeo, S. Nawano. Computerized Detection of Malignant Tumors on Digital Mammograms. - In: IEEE Tran. Medical Imaging, Vol. 18, 1999, No 5, 369-378.10.1109/42.77416410416798]Search in Google Scholar
[2. Zhou, X. Q., H. K. Huang, S. L. Lou. Authenticity and Integrity of Digital Mammography Images. - IEEE Trans on Medical Imaging, Vol. 20, 2001, No 8, 784-791. 10.1109/42.93824611513029]Search in Google Scholar
[3, Lundahi, T., W. J. Ohley, S. M. Kay, R. Siffert. Fractional Brownian Motion: A Maximum Likelihood Estimator and Its Application to Image Texture. - In: IEEE Trans. Med. Imaging, Vol. MI- 5, September 1986.10.1109/TMI.1986.430776418244001]Search in Google Scholar
[4. Erkang, C., X. Nianhua, L. Haibin, P. R. Bakic, A. D. A. Maidment, V. Megalooikonomou. Mammographic Image Classification Using Histogram Intersection. - In: IEEE Proc. ISBI’10, 2010, 197-200.]Search in Google Scholar
[5. Hassanien, E. A., M. H. Jafar Ali. Rough Set Approach for Classification of Breast Cancer Mammogram Images. - In: Int.Workshop on Fuzzy and App., 2003, 224-231.10.1007/10983652_28]Search in Google Scholar
[6. Lúcio, F. A., C. S. C. Aristófanes, A. K. Barros. Diagnosis of Breast Cancer in Digital Mammograms Using Independent Component Analysis and Neural Networks. - LNCS, Vol. 3773, 2005, 460-469.]Search in Google Scholar
[7. Arod, T., M. Kurdziel, E. O. D. Sevre, D. A. Yuen. Pattern Recognition Techniques for Automatic Detection of Suspicious-Looking Anomalies in Mammograms. − Comput. Methods Prog. Biomed, 2005, 135-149.10.1016/j.cmpb.2005.03.00915925425]Search in Google Scholar
[8. Huai, Li, K. J. R. Liu, S.-C. B. Lo. Fractal Modeling and Segmentation for the Enhancement of Microcalcification in Digital Mammograms. - In: IEEE Trans. Med. Imaging, 1997, 785-798.10.1109/42.6508759533579]Search in Google Scholar
[9. Zhang, P., K. Kumar, B. Verma. A Hybrid Classifier for Mass Classification with Different Kinds of Features in Mammography. - LNCS, Vol. 3614, 2005.10.1007/11540007_38]Search in Google Scholar
[10. Buciu, I., A. Gacsadi. Directional Features for Automatic Tumor Classification of Mammogram Images. − Biomedical Signal Processing and Control, 2011 (in Press).10.1016/j.bspc.2010.10.003]Search in Google Scholar
[11. Dua, S., S. Harpreet, H. W. Thompson. Associative Classification of Mammograms Using Weighted Rules. − Expert Syst. Appl., 2009, 9250-9259.10.1016/j.eswa.2008.12.050277424220160889]Search in Google Scholar
[12. Antonie, M.-L., O. R. Zaiane, A. Coman. Application of Data Mining Techniques for Medical Image Classification. - MDM/KDD, 2001, 94-101.]Search in Google Scholar
[13. Petroudi, S., T. Kadir, M. Brady. Automatic Classification of Mammographic Parenchymal Patterns: A Statistical Approach. - In: IEEE Proc. EMBS, 2003, 798-801.]Search in Google Scholar
[14. Lekshmi, S., K. Revathy, S. R. Prabhakaran Nayar. Galaxy Classification Using Fractal Signature. - A&A, Vol. 405, 2003, 1163-1167.10.1051/0004-6361:20030541]Search in Google Scholar
[15. Don, S., K. Revathy. Classifying Remotely Sensed Data Using Fractal Features. - AIPR, USA, 2007, 262-266.10.1109/ICCIMA.2007.175]Search in Google Scholar
[16. Heath, M., K. Bowyer, D. Kopans, Jr. P. Kegelmeyer, R. Moore, K. Chang, S. Munishkumaran. Current Status of the Digital Database Screening Mammography. − In: Proceedings of the 4th IWDM, 1997, 457-460.10.1007/978-94-011-5318-8_75]Search in Google Scholar
[17. Suckling, J. et al. The Mammographic Image Analysis Society Digital Mammogram Database Exerpta Medica. − International Congress Series, Vol. 1069 1994, 375-378.]Search in Google Scholar
[18. American College of Radiology, Illustrated Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System BIRADS. Reston,VA, American College of Radiolog., 1993.]Search in Google Scholar
[19. Mandelbrot, B. B. The Fractal Geometry of Nature. San Francisco, CA, W. H. Freeman, 1982.]Search in Google Scholar
[20. Yuan, Yan Tang. Wavelet Theory Approach To Pattern Recognition. 2nd Edition. World Scientific.]Search in Google Scholar
[21. Douketis, C., W. Zhouhang, T. L. Haslett, M. Moskovits. Fractal Character of Cold-Deposited Silver Films Determined by Low-Temparature Scanning Tunneling Microscopy. - Phys. Rev., Vol. B51, 1995, 11022-11031.10.1103/PhysRevB.51.11022]Search in Google Scholar
[22. Espinal, F., T. L. Hunberger, B. Jawerth, T. Kubota. Galaxy Classification Using Fractal Signature. - Opt. Eng., Vol. 37, 1998, p. 166.10.1117/1.601844]Search in Google Scholar
[23. Peleg, S., N. J. Hartley, R. Avnird. Multiple Resolution Texture Analysis and Classification. - In: IEEE Trans. on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, Vol. PAMI6, 1984, 518-523.10.1109/TPAMI.1984.476755721869220]Search in Google Scholar
[24. Zhang, W., K. Doi, M. Giger, R. Nishikawa, R. Schmidt. An Improved Shift- Invariant Artificial Neural Network for Computerized Detection of Clustered Microcalcification in Digital Mammograms. - Med. Phys., Vol. 23, 1996, No 4, 595-601.10.1118/1.5978918860907]Search in Google Scholar
[25. White, R. L. Object Classification in Astronomical Images. − In: Statistical Challenges in Modern Astronomy II. Springer, 1997.10.1007/978-1-4612-1968-2_8]Search in Google Scholar
[26. Karahaliou, A., S. Skiadopoulos, I. Boniatis, P. Sakellaropoulos, E. Likaki, G. Panayiotakis, L. Costaridou. Texture Analysis of Tissue Surrounding Microcalcifications on Mammograms for Breast Cancer Diagnosis. - The British Journal of Radiology, 2007, 684-656.10.1259/bjr/3041575117621604]Search in Google Scholar