1. bookTom 12 (2021): Zeszyt 2 (December 2021)
Informacje o czasopiśmie
Pierwsze wydanie
19 Sep 2012
Częstotliwość wydawania
2 razy w roku
access type Otwarty dostęp

Blended Learning and Student Satisfaction: The Moderating Effect of Student Performance

Data publikacji: 10 Apr 2022
Tom & Zeszyt: Tom 12 (2021) - Zeszyt 2 (December 2021)
Zakres stron: 79 - 94
Otrzymano: 12 Jan 2021
Przyjęty: 07 Aug 2021
Informacje o czasopiśmie
Pierwsze wydanie
19 Sep 2012
Częstotliwość wydawania
2 razy w roku

Background: Blended learning is a new approach to teaching and learning created by combining traditional classroom learning with an online learning platform. In recent years, blended learning has become an increasingly popular form of e-learning. It is particularly suitable for transitioning from completely traditional forms of learning to online learning.

Objectives: This paper aims to examine the effect of blended learning on students’ performance and satisfaction and showcase whether students’ satisfaction with blended learning leads to performance improvement.

Methods/Approach: A quantitative research design has been utilized for data collection, consisting of a questionnaire administered to a sample of three hundred and nineteen (319) students from bachelor and master study programs at South East European University (SEEU) in N. Macedonia. Data gathered through this questionnaire have been analyzed through structural equation modelling (SEM).

Results: The results show that blended learning influences students’ performance and satisfaction.

Conclusions: Course management and interaction positively impact students’ satisfaction and performance. The interaction has a more significant effect on both satisfaction and performance outcomes from blended learning. The main conclusion is that blended learning contributes to students’ satisfaction which eventually leads to students’ improved performance.


JEL Classification

1. Anderson, J. C., Gerbing, D. W. (1988), “Structural equation modeling in practice: A review and recommended two-step approach”, Psychological bulletin, Vol. 103 No. 3, pp. 411-423.10.1037/0033-2909.103.3.411 Search in Google Scholar

2. Anthony, B., Kamaludin, A., Romli, A., Raffei, A. F. M., Abdullah, A., Ming, G. L., Baba, S. (2019), “Exploring the role of blended learning for teaching and learning effectiveness in institutions of higher learning: An empirical investigation”, Education and Information Technologies, Vol. 24 No.6, pp. 3433-3466.10.1007/s10639-019-09941-z Search in Google Scholar

3. Bagozzi, R. P., Yi, Y., Phillips, L. W. (1991), “Assessing construct validity in organisational research”, Administrative Science Quarterly, Vol. 36 No. 3, pp. 421-458.10.2307/2393203 Search in Google Scholar

4. Bernard, R. M., Borokhovski, E., Schmid, R. F., Tamim, R. M., Abrami, P. C. (2014), “A meta-analysis of blended learning and technology use in higher education: From the general to the applied. Journal of Computing in Higher Education, Vol. 26 No.1, pp. 87-122.10.1007/s12528-013-9077-3 Search in Google Scholar

5. Boelens, R., Van Laer, S., De Wever, B., Elen, J. (2015), “Blended learning in adult education: towards a definition of blended learning”, available at https://biblio.ugent.be/publication/6905076/file/6905079 (2 June 2020) Search in Google Scholar

6. Boyle, T., Bradley, C., Chalk, P., Jones, R., Pickard, P. (2003), “Using blended learning to improve student success rates in learning to program”, Journal of Educational Media, Vol. 28 No. 2-3, pp. 165-178.10.1080/1358165032000153160 Search in Google Scholar

7. Diep, A. N., Zhu, C., Struyven, K., Blieck, Y. (2017), “Who or what contributes to student satisfaction in different blended learning modalities?”, British Journal of Educational Technology, Vol. 48 No. 2, pp. 473-489.10.1111/bjet.12431 Search in Google Scholar

8. Drysdale, J. S., Graham, C. R, Spring, K. J., Halverson, L. R. (2013), “An analysis of research trends in dissertations and theses studying blended learning”, Internet and Higher Education, Vol. 17, pp. 90-100.10.1016/j.iheduc.2012.11.003 Search in Google Scholar

9. Du, C., Wu, J. (2014), “The effect of human interactions on student performance and satisfaction of blended learning”, Academy of Educational Leadership Journal, Vol. 18 No. 3, pp. 11-21. Search in Google Scholar

10. Ekwunife-Orakwue, K. C., Teng, T. L. (2014), “The impact of transactional distance dialogic interactions on student learning outcomes in online and blended environments”, Computers & Education, Vol. 78, pp. 414-427.10.1016/j.compedu.2014.06.011 Search in Google Scholar

11. Fadde, P. J., Vu, P. H. (2014), “Blended online learning: benefits, challenges, and misconceptions”, in Lowenthal, P. R., York, C. S., Richardson, J. C. (Eds.), Online Learning: Common Misconceptions, Benefits, and Challenges, Nova Science Publishing, Hauppauge, pp. 38-48. Search in Google Scholar

12. Fisher, R., Perényi, Á., Birdthistle, N. (2018), “The positive relationship between flipped and blended learning and student engagement, performance and satisfaction”, Active Learning in Higher Education, Vol. 18, No. 1, pp. 11-24. Search in Google Scholar

13. Fornell, C., Larcker, D. F. (1981), “Structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error: algebra and statistics”, Journal of Marketing Research, Vol. 18 No. 3, pp. 382-388.10.1177/002224378101800313 Search in Google Scholar

14. Friesen, N. (2012), “Report: defining blended learning”, available at https://www.normfriesen.info/papers/Defining_Blended_Learning_NF.pdf (6 December 2018) Search in Google Scholar

15. Giannousi, M., Vernadakis, N., Derri, V., Michalopoulos, M., Kioumourtzoglou, E. (2009), “Students’ satisfaction from blended learning instruction”, in TCC, Hawaii, pp. 61-68. Search in Google Scholar

16. Graham, C. R. (2013), “Emerging practice and research in blended learning”, in Moore, M. G. (Ed.), Handbook of Distance Education, 3rd ed., Routlegde, New York, pp. 333-350.10.4324/9780203803738.ch21 Search in Google Scholar

17. Graham, C. R., Allen, S., Ure, D. (2005), “Benefits and challenges of blended learning environments”, in Encyclopedia of Information Science and Technology, IGI Global Hershey, pp. 253-259.10.4018/978-1-59140-553-5.ch047 Search in Google Scholar

18. Hair Jr, J. F., Hult, G. T. M., Ringle, C., Sarstedt, M. (2016), A primer on partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM), Sage publications, Thousand Oaks. Search in Google Scholar

19. Hair, J. F., Anderson, R. E., Babin, B. J., Black, W. C. (2010), “Multivariate Data Analysis: A Global Perspective”, Pearson Education, London. Search in Google Scholar

20. Hair, J. F., Hult, G. T. M., Ringle, C. M., Sarstedt, M. (2014), A primer on partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM), Sage Publication, Los Angeles. Search in Google Scholar

21. Heirdsfield, A., Walker, S., Tambyah, M., Beutel, D. (2011), “Blackboard as an online learning environment: what do teacher education students and staff think?”, Australian Journal of Teacher Education, Vol. 36 No. 7, pp. 1-16.10.14221/ajte.2011v36n7.4 Search in Google Scholar

22. Henseler, J., Ringle, C. M., Sarstedt, M. (2014), “A new criterion for assessing discriminant validity in variance-based structural equation modeling”, Journal of the academy of marketing science, Vol. 43 No.1, pp. 115-135.10.1007/s11747-014-0403-8 Search in Google Scholar

23. Hernaus, T., Bach, M. P., Vukšić, V. B. (2012), “Influence of strategic approach to BPM on financial and non-financial performance”, Baltic Journal of Management, Vol. 7 No. 4, pp. 376-396.10.1108/17465261211272148 Search in Google Scholar

24. Hoic-Bozic, N., Mornar, V., Boticki, I. (2008), “A blended learning approach to course design and implementation”, IEEE transactions on education, Vol. 52 No. 1, pp. 19-30.10.1109/TE.2007.914945 Search in Google Scholar

25. Huang, Q. (2016), “Learners’ perceptions of blended learning and the roles and interaction of f2f and online learning”, ORTESOL Journal, Vol. 33, pp. 14-33. Search in Google Scholar

26. Jain, P., Jain, S., Jain, S. (2011), “Interactions among online learners: A quantitative interdisciplinary study”, Education, Vol. 131 No. 3, pp. 538-545. Search in Google Scholar

27. Kiviniemi, M. T. (2014), “Effects of a blended learning approach on student outcomes in a graduate-level public health course”, BMC Medical Education, Vol. 14, No.1, pp. 1-7.10.1186/1472-6920-14-47 Search in Google Scholar

28. Kock, N. (2015), “Common method bias in PLS-SEM: a full collinearity assessment approach”, International Journal of e-Collaboration, Vol. 11 No.4, pp. 1-10.10.4018/ijec.2015100101 Search in Google Scholar

29. Lim, D. H., Morris, M. L. (2009), “Learner and instructional factors influencing learning outcomes within a blended learning environment”, Journal of Educational Technology & Society, Vol. 12 No. 4, pp. 282-293. Search in Google Scholar

30. López-Pérez, M. V., Pérez-López, M. C., Rodríguez-Ariza, L. (2011), “Blended learning in higher education: students’ perceptions and their relation to outcomes”, Computers & education, Vol. 56 No.3, pp. 818-826.10.1016/j.compedu.2010.10.023 Search in Google Scholar

31. Martínez-Caro, E., Campuzano-Bolarín, F. (2011), “Factors affecting students’ satisfaction in engineering disciplines: traditional vs. blended approaches”, European Journal of Engineering Education, Vol. 36 No. 5, pp. 473-483.10.1080/03043797.2011.619647 Search in Google Scholar

32. Melton, B., Graf, H., Chopak-Foss, J. (2009), “Achievement and satisfaction in blended learning versus traditional general health course designs”, International Journal for the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning, Vol. 3 No. 1, pp. 1-15.10.20429/ijsotl.2009.030126 Search in Google Scholar

33. Noemy, M. S., Rodrigo, I. G., Izquierdo, G. C., Ajenjo, P. P. (2017), “Exploring Academic Performance: Looking beyond Numerical Grades”, Universal Journal of Educational Research, Vol. 5 No.7 pp. 1105-1112.10.13189/ujer.2017.050703 Search in Google Scholar

34. Okaz, A. A. (2015), “Integrating blended learning in higher education”, Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, Vol. 186 No.13, pp. 600-603.10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.04.086 Search in Google Scholar

35. Picciano, A. G. (2006), “Blended learning: implications for growth and access”, Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, Vol. 10 No. 3, pp. 95-102. Search in Google Scholar

36. Qiu, R. G. (2019), “A systemic approach to leveraging student engagement in collaborative learning to improve online engineering education”, International Journal of Technology Enhanced Learning, Vol. 11 No.1, pp. 1-19.10.1504/IJTEL.2019.096734 Search in Google Scholar

37. Rahman, N. A. A., Hussein, N., Aluwi, A. H. (2015), “Satisfaction on blended learning in a public higher education institution: what factors matter?”, Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, Vol. 211, pp. 768-775.10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.11.107 Search in Google Scholar

38. Ramayah, T., Yeap, J. A., Ahmad, N. H., Halim, H. A., Rahman, S. A. (2017), “Testing a confirmatory model of Facebook usage in SmartPLS using consistent PLS”, International Journal of Business and Innovation, Vol. 3 No.2, pp. 1-14. Search in Google Scholar

39. Romero-Frías, E., Arquero, J. L. (2013), “A view on personal learning environments through approaches to learning”, Vol. 1 No.1, pp. 29-36. Search in Google Scholar

40. Sadeghi, R., Sedaghat, M. M., Ahmadi, F. S. (2014), “Comparison of the effect of lecture and blended teaching methods on students’ learning and satisfaction”, Journal of Advances in Medical Education & Professionalism, Vol. 2 No. 4, pp. 146-150. Search in Google Scholar

41. Sajid, M. R., Laheji, A. F., Abothenain, F., Salam, Y., AlJayar, D., Obeidat, A. (2016), “Can blended learning and the flipped classroom improve student learning and satisfaction in Saudi Arabia?”, International Journal of Medical Education, Vol. 7, pp. 281-285.10.5116/ijme.57a7.83d4 Search in Google Scholar

42. Shahid, S., Paul, J. (2021), “Intrinsic motivation of luxury consumers in an emerging market”, Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Vol. 61, pp. 102531. Search in Google Scholar

43. Sorden, S. D., Munene, I. I. (2013), “Constructs related to community college student satisfaction in blended learning”, Journal of Information Technology Education: Research, Vol. 12 No.1, pp. 251-270.10.28945/1890 Search in Google Scholar

44. Tselios, N., Daskalakis, S., Papadopoulou, M. (2011), “Assessing the acceptance of a blended learning university course”, Journal of Educational Technology & Society, Vol. 14, No. 2, pp. 224-235. Search in Google Scholar

45. Ursachi, G., Horodnic, I. A., Zait, A. (2015), “How reliable are measurement scales? External factors with indirect influence on reliability estimators”, Procedia Economics and Finance, Vol. 20 No. 2, pp. 679-686.10.1016/S2212-5671(15)00123-9 Search in Google Scholar

46. Verkroost, M. J., Meijerink, L., Lintsen, H., Veen, W. (2008), “Finding a balance in dimensions of blended learning”, International Journal on E-learning, Vol. 7 No. 3, pp. 499-522. Search in Google Scholar

47. Vernadakis, N., Giannousi, M., Tsitskari, E., Antoniou, P., Kioumourtzoglou, S. (2012), “Comparison of student satisfaction between traditional and blended technology course offerings in Physical education”, Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education, Vol. 13 No.1, pp. 137-147. Search in Google Scholar

48. Wach, F., Karbach, J., Ruffing, S., Brunken, R., Spinath, F. (2016), “University Student Satisfaction with their Academic Studies: Personality and Motivation Matter”, Frontiers in Psychology, Vol. 7 No. 55, pp. 1-12.10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00055 Search in Google Scholar

49. Wu, J., Tennyson, R. D., Hsia, T. (2010), “A study of student satisfaction in a blended eLearning system environment”, Computers & Education, Vol. 55 No.1, pp. 155-164.10.1016/j.compedu.2009.12.012 Search in Google Scholar

50. Yang, Z., Becerik-Gerber, B., Mino, L. (2013), “A study on student perceptions of higher education classrooms: Impact of classroom attributes on student satisfaction and performance”, Building and Environment, Vol. 70, pp. 171-188.10.1016/j.buildenv.2013.08.030 Search in Google Scholar

51. Zeqiri, J., Alserhan B. A. (2020), “University student satisfaction with blended learning: a cross-national study between North Macedonia and Jordan”, International Journal of Technology Enhanced Learning, Vol. 13 No.3, pp. 325-337.10.1504/IJTEL.2021.115982 Search in Google Scholar

Polecane artykuły z Trend MD

Zaplanuj zdalną konferencję ze Sciendo